Daniel Frawley sentencing December 20, 2011, Rezko partner, Deposition reveals Rezko payment to Obama, Companion Security link

Daniel Frawley sentencing December 20, 2011, Rezko partner, Deposition reveals Rezko payment to Obama, Companion Security link

“In the Daniel Frawley Deposition, why did Tony Rezko give Obama money and why did Frawley assert his Fifth Amendment privilege?”…Citizen Wells

“Why did Patrick Fitzgerald and the US Justice Department wait until December 2008 to arrest Rod Blagojevich?”…Citizen Wells

“I believe I’m more pristine on Rezko than him.”…Rod Blagojevich

Daniel Frawley, a one time partner of Tony Rezko,  is scheduled for sentencing  Tuesday, December 20, 2011 in the courtroom of Judge Ronald A. Guzman .

Daily Calendar

Tuesday, December 20, 2011  (As of 12/13/11 at 03:48:00 AM 

Honorable Ronald A. Guzman                  Courtroom 1219 (RAG)

1:11-cr-00056   USA v. Frawley                         10:30   Sentencing                 


Commenter Bessie gave us a heads up on the sentencing dates on 2011/11/22 at 3:35 pm.
“Daniel T. Frawley sentencing date is scheduled for December 20 and the 21st….Why 2 date’s I don’t know….a little confusing…but again it’s just day’s before Christmas”

From Citizen Wells November 16, 2011.

“On March 9, 2011, Ulsterman reported the following White House Insider report.

“You said earlier that Obama was more confident these days though…

He is.  Pelosi backed off.  Issa appears to have done the same.  Holder is holding the line.  Information coming out of Chicago is still being limited – clamped down upon.  That doesn’t mean they aren’t nervous.  They are.
 Watch the Blagojevich thing – the trial.  The deal to be made.  Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.  And what happened to Rezko?  That’s part of the same deal.  A company called Companion Security…Blago, Rezko, the Feds.  It’s all brewing – maybe boiling over?  Of course the national media is burying all of this.  Most of it – that’s partly why we gotta back off.  The risk, the exposure, it’s too great.  We need help – help that I thought was coming but never fully materialized.

Rezko?  That could still be a problem for Obama?

(Laughs)  Yeah – do you think?  Hell yeah it could be a problem.  The guy has been holed up in jail waiting for sentencing.  Why?  Why so long?  Holder’s people are all over that thing – just like Blago.  Obama is in the mix of that mess for sure.  Does anybody really dispute that?  But you see, it’s the Justice Department’s complicity in protecting Obama during the ongoing investigations – talking current crimes here now… that is what can really sink them.  Not that there is just bank fraud, RICO  laws that were broken, payoffs, intimidations, – that’s all basic Chicago business as usual, right?  But now add the White House’s handling of all of that since Obama became President  – now you got a presidential scandal.  Now you got an investigation that leads to uncovering all of that mess.  Now you got grounds to legally go after Holder, Jarrett, and even the President of the United States.  Hell, throw in the First Lady too…”

“On July 11, 2011 the Chicago SunTimes presented 2 articles.”

”Ex-Rezko partner’s sentencing delayed”

“After this story was published Monday morning, U.S. District Judge Ronald A. Guzman canceled Daniel T. Frawley’s sentencing hearing, which had been scheduled for Tuesday. Court records did not indicate why Guzman did this. Frawley’s sentencing had not been re-scheduled.

Daniel T. Frawley once teamed with Tony Rezko — the political fixer who’s now in jail — in what turned out to be a doomed effort to open a training school for Iraqi security forces in western Illinois. Now, Frawley faces a federal prison stretch of his own.”

“Details about Frawley’s cooperation with the U.S. attorney’s office, the FBI and the Illinois attorney general’s office can be gleaned from a 65-page court deposition he gave seven months ago in a legal-malpractice lawsuit that he filed against his former longtime lawyer, George Weaver. In the lawsuit, Frawley accuses Weaver of having overbilled him and telling him to “withhold certain information from the government” when he was cooperating with authorities.

That sworn statement, given Dec. 1, 2010, is posted at suntimes.com/news/watchdogs. In it, Frawley talks about three meetings he’s had with law enforcement authorities since 2006. The deposition outlines how he secretly recorded Rezko, and it raises a new and unsubstantiated question about Rezko’s once-close relationship with Obama — an issue that dogged the then-U.S. senator during his presidential campaign four years ago.”

