Natural Born Citizen must be defined by courts, US District Judge S. Thomas Anderson, Obama eligibility case, Qualification for presidency important not trivial

Natural Born Citizen must be defined by courts, US District Judge S. Thomas Anderson, Obama eligibility case, Qualification for presidency important not trivial

“Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”

“If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”…Chief Justice Marshall opinion, Marbury Vs Madison

“If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation, for through this in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”…George Washington

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln

From WND April 26, 2012.

“JUDGE WANTS DEFINITION OF ‘NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'”

“A federal judge has determined in a case challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility for a state ballot that the meaning of the constitutional phrase “natural born citizen” is “important and not trivial.”

U.S. District Judge S. Thomas Anderson of Tennessee said the courts ultimately must define “natural born citizen,” affirming that the “issue of whether President Obama is constitutionally qualified to run for the presidency is certainly substantial.”

“This specific question has been raised in numerous lawsuits filed since President Obama took office,” Anderson wrote in his opinion. “The outcome of the federal question in this case will certainly have an effect on other cases presenting the same issue about whether President Obama meets the constitutional qualifications for the presidency.”

Van Irion, whose Liberty Legal Foundation brought the case, alleges the plan by Tennessee Democrats to register Obama as their nominee for president opens a case, under state law, of negligent misrepresentation and fraud or intentional misrepresentation because of doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

Irion was pleased the court recognized the significance of the claims.

“The court made several very positive statements about our case,” he noted.

He cited Anderson’s statement that the court “finds that the federal question presented, the meaning of the phrase ‘natural born citizen’ as a qualification for the presidency set out in Article II of the Constitution, is important and not trivial.”

“It is clear that the stated federal issue of President Obama’s qualifications for the office are ‘actually disputed and substantial,” the judge said.

Anderson said it also is “clear that there will be a legal dispute over the Constitution’s definition of ‘natural born citizen’ and the Supreme Court’s decision in Minor.”

Irion told supporters, “While it is certainly dangerous to read too much into such an opinion, the statements from this federal court are encouraging. The court appears to understand the most critical issues presented by our complaint.”

He told WND that the issue identified by Anderson is what virtually all of the dozens of cases challenging Obama’s eligibility have been seeking: a ruling on accusations that Obama is unqualified.

Previously, cases have been dismissed based on standing or other technicalities, not on the merits.

The decision from Anderson came in a case brought by Irion on behalf of voters and political candidates in Tennessee. The plaintiffs argue Obama’s name cannot be submitted because he is ineligible.

The defendants had moved the case from state court, where Irion wanted to argue the state issues, to federal court, where Obama virtually has batted a thousand in preventing cases from reaching the point at which the merits are assessed.

Irion had submitted a motion to have the case returned to the state courts, a request Anderson denied.

But Irion was heartened by the comments from the judge, who said that without a determination on the questions facing the court, there easily could be differing results in court jurisdictions around the nation.

“There is a risk of inconsistent adjudications on the federal issue presented,” the judge said.

Irion also had raised questions about “Obama’s dual citizenship” and allegations that his Social Security number is fraudulent.

“The court construes these allegations about President Obama … as corroboration of plaintiffs’ main allegation that President Obama is not a natural born citizen or otherwise qualified to be president,” the judge wrote.

Anderson’s opinion included a notation that the U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett defined “natural born citizen” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

“It is undisputed that the material fact at issue in this case is whether under the circumstances of president Obama’s birth, the president is a ‘natural born citizen,’ a term set out in the United States Constitution and construed under federal law,” he wrote.

The case is developing just as a new petition urges members of Congress to take the issue seriously by investigating it. The number of names on the document has surged past 40,000 and soon will be approaching 50,000.

WND reported just a day ago that members of Congress, regarding Obama’s eligibility, still are relying on statements from Hawaii officials, “vetting” by voters and his own word.

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio., for example has said. “I will continue to take the president at his word that he is a natural born citizen of the United States.”

