Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 1

Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 1

“In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”…Barack Obama

“Today, Barack Obama has revealed himself to be just another typical politician who will do and say whatever is most expedient for Barack Obama. The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people. Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics. Barack Obama is now the first presidential candidate since Watergate to run a campaign entirely on private funds. This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system.”…Jill Hazelbaker, McCain campaign communications director

“Sen. Obama (IL) opted out of the public financing program for the general election. Primary matching fund payouts in 2008 were the lowest since the inception of the presidential election public funding program in 1976.”…FEC website

Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?

Part 1

To Judge Michael Malihi , presiding judge of the Obama GA ballot challenge, members of congress, presidential candidates and other interested Americans. This multi part series on facts regarding Obama refusing Federal Matching Funds in 2008 will raise reasonable doubts about Barack Obama’s Natural Born Citizen status.

From Politico February 07, 2007.

“Obama Wants Public Financing Option

My colleague Ken Vogel emails that the reports today that Obama has opted out of public financing aren’t quite right.

Vogel writes:

Contrary to media reports today, Sen. Barack Obama is trying to leave open the option of accepting public financing for his expected presidential bid.

Obama, D-Ill., last week asked the Federal Election Commission whether he could raise contributions that would disqualify him from receiving public financing, but return them later if he decided he wanted to receive taxpayer money for his campaign.

Obama’s question, tendered in the form of a request for an advisory opinion, is a new one for the Commission, which is expected to post the request on its Web site Wednesday afternoon. (UPDATE: Here it is now(.pdf).)

The request lays out the following scenario: Obama’s campaign would accept contributions for both the primary and general elections, but then return the general election contributions later if the Republican nominee agreed to accept public financing. The public financing system provides taxpayer dollars to candidates who abide by restrictions on how much they can raise.”

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0207/Obama_Wants_Public_Financing_Option.html

From ABC News June 19, 2008.

“Obama to Break Promise, Opt Out of Public Financing for General Election”

“In a web video to supporters — “the people who built this movement from the bottom up” — Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, announced this morning that he will not enter into the public financing system, despite a previous pledge to do so.

“We’ve made the decision not to participate in the public financing system for the general election,” Obama says in the video, blaming it on the need to combat Republicans, saying “we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system. John McCain’s campaign and the Republican National Committee are fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs. And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations.”

In November 2007, Obama answered “Yes” to Common Cause when asked “If you are nominated for President in 2008 and your major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign, will you participate in the presidential public financing system?”
Obama wrote:

“In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (R-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

Not so “aggressively,” according to the McCain campaign, which argues that Obama did not discuss this or try to negotiate at all with the McCain campaign, despite writing that he would “aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

The Obama campaign disputes this. Obama campaign counsel Bob Bauer met with McCain campaign counsel Trevor Potter and, according to Obama spox Bill Burton, Potter “immediately made it clear there was no basis for further discussion,” that they weren’t interested in any sort of agreement.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2008/06/obama-to-break/

Judge Michael Malihi, et al,

Why did Obama break his promise to use Federal Matching Funds?

For those paying attention, the answer is obvious.

More to come.

Advertisements

100 responses to “Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 1

  1. Well, after all these years this is what conservatives SAY they want…..let’s see what they actually DO:

    Gingrich On Obama: ‘I Don’t Want To Bloody His Nose, I Want To Knock Him Out’

    http://www.breitbart.tv/gingrich-on-obama-i-dont-want-to-bloody-his-nose-i-want-to-knock-him-out/

  2. Carney Dodges Question About Obama’s College Transcripts: “I Would Refer You To The Campaign”

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/17/carney_dodges_question_about_obamas_college_transcripts_i_would_refer_you_to_the_campaign.html

    White House press secretary Jay Carney is asked why President Obama hasn’t released his college transcripts. Carney dodges the question and tells the reporter, Ed Henry of FOX News, to ask the campaign.

    Carney then talks about candidates and releasing their tax returns.

    Ed Henry, FOX News: “I don’t know how many years, maybe you do, George Romney released of his college transcripts, but Republicans like to complain that the President has not released his college transcripts. What is the stated reason for that?”

    Jay Carney, White House: “I would refer you to the campaign.

  3. Simple:

    Did he or did he not [Obama] accept foreign scholarships as Obama himself proclaimed he could not afford college, little lone the costs of Ivy league Universities. Additionally, was Obama accepted as a poor high school GPA student – to Ivy league Universities based on his race and known foreign donations from the middle the East?

    Not difficult to understand the question(s). The release of such records will clearly tell the story and certainly dispel the White House B.S.

    Amazingly, it Obama were applying for a job at Amazon as a warehouse supervisor, he would be required to sign a wavier to release all his college records to the company. Good thing he only applied for the Job of President of the United States of America with access to America’s top secret technology and dealing with Nuclear weapons. Sure would hate Obama to have to expose his records for a warehouse job and listen to the reasons why he should not comply.