““I was on the phone, making a phone call to Tony Rezko,” Frawley says, according to the transcript. “I had a luncheon engagement with him. George was outside of the room where I was making the telephone call, and the purpose of the call was for me to keep my luncheon engagement with Tony Rezko and to go over and to record Tony Rezko.

“George saw and heard me on the phone, came running in and went like this [demonstrating]: Cut it,” drawing his hand across his throat.

Later in the deposition, Weaver’s lawyer, Daniel F. Konicek, asks Frawley about what specific information Weaver is supposed to have told Frawley to withhold from federal authorities.

“I’m assuming the information is about the payments made by Rezko to Obama, so we know we’re talking about the right conversation, right?” Konicek asks Frawley.

Frawley doesn’t answer. So Konicek presses him: “Am I correct it was about Obama being paid by Rezko?”

Frawley replies: “I’m not answering that question, based upon my attorney’s instructions.””

“Tony Rezko’s $50 million Iraq deal  (reprinted from August 7, 2007)”

“Two years ago, Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity gave a $50 million contract to a start-up security company owned by now-indicted businessman Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop with a checkered financial past. Within a month, an Iraqi leadership change left the deal in limbo.

Now the company, Companion Security, is working to revive its contract to train Iraqi power-plant guards in the United States.

Companion found support last summer from Gov. Blagojevich, whose staff offered to let the company lease a military facility in western Illinois. Since then, Companion has been lobbying officials from Washington to Baghdad about its Iraqi deal, according to documents obtained by the Chicago Sun-Times.

Blagojevich’s offer to assist Companion came as a federal investigation into Rezko’s state-government dealings was heating up. A former top fund-raiser for the governor and other politicians, Rezko was indicted on corruption charges in October — four months after Blagojevich’s homeland security chief wrote a letter inviting Companion to train the guards at the Savanna Army Depot.

The governor’s spokeswoman said state officials didn’t know Rezko had ties to Companion until the Sun-Times began asking questions. Blagojevich and his staff also didn’t know that Companion’s chief executive, former cop Daniel T. Frawley, had a history of financial problems, she said.

It’s unclear if Frawley and Rezko remain partners. They declined to comment.

After the state found a proposed training site, Frawley went to Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) last August.

Obama’s staff declined to help.

“The Senate staff had two meetings, one conference call, and sporadically e-mailed with representatives of Companion Security about their request for Sen. Obama to write a letter introducing the company to senior officials in the Iraqi government,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt said. “That is not the kind of action Sen. Obama usually takes for individual companies, and our staff concluded on that basis to decline the requested assistance.”

LaBolt said Obama’s staff was unaware Companion had any ties to Rezko, who has raised campaign donations for Obama.
Companion beefed up its lobbying efforts in March, hiring a Washington attorney who has contacted the U.S. State and Commerce departments. Frawley wants U.S. officials to persuade the Iraqi government to honor the contract he signed on April 18, 2005, when Aiham Alsammarae, another friend of Rezko’s, ran Iraq’s electricity agency.”

“As Frawley sought to revive the contract in spring 2006, Blagojevich’s chief of staff, John Harris, directed the state’s homeland security adviser, Jill Morgenthaler, to find “a military site for the training of Iraqi police forces,” Morgenthaler wrote in an April 26, 2006, e-mail. She wrote the letter in June 2006 offering the Savanna site.

Two months later, Frawley sought help from Obama, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee who is now running for president. Frawley met with Seamus Ahern, who runs Obama’s Moline office. Frawley and Ahern discussed the proposal over a period of about six months.

Obama and Blagojevich viewed Frawley’s efforts as a chance to create jobs in the Quad Cities area.”