Obama released an image of a Hawaiian long-form birth certificate on April 27, 2011, after years of stating that the document was not available. But at that time, the Hawaii Department of Health and governor’s office refused to confirm for WND that the image released was an accurate representation of the state’s records.

However, Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s law enforcement investigators have found probable cause that the document is a forgery. Others, meanwhile, argue that the document affirms Obama is not eligible, because it lists his father as a foreigner. The Founders, they argue, understood “natural born citizen” to be the offspring of two American citizens.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/judge-wants-definition-of-natural-born-citizen/

More on Natural Born Citizen from Citizen Wells December 28, 2008.

https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/natural-born-citizen-obama-is-not-eligible-obama-birth-certificate-us-constitution-founding-fathers-intent-lawsuits-obama-kenyan-vattel%E2%80%99s-the-law-of-nations-john-jay-berg-donofrio-k/

Reprinted from Citizen Wells December 7, 2008.

Donofrio versus Wells is before all nine Justices of the US Supreme Court
and it is expected that they will decide by Monday morning, December 8,
2008 whether or not they will accept the case for a possible opinion or ruling.
The Leo Donofrio case is based on the natural born citizen provision of the
US Constitution and the failure of New Jersey Secretary of State, Nina Wells to ensure
that Barack Obama is qualified under that provision. Having the US Supreme
Court give serious consideration to this case and uphold the US Constitution
is of utmost importance. However, this case demands attention to other
aspects of upholding the Constitution and clarifying duties that may in the
long term have more far reaching consequences. Here are three distinct
aspects of the Donofrio case that must be addressed and clarified by the
US Supreme Court Justices:

  • The Natural Born Citizen provision of the US Constitution as applicable to the 2008 election.
  • The powers given to state officials in the election process and inherent duties to uphold the
    US Constitution and Federal Election Laws.
  • The oath of office taken by federal and state officers, election officials and judges and the
    duty to uphold the US Constitution.

Not addressed specifically in the Donofrio lawsuit and therefore
not before the US Supreme Court, but a matter of much confusion,
is the statutes in some of the states and pledges by some
political parties to dictate how Electoral College Electors must
vote. This violates the letter and spirit of constitutional law
and the intent of the founding fathers to give carefully chosen
Electors the leeway to make wise choices.

Here is the basis in fact of Leo Donofrio’s lawsuit:

“On October 27, 2008, plaintiff-appellant, Leo Donofrio, a retired attorney acting Pro Se, sued Nina Mitchell Wells, Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, demanding the Secretary execute her statutory and Constitutional duties to police the security of ballots in New Jersey from fraudulent candidates ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States due to their not being “natural born citizens” as enumerated in Article 1, Section 2, of the US Constitution.”

“The cause of action first accrued on September 22, 2008, when Secretary Wells certified to county clerks, for ballot preparation, a written “statement”, prepared under her seal of office, that was required by statute to contain names of only those candidates who were “by law entitled” to be listed on ballots in New Jersey.  The statement is demanded by N.J.S.A. 19:13-22.

The law suit raises a novel contention that the statutory code undergoes legal fusion with the Secretary’s oath of office to uphold the US Constitution thereby creating a minimum standard of review based upon the “natural born citizen” requirement of Article 2, Section 1, and that the Supremacy clause of the Constitution would demand those requirements be resolved prior to the election.

The key fact, not challenged below, surrounds two conversations between the plaintiff-appellant and a key Secretary of State Election Division official wherein the official admitted, twice, that the defendant-Secretary just assumed the candidates were eligible taking no further action to actually verify that they were, in fact, eligible to the office of President.  These conversations took place on October 22nd and 23rd.”

“Now, post-election, plaintiff is seeking review by the United States Supreme Court to finally determine the “natural born citizen” issue. Plaintiff alleged the Secretary has a legal duty to make certain the candidates pass the “natural born citizen” test.  The pre-election suit requested that New Jersey ballots be stayed as they were defective requiring replacements to feature only the names of candidates who were truly eligible to the office of President.”