    Keeps getting better doesn’t it……

  4. Mr Ed's Friend, Wilbur

    Citizen Wells,

    I honestly don’t know the answer to your question, “Why did Obama break his promise to use Federal Matching Funds?

    For those paying attention, the answer is obvious.

    More to come.”

    Can you please tell me the answer to this? I am paying attention and I don’t know the answer to it. I am new to this illegal criminal business. Thank you.

  5. Headline at “Give Us Liberty”:

    “KIND OF AWKWARD TO RELEASE COLLEGE RECORDS THAT SHOW AKA OBAMA WAS RECEIVING AID AS AN INDONESIAN STUDENT!…THAT WOULD SORTA BLOW OBAMA’S COVER AND WE WOULDN’T WANT AMERICA TO FIND OUT THAT WE HAD A FOREIGN USURPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE, WOULD WE?…”

    http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2012/01/kind-of-awkward-to-release-college.html
    ========
    True ???

    Let Soetoro prove it false.

    [This needs to be pushed.]

  6. received this in Email from G. Beck. Every now and then he releases clips from his new program. Will check through some contacts if limited withdrawals from banks in Itally is actually happening now.

    http://www.glennbeck.com/2012/01/16/italy-mf-global-and-the-economy/

  7. William, I left you a note at bottom of last thread (about the Captain).

  8. Rules? What rules?:

    Jarrett’s partisan pulpit speech may have violated IRS church-state rules
    “Voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention,” according to the IRS website.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/17/jarretts-partisan-pulpit-speech-may-have-violated-irs-church-state-rules/#ixzz1jligK9LE

    Just try the same thing vs the regime and their party (even without the obvious voter registration part) and watch the irs vultures descend upon the “guilty”! They’ve tried to stop the mere comparison of platforms of both parties where a church is known to disagree on the basis of faith and morals.

  9. We are so screwed, on the drudge report it says a foreign company will be over all our election results. We know who will win if that is the case. It won’t matter about the votes. I don’t like any of the people running and I guess it really won’t even matter. I am so sick of what is happening in our country. I don’t know why the people in charge want to ruin our country.

  10. Shocker! Supreme Court lets stand lower bench’s ban on saying ‘Jesus’ too often in public prayers

    Pastors and priests in five states cannot mention ‘Jesus’ more than once or twice if they pray in public at an official function after the U.S. Supreme Court stunned constitutional law experts earlier today by letting stand a lower court ruling.

    ‘Legislative prayer’ is what courts call the tradition of legislative bodies (Congress, state legislators, town councils, etc.) beginning their meetings with an invocation.

    Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that when pastors and priests offer such prayers, it’s okay to mention the name of Jesus Christ once or maybe twice.

    But if Jesus’ name is mentioned frequently, or if the prayer includes statements of Christian beliefs (such as the forgiveness of sins, Jesus’ resurrection, or Jesus as the Son of God), then the prayer violates the Establishment Clause of the Constitution, and must be banned.

    Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/2012/01/shocker-supreme-court-lets-stand-lower-court-ruling-banning-jesus-certain-pub#ixzz1jlpRiSfL

    pub#ixzz1jloxqGAG

  11. I’m in moderation at 8:53….help please!

  12. I’ll take a stab at it. In order to receive public funds you would have to fill out an application, provide supporting documents and sign it and have it notarized. your submission is subject to federal perjury and fraud laws.

    applying to the FEC is probably harder than having to prove you are a natural born citizen.

    why did barky give up his law license? hmmmmm

  13. Papoose, If you accept matching funds you must be eligible for the office being sought, and they would have to open their “books” for audit. Obama doesn’t qualify for office ,and foreign campaign contributions would be disclosed, which is illegal, at least for republicans.

  14. Just hearing on Fox that about 1,000 protesters are on the White House grounds, or nearby. W.H. on partial lock down. No worry, Barky and spouse went out to celebrate her birthday.

  15. Cabby – AZ | January 17, 2012 at 10:03 pm |

    Just hearing on Fox that about 1,000 protesters are on the White House grounds, or nearby. W.H. on partial lock down. No worry, Barky and spouse went out to celebrate her birthday.
    ************************************
    I wonder if the Tea Party will be blamed. lol

  16. I am personally hoping that Judge Mahali will look upon the actions of MMMMSSSS. IMPORTANT(Nagamine) in the same light as Nagamine did with regard to Orly, and then take an action via the STATE TO STATE RECIPROCITY agreements. They DO EXIST! If Mahali fails to initiate inter court action, then he is probably being paid by Soetoro to STAND DOWN.

