I reported many weeks ago, after reading the allegations by Larry Sinclair that he and Obama used drugs and engaged in gay sex in November 1999, that Obama was absent from the Illinois Senate on November 4, 1999. We have proof that Larry Sinclair was in Chicago from November 3 to November 8, 1999. We now know that Obama was in Chicago on November 8, 1999. We also know that the Illinois Senate was not in session again until November 16, 1999.
Obama was in Chicago at least by November 8, 1999 to speak at Public Interest Law Week at Northwestern University School of Law. Obama was a speaker at the 12:00 Noon Keynote Address on Monday, November 8, 1999.
So now we know that both Larry Sinclair and Obama were in Chicago at the same time.
We have allegations from a former chef in Chicago of persistent rumors from the gay community in Chicago that Obama was on the down low.
We also have allegations from Reverend Manning that Obama and Jeremiah Wright are closet homosexuals. Reverend Manning states that he has solid proof.
Here is a link to the Public Interest Law Week at Northwestern University School of Law:
http://www.law.northwestern.edu/news/Fall99/PubIntLWeek/Schedule2.htm
Here is a link to Larry Sinclair’s blog:
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/
Here is a link to an interview of Reverend Manning:
http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_Pastor_J_Manning_051208.mp3
Do you still believe Larry Sinclair’s allegations are far fetched? Remember. We know that Obama has used cocaine before.
Citizen WElls 
Pingback: It would be a public service if some credible news service would investigate Larry Sinclair’s allegations of drug use and gay sex with Obama in 1999. « Zachjonesishome’s Weblog
Is this a complete joke? I am constantly amazed at what passes for “news” on this self-proclaimed unbiased website. Citizen, where’s your coverage of the polygraph Larry Sinclair took, and then failed when questioned about his gay affair with Obama? Surprising that that story slipped through your net.
Stanton.
I am totally aware of this story, inside and out.
What you have stated is a misrepresentation and
basically a lie.
Stanton, I failed a polygraph once, even down to giving my real name, while investigating their use and abuse back in my days as a news reporter/anchor. There’s a reason that polygraphs aren’t accepted as evidence in most American courtrooms: they’re grossly inaccurate. And in Larry Sinclair’s case, keep in mind, the (unbiased) computer passed Sinclair. It was the human examiner who considered SOME of Sinclair’s responses untruthful… the human examiner who a) hooked the machine up incorrectly; and b) got his supposed doctorate from an online diploma mill.
In any case, I’ve been hearing rumors concerning Obama’s sexuality for the better part of a decade now. I didn’t even learn of Larry Sinclair until April… but his allegations support the similar stories I’ve heard from other Chicago-area gay men. So Sinclair or no Sinclair, I have dozens of reasons to believe that Obama genuinely does have clandestine sexual encounters with men. And frankly the allegations about drug use resonate with me, too.
I have no objections whatsoever to having a gay or lesbian president — in many ways I’d welcome it, depending on the individual. But I have serious objections to having a lying, deceitful, legislatively unimpressive drug user as president.
Delenn
I love you
My exact sentiments
Just a thought – As we know, Sen. Obama has stated that he would sit down with the enemies of the United States as part of his foreign diplomacy position. The degree of preparation before such meetings and whether it would be interpreted as appeasement or lack of resolve are questions for others. I just wonder if the Democratic leadership has thought about the huge logistical consequences and embarrassment to the United States’ diplomacy efforts if the President is discovered at some point to be bisexual and an adulterer.
Are they willing to be responsible for those and any other legitimate consequences, especially given that they are fully aware of the allegations and have chosen not to act or require investigation into the veracity of the charges? I would bet that Al Jazeera and other foreign news services are monitoring the rumors about the candidates that are circulating on the internet and that they will likely withhold comment until the most politically damaging effect to the United States can be achieved. The U.S., the great Satan, might be being led by a bisexual adulterer as its President -WOW. It seems as though the Democratic leadership should think about this. Therefore, I suggest that not only must the allegations be investigated and the truth discovered, but if the charges have any possibility of being true – they need to be affirmatively disproved by Sen. Obama. All he needs to do is prove he was not in Chicago during the time in question. This allegation, true or not, could very well further damage the reputation of the United States.
Pingback: FACT: Obama is a Homosexual « The Obambi.com Blog
sisterrosetta, I love you, too… I remember your posts on Larry’s site from when I first began posting there, after I’d been irked half to death by Paul of “cesspool” fame’s misquoting my information on his blog (when I initially posted only at savagepolitics.com). So it was, ironically, the Obama faithful themselves who sent me to Larry’s site, which led me to send a detailed account to Larry’s lawyer regarding all the rumors I heard when I still had my restaurant. I’m delighted to run into you here at the good Citizen’s site.
And I’ll keep “doing you proud,” my sister.