39 responses to “Daniel Frawley sentencing December 20, 2011, Rezko partner, Deposition reveals Rezko payment to Obama, Companion Security link

  1. Good Morning CW, et. al.!

  2. Good Morning Everyone!!! Happy Tuesday!!! After reading Rezko’s letter to the judge it looked to me that the feds’ never confronted him on the Frawley vs. Weaver file…He seeme confident that he still had a friend in Barack Obama…and from what the feds said about him not “fully cooperating” seemed to back that up…I will try and find the letter…

  3. Good morning All!
    In response to a post from the previous thread……..

    Miri | December 12, 2011 at 10:00 pm |
    Jonah, for what it’s worth: A cursory check of 1920 census records for the most unusual names on Berg’s list shows little Patsy Capocci, little Charles Yasgur, little Harry Highkin, and little Roland Crisafi living IN CT with their respective parents. All were in CT in 1920. If they all died in HI, Berg still doesn’t know where they lived when they got their SS#’s. Anybody with access to census records can find these four. I didn’t check all the others because, frankly, I don’t have the time. But it’s likely all these people did live in CT at some point. And then they died in HI. Berg also misstates when Obama got his SS#. It was 1977, after they started assigning numbers by state of residence. Berg says 1972. He’s simply wrong. Or deliberately wrong, if you get my drift.
    Miri | December 12, 2011 at 10:00 pm |
    Good work!
    You’ve looked into enough census records to prove that those folks lived in CT at some time even though they later resided in Hawaii. That is likely the reason they were issued SS#s through CT, not because of some far out notion that Berg presented.

    In regard to Berg’s statement below:

    “According to the Social Security death index, the majority of the SSN’s issued for Hawaii residence were in fact issued out of CT, see below, there are thousands of records and were issued during the same time period as Obama’s was issued to him, which was in or about 1972”.

    Oh my! If you take a good look at Berg’s list, there is so much to dispute! Aside from the misspelling of residence (should be residents).

    First of all, Berg’s list was only a small portion of the entire SS Death Index for Hawaii. I pulled up the entire Hawaii list before rootsweb pulled the plug. The Index was sorted according to SS# and consequently grouped by state. Keep in mind the first 3 numerals are designated to a particular state. (I hope that makes sense)

    I researched further the four people you mentioned and discovered they all lived in Connecticut through adulthood. I found an obit for Highkin which says that he was born in CT and died in HI.

    Harry R. Highkin – Honolulu Star-Bulletin, The – (Aug/20/2007)
    Aug. 16, 2007
    Harry R. Highkin, 89, of Kailua-Kona, a California State University at Northridge professor emeritus and plant physiologist, died at home. He was born in New Haven, Conn……..

    And 3 of the 4 people were issued SS#s prior to 1951, not about 1972 as Berg stated. I find it difficult to believe that an attorney presented such shabby evidence. Surely someone else did the actual research.

  4. Good morning Zach, Bessie, et al.
    Thanks for the Rezko effort Bessie.

  5. yo,

    I hope my previous comment answered some of your questions.

    Miri and I researched four people listed on Berg’s list of those who resided in Hawaii and were issued SS#s through the state of Connecticut. All four had previously lived in CT as youths through adulthood. That would explain why they had CT issued SS#s. There is nothing I’m aware of that indicates that someone who never resided in CT would somehow be issued a CT SS#.

  6. ♫ O Come, O Come, Emmanuel (Veni…) ♫



    * * * *

    ♫ O Come, O Come, Emmanuel ♫



    Mathew 1:23 – “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” – which means, “God with us.”

    Isaiah 7:14
    “Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.”

    Our Forever Living Creator – Lord Jesus Christ Immanuel ~ Yeshua ~ Our Always Faithful & Always True Almighty & Infinite GOD, The Savior Of Humanity, GOD THE SON – The Messiah, In The Forever Living Infinite GOD The Most Holy Trinity, GOD The Father, Son, & Holy Spirit

    Many Holy Bible Forever Living Infinite Promises Of God Are Here:

    * * * *

    ♫ Glory Glory Glory To God ♫ Glory To God In The Highest ♫
    ♫ And Peace Peace Peace On The Earth ♫ Kids Choir ♫




    * * * *

  7. Berg’s BS gives the dishonest media an excuse to not cover the Obama phony SS number story. Same tactic Obama used when they put out the phony birth certificate, obfuscate the issue, and cloud the waters.

    It has almost become predictable.

  8. Jonah | December 13, 2011 at 8:55 am |


    I hope my previous comment answered some of your questions.