  17. MS. NAGAMINE is WRONG (deliberately). It is called lying,or wordsmithing. The subpoena does have the same power in Hawaii as it does in Georgia. It was served in one of the UNITED STATES. Those two words make it valid in ALL states in the Union. Since the subpoena was issued by a Federal Court, it IS VALID. It is easy to see that Judge Nishimura is another tentacle of the USURPER. In all probability MS.Nishimura is HUNG UP on Soetoro, and would walk through fire in her bare feet if he commanded her to. Really sad that MORONS like her are now serving as Judges all over the US, and as a result we are seeing a HELLOFALOT of INSANE judgements being rendered by these SNOT NOSED wannabes. It is even sadder that our seasoned and older senior judges have become complicit with the overthrow of our Republic. This is exactly what is going on!

  18. A Crazy Old Coot

    http://m.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/explosive-new-evidence-shows-ruling-of-az-judge-illegal

    Explosive new evidence shows ruling of AZ judge illegal
    July 31st, 2010 by Anthony Martin

    “Does anyone read the U.S. Constitution these days? American lawyers don’t read it. Federal Judge Susan R. Bolton apparently has never read it. Same goes for our illustrious Attorney General Eric Holder. But this lawyer has read it and she is going to show you something in Our Constitution which is as plain as the nose on your face.

    “Article III, Sec. 2, clause 2 says:
    “In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction.”

    In other words, the Judge in the Arizona case has absolutely no Constitutional jurisdiction over the matter upon which she ruled. As the Constitution makes abundantly clear, only the U.S. Supreme Court can issue rulings that involve a state
    /////////////////////
    Read the rest at the above link
    This was written in July 2010 and we just now see it. Guess the MSM did’nt want anyone to know…. MSM includes fox!

  19. bob strauss | January 17, 2012 at 10:08 pm |
    I wonder if the Tea Party will be blamed. lol
    *********************
    In these days I’d never be surprised at anything, Bob! The lyin’ Dems seem to find a way to get back to blaming the Tea Party for just about anything.

  20. oldsalt79 | January 17, 2012 at 10:45 pm |
    Really sad that MORONS like her are now serving as Judges all over the US, and as a result we are seeing a HELLOFALOT of INSANE judgements being rendered by these SNOT NOSED wannabes. It is even sadder that our seasoned and older senior judges have become complicit with the overthrow of our Republic. This is exactly what is going on!
    *******************************
    It is a hard truth to accept, but I believe it, Old Salt. There is just no other way to explain what is going on in the judicial system. Well, when we realize that the highest justice department in the country, the DOJ, is so corrupt, that explains much. Furthermore, little by little the courts have been packed with liberal judges.

    Is it little wonder that the DOJ is trying to drive our Sheriff Arpaio from office? He’s in for one terrible battle. If anyone can handle it, he can, but there is just so much that one person can take.

  21. A Crazy Old Coot | January 17, 2012 at 11:08 pm |
    The information in Martin’s article came to my attention while looking at that section in the Constitution, and, if my memory serves me correctly, I wrote to our Gov. Brewer about her seeking FIRST judicial relief from the Supreme Court instead of going to a lower federal court. I never heard any response – But what am I supposed to know? (after all, they have highly paid attorneys to take care of matter like that) Hmm…..

  22. A Crazy Old Coot

    http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/01/very-important-american-revolution.html

    Very Important – American Revolution: County Sheriffs vs. the Federal Government
    http://www.countysheriffproject.org/CSPOA_Invitation_Dec29.2011.pdf By Mark S. McGrew

    Get one thing straight and get it right!

    Americans are not revolting against the Federal government and we are not planning a revolution against the Federal Government of The United States of America.

    The Federal government revolted against us. They are the ones constantly violating our Constitution, from the street punk who calls himself President, right on down to local government employees.

    snip

    As in France during World War II, there is in fact an American Resistance and an American Underground. We are everywhere. We have more people and we have more guns than do the traitors. Does anyone think that they are not afraid of us?

    Then why else do they secretly hurry through a Federal law to pick up and imprison any American citizen without charges, without trial, without legal counsel, without evidence and put them under military dominance in a secret location?

    /////////////////////

    Read the rest at the above link.

  23. A Crazy Old Coot

    January 17, 2012 at 11:45 pm |
    Your comment is awaiting moderation
    I guess I did a no no.

    Very Important – American Revolution: County Sheriffs vs. the Federal Government
    http://www.countysheriffproject.org/CSPOA_Invitation_Dec29.2011.pdf

  24. A Crazy Old Coot

    Your comment is awaiting moderation

    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    January 17, 2012 at 11:45 pm |
    I guess I did a no no. again.