Delenn // May 22, 2008 at 3:58 am:
How have you heard rumors of Obama being on the Down Low? Are you in the Chicago area?
Lee, I think you are right on in your post. The dems talk about how America has lost respect and on and on, well what kind of respect do you think America will have if a gay/bi adulter sitting down with enemies. They will laugh at him.
Saw an interesting piece on MSNBC yesterday, it was a quote from JFK and the after time, after his meeting with Khrushcev. And basically it came down to JFK’s lack of expierence leading to the Cuban Missile Crisis. I can see the same thing with Obama but this time we are not talking about Russia who did have some cool heads in place we are talking about countries who have/want nuclear weapons and are not afraid to use them. I prey for America and Israel if Obama somehow gets elected.
Vote informed.
I put together an article using many of the posts that are listed here. They are cited as endnotes. I submitted it to RCP but I doubt it will be approved. This is just a heads up. http://zachjonesishome.wordpress.com/
I continue to be amazed by how many people (1) accept the validity of polygraphs as conclusive (when the courts don’t), (2) mention that Sinclair failed the polygraph, (3) but fail to mention the questionable credentials of the administrator, (4) fail to mention that the video of the tests has never been released as promised, (5) fail to mention that the test was reviewed by another “expert” who “agreed” with the results but noted severl issues in its administration that could have caused errors, and (6) that the computer analysis of the test actually reflected that Sinclair passed the test.
Perhaps we should ask how it will be handled if Obama were to win in Nov, and he and his personal assistant travel to Iran for talks, and God forbed a Sinclair moment occur in a countryt where that is punishable by death! Sound absurd– do we want to test Iran??
I have had a number of polygraphs done on me due to my security clearances and jobs working in Critical National Security related positions and places most of my life; starting with the Military and my MOS being Nuclear/Chemical/Biological Weapons.
There are very good reason that all proper polygraph tests are conducted a minimum of 3 times before they are analyzed and determinations are made.
1: A control test on the individual in order to record the physiological and neurological baselines that individual has as their unique biology.
2: Normal Polygraph test.
3: Normal Polygraph test.
4: Then you have to compare the Control Test to the other two polygraphs in order to get a reasonable result, analysis, and determination of ones truthfulness or deceptiveness.
The suspicious thing is the polygraph conducted on Mr. Sinclair did not follow those guidelines and there were other procedural errors noted which were committed either by accident or willful intent during the process. Not to mention the suspicious nature of the aftermath of it by whitehouse.com and others.
What I find so irritating and irresponsible about the general public and most notably Obama supporters; is if it were in turn reported Mr. Sinclair passed the polygraph (which he did anyway), these same sorts of people would have just as proudly and hypocritically stated:
“Polygraphs are know to be unreliable and that is why they are inadmissible in a court of law. The polygraph means nothing, it is irrelevant.”
On that note it will inevitably be asked by some ignorant people:
“Oh Yea? Just what level of Polygraph did you have to take.”
I have had the highest level of polygraph including CI, and Full Scope/Lifestyle. I have also been cleared up to and including TS/SSBI/CNWDI SCI; if you don’t know what those mean, you shouldn’t be asking stupid questions to begin with.
The article did get posted and started getting votes like crazy. I took my dog for a walk and when I got back it was taken off RCP. Oh well. Truth will get out on this.
I like the additional technical polygraph information posted here. Thank you for your work.
One last thing, I promise. It anyone would like to copy and post the article elsewhere. You have my permission. No acknowledgment is necessary.
Pingback: U. S. Diplomacy and Why Larry Sinclair’s allegations of gay sex and drug use must be investigated.,Zach Jones blog « Citizen Wells
Hi, Madison…
Yes, I do live in the Chicago area. I was a chef/restaurant owner here until several years ago. During that time, I heard from several dozen different Chicagoland gay men that Obama was bisexual. Their details closely correspond with Larry Sinclair’s account. This was several years before Obama’s presidential run… he was simply a local politician, part of the same dark Chicago political machine that makes that of my home area (Washington, DC) seem almost tame by comparison. Back then, all I knew of Obama was that he was an extremely mediocre legislator and was one of the dirtiest campaigners I’ve ever encountered… and I come from a politically involved family, and had previously known many a less-than-clean politician. I’m honestly astonished that anyone considers him capable of leading this country in any direction except down.
Pingback: Blagojevich to Speak at Northwestern Illinois University, The Daily Northwesterner, Obama speech November 8 1999, Ethical?, well educated people?, ask pointed questions?, Rigging of IL Health Board, Obama ties « Citizen WE lls
Pingback: Obama 2000 tax return raises questions, Obama drug use left him more or less broke?, Obamas adjusted gross income over 240K, Obama Larry Sinclair Stuart Levine | Citizen WElls