HERE ARE THE THREE DISTINCT ASPECTS OF DONOFRIO’S LAWSUIT THAT SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND CLARIFIED
BY THE US SUPREME COURT JUSTICES:

The Natural Born Citizen provision of the US Constitution as applicable to the 2008 election.

Leo Donofrio states:

“Don’t be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues. They are irrelevant to Senator Obama’s ineligibility to be President. Since Barack Obama’s father was a Citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama’s birth, then Senator Obama was a British Citizen “at birth”, just like the Framers of the Constitution, and therefore, even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he were born on US soil, he still wouldn’t be eligible to be President.”

Read more from Leo Donofrio

The powers given to state officials in the election process and inherent duties to uphold the
US Constitution and Federal Election Laws.

There is much confusion and misunderstanding about the duties and powers of state officers and election
officials involved in presidential elections.

Read more here

The oath of office taken by federal and state officers, election officials and judges and the
duty to uphold the US Constitution.

From the opinion by Chief Justice Marshall on Marbury Vs Madison:


“The oath of office, too, imposed by the legislature, is completely demonstrative of the legislative opinion on the subject. It is in these words, “I do solemnly swear that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich; and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge all the duties incumbent on me as according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution, and laws of the United States.”

Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?

If such be the real state of things, this is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.”

For the Justices of the US Supreme Court to disregard this important
lawsuit by Leo Donofrio, I am certain that all nine Justices would
violate their oath to uphold the US Constitution and duty to review,
consider and clarify the important principles outlined above. We are
accountable not only to uphold  the US Constitution and rule of law
in regard to the 2008 election, but the future integrity of the
Constitution, our system of checks and balances and stability of our
government. I strongly urge the Supreme Court Justices to help keep
our Constitution and government intact.
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.”

Chief Justice Marshall opinion, Marbury Vs Madison

47 responses to “Natural Born Citizen must be defined by courts, US District Judge S. Thomas Anderson, Obama eligibility case, Qualification for presidency important not trivial

  1. http://news.yahoo.com/another-secret-sex-scandal-164800753.html

    How bad is this for the Secret Service?

    It’s certainly poorly timed, says Alicia A. Caldell of the Associated Press. The news emerged just hours after Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano called the Colombia scandal an isolated incident, and said she’d be surprised if a broader problem existed. Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan could find his head on the line if it emerges that prostitute use was widespread under his watch, says Raf Sanchez at the U.K.’s Telegraph.

  2. Dear Judge S. Thomas….

    The Supreme Court of the United States has already defined “natural-born citizen”…..please read Minor vs Happersatt…that decision stated “a natural born citizen was a person born in the US of citizen parents”….Please note that is 2 citizen parents…not one, or not one under aged female.

    Thank you

  3. Surprise Janet, surprise !!!!

    Guess what Janet, time will prove this has happened many, many times before…..all because we have idiots like you in charge of our government.

  4. http://in.news.yahoo.com/raining-sex-scandals-us-secret-agents-110940414.html

    Washington, April 27 (ANI): The Secret Service has said that it is investigating if its employees had hired prostitutes before President Barack Obama’s visit to El Salvador last year.

    The disclosure came after the Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano assured senators that a separate prostitution scandal in Colombia was an isolated incident, CBS News reports.

  5. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/04/aide-obama-angry-about-secret-service-scandal/1

    It’s official: President Obama is angry over the prostitution scandal that has plagued the Secret Service for two weeks.

  6. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/27/us-usa-economy-idUSBRE83Q05W20120427

    First-quarter growth slows on inventories, weak business spending

  7. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/federal-judge-blocks-release-of-dead-bin-laden-photos/story-e6frf7jx-1226340552728

    A FEDERAL judge today refused to order the Obama Administration to release photographs and videos of the operation that killed al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden last year.