  25. Mister consistent, as he likes to call himself, once ran as a Libertarian, and switched to the GOP for political gain, then endorsed a Commie in 2008 when he didn’t win the nomination, and now wants us to believe he is a loyal Republican. I have a bridge I’d like to sell you too.

    http://www.redstate.com/leon_h_wolf/2011/12/21/ron_paul_hates_republicans_and_everything_they_stand_for/

  26. Cabby, I am getting news alerts that it is the OWS folks in front of the WH.

  27. Tammy……………….
    The reason why our (ALLEGED) leaders want to destroy America is because their NEUROTIC MENTALITY has led them to think that UP IS DOWN, and they alone know how everybody on earth SHOULD LIVE. They believe that they are GOD, and everyone on earth should BOW to them and/or KISS THEIR FEET. They are OVEREDUCATED MORONS. These are the people who STILL support Soetoro. They have no regard whatsoever for our Constitution,or our laws. In fact some of these people have actually written our laws. That is primarily why many of our laws are now wordsmithed meaningless essays. This was deliberately done by the progressive MANURE SPREADERS who are the real threat to America, and was done for the purpose of making everybody into DUMBED DOWN MORONS, so that their minds can be permanently PROGRAMMED to SEE UP AS DOWN,and LEFT AS RIGHT. When you are so DUMB that you can no longer perceive the truth then the LIBERAL LOONEYS can make you believe anything they tell you.

  28. “Why Establishment Republicans, Democrats, and Karl Rove want Romney: Because he Loses to Obama”

    http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/why-establishment-republicans-democrats-and-karl-rove-want-romney-because-he-loses-to-obama/

  29. A Crazy Old Coot | January 17, 2012 at 11:59 pm |
    Your comment is awaiting moderation
    ***************
    Oh fiddlesticks!

  30. Tina | January 18, 2012 at 12:03 am |
    Cabby, I am getting news alerts that it is the OWS folks in front of the WH.
    *********************
    No surprise there! Wouldn’t it be something for their smell and other trappings to permeate the grounds – as close as they can get? Wow! I just read where rats are accumulating overwhelmingly around where they have been camping out in D.C. In fact, certain species are no longer allowed to be exterminated. They (rats) have to be moved in “families” and relocated. Virginia is afraid the rats will migrate there. When we talk “rats”, we’re thinking plague and other diseases known to be carried by them. This is pestilence in plain language.

  31. …………what is worse, if people are happy being stupid then they DESERVE to receive everything that they have asked for. Sadly it is our YOUNG URBAN PROFESSIONALS like MMMMSSSS. NAGAMINE, and MMMMSSSS. NISHIMURA who DELIBERATELY TWIST OUR LAWS, into
    a meaningless essay of words then try to make other people believe it is the law.

  32. To that end, I reiterate that these WORDSMITHS are going to feel the wrath of the people who have felt the sting of the wordsmiths twisted words. I will HAPPILY watch them receive their JUST DUE.

  33. Sarah Palin:

    ” ….I’d Vote For Newt and I would want this to continue, more debates. more vetting of candidates because we know the mistake made in our country four years ago was having a candidate that was not vetted…..”.

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/01/sarah-palin-id-vote-for-newt-video/

  34. OT but IMPORTANT! For a change of pace I spent most of the evening on YOU TUBE watching and listening to past sermons of Bill Graham. I love the song “Just as you are.” There is a lot of versions of it on YOU TUBE.

  35. Goodnight all………God Bless!

  36. Old Salt, you couldn’t have ended the day in a better way. God bless you, too.

  37. Good Morning all,

    Just reviewed this,

    “Sarah Palin on Hannity: America Made Mistake Not Vetting Obama in 2008; Must Vet Better This Time!!”

    You think so?

  38. Interested Bystander

    Hey All,

    I could barely stand to watch this video, but this is from Rahm’s Chicago.

    WARNING VERY graphic video

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/17/chicago-teen-beating-video_n_1210266.html

    This is disgusting.

  39. Interested Bystander

    Good morning All,

    I apologise to anyone this may offend, but THIS is why I support Dr Paul,

  40. Interested Bystander

    Embedded video sent my comment in to moderation.

    Darn it!!

  41. Good Morning!

    It might be a good thing if Newt said to Gov. Perry that if I am elected I will put you in charge of shutting down illegal traffic on the boarder with Mexico within 6 months. (If Perry leaves the race)

    Sarah came very close to an endorsement I hear.

  42. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2834325/posts

    Poll Position: In one-on-one GOP contest, Gingrich trounces Romney (Newt-48, Romney-33)
    pollposition.com ^ | 1/18/2012 | Eason Jordan

    Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 6:54:34 AM by TBBT

    —–

    Gov. Perry was my first choice but it’s clear he is not viable at this point to beat Mit.

    In a hypothetical one-on-one match-up between Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney for the GOP presidential nomination, Gingrich beats Romney by a wide margin.

    In our national scientific telephone survey last night, we asked Americans who said they’d vote in their state’s Republican primary or caucus for whom they’d vote if only two candidates were on the ballot.

    We asked for responses to three head-to-head hypothetical contests: Gingrich-Romney, Paul-Romney, and Santorum-Romney.

    Gingrich topped Romney 48%-33%, Santorum edged Romney 45%-39%, and Romney beat Paul 61%-23%.

  43. http://news.yahoo.com/pentagon-cia-sued-over-alleged-meetings-filmmaker-012226747.html

    It looks like Obama’s political promo movie will be postponed until after the election…

  44. Sorry but my comment landed in the middle of quote.

    The sentence – “Gov. Perry was my first choice…” is mine. Need another cup of coffee.

