CT schools still don’t get security, Connecticut law allows armed personnel, State and educators to blame not guns, North Carolina schools protected?

CT schools still don’t get security, Connecticut law allows armed personnel, State and educators to blame not guns, North Carolina schools protected?

“Gun control is the solution of dictators and those lacking reason and accountability.”…Citizen Wells

“Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state.”…CT Constitution

“The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference – they deserve a place of honor with all that’s good”…George Washington

Why do the liberals and Obama blame guns for tragedies like Sandy Hook?

Lack of reason and accountability.

Yesterday  Citizen Wells presented what all school systems, especially those most vulnerable, should have been doing to protect students.

1. Monitor the areas outside the buildings. This would include monitored security cameras and some combination of walk arounds by staff and or security personnel.

2. Security alarms for illegal entry.

3. Buffered entry ways. i.e. double entry ways. The first door should set off the alarm and the second would slow down intrusion.

4. Stronger doorways.

5. Regular drills for emergency preparedness. We had those when I was in grade school.

6. As many armed school personnel as possible. “Good guys with guns to stop the bad guys with guns.” Each armed person should be psychologically evaluated.


Connecticut gun laws among the toughest in the U.S.

However, school personnel could have been armed.

“It is unlawful to possess a firearm on public or private elementary or secondary school property. This prohibition shall not apply to a person with a firearm carrying permit, with permission from school officials, or while traversing school property with an unloaded firearm for the purpose of gaining access to lands open to hunting or for other lawful purposes, provided entry is not prohibited by school officials.”


School security at Sandy Hook, in CT and across the country in the past has been inadequate and still is. Apparently the folks in Connecticut still don’t get it.

From the Examiner January 14, 2013.

“Connecticut school new security policies, after the Sandy Hook massacre”

“Nearly one month after the Connecticut school shooting, several local districts have put new security measures in place, including locked front doors and tighter visitor sign-in policies, and launched reviews of their safety procedures.

Area officials say they have been working closely with local police departments and staff members to come up with the best policies to protect students and teachers in the wake of the Dec. 14 tragedy in which 20 children and six adults were killed.

“We’re taking it seriously, but we’re mindful of the human factor and not increasing the anxiety of our students,’’ said Weston Superintendent Cheryl Maloney.

In Weston, all school doors were previously locked except front doors. Maloney said those doors are now locked but the district has yet to install buzzers or cameras. Members of the office staff, she said, are responsible for answering the door until a new system can be installed.

Natick has also started locking the front doors at its schools, while Newton, Sudbury, and the Ayer-Shirley Regional district have plans in the works. Acton is studying the option. Needham has completed an upgrade of security at the town’s schools that includes a buzzer and surveillance system and locked front doors,

In Weston, Maloney said there has been mixed reaction among parents to the changes. “They preferred the more welcoming front door,’’ she said.

Maloney said the district is considering a swipe-card system for the doors, but it will take time to go through the bidding process to buy the equipment and have it installed. “We will continue with that plan and may accelerate it,’’ she said.

Maloney said the district is also looking at hiring a consultant to review its practices and see whether any additional changes are necessary. She said they have been more vigilant about visitor passes, and having parents wait in the lobby for students.

Natick Superintendent Peter Sanchioni said that before the Newtown shooting, just one of the district’s eight schools had a camera and buzzer system. During the winter break, locks and buzzers were installed at all schools, he said.”


“We’re taking it seriously”

I wouldn’t bet on it.

If you have children in CT schools, contact your officials and insist that armed personnel be present at your schools.

Too many liberals, guided by their “feelings”, have been running our school systems. We conservatives must get more involved.

I will be investigating further school security in my home state of NC.

19 responses to “CT schools still don’t get security, Connecticut law allows armed personnel, State and educators to blame not guns, North Carolina schools protected?

  1. “You must understand that our nation today is ruled not by democrats or republicans, but by the party of royalty with a European mindset and a Globalist agenda. The morphing from a two-party system into one of elite royalty did not happen overnight, but incrementally and under the proverbial radar of a deliberately distracted public.”