  8. The woman who in 2008 said, “For the first time in my adult life, I’m proud of my country” has just recently said, “No, I will not run for President “…. thanks for that favor. She also said, she would like to just walk out of the WH and keep walking…..please, oh please do that for the people, the way back to Chicago is due west….just follow the sitting sun.

    Gee thanks Muchelle for those words of wisdom….now tell Hillery she has no chance in 2016 either……Oh by the way…

    Please stop taking your half-million dollar vacations on the taxpayer’s dime. You know, where you take all your relatives, friend, and all the ally cats of Chicago…our bank account out is reading almost zero….

  9. RMinNC | April 27, 2012 at 9:34 am |

    Don’t be surprised if the demRats pull a bait a switch and put hillary on the ballot as president or vp in 2012.

  10. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/want-to-know-just-how-close-the-muslim-brotherhood-is-to-the-obama-admin/

    Want to Know Just How Close the Muslim Brotherhood Is to the Obama Admin?

  11. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    RMinNC – I liked your instructions for Moochelle to get back to Chcago “i..please, oh please do that for the people, the way back to Chicago is due west….just follow the sitting sun.cago -”

    Here is a more direct way – “Go west to you smell it, and then go north to you step in it!!”

  12. What are the chances the nightmare will be over soon? No person except a natural born citizen or a citizen of the United states at the time of the adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible? How could someone born with dual citizenship be a natural born citizen? One must be born with sole allegiance to the U.S. to be CIC of the USA. Prayers, stay safe, God Bless.

  13. http://www.sunshinestatenews.com/story/vp-buzz-continues-marco-rubio-pushes-conservative-legislation-senate

    As VP Buzz Continues, Marco Rubio Pushes Conservative Legislation in Senate

  14. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stewart-j-lawrence/to-rubio-or-not-to-rubio-_b_1456377.html

    The dominant view, advanced by conservative pundits, including, most recently, Charles Krauthammer, is that Rubio is just what the party — and Romney — needs both to electrify the base, especially Tea Partiers, and to give the GOP a stronger shot at capturing Latinos.

    Latinos will figure prominently in the fall in a handful Southwestern swing states as well as in Florida, where Rubio captured 57 percent of the state’s Latino vote en route to his commanding election victory 18 months ago. If he gets the nod, Rubio would be the first Latino VP candidate in history, and some conservatives think, not without reason, that the party needs to make a bold statement to the fastest-growing voter bloc (which traditionally leans Democratic ) if it expects to surpass the paltry 31 percent that John McCain received in 2008.

  15. http://redalertpolitics.com/2012/04/23/krauthammer-rubio-will-be-vp-whether-he-wants-to-or-not/

    Conservative pundit Charles Krauthammer said yesterday on Inside Washington that, “if Rubio passes the vetting process, he is the obvious choice.”

    The truth of the matter is Romney will need to choose a Vice President who can mobilize reluctant Evangelical Republicans and Tea Partiers. Romney failed to win these voters in the deep south, and Romney will have to make a smart VP decision to turn them out to vote in November. This may mean selecting Tea Party favorite, Marco Rubio.

  16. Contempt of Congress Charges Drafted for Eric Holder
    April 27, 2012,

    It’s on.

    For nearly a year now, we’ve heard threats of contempt charges against Attorney General Eric Holder for his refusal to provide the House Oversight Committee with requested information and documents about the fatal Operation Fast and Furious program. The Justice Department has repeatedly ignored subpoenas, the White House has refused to provide key Fast and Furious witnesses and the information DOJ officials have submitted to Congress, has been so redacted, Issa describes them as “black paper” instead of white paper.

    Now, members of the House Oversight Committee are tired of being patient and are ready to hold Holder accountable.

    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/04/27/contempt_of_congress_charges_drafted_for_eric_holder

  17. Could someone enter into such a court that it isn’t established that Obama is any kind of a citizen in the present time due to more circumstances than what will probably be argued for a lengthy period here. It would be great if somehow Arpaio’s evidence could be allowed to demonstrate a background for lack of American citizenship period!

