Benghazi facts, Obama administration obscures, Judge Jeanine blasts Obama Hillary et al, Weekly Standard timeline, We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to Al-Qa’ida participated in the attack

Benghazi facts, Obama administration obscures, Judge Jeanine blasts Obama Hillary et al, Weekly Standard timeline, We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to Al-Qa’ida participated in the attack

“the Times of the nineteenth of December had published the official forecasts of the output of various classes of consumption goods in the fourth quarter of 1983, which was also the sixth quarter of the Ninth Three-Year Plan. Today’s issue contained a statement of the actual output, from which it appeared that the forecasts were in every instance grossly wrong. Winston’s job was to rectify the original figures by making them agree with the later ones.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

“Propaganda must not serve the truth, especially not insofar as it might bring out something favorable for the opponent.”… Adolf Hitler

 

 

The Weekly Standard obtained the Benghazi talking point memos that were initiated by the CIA and heavily modified by the Obama Administration, clearly in an effort to mislead the american public.

The first version of the memo from the CIA states:

“we do know that Islamic extremists with ties to Al-Qa’ida participated in the attack.”

It does not say we believe, we suspect, etc.

Benghazi Talking Points memos.

First, Friday Sept. 14, 2012, 11:15 AM

BenghaziTalkingPoints01

Last, Sat Sept. 15, 2012, 11:26 AM

BenghaziTalkingPoints12

Read all 12 memos and “rectifications” here:

http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/Benghazi%20Talking%20Points%20Timeline.pdf

From the Weekly Standard May 13, 2013.

“The Benghazi Talking Points

And how they were changed to obscure the truth”

“Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults. The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.

As intelligence officials pieced together the puzzle of events unfolding in Libya, they concluded even before the assaults had ended that al Qaeda-linked terrorists were involved. Senior administration officials, however, sought to obscure the emerging picture and downplay the significance of attacks that killed a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. The frantic process that produced the changes to the talking points took place over a 24-hour period just one day before Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, made her now-famous appearances on the Sunday television talk shows. The discussions involved senior officials from the State Department, the National Security Council, the CIA, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the White House.”

“The White House provided the emails to members of the House and Senate intelligence committees for a limited time and with the stipulation that the documents were available for review only and would not be turned over to the committees. The White House and committee leadership agreed to that arrangement as part of a deal that would keep Republican senators from blocking the confirmation of John Brennan, the president’s choice to run the CIA. If the House report provides an accurate and complete depiction of the emails, it is clear that senior administration officials engaged in a wholesale rewriting of intelligence assessments about Benghazi in order to mislead the public. The Weekly Standard sought comment from officials at the White House, the State Department, and the CIA, but received none by press time. Within hours of the initial attack on the U.S. facility, the State Department Operations Center sent out two alerts. The first, at 4:05 p.m. (all times are Eastern Daylight Time), indicated that the compound was under attack; the second, at 6:08 p.m., indicated that Ansar al Sharia, an al Qaeda-linked terrorist group operating in Libya, had claimed credit for the attack. According to the House report, these alerts were circulated widely inside the government, including at the highest levels. The fighting in Benghazi continued for another several hours, so top Obama administration officials were told even as the fighting was taking place that U.S. diplomats and intelligence operatives were likely being attacked by al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists. A cable sent the following day, September 12, by the CIA station chief in Libya, reported that eyewitnesses confirmed the participation of Islamic militants and made clear that U.S. facilities in Benghazi had come under terrorist attack. It was this fact, along with several others, that top Obama officials would work so hard to obscure.”

“After a briefing on Capitol Hill by CIA director David Petraeus, Democrat Dutch Ruppersburger, the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee, asked the intelligence community for unclassified guidance on what members of Congress could say in their public comments on the attacks. The CIA’s Office of Terrorism Analysis prepared the first draft of a response to the congressman, which was distributed internally for comment at 11:15 a.m. on Friday, September 14 (Version 1 at right). This initial CIA draft included the assertion that the U.S. government “know[s] that Islamic extremists with ties to al Qaeda participated in the attack.””

“The talking points were first distributed to officials in the interagency vetting process at 6:52 p.m. on Friday. Less than an hour later, at 7:39 p.m., an individual identified in the House report only as a “senior State Department official” responded to raise “serious concerns” about the draft. That official, whom The Weekly Standard has confirmed was State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland, worried that members of Congress would use the talking points to criticize the State Department for “not paying attention to Agency warnings.””

Read more:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/benghazi-talking-points_720543.html?page=1

“Judge Jeanine “Fact Blasts” Hillary & Obama Administration on Benghazi”

“Judge Jeanine Pirro, who attended this week’s Congressional hearing on Benghazi, says the testimony she witnessed proved President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are liars.”

Advertisements

18 responses to “Benghazi facts, Obama administration obscures, Judge Jeanine blasts Obama Hillary et al, Weekly Standard timeline, We do know that Islamic extremists with ties to Al-Qa’ida participated in the attack

  1. citizenwells

    Good morning William, et al.

  2. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)
  3. The real question relating to Benghazi is Why were we there in the first place? Obama was sending missiles via Turkey to Syria…That was WITHOUT congressional approval and also violates international laws.