    Miri and I researched four people listed on Berg’s list of those who resided in Hawaii and were issued SS#s through the state of Connecticut. All four had previously lived in CT as youths through adulthood. That would explain why they had CT issued SS#s. There is nothing I’m aware of that indicates that someone who never resided in CT would somehow be issued a CT SS#.
    Could it be that Obama stole his number from the deceased file, of people originally from Connecticut. I remember granny had some connection with the SS, and had access to the system.

    Given the age of Obama’s SS number account, I wonder if Obama has been receiving a monthly check from the SS administration?

  9. good job jonah and miri!

    I think you’ve both shown enough to debunk berg’s explanation.

    And I think the reason they shut down the search site is because they really don’t want anyone doing an in depth study. It might lead to the truth.

    I wonder if berg even did that analysis. Probably done by some obot who sent it to berg, and berg ran with it thinking he had something.

    I still bet if we had the entire death list we wouldn’t find anyone who was born in hawaii and was the same age as obama and got a ssn from conn.

  10. Obama TAX Hiker and Redistributionist in Cheif.

    I wonder how all those liberal 2 income middle class family’s feel about this.

    Do they even know?


  11. The ssn is going to be the same as the bc. Mountains of misinformation will be thrown out there to give the msm some talking point for their man.

  12. A black guy, an illegal alien, a muslim, and a communist walk into a bar.

    The bartender asks, “What can I get you Mr. President ? “

  13. Jonah………………….
    I am having a lot of difficulty believing that Berg would not have dug any deeper. It would seem to me that any ATTORNEY,particularly one who was once held the office of assistant AG of a state would not examine his facts any closer than that. I tend to think that there might very well be an UNDERLYING motive involved. Perhaps a little selling out …..if you will. I can’t believe that he would expect that sort of crap to derail Orly. She is far too sharp to believe it at face value.

  14. Hi YO……………..
    Hey we got a heat wave going here in Allen County. It is going to be upwards to 52 degrees Wednesday. You folks get a lot of LAKE EFFECT weather. My step daughter just moved out of South Bend, to Elkhart. Easier for her to get to work.

  15. CW…………………….
    Wasn’t Frawley a “go between” for Soetoro and Blago? I seem to recall this having been mentioned once or twice.

  16. Pat 1789………………..
    I am certain that they will smile broadly, and volunteer even MORE in TAXES. Their gullibility knows NO BOUNDARIES.

  17. Jonah……………….
    Have you researched the Barry Soetoro name to see if there is a Connecticut connection? Can you find a SS# for the name Barry Soetoro?

  18. Jonah……………….
    It would seem that if the same SS# would show up for Barry Soetoro,that Obama is now using then this would tend to re inforce the evidence that the name was NEVER LEGALLY REINSTATED. This would also confirm my worst fear………..the US now has NO LEGALLY ELECTED POTUS.

  19. Let’s recap. How did we get to where we are today, and is it where we want to stay?

    Romney is supersmart from strong colleges with polished good looks, a stable marriage with a great wife and a strong belief in God. He doesn’t smoke and he doesn’t drink. While currently professing stong social and fiscal conservative positions where he would be the normal GOP nominee as he’s the most electable, many people feel he’s flipflopped too much and is the author of Romneycare.

    So now people are looking at Gingrich. He’s supersmart as well and comes off as the best debater who knows the most on the issues and has great ideas. And he’s willing to be a pit bull when we need a fighter against Obama, who we already know has said he will try to distroy the GOP candidate. While Gingrich has converted to Catholism and has a current stable marriage, his previous personal bad behavior and a lack of previous message discipline is off-putting to some.

    That brings us to Rick Perry who was suppose to save the Republican party, but his very poor performances in the early debates made him tank fast. He seems too liberal on the immigration issue, and he also has flipflopped on issues during his career. It seems the people who encouraged him to jump into the race did the GOP a great disservice because others stayed out of the race once Perry got in.

    That brings us to Glenn Beck, who called the birthers idiots, but is willing to support a third party candidate in Ron Paul which almost certainly will hand the election back to Obama just as it did to Bill Clinton in the 90’s. Who is the idiot now, Mr. Beck? Mr. Paul is also too isolationist for the general election and too willing to pull support from Israel during a time when the GOP has some chance to win over more Jewish voters as evidenced in the election to replace Anthony Weiner when a republican won in a very blue district in NY

    That leaves us with Jon Huntsman who normally would be considered to be a conservative candidate with his push for flat taxes and years of successful governship in Utah. He also has a long stable marriage, is a great debater and has extensive experience in foreign policy. While he is somewhat isolationist like Ron Paul, he also is a very strong supporter of Israel. Jon Huntsman did very well in the debate with Newt Gingrich. It seems like he would be the second choice for Ron Paul supporters and conservative types except that he accepted an ambassadorship under Barack Obama who wanted to create this problem for Huntsman so he would be taken out of the GOP race. The question is will the GOP allow Obama’s strategy to work?

