To Sean Hannity, Fox News, From Citizen Wells, Philip J Berg, Lawsuit, Obama not qualified, Obama not US citizen, Obama Indonesian citizen, Citizenwells blog covering story, Bloggers cover, Is Obama an Illegal Alien?

Here is the basis for the complaint from Philip J Berg’s website:

“Berg filed this suit for the best interests of the Democratic Party and the citizens of the United States.“Eighteen million Democratic Primary voters donated money, volunteered their time and energy, worked very hard and then not only supported Senator Clinton, but voted for her and often recruited other supporters as well. All the efforts of supporters of legitimate citizens were for nothing because this man lied and cheated his way into a
Philip J. Berg, Esquire stated in his lawsuit that Senator Obama:

1. Is not a natural-born citizen; and/or

2. Lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia; and/or

3. Has dual loyalties because of his citizenship with Kenya and Indonesia.

Berg stated: “I filed this action at this time to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”

Coverage of this story.

There is a great amount of interest in this story from the American
people and the Citizen Wells articles are ranking high on WordPress. Where is the MSM? Fox News has covered Obama more than the other TV networks. Sean Hannity is trying to reveal the truth about Obama. Is the Fox Network
restraining Hannity? Sean Hannity, have you covered the lawsuit
by Philip J Berg and subsequent service on Obama, the DNC and the FEC?
This is a real story, with documented facts. Sean Hannity, are you
going to cover this story?

The Citizen Wells blog has covered this story from the beginning. We have received much help from other bloggers and American Citizens that
want the truth about Obama. I would like to thank everyone that has
provided input and support. Here are some of the articles from this
blog starting with the first:

We were given a heads up earlier that a complaint was being filed in US District Court, Eastern District of PA. The complaint is a follows: “for an emergency temporary restraining order prohibiting Obama from running for president, and enjoining the DNC from nominating Obama as the Democratic presidential candidate.”

How will Barack, Barry, the Democratic National committee and the Federal Election commission react?

Obama and the Obama Campaign will attack and use diversions.

So far, the Obama Campaign can only provide a fake COLB. Will that impress the judge?

How will the delegates to the Democratic National Convention react? Will they continue to stick their heads in the sand?
The Philadelphia Times Herald has an update on the status of the temporary restraining order and the lawsuit. Here are some exerpts:

“A day earlier, Philip Berg filed a motion for a temporary restraining order in federal court in Philadelphia questioning the authenticity of Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate and claiming the Illinois senator was actually born in Kenya, according to court papers.
Though the motion was denied, Berg said he was encouraged that Judge R. Barclay Surrick did not dismiss the lawsuit. The litigation also sought “expedited discovery.”
“We’re still waiting to serve the senator,” Berg said in a telephone interview Wednesday. Discovery would include examining the candidate’s birth certificate and adoption papers, among other documents, Berg said.”
I received an update from Philip J Berg last night regarding the status of service on Obama:

“No I have not received confirmation Senator Obama and/or his Congressional Office has been served.  When I filed the Federal lawsuit on Thursday, 8/21/2008 in the afternoon, the Clerk of the Court mailed the Summons to my office.  You cannot conduct service without the summons.  Once all paperwork was received the documents were sent to Washington D.C. for Service.  I am in Pennsylvania.”

Service of the lawsuit on Barack Obama:

Sean Hannity, we are not picking on you, in fact, you may be the only major player on TV with the guts and integrity to cover this story and reveal the truth about Obama.

Sean Hannity, will you cover this story?

15 responses to “To Sean Hannity, Fox News, From Citizen Wells, Philip J Berg, Lawsuit, Obama not qualified, Obama not US citizen, Obama Indonesian citizen, Citizenwells blog covering story, Bloggers cover, Is Obama an Illegal Alien?

  1. NEW VIDEO from this mornings BO interview with George Stephanopolous.

    “Yes, Obama said “John McCain has never questioned my Muslim faith””

  2. Hi CW,

    This from this morning.
    “There’s many a slip ‘twixt the cup and the lip!”

  3. I have listened to Hannity on the radio, along with his long time friend and guest Levine. Both have great minds and know how to motivate us – bring out information that we could never get from the msm.

    BUT (the “but” monkey) they are just as guilty, when it comes to these allegations/stories/accusations, (including Sinclair/Obama/Young) – since they are well aware they exist and will not report. They keep asking, “WHEN is the msm going to vet BO?”.

    Hannity was the pioneer on the Rezko & Wright/Trinity stories, but he can’t bring himself to ask about Donald Young… because asking about Young, you must link to homosexuality… and then eventually, you arrive at Larry Sinclair.

    Racking my brain over this, sometimes I think there is a general view that the LS story would not hurt BO voter base, since history has shown, those who have made these types of “mistakes” in the past have been re-elected. So perhaps they don’t want to waste their (reporting) time (?) on this type of “scandal”. Regardless of outcome, BO could still run for President.

    I think discovering that BO is NOT a US Citizen, is explosive and would put a LEGAL response on his candidacy. That could not be fought, period. The voter base could not have any influence over this discovery – and BO could not run for President.

    While the press and Democrats continue to vet Palin, NOBODY is vetting BO.

    I do not have the knowledge as to WHO (which branch of government), would be the one(s) to investigate and challenge Obama’s citizenship.

    If there was a respected, media person AND politician out there, that could put this issue to REST, it should be done.

  4. from

    ” “Yes, Obama said “John McCain has never questioned my Muslim faith” ”

    Obama is blaming RNC for reigniting the question of his religious faith… but then makes the above comment.

    Speaking from your heart is always easy when what you are saying is the truth.