    Trying to fight off all of the political arguments against getting a final definition at this time would extend far beyond the next election while there exists established evidence to present a solid reasoning against any American citizenship for the man without all the opposition’s spin to convince that there hasn’t been anything concrete previously established. I’m just looking at what is probably going to be the approach of the Obots. Maybe they even know that nothing will be defined by this next election period, and….they’ll use this to gin up more public/racial violence/chaos.

    The evidence of fraudulent documents demonstrates a need to phony up documents any kind of citizen would not need to do. More simple for the public to understand.

  18. Thanks! Mr. Clean | April 27, 2012 at 11:21 am |

    Indictments of bo and his criminal cohorts is long overdue.

  19. observer | April 27, 2012 at 11:34 am |

    Trying to fight off all of the political arguments against getting a final definition at this time would extend far beyond the next election while there exists established evidence to present a solid reasoning against any American citizenship for the man without all the opposition’s spin to convince that there hasn’t been anything concrete previously established. I’m just looking at what is probably going to be the approach of the Obots. Maybe they even know that nothing will be defined by this next election period, and….they’ll use this to gin up more public/racial violence/chaos.

    ————————————————————-
    Exactly!

    As I have advocated since 2009. the only way to legally remove bo is by criminal indictment. Sheriff Joe has the right idea. There is abundant evidence of fraud and myriad other crimes by bo and his criminal cohorts all across the Country.

    This latest dicta by the memphis judge is another diversion. It will be years before that case is before the US Supreme Court.

  20. jacqlynsmith

    Why MITTENS won’t be the next PREZ….can you say CRIMINAL……

    Awakening Americans: Behind the scenes intelligence briefings ALL patriot Americans MUST know…the REAL facts and truth the corporate-controlled fascist, extortion-friendly U. S. media covers up
    EXPLOSIVE Back Breaking News
    Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols Reach Critical Mass
    by Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence Expert
    Thursday April 26, 2012

    http://www.myspace.com/tom_heneghan_intel/blog/545639133

  21. jacqlynsmith

    Comments on the White Hats Blog:
    It looks like the dirt on Bush, Clinton, Biden and Romney will come out before the presidential election.

    http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/2012/04/april-7-2012-white-hats-report-39.html#comment-form

    Comments on the White Hats Blog:

    Comment from our guy John in the UK

    John Apr 25, 2012 11:25 AM
    Geno, Fed Up etc.

    Place all your associates on standby. Herzog and parties were all raided. Major German Police and Agency action is now under way which DC can’t cover up. Vast tentacles will now reach right back into Texas and DC with deeply incriminating records all now seized. Major articles will no doubt appear soon via the White Hats and every good Patriot will be needed to expose them so you can bring them down. Round up the Grannies as Congress is neutered! Romney has to be faced down with Herzog now and Sr has a world of explaining to do. If Texas hangs Horse Thieves, what do you do with the Bushes?

    From our guy across the pond – comment from our blog.

    John Apr 25, 2012 11:11 PM
    Abbey, Geno

    Watch for the next few days. CNN started releasing info on Herzogs arrest last night. A major Global crime file is coming together on all of them and their past disgusting history. The master contracts seized in a Police raid will now lead to jail sentences for Herzog and his criminal associates.

    The Edward Falcone sting was set up by the Lt Governor of Texas working for Bush Sr. The bribes to Biden, Clinton, Romney and the whole stinking bunch will all come out. Herzog is already plea bargaining to hand over evidence on Bush and his many, many crimes and scams, for a lesser sentence. The White Hats soon will help a lot.”