    Then we have Rick Santorum and Michelle Bachmann. Both are sharp, articulate and good debaters with consistent conservative records and strong marriages. But they have not caught on with the public recently, even though, Bachmann won the Ames Iowa straw poll. Will this change? They certainly are campaigning hard to make things happen for them in the coming weeks.

    The next debate is Thursday night. I’m looking forward to see if it changes anything. No one is going to be perfect. We will have to decide soon.

  20. Jonah…………….
    I would also strongly suspect that John Roberts knew that there was a great deal of suspicion of Soetoro at the time he swore him in as POTUS. If this is true then John Roberts is now complicit in the fraudulant election, because he failed to take any action to learn the truth.

  21. Chief Justice Roberts could have went before Congress and simply said “There is a great deal of evidence which seems to indicate that the person who I am about to swear in as POTUS is NOT ELIGIBLE to hold that office, and until you can determine his exact status I will NOT swear him into the OFFICE OF POTUS.” John Roberts FAILED to INITIATE, or take any action that could have cleared all of our present problem up. That said, he is now PART OF THE PROBLEM.

  22. Tina……………
    You might take an in depth look at how well ROMNEY CARE worked in Massachussetts. The state allegedly LOST several BILLION dollars in it’s application. Suek has some insight to this. If Romney would accidently win the election and was successful in applying Obamacare then it is probable that the US will end up a Socialist Country, including a Canada type healthcare system. Canadians must think great things about their healthcare system………..COULD THAT BE WHY SO MANY OF THEM COME TO THE US FOR THEIR HEALTHCARE TREATMENTS,OR HOSPITALISATION?

  23. If Romney ends up as the Nominee for the Repubs,and he runs against Soetoro, he will LOSE, and you and I will have another 4 years of Soetoro. Some people think this would be great. I think it will bring a PERMANENT END to the Republic of the US. NO Offense, just my own viewpoint.

  24. Some folks say that they have a lot of Foreign Policy experience. They sometimes think that a two week visit to a foreign country makes them GURUs relating to US POLICY towards that country. This is about as far from reality as you can get. It takes YEARS to develop even a relatively SMALL level of experience in foreign policy. Many so called AMBASSADORS have discovered the hard way that they in actuality know very damn little about the job that they accepted. In reality you NEVER STOP acquiring experience while engaged in either APPLYING, or SETTING foreign policy. The ONLY candidate in the REPUBLICAN who can honestly say that he has some foreign policy experience is in fact Newt Gingrich. The rest are like SCHOOL CHILDREN. Including Romney.

  25. …………..We don’t need a SNOT NOSED CHILD trying to apply foreign policy. You have seen for the last three years what results from a complete nitwit as POTUS does for our foreign policy. He becomes one of the FOREIGNERS………..NOT GOOD AT ALL!


    By J. Christian Adams
    December 11, 2011


    “Just when you thought Attorney General Eric Holder couldn’t get more sordid and arrogant, he has. His testimony last week before the House Judiciary Committee took the scandal plagued Justice Department into territory not traveled since John Mitchell worked overtime to conceal administration wrongdoing nearly four decades ago. Even Chairman Darrell Issa recognizes the comparison is appropriate.


    “[…] [A] counter-rally organized by Catherine Engelbrecht and True the Vote will greet Eric Holder’s appearance in Austin, Texas at the LBJ Library at 4 p.m. America is invited, and here is a flier with details.

    You have a First Amendment right to petition your government for redress of grievances. Use it. So rarely has so much been worth grieving.

    As bad as Watergate was, it didn’t involve hundreds of murders, dead American law enforcement agents, and the illegal distribution of thousands of firearms. How long has it been since an Attorney General appeared before Congress and words such as “contempt” and “impeachment” were used by members as they were last week?

