H. Brooke Paige V Vermont et al US Supreme Court case update, April 24, 2014, Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status challege, Marbury V Madison revisited

H. Brooke Paige V Vermont et al US Supreme Court case update, April 24, 2014, Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status challege, Marbury V Madison revisited


“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln



From H. Brooke Paige April 24, 2014.


Current “scoop” at: http://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx  docket
13-1076 additional information appears at:
https://certpool.com/dockets/13-1076 where the case will be shown as
scheduled for conference when a date is set (no sooner than 14 days after
date set for response).

The State filed a response waver March 26th, if the case passes muster in
the conference, SCOTUS would request that the State file a response – in
the absence of which the case would proceed on the merits outlined in my

Another Vermont SCOTUS case just after mine – Daniel Brown v Vermont,
State filed response waver on was received on April 4th with the case
“distributed” on April 16th for the conference on May 2nd.
https://certpool.com/dockets/13-1113, the conference schedule is found at:

I suspect that SCOTUS is awaiting “candidate Obama’s” response
(required by April 9th) before scheduling the case for conference. All
cases are considered in conference.

For now patience seems in order – the conference review is the
“gatekeeper” for SCOTUS cases – the “rule of four” decides which cases
will proceed – possibly on the May 22 or 29

Thank You for Your Continued Interest,


The FEC recently ruled in Hassan that since he was not a natural born citizen, he was ineligible for federal matching funds. That case was simple. Hassan admitted that he was not born in the US. The FEC may soon be confronted with a more complex ruling because the definition of natural born citizen has not been clarified. The US Supreme Court has failed to do their duty.

“The government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined, and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be pruledassed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction, between a government with limited and unlimited powers, is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed, are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.

Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”

Marbury V Madison


16 responses to “H. Brooke Paige V Vermont et al US Supreme Court case update, April 24, 2014, Obama eligibility, Natural born citizen status challege, Marbury V Madison revisited

  1. CW……..
    Do you believe that the membership of our present SCOTUS has the courage to take the FINAL,and irreversible step of finding AGAINST the Constitution in possible upcoming cases put before that body? I say it this way because once such a step is taken, it will become irreversible as long as that body exists, and eventually the system of justice in America will descend into a quagmire from which there will be NO ESCAPE for anyone. All rule of law will go out the window and the rule of the weapon will become the law. In short we will lose what little civility still remains. When that happens America will NO LONGER be a FREE COUNTRY.

  2. ………further, I believe that this possibility is closer than anybody cares to admit, yet those who see this possibility are too cowardly to stand TOGETHER and DEFEAT those who would have America become a feudal sort of country,which is where it seems to be headed now,and sadly a large portion of our young people actually SUPPORT such a system. They are so CRAZED by their poor upbringing that they think UP is DOWN. When they learn the truth they too will bemembers of the feudal system.I wonder how they will like the system of their choice ,NO POT,NO FREE TIME,NO FREEDOM,and told when to sleep, and they will be forcibly worked until they drop in their tracks. Any youngster who thinks such a system is GREAT, needsa to book passgae on the next BANANA BOAT to Communist Russia.

  3. typo passgae= NO……PASSAGE= YES

  4. Bob Strauss…..
    Thank you for posting the Battle Hymn of the Republic,it is my favorite music. I can visualise Abe Lincoln in the Presidency,and doing what was then sorely needed by our country……..BEING A LEADER OF MEN. For having done that he was BRUTALLY MURDERED…….soon thereafter the murderer met his RIGHTFULLY EARNED DISPATCH.

  5. Tomorrow is DC document dump day, let’s see if we get any good news, that will end this fraud and usurpation of our Presidency.

  6. It saddens me to say that I personally believe that it is a large percentage of the people who are 60 years of age and younger who are the block of Americans who have become LOST IN SPACE. They wanted FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE, and now that such change is happening to them they are WHINING ABOUT IT, but I am heartend to see that there is an ever increasing number of them who have abandoned the NOTION OF HOPEY CHANGEY, and want things to be like they ONCE WERE. This all didn’t happen OVERNIGHT………it goes back many decades. Everybody was so caught up in pursuing the alleged AMERICAN DREAM that all but a few of us forgot to vote responsibly,and some simply couldn’t take time to even vote AT ALL…..and now we are reaping the dividends of our ignorance.

  7. BYE BYE……Have a really great day tomorrow!

  8. I am back just briefly, because I forgot to ask the question why is REVIEW even necessary? It has always been my understanding that the founders of the Constitution had it right to begin with,and Marshall didn’t change anything except to create “REVIEW”.

  9. Comments at ORYR:

    Barry Soetoro: “Hey everyone, stop worrying, b/c the GOP wrote a letter!

    If this doesn’t stop Hussein, I don’t know what will.”


    bob68: “Finally, a sternly worded letter from Congress. This letter should eliminate the need for any other action by Congress…………….and it might as well because there won’t be any.

    The question is if this letter makes Obama angry will these Senators send him a letter of apology?”

    Barry Soetoro: “Yeah, why DEFUND Hussein’s islamo-nazi treason when you can defeat him by typing a letter every 6 months?”

  10. Replace

  11. George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796: “Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence … the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of Republican Government.”

  12. citizenwells

    oldsailor, et al.
    Remember, the SCOTUS justices can be impeached.
    Eventually many entities will be required to do a CYA.

  13. citizenwells

    Good morning Zach, et al.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s