  45. Ooops…Good Morning All!!!

  46. Larry Sinclair has redone his site – LS NEWS and it has a facebook page.

    http://www.networkedblogs.com/blog/larry_sinclair

  47. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Here’s why Ron Paul must run as a third party to pull all the young liberals from Obama . This will make ANY Republican win by default. If no party wins the required 271 electoral college votes, the U.S. House of Representatives(Republican controlled) chooses the next President.

    “occupy wall street + White House”

    https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&btnmeta_news_search=1&q=occupy+wall+street+%2B+Whitehouse&oq=occupy+wall+street+%2B+Whitehouse&aq=f&aqi=d1d-o1&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2755l2755l0l5087l1l1l0l0l0l0l210l210l2-1l1l0

  48. Good Morning, Fellow Patriots!
    Good Morning, Homeland Security!

    Carney Dodges Question About Obama’s College Transcripts: “I Would Refer You To The Campaign”
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/17/carney_dodges_question_about_obamas_college_transcripts_i_would_refer_you_to_the_campaign.html

  49. Good morning all.

  50. Exclusive Sneak Peek: Gingrich SuperPAC Ad Imagines Romney/Obama Debate Debacle

    http://www.breitbart.tv/exclusive-sneak-peek-gingrich-superpac-ad-imagines-romneyobama-debate-debacle/

  51. UK Blog getting Thousands of Hits – Obama’s Gay Past Being Hidden By Killing Ex-Lovers
    Obama’s Gay Past Being Hidden By Killing Ex-Lovers

    http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-gay-past-being-hidden-by-killing.html

  52. This should be fun to watch. I heard 60k anarchists are going to show up..

    http://www.chicagog8.com/

  53. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Pat – They are all (G-8 Summit, NATO + OWS Crowd) coming to Chicago to learn “The Chigago Way”!!!

  54. Looks like Newt may come back.

    2 stories –

    Romney Was Board Member Of Company Fined Over $100 Million For Medicare Fraud — Criminal Fine
    Daily Caller ^ | McCain Campaign

    Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:28:27 AM by xzins

    DAMON CLINICAL LABORATORIES

    Romney Was Board Member Of Company Fined Over $100 Million For Medicare Fraud – At The Time, It Was The Largest Criminal Fine For Health Care Fraud In History

    Romney Sat On Board Of Damon Clinical Laboratories, A Bain Capital Portfolio Company Fined Nearly $120 Million In 1996 Due To Medicare Fraud. “A Needham clinical laboratory agreed yesterday to pay $119 million in criminal and civil fines after pleading guilty to charges that it defrauded the nation’s Medicare system by seeking reimbursements on millions of dollars worth of unnecessary blood tests. … Damon Clinical Laboratories Inc. admitted it tried to boost its profits by submitting the unnecessary tests. The company, the government said, misled doctors into ordering the tests, ensuring that they would be covered by Medicare, the federal health care program for the elderly.” (Kimberly Blanton, “Needham Lab Fined $ 119m For Fraud,” The Boston Globe, 10/10/96)

    And

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/election_2012_republican_presidential_primary
    he latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Republican Primary Voters nationwide shows Romney with 30% support and Gingrich with 27% of the vote. Former U.S. Senator Rick Santorum, who was running second two weeks ago, has now dropped to 15%.

  55. “Private Investigators Respond to Snopes Latest Piece on Obama’s Social Security Number Reserved for Connecticut Applicants.”

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/private-investigators-respond-to-snopes.html

  56. bob strauss | January 18, 2012 at 10:33 am |

    GORDO | January 18, 2012 at 11:38 am |
    ==================================
    Have you ever seen anything like it??? We now have a couple of weak voices whispering out there “Obama should have been better vetted” and when you offer them the very evidence they’d prefer to trip over it while indirectly aiding the criminal activity that it all points to….and that includes Palin, Limbaugh and all those trying to convince everyone they are THE foundation of what “conservative” means. Isn’t it unbelievable too how there doesn’t seem to be even a little curiosity from law enforcement from the lowest to the highest…..except perhaps the lone ranger Arpaio? While the universal information internet deposits scrub what was previously seen, one wonders just what evidence was still available for Arpaio’s posse to use.

  57. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Before long Obama will say he is a Repblocrat!!!

  58. Mr. Bill(ms. helga)

    Or worse yet “Democan”

  59. Since certain voices are now finally mentioning Obama vetting being necessary….like Palin and/or Limbaugh….start bombarding them then with the resource links of the investigators who have begun the searches, their findings, listing everything that still must be answered….start with perhaps Bob Strauss’ link: http://the-tap.blogspot.com/2012/01/obamas-gay-past-being-hidden-by-killing.html

    to get their attention and ask why law enforcement hasn’t been involved….except for Arpaio whom the regime is trying to ruin in order NOT to be vetted!! Twitter to Palin’s twitter asking for just such info and see her actual response and commitment!