    The Fast and Furious scandal isn’t the only mess overseen by Eric Holder. His entire tenure has been characterized by racialist radicalism, disguised to some critics as mere incompetence. But it is far worse than incompetence, and to think otherwise is a mistake.”

    Read The Full Article Here: http://biggovernment.com/jcadams/2011/12/11/holder-plans-major-announcement-on-voting-laws-tuesday-patriots-plan-counter-rally/#more-389044

  27. Starla………………
    You posted a great read. Christian Adams seems to be seeing 20-20.

  28. Well it appears that (Eric the A-RAB), is going to become a LEGISLATOR. How about that! Of course I will just have to WAIT AND SEE………….like everybody!

  29. BYE BYE ALL……….Got to move ,the roof of my dirty little trailer is leaking!

  30. CW and Bessie,

    There are some interesting facts that have not received the attention deserved.

    1. One of Daniel T Frawley’s handlers was AUSA Carolyn McNiven.
    2. Piper Rudnick law firm was involved in contract process for rebuilding Iraq.
    3. AUSA Carolyn McNiven was also very active in both the Tony Rezko and John(Bernard Barton)Thomas cases.
    4. Carolyn McNiven is now a partner with DLA Piper (formally Piper Rudnik, Daniel Mahru’s old law firm) Peter Bynoe (Obama inner circle & Piper Rudnick) is senior counsel with DLA Piper.

    I will leave it there for now.

  31. One more fact for now, before going to work at the U.S. Attorneys office, Carolyn McNiven worked at the law firm Winston & Strawn.

  32. Thanks Whistleblower



    “As soon as December 13, the President will sign NDAA Section 1031 into law, permitting citizen imprisonment without evidence or trial. The bill that passed Congress absolutely DOES NOT exempt citizens. The text of Section 1031 reads, “A covered person under this section” includes “any person who has committed a belligerent act”. We only have to be ACCUSED, because we don’t get a trial.

    – Confusingly, Obama threatened a veto for 1032, but NOT 1031. 1032 is UNRELATED to imprisoning citizens without a trial. He has never suggested using a veto to stop Section 1031 citizen imprisonment — in fact, it was requested by the Obama administration. Watch the video for proof.

    – The Feinstein Amendment 1031(e) is dangerously misleading. Don’t be fooled: In the text of 1031(e), “Nothing in this section shall be construed…”, the only word that matters is “construed” because the Supreme Court are the only ones with the power to construe the law. The Feinstein Amendment 1031(e) permits citizens to be imprisoned without evidence or a trial forever, if the Supreme Court does not EXPLICITLY repeal 1031.

    – Any time you hear the words, “requirement for military custody” this refers to 1032 NOT 1031. We MUST not confuse these two sections. In its statements, the Obama administration has actually contributed to the confusion about 1032’s “requirement for military custody”, which is COMPLETEY UNRELATED to Section 1031 citizen imprisonment without trial. These tricky, misleading words appear even in major news stories. Don’t fall for it!

    If we act urgently to tell our friends, family, and colleagues, we may still be able to prevent this. Here is what we can do:

    1) Americans must know about this to stop it. Urgently pass this petition as widely as possible: http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-ndaa-section-1031-citizen-imprisonment-l

    2) Spread this C-SPAN video evidence. People deserve to watch this before he signs it.

    3) Write and call your Representative and Senator telling them to stop NDAA Section 1031 and the dangerously misleading Feinstein Amendment 1031(e).

    Contact your Representative: http://writerep.house.gov/writerep/
    Contact your Senator:


    4) Write and call the White House to tell the President you won’t sit by and watch NDAA Section 1031 and the dangerously misleading Feinstein Amendment 1031(e) become law:”


    Article & Video Here:

  34. @ Tina | December 13, 2011 at 2:02 pm |

    Let’s not forget Newt Limbaugh who has decided to spend 3 or 4 hours a day lying about Republicans and Mitt Romney using Obama talking points.
    What a sell out.
    I now see why he supported that socialist GW Bush for 8 years, he’s one of them.

  35. HOLY SH!T Whistleblower, I found out recently that Frawley has partnered up with Dan Mahru….I can’t get into details on this forum…but this is pretty interesting….

  36. “Barry made friends quickly and told his classmates that his father was an African prince, the leader of a proud and successful people.”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s