  5. p.s. Donald Young was MURDERED. This is a CRIME. Finding his murderer could also eliminate another blemish on the Obama campaign for President of the United States of America.

  6. I have started listening to Hannity’s radio show recently. He sounds like he would have the guts to cover this story, but I’m not sure that he will. Will anyone?

  7. What is telling in the link cited by Mighty Quinn, is not just that Obama was corrected on his statement, but the obvious discomfort he manifested with the correction. Its just as telling as the the “freudian” slip.

  8. UNCONFIRMED comment heard moments ago on FOX(lead from that BO has a new campaign speech stating that he is WILLING TO KEEP THE BUSH TAX CUTS !! ???HUH??????????????? His base will think he’s smoked crack !

    You are “here”.


    Has Obama miraculously changed into a REPUBLICAN? I guess changing your pants, is like changing your religion. Both are acceptable to his follower’s.

  10. Hannity …!!!
    JUST DO IT !!!!
    Expose this FRAUD…..Obama

  11. “Comeback kid Clinton as the last president of the US” script.

    Clinton endorses Obama = theater to help Obama’s crowd accept to support Clinton, once Obama, after the coming “scandal”, will be “forced” to exit the “race”.

    Obama’s role: voting machines count Clinton’s 5 pct votes correctly.

    Role of senile McCain as alternative to next “elected” president Clinton: prove that the illuminati can sell ANYTHING to the “human cattle”.

    To understand Obama all you need is to google:

    MattMarriott illuminati agenda Obama for dummies


    Ron Paul = Obama = Alex Jones = illuminati agent



    New Hampshire primary 2008 and 2004 for dummies: Obama’s role explained, or How can Hillary Clinton win with 5 pct of the votes?

    The magic: voting machines + the candidate who is supposed to lose.

    Reminder: Obama and Ron Paul role is to confirm that illuminati media polls are legit and voting machines count Clinton’s votes correctly.

    All has been explained long ago:


    Dear Sean Hannity,
    Tonight there is a local TV channel program in the greater Rancho Mirage,Ca. areas which is discussing and showing the mortgage failures and the problem for these homeowners to get help to get lower mortgage payments from their mortgage companies to help them avoid foreclosure on their houses. The point was made over and over that they got foreclosed even though they called the lender to get help in this matter. My question-What happened to all of this money which was given to these institutions to prevent the homeowner from losing their homes by helping them pay a reduced amt. of a
    payment every month. There were stories over and over that they did not get this help. What
    happened to all of this money given by the federal goverment? This looks like a huge crime
    that would demand a quick investigation before
    they hide what they have done with the “help money” to prevent foreclosure from occurring.
    WHERE DID IT ALL GO???.I can not believe that they do not know where this money has all
    gone since it is such new money .

    Rachel Waters, Rancho Mirage,Ca.

  13. While Obama supporters distract citizens from the obviously stated Constitutional requirement for Presidency, the “strict” construction approach should be the first interpretation to consider, not the last. Before enumerating the vast powers the designers were to provide whoever would become President of the United States, those same designers created the filters upon which we focus here. I believe we must approach the understanding of those safeguards with the amount of caution that at least equals the amount of care required to prevent the most remote possibility of any abusive usurpation of such a powerful office (“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America”). Remember, whereas the other two branches of Federal government have many checks and balances within, the executive has none.

    The U.S. Constitution does not state “No Person except a born citizen”, which, even as such, would certainly appear to address ambiguities of naturalization via the several scenarios of congenital citizenship, those being the birth under the concurrent citizenship of none, one, or both parents. The designers added the word, ‘natural’, a further requirement.

    To further emphasize the care given to the most prominent and cardinal requirement, removing the subordinate adjectival and adverbial phrases, it would become most clear: “No Person except a natural born Citizen shall be eligible to the Office of President,” the full phrase being “[cardinal] No Person except a natural born Citizen [subordinate follows], or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,[subordinate ends here] shall be eligible to the Office of President;[secondary starts here]neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

    At this point, I hope you are receptive to the next point, the meaning of ‘natural’. When something occurs ‘naturally’, such as applies to citizenship wrought by birth, its meaning typically incurs that such was ‘inevitable’, ‘without question’, ‘exclusively so’, ‘predictable’, ‘not synthetic’, ‘not acquired’, ‘not contrived’. Simply, no questions of citizenship from the natural processes or components that produced the baby in question would need to be addressed, altered, or remedied. While I was not, my sisters were naturalized because the status of their citizenship had to be remedied, which would affect the natural citizenship of the birthing of their own children; so, I am familiar with both the meaning and history of the terms. I am also aware (and so you must be from your own statements, maybe without realizing it until now) that many persons throughout history who were not naturally a citizen have wished to be accepted ‘naturally’ as a member of a particular nation; such pleadings and reaffirmations are as old as the history of nations. So, it is never surprising to hear historically (or currently, from members of the Federal government) that the phrase ‘natural born’ had been in use incorrectly; thus, the incessant need for clarification throughout history and thus the selection of the word ‘natural’ in addition to ‘born citizen’.

    As described above, the lack of interest to uphold the Constitution’s safeguarding of this powerful office is treasonous. It is not a light, 4-vote matter. The only top-level member of the three branches that appears innocent is Justice Clarence Thomas; still, he probably feels very dirty each day he executes his affirmed duties and responsibilities. Know that the anger regarding this grows daily.

    Not to emphasize circumstantial evidence, Obama’s known associations (not just Bill Ayers), Obama’s wife’s shameless statement, “For the first time in my life, I was proud to be an American,” and Obama’s recent Trash-the-US tour are the U.S. Constitution framers’ telling us, “We told you so.”

    John Freeman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s