  60. I just read in my local newspaper this morning that Mr. Obama will be giving his DNC acceptance speech at the Bank of America football field which is the home of the Carolina Panthers.

    BOA field will hold 74, 000 people…..

    Does anyone besides me smell a repeat performance of 2008? ….remember when King O’bummer marched through the plywood gates of Rome (the only thing missing was a golden laural wreath)…..

    I’m not sure Charlotte has 74,000 black people in our city that will be in attendance…..at least not that many looking for a welfare handout….

    Remember after the last frenzy? Everyone looking for that “Obama money”. Wonder what he is going to promise them this year.

    I wonder if he will make it to Charlotte !

  61. Tebow Played Through Injuries In Playoff Loss

    http://denver.cbslocal.com/2012/01/18/tebow-played-through-injuries-in-playoff-loss/
    ………
    ESPN first reported Wednesday that Tebow got hurt on a third-quarter tackle, then had trouble sleeping because of the pain and underwent an MRI on his chest Monday.

    Team spokesman Patrick Smyth said that while he couldn’t confirm the exact extent or nature of the injuries due to team policy, he acknowledged that Tebow finished the game in considerable pain.

    Backup Brady Quinn quickly got ready to go into the game after Tebow was hit by Vince Wilfork and Rob Ninkovich, but Tebow stayed in and finished up.

    “It’s just the physicality of playing football. Sometimes you get hit and it can hurt a little bit. But, I wanted to play a lot of the game,” Tebow said after the game.

    The outcome had long been decided by the time Tebow got hurt.

    “I just wanted to show character. You just continue to fight and it doesn’t change who you are, how you play, how you go out there, you should be the same at all times,” Tebow said. “That’s what I wanted to show, it didn’t matter if it was the first play or the last play or you were down by 42. I was going to be the same player and I was still going to give everything I have. Because that’s all I have to give.”

  62. aka bari shabazz hiding out in broad day light. the truth will be revealed its the greatest scam ever on america besides the moon landings.

  63. Obama Rejecting Pipeline, Pokes Back at GOP

    http://nationaljournal.com/congress/obama-rejecting-pipeline-pokes-back-at-gop-20120118?mrefid=subhplead_1
    **************************
    It seems that although the administration had until the last of Feb. to make a decision, they decided to do it before tomorrow night’s Repub. debate.

  64. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2834570/posts

    A message from Judson Phillips, founder of Tea Party Nation. [Help Newt in SC]
    JudsonPhillips.com ^ | January 18, 2012 | Judson Phillips

    Posted on Wednesday, January 18, 2012 3:39:49 PM by greyfoxx39

    This Saturday will be the most important primary vote of the year. Either conservatives and Tea Party members unite to stop Mitt Romney or we see a repeat of 2008, with a liberal Republican going up against Barack Obama.

    The conservative movement is split between three candidates, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum.

    I am calling on conservatives and members of the Tea Party movement to unite behind Newt Gingrich in South Carolina so that we can stop Mitt Romney.

    If we are going to see a conservative agenda advanced, we need a conservative candidate to do it and the only remaining candidate that can do it is Newt Gingrich.

    I like Rick Perry. If Newt were not in the race, I would be behind Perry. But Perry’s campaign is on its last legs. Nationally Perry is at only 7% and is less than that in South Carolina. After the primary vote on Saturday, Perry’s campaign will more than likely end.

    Rick Santorum is polling well but he has problems. Since he focused so intensely on Iowa, he does not have campaign infrastructure in many states. In fact, there are a number of states where he will not even appear on the ballot. In other states, like my home state of Tennessee, his name will appear but he has no delegates who have qualified for the ballot. What that means is that even if Santorum were to win Tennessee, he would get no delegates for the convention.

  65. I don’t really know what “good” it does to post something like the following, but it just goes to once again prove how insensitive the occupants of the W.H. truly are:
    http://cnsnews.com/news/article/first-lady-celebrates-b-day-steakhouse-featuring-28-obama-burger-kobe-beef-bacon-cheese

    BTW, they went for the $92 steak dinner, not the burgers. Mrs. O eats there quite frequently, so says the restaurant.

  66. Jach (4:21 pm)
    That is some Insider Report! There are some things in there that could be explaining a few of the complexities that we have run into about O. Thanks for the link.

  67. Thank you for posting the insider reports. They scare me to death but it is important for us all to see everything behind the curtain. I know Mr. soetero is evil personified but the report explains and exposes the power structure.
    May God help us.

  68. “JBJD PROTESTS THE PROTECT IP ACT”

    http://jbjd.org/

  69. Zach, I like Newt too. My two favorite are Newt and Santorum. I think Newt would be the best to debate Obama. People seem to think Perry will drop out soon. Ron Paul really should drop out soon too as most of his support is from the fringe far right, the fringe far left and independents. But he has too big of an ego to drop out. However, if Ron Paul dropped out, people would see the real choice would be Mitt, Newt and Santorum.