  22. jacqlynsmith

    The latest comment over at the White Hats today…..look for a NEW REPORT from them today……

    johnApr 27, 2012 08:46 AM

    Key in after three onwards today. So much more is going to be released for you. Even overnight major moves took place. Get it all out mass circulated. Once you have the Court case numbers, which you will have for all 3 of the parties so far charged, they track right into Ackermann, Romney, Bush and the whole Cabal. With the Herzog Berlin Court case numbers the media have no excuse now not to publish. Remember Watergate.This is 10,000 times bigger. And they are 10,00 times worse. Herzog will roll over on all of them. Then you will get action once Bubba wakes up. Why are the Agencies not acting? That’s sickeningly obvious! It’s down to you all now. Your capable.

  23. As I have advocated since 2009, the only way to legally remove bo is by criminal indictment. Sheriff Joe has the right idea. There is abundant evidence of fraud and myriad other crimes by bo and his criminal cohorts all across the Country.

    This latest dicta by the memphis judge is another diversion. It will be years before that case is before the US Supreme Court. Only the demRats benefit by the memphis judge’s dicta.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-expands-obama-probe-to-hillary-supporters/

  24. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/04/26/Get-bin-laden-memo-CYA

    What ‘Gutsy Call’?: CIA Memo Reveals Admiral Controlled bin Laden Mission

  25. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2876922/posts

    “…I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”

    “The Audacity of Hope,” page 261 (paperback version)
    Barack Hussein Obama

  26. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/president_obama_must_choose_wh.html

    In his speech in Cairo, Mr. Obama said, “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” Defending the honor of Islam and protecting Muslims is one of the goals that Barack Obama has set for himself

  27. jacqlynsmith

    4-26-12 Drake on One Planet Radio (via Freedom Reigns) (via Wolf Spirit Radio)… More Information…
    Posted on April 26, 2012

    http://kauilapele.wordpress.com/2012/04/26/4-26-12-drake-on-one-planet-radio-via-freedom-reigns-via-wolf-spirit-radio-more-information/

  28. http://newsbusters.org/forum/topic-discussion/when-will-it-matter

    When will it matter?

    When Obama wrote a book and said he was mentored as a youth by Frank (Frank Marshall Davis) an avowed Communist, people said it didn’t matter.

    When people found out that Barrack Hussein Obama was enrolled as a Muslim child in school and his father and stepfather were both Muslims, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he wrote in another book he authored “I will stand with them (Muslims) should the political winds shift in an ugly direction” people said it didn’t matter.

    When he traveled to Pakistan, after college on an unknown national passport, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he sat in a Chicago Church for twenty years and listened to a preacher spew hatred for America and preach black liberation theology, people said it didn’t matter.

  29. http://newsbusters.org/forum/topic-discussion/when-will-it-matter

    When will it matter?

    When the Palestinians in Gaza set up a fund raising telethon to raise money for his election campaign, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan and Mummar Kadaffi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn’t matter.

    When he surrounded himself in the White house with advisors who were pro-gun control, pro- abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition people said it didn’t matter.

    When the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate people said it didn’t matter.

  30. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304723304577368280604524916.html

    “We don’t tolerate presidents or people of high power to do these things,” says Theodore Olson, the former U.S. solicitor general. “When you have the power of the presidency—the power of the IRS, the INS, the Justice Department, the DEA, the SEC—what you have effectively done is put these guys’ names up on ‘Wanted’ posters in government offices.”

  31. I guess now it’s “divided we conquer”:

    Issa, Boehner at odds over holding Holder in contempt of Congress

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/27/issa-boehner-at-odds-over-holding-holder-in-contempt-of-congress/#ixzz1tGOtHr4R

  32. As I have advocated since 2009, the only way to legally remove bo is by criminal indictment. Sheriff Joe has the right idea. There is abundant evidence of fraud and myriad other crimes by bo and his criminal cohorts all across the Country.

    This latest dicta by the memphis judge is another diversion. It will be years before that case is before the US Supreme Court, if ever SCOTUS decides to hear it.