    I am thinking Obama would be happy to confess to a stupid cover-up on his premise that the terrorists are on the run…What he does NOT want brought out is his illicit arming of rebels whose affiliations are unknown.
    We now know they are a melting pot of all factions of terrorists and enemies of democracy.

    The real question to the IRS scandal is how much of the illegal info the IRS obtained was sent off to the Left wing progressives. Those stories are beginning to break…they not only tried to block giving them tax exemptions, they also leaked financial info to the left political factions.

    Remember Harry Reid accusing Romney of something nefarious in his tax reporting. Also, they got stuff on the Koch Brothers as well. They ultimately illegally “vetted” patriot type citizens but ignored “vetting” terrorists and illegal immigrants….

    The phone line seizures….intimidation? or blackmail?

    No wonder they have tried sooooo hard to take are guns away.
    With Chicago on the Potomac, is anyone surprised?

  4. Those who died or silenced in Benghazi were sacrificed. The seal team 6 were sacrificed. Dead men tell no secrets!

  5. HONOR FIRST….

    You scored a Double B I N G O on your above post concerning the two big problems facing OBOZO today……..good logic

    If that’s your story….I’m sticking too it !

  6. May 14, 2013

    “JUST IN (10:50 AM ET) DUE FOR RELEASE TODAY!”

    PPSIMMONS:

    “CARL GALLUPS is in possession of the Mike Zullo affidavit for the Alabama Supreme Court and has read it – word for word. There are 207 points of information – much of it NEVER BEFORE SEEN by the public. Hard-hitting – powerful stuff.

    As soon as it is lawful for Carl to release it – it will be released on PPSIMMONS – first and exclusive! DUE FOR RELEASE TODAY …”

  7. What do you think is the worst scandal that has come to light recently?
    Benghazi?
    Tapping AP phones?
    IRS targeting conservatives?
    IRS reading your emails?
    Obamacare train wreck?
    Kathleen Sebilius shaking down companies for donations?

    Or some not so recently………
    Fake BC, SSN and Selective Service Registry?
    Fast and Furious?
    Disposition Matrix?
    Outing Seal Team 6?

    I’m sure I left out many.

    In a normal world, any one of these would bring this administration down. But up is down nowadays, and even taken all together, I still don’t think it’s going to happen. The only one I have any hope for is the AP scandal. This time he turned on his own. But even then, Obama and the MSM will probably kiss and make up. They will resume trashing anyone who questions our first gay black president. And everything will continue as before. I SO hope I’m wrong.

  8. SUEQ…you ask:
    What do you think is the worst scandal that has come to light recently?

    My response:…ALL OF THE ABOVE…..

  9. coldwarvet2

    I have a better word than scandals…let’s try “criminal conspiracies”…THAT would be the Chicago Way….truely the “abomination” that brings “desolation”…

  10. None of the liberal reporters are smiling today on TV. I think it has finally sunk in that this is serious.

  11. THIS IS WHAT REAL IMMIGRATION WAS…this is what built America into the greatest nation in the world….

    Now today….the immigrants wade across the Rio Grande river in the dead of night…infiltrate into every city in America, straining our welfare assistance to a breaking point….and someone has told them they are entitled to it….

    God help us but remember;
    DON’T GIVE UP TILL IT’S OVER,
    DON’T QUIT IF YOU CAN.
    THE WEIGHT ON YOUR SHOULDERS,
    WILL MAKE YOU A BETTER MAN.

  12. “ABC Political Analyst Trey Hardin was a guest this morning on KABC’S morning show, “McIntyre in the Morning” and dropped a bombshell, stating that he is absolutely convinced that the IRS scandal emanates from the West Wing of the White House. …”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2013/05/bombshell-abc-news-political-analyst.html

  13. GORDO. you said;
    “ABC Political Analyst Trey Hardin was a guest this morning on KABC’S morning show, “McIntyre in the Morning” and dropped a bombshell, stating that he is absolutely convinced that the IRS scandal emanates from the West Wing of the White House. …”
    ————————————————————————————————

    I AGREE…..it smells like that sneeky bitch, Vallery Jarrett to me……annd this scandal will go very deep before it’s over………

  14. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    I hope you all remember that when Jay Carney steps before the microphone for today’s WH press conference, his wife IS Claire Shipman, a senior correspondent for ABC News!?!?

  15. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    PS – They are flaunting it now!

  16. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Isn’t ABC News where George Stepontopofthis works?

    “ABSOLUTELY”!!

  17. Who ordered a stand down during the Benghazi attack? Was this a Commander and Chief screw up? Apparently this is Obama’s viewpoint, “that it is better to let Americans die than risk offending certain groups.” This may seem harsh, but when it was decided in the WH Situation Room “NOT” to send a rescue mission, that was precisely what was happening. Was there is a total lack of competence by a president who doesn’t know his duty? And also by high-ranking subordinates, who would not remind him out of fear of that duty?

    http://www.nowpublic.com/world/army-general-ham-arrested-rescue-attempt-benghazi

  18. I’m really suspicious of this IRS thing. Didn’t Obama call a ‘behind the doors’ press conference last week regarding Benghazi and then a day or two later, the story about the IRS just magically appears? I think the liberal press is just showing mock outrage re: IRS scandal to take the heat off Obama, Clinton and Benghazi. They’re just playing their part, as usual.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s