  70. zachjonesishome | January 18, 2012 at 4:21 pm |
    ============================
    Well, put these reports together with the unsolved murders of Chicago/church “guys” and one might just come to the conclusion that, yes, I think a few things ought to still be vetted in O’bama’s case! And the “chanting” and whatever else gets the guy back “up”!!! Diabolical, weird and scary stuff….if backed up with reality.

  71. It is starting up again. Some bombshell info against Newt on Drudge.

  72. GORDO | January 18, 2012 at 5:15 pm |

    “JBJD PROTESTS THE PROTECT IP ACT”
    *********************************************************************\
    I unblocked my site a little while ago. And it looks like bill sponsors are backing down. These bills were couched as protecting copyright infringement. But, practically speaking, under the proposed legislation, a private company, including a competitor of a site, could accuse that site of posting in violation of copyright. In other words, a hosting site like WordPress could have a blogger who is charged with violating copyright. And, based on this charge, the WordPress server would have to block that blog; and/or get blocked, pending a full investigation.

    But worse; this means, the government can charge copyright infringement; and shut down sites. (Does anyone think these shutdowns would not be ‘point of view’ based?)

  73. http://www.esquire.com/features/newt-gingrich-0910

    Can’t wait for “Mrs ex Newt” to drop the hammer on this loser.

    What a phony.

  74. “Mrs ex Newt”

    ex Mrs Newt

  75. and here it is, just up on Drudge.

    http://drudgereport.com/flash2.htm

  76. Why wouldn’t ABC air the interview? Who are they protecting?

  77. I saw an interview with her about a year ago. She sounded like the typical “ex” and is probably being paid a ton of money. This is so like the media don’t you think. Gee, I wonder why the NYT never printed the story from the acorn whistleblower, Anita (can’t remember her last name). The times wouldn’t print it because they said it would be a game changer. Also, what about the story from the LA times that they never printed along with pictures of Obama and Rashid Khalidi at his going away party..

    I think the left is terrified of Newt, and not Romney This just verifies my suspicions.

  78. Hell hath no fury like…….

  79. Team Obama Responds to Georgia Subpoenas: Files Motion to Quash Administrative Subpoenas

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/team-obama-responds-to-georgia.html

    Obama’s Georgia attorney filed a motion to quash the Georgia subpoenas in the Farrar, et. al. v Obama ballot access challenge. Although we disagree 100 percent with Michael Jablonski(Obama atty) on his political arguments, the legal argument with respect to the administrative subpoenas having only limited powers and only within the State of Georgia is correct. Read the full motion provided below. Much of it is garbage however the part about the out-of-state rules is spot on. Also the response to one of the subpoenas provided below from the Department of Health and Human Services.

  80. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9SBN46O0&show_article=1

    The ex-wife has said Gingrich proposed to her before the divorce from his first wife was final in 1981. Her marriage to Gingrich ended in divorce in 2000. Gingrich admitted he’d already taken up with Callista Bisek, his third wife.

    Okay….so you knew he was a scoundrel before your marriage to him, married him anyway, and now want only him to look like the less than genuine kind of guy?? What do they say about trying to change a partner AFTER a marriage??? IOW, so what did you expect…that you would cause a conversion?? When that didn’t happen you are “shocked,shocked”? These days a story a minute!

  81. Isn’t it going to take a scoundrel to beat the biggest soundrel we have already; OB? Axelrod, Valerie and OB will be as dirty as they come. Nice guys finish last, it seems.

  82. I received this email from Orly Taitz, apparently Obama and his attorney are sweating the subpoenas for Obama’s records.
    ********************
    Barack Obama files a motion to quash subpoenas from attorney Orly Taitz. Judge Malihi to decide soon‏

    Barack Obama filed a motion asking judge Malihi to quash my subpoenas. I am working on opposition to Obama’s motion

    Motion to Quash Subpoenas
    X
    InboxX
    Reply |Michael Jablonski to Kim, me, Kip
    show details 10:40 AM (1 hour ago)

    Attached you will find a motion to quash subpoenas on behalf of President Obama. The motion is directed at subpoenas directed to the President and all of the other subpoenas being sent on behalf of the plaintiff in the Farrar case. Thank you.

    Michael Jablonski

    Farrar v Obama motion to quash subpoenas

    I don’t have an opposition yet. However, I am posting below my reply to opposition to reciprocal subpoena enforcement, which I was forced to write at night before 01.13.2012 hearing in Hi, when I was ambushed by Nagamine with the opposition to subpoena enforcement in HI, which I got only at 11 pm at night before the hearing in the morning. that was the reason, I had to read from my laptop, I did not even have an opportunity to print it out. To a great extend this reply answers issues raised in by Obama in his motion to quash. In a nut shell:

    1. most of his motion is a total BS, irrelevant material, improper attacks on plaintiff’s counsel with an attempt to prejudice the court

    2. Obama has no standing to challenge subpoenas issued and addressed to other parties. If other parties want to challenge, it is up to them. It is interesting that he mentions Susan Daniels, John Smpson and Loretta Fuddy, I wonder why? Is there something in their testimony he does not want to be heard by the judge?