    Only the demRats benefit by the memphis judge’s dicta.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-expands-obama-probe-to-hillary-supporters/

  33. http://hotair.com/archives/2012/04/27/more-secret-service-sexcapades-coming-to-light/

    So much for the sex scandal involving Secret Service agents and supervisors in Cartagena, Colombia being an “isolated incident.” Just days after administration officials told Congress that they have no indications of a pattern of misbehavior, CBS News now says that there are at least four incidents over 12 years involving Secret Service details and sex workers — including two Bill Clinton trips:

  34. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57422766/secret-service-probing-foreign-hard-partying-allegations-going-back-to-2000/

    The Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal have reported that Secret Service personnel traveling in 2009 with former President Clinton partied at strip clubs on a visit to Buenos Aires, Argentina, and that agents and White House staffers went to a Moscow night club known for its sexually charged atmosphere prior to Mr. Clinton’s trip to Russia in 2000.

  35. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/colombia-top-diplomat-demands-apology-president-obama-secret-service-hooker-scandal-article-1.1068465

    Colombia’s top diplomat demands apology from President Obama for Secret Service hooker scandal

  36. Prostitution is NOT legal in the United State. Local Law Enforcement Officials should investigate bo and the demRats sex tours in the US.

  37. Prostitution is NOT legal in the United States. Local Law Enforcement Officials should investigate bo and the demRats sex tours in the US.

  38. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0412/75680.html

    Any hope that the Secret Service sex scandal in Colombia was an isolated incident appears lost, as the investigation reportedly has widened to include incidents in at least four countries dating back to the Clinton administration.

  39. As I have advocated since 2009, the only way to legally remove bo is by criminal indictment. Sheriff Joe has the right idea. There is abundant evidence of fraud and myriad other crimes by bo and his criminal cohorts all across the Country.

    While Prostitution may or may not be legal in Columbia, it is NOT legal in the US. Sheriff Joe and other LEOs should expand their local investigations to include bo and the demRat sex tours in the US.

    This latest dicta by the memphis judge is another diversion. It will be years before that case is before the US Supreme Court, if ever SCOTUS decides to hear it.

    Only the demRats benefit by the memphis judge’s dicta.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-expands-obama-probe-to-hillary-supporters/

  40. While Prostitution may or may not be legal in Columbia, it is NOT legal in the US. Sheriff Joe and other LEOs should expand their local investigations to include bo and the demRat sex tours in the US.

    As I have advocated since 2009, the only way to legally remove bo is by criminal indictment. Sheriff Joe has the right idea. There is abundant evidence of fraud and myriad other crimes by bo and his criminal cohorts all across the Country.

    This latest dicta by the memphis judge is another diversion. It will be years before that case is before the US Supreme Court, if ever SCOTUS decides to hear it.

    Only the demRats benefit by the memphis judge’s dicta.

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/sheriff-joe-expands-obama-probe-to-hillary-supporters/

  41. While Prostitution may or may not be legal in Columbia, it is NOT legal in the US. Sheriff Joe and other LEOs should expand their local investigations to include bo and the demRat sex tours in the US.

  42. That is strange…….I thought prostitution was STILL LEGAL in Nevada.

  43. …….BTW prostitution is also legal in Rhode Island.

  44. Air Force Brat

    I see ownership has changed hands again.

  45. Air Force Brat | April 27, 2012 at 9:21 pm |

    I see ownership has changed hands again.
    ***********************************************************
    Been really busy preparing for the next event in the eligibility saga. Just stopped by for a moment to check things out, and saw this. Made me chuckle. Thanks; I needed that. (Will return after the week-end to update everyone on what ‘happened’ on Monday.)

  46. The Supreme Court unanimously defined natural-born citizen in Minor v. Happersett, and the court unanimously upheld that definition in Wong Kim Ark, as both the majority and the dissent agreed on that definition. What they didn’t agree on was whether the child of a Chinese subject could be a U.S. citizen through the 14th amendment despite a Treaty to the contrary. Both sides agreed he was not a natural-born citizen. There’s no compelling argument for a lower court judge to overrule two sets of Supreme Court justices.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s