  2. “Obama-Media Sycophant Goes Birther On NRA Members; NRA Rips Obama & Media”


  3. Thanks GORDO.
    Great video.

  4. Start immediate investigation of Barack Obama\’s use of forged IDs and a CT SSN which was never assigned to him according to e-verify


  5. Good morning Zach, et al.

  6. NRA President Says Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation is “Legitimate Fear” (Video)
    Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, January 17, 2013, 10:09 AM
    It’s an Obama World…
    NRA President David Keene told CBS that door-to-door gun confiscation under this administration is a legitimate fear.


    The National Rifle Association didn’t disagree with everything in President Obama’s proposal today to cut back on escalating gun violence, the group’s president David Keene told CBS News Senior White House Correspondent Bill Plante today, but with coming talks of reform, he said there are “legitimate” fears on the horizon for law-abiding gun owners.

    One of his fears: that a universal background check for anyone purchasing a firearm – the first of Mr. Obama’s suggestions today – would lead to a national tracking registry of gun owners. That, in turn, Keene said, could give way to “forced buybacks,” or, door-to-door confiscation of specific weapons by the government.

    “In other words, ‘I have a record that you have a shotgun, and you’re going to sell it to the government, or else,’” Keene said. “That’s the equivalent of confiscation.”

  7. A few pictures speak a few thousand words indeed:

    Obama Not The First Gun-Grabbing Tyrant Who Used Children As Cheap Political Props…


  8. Obama Second Term Preview: We Are All Chicagoans Now


    In March 2003, amidst simmering legislative controversy over the future of Chicago’s lakefront airport, Meigs Field, then-Mayor Richard M. Daley sent bulldozers in the dead of night to carve the letter “X” several times into the runway, rendering the airport useless and ending the debate. That stunt is a model for President Barack Obama’s second term, in which he is determined to exceed the boundaries of his power.

  9. Confiscate legal weapons but keep the child killing industrial complexes working full speed ahead….remind you of another time “never again” to repeat?:

    Another abominable CINO who also parades his disgrace to church:

    Andrew Cuomo’s Brave New ‘Roe’ (5237)

    New York State’s Catholic governor pushes on-demand abortion legislation that, if enforced, could put Catholic hospitals and many state-funded ministries out of business.

    Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/andrew-cuomos-brave-new-roe/#ixzz2IFhQqPyg

  10. Gordo…………
    “The only people who don’t want to disclosae the truth are people with something to hide”……………YOU TELL EM SOETORO! YOU ARE DEFINITELY THE VOICE OF EXPERIENCE!

  11. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    GORDO | January 17, 2013 at 8:44 am |
    “You must understand that our nation today is ruled not by democrats or republicans, but by the party of royalty with a European mindset and a GLOBALIST agenda.

    It is interesting how the new buzz word seems to be “GLOBAL”. Here are 3 well known names with a “GLOBAL” connection :

    1 – William Jefferson(KISSIT) Clinton

    Clinton Global Initiative


    2 – John Corzine (former Gov & Senator of N.J.)



    3 – Michael Axelrod (Son of David)

    Grant Park Global


  12. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Here is a freshman congressman mentioning “impeachment”.


    I heard him on the radio this morning mentioning this.then he said the Repubs are all meeting in Williamsburg, Va. this weekend for a meeting. I call this a “Road Trip!!” WHO’S Going to pay for this?? Why couldn’t they have just staid in Washington?

  13. What is an “executive action” as opposed to an “executive order”? Anybody know? Why this language? There seemed to be an official signing with his “props”. What does this mean?

  14. Thornton Parsons

    SueQ, it sounds scary to me.

  15. TP,

    I’m thinking it means nothing. It’s all for show. But I’m not an expert. That’s why I’m asking.

  16. Anyone remember the jack booted thugs that raided Gibson guitars?

    Anybody know what became of Gibson?

  17. they are instigating civil commotion with this gun grabbing game… to distract us from what they are doing globally.

    Benghazi, Mali… installing new heads of states in every nook and cranny.

    Thanks Gordo. and All.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s