    3. there is nothing in subpoena issued to him, that is improper or oppressive

    4. he was properly served through his attorney in Atlanta GA, within the jurisdiction

    Reply to opposition to reciprocal subpoena enforcement

    PS I wanted to thank everybody who donated for my new laptop, which came in handy after my old laptop mysteriously disappeared during my prior trip to HI. It might be a coincidence, but right before I got this motion to quash from Obama, I got a letter from the Inspector General, which was not a motion to quash and I got a phone call from TSA, saying that they are looking for my lap top but did not find it yet. I, also wanted to thank people, who are donating for this hearing. I just got an e-mail from my credit card, saying that I maxed out with over $8,500 in charges as I had to pay for airfare, hotel accommodations for a lot of people, I am paying another attorney to help me, so donations are appreciated

  83. Pat 1789 | January 18, 2012 at 7:33 pm |

    http://www.esquire.com/features/newt-gingrich-0910

    ————————————————————————————–

    What deal did Newt make with Bill Clinton to sell out the Republican Party in the 90’s when he was Speaker?

    Why is Sarah Palin supporting a person of such low moral character ?

    Did Palin vett Newt ?

  84. Jack Cashill:

    “The callers would remind D’Souza that Obama did not write his books and that their content was provably false in ways lethal to D’Souza’s thesis. D’Souza would politely blow off the caller and kick my thesis back downstairs where it belonged.

    D’Souza’s book was published before “Deconstructing Obama,” my book-length exposé of “Dreams.” By the time he wrote the new intro, however, he obviously knew about my book, knew that it undid his own thesis and then failed to mention it in his new introduction.

    D’Souza failed also to mention my earlier and much too gentle critique of his book. Battling Maureen Dowd is so much easier and more rewarding.

    “I have never objected to genuine and thoughtful concerns and objections,” D’Souza writes in the new intro. No, Dinesh, you just ignore them.”

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/dsouza-doubles-down-on-obamas-rage/

  85. Whenever we start talking about a candidate’s infidelity perhaps it would be wise to first consider the WELL KNOWN ERRANT behavior of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, John Fitzgerald Kennedy,……….and of course the ALLEGED HOMOSEXUAL ACTS of our ALLEGED POTUS himself. I would tend to think that anything Newt Gingrich’s EX WIFE wold have to say would pale in comparison with our present alleged DEVIATE POTUS. For her to do this takes a HUGE PAYDAY. Where did we recently see the same thing done to another candidate. This sort of play is STRAIGHT OUT OF THE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT PLAYBOOK that only a SEXUAL DEVIATE would PAY SOMEBODY ELSE to do.

  86. While I am only guessing,I tend to believe that there are DAMNED FEW politicians, lawyers, mechanics,etc these days who DO NOT have some measure of an errant life style at some point in their lives either during their marriage,or during their single years. It comes with the territory these days. While some of us don’t condone such a behavior of others we are not the ones who should be trying to judge somebody’s personal lives. Sadly it is the LIBERAL DEMOCRATS whose maritual history, sometimes has a sexually perverted,and otherwise deviated past history. In reality they are hardly in a position to pass judgement on the marital conduct of anyone else.

  87. Graphic illustration of “O’s” administration to date:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2834438/posts?page=14#14

  88. BYE BYE……..sleep tight.

  89. Amen!

    —–
    observer | January 18, 2012 at 6:53 pm | zachjonesishome | January 18, 2012 at 4:21 pm |
    ============================
    Well, put these reports together with the unsolved murders of Chicago/church “guys” and one might just come to the conclusion that, yes, I think a few things ought to still be vetted in O’bama’s case! And the “chanting” and whatever else gets the guy back “up”!!! Diabolical, weird and scary stuff….if backed up with reality.

    ———
    http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/18/white-house-insider-you-dont-ever-wanna-do-the-things-ive-done/

  90. Pat 1789 | January 18, 2012 at 9:56 pm |

    What deal did Newt make with Bill Clinton to sell out the Republican Party in the 90′s when he was Speaker?

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Pat,

    The answer is…NAFTA

  91. William | January 19, 2012 at 8:09 am |

    The answer is…NAFTA
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    EXACTLY. Newt was there. 1994 I believe.

  92. Pingback: Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 2, Robert Bauer et al help Obama hide records | Citizen WElls

  93. Pingback: Obama GA ballot challenge, Natural born citizen status, Judge Michael Malihi, Why did Obama refuse matching funds in 2008?, Part 3, Citizen Wells FEC FOIA, FEC bias? | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s