Tag Archives: 2001

Clinton to blame for 9/11, CIA officials reveal what went wrong, E-mail from a recently retired high-ranking CIA official, CIA never recovered from the “Human Rights Scrub” policy, Reported by NewsMax on September 11, 2001

Clinton to blame for 9/11, CIA officials reveal what went wrong, E-mail from a recently retired high-ranking CIA official, CIA never recovered from the “Human Rights Scrub” policy, Reported by NewsMax on September 11, 2001

“August 1998: covert operations limited to a ‘capture operation,’ not kill
As will be shown, Clinton vacillated over signing a memo that would authorize the killing of bin Laden. He first authorized only a capture, then agreed to allow bin Laden’s killing, only to weaken the language later. CIA officials were under the impression they did not have permission to kill the al-Qaeda leader.”…Washington Post February 16, 2016

“I could have killed’ Osama bin Laden in 1998”…Bill Clinton

“Clinton policies reached their zenith under CIA Director John Deutch and his top assistant, Nora Slatkin. The pair ran Clinton’s CIA in the mid-1990s and implemented a “human rights scrub” policy.”
“After that, each asset had to be certified as being ‘clean for human rights violations.’
“What this did was to put off limits, in effect, terrorists, criminals, and anyone else who would have info on these kinds of people.”
Roger says the CIA, even under new leadership, has never recovered from the “Human Rights Scrub” policy.”…NewsMax September 11, 2001

 

 

Yesterday Citizen Wells proved proof, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the Clinton Administration was most responsible for 9/11.

https://citizenwells.com/2016/09/10/911-15th-anniversary-september-11-2016-clinton-administration-most-responsible-citizen-wells-proof-bill-clinton-multiple-opportunities-to-capture-bin-ladin-ins-weakened-by-clinton-political-agen/

 

Reported by NewsMax on September 11, 2001.

 

“Common sense, in fact, dictates that we need to critically examine the people who are to blame for this incident, both the perpetrators (and if you believe Osama bin Laden was the major mastermind behind this, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell you) and the people we pay to protect us – that is, our national security agencies.

Without question, these agencies failed miserably in preventing this sophisticated, wide-scale and coordinated attack against America.

Tuesday I received an e-mail from a recently retired high-ranking CIA official. I will identify him as “Harry”:

Here’s what Harry said:

“… Reacting effectively and justly to this [attack] makes us hugely dependent on intell [intelligence] capabilities that failed us miserably. This is an enormous liability, which we shall not be able to fix before we have to react. Payback time for the last eight years!”

He continued: “There were clearly enormous failures here. This operation was ingenious in its simplicity, which would have limited the size (number of people, actions) of the operation and hence detectability. But it could not have been that small for at least a dozen men to hijack four carefully chosen aircraft (routes, fuel load) with carefully coordinated timing. And to get through security with knives big enough to subdue four relatively large crews. If the intell and security systems claim that this challenge is simply too hard for them, they have to be replaced, root and branch. Because this challenge is the challenge. It is now pretty self-evident that claims of reform and adjustment [at the intelligence agencies] to new realities that we’ve heard over the past eight years or so are hollow.”

Of course, it’s obvious why the media doesn’t want any finger pointing.

Guess who ran the U.S. government and was responsible for our national security for the past eight years?

The Clintons were supported vociferously by the media through the worst imaginable scandals.

During that time I was one of the lead reporters opposing the Clintons. I was mocked and vilified by my colleagues for doing so.

I said throughout that period that Bill Clinton’s personal corruption was wholesale and mirrored how he was corrupting America’s national security.

I wrote articles and said repeatedly that America, sadly, may end up paying a heavy price for Bill Clinton and the major media’s complicity.

I don’t believe the worst has passed with the incidents of today.

We remain vulnerable and weak.

Brutally, we witnessed our weakness today.

During eight years, Clinton decimated America’s military. Our forces were cut almost in half under his stewardship.

Research and development on all new weapons systems were brought almost to a halt as other nations continued to build. Clinton destroyed nearly our entire arsenal of tactical nuclear weapons. Monsters like Saddam flourished as Clinton bombed aspirin factories, tent cities in Afghanistan and worthless radar stations in the Iraqi desert.

These are open facts, easily verifiable.

But Clinton, the ever clever bastard, was more insidious. Little, systematic changes were undertaken to destroy America’s intelligence agencies.

Let me explain. A regular NewsMax reader, “Roger,” was a CIA spy in the Mideast.

I met him almost two years ago. Roger wanted to tell me why a gung-ho American quit the CIA in disgust.

Roger said the CIA was not interested in recruiting spies.

Clinton and company knew they could not just tell the CIA to stop recruiting spies. That would look stupid and embarrassing.

So they just changed the rules of how spies are recruited, raising the bar on requirements to such a high degree that the most valuable spies could never meet CIA standards and couldn’t work for us.

Previously, I wrote how Clinton effectively stopped the recruitment of Chinese nationals by demanding that only high-ranking embassy officials could be recruited – knowing this is almost impossible. Roger told me that. Roger reminded me again of this today.

He noted that Clinton policies reached their zenith under CIA Director John Deutch and his top assistant, Nora Slatkin. The pair ran Clinton’s CIA in the mid-1990s and implemented a “human rights scrub” policy.

Here’s how Roger described it in an e-mail Tuesday evening: “Deutch and Nora, Clinton’s anti-intelligence plants, implemented a universal ‘human rights scrub’ of all assets, virtually shutting down operations for 6 months to a year. This was after something happened in Central America (there was an American woman involved who was the common law wife of a commie who went missing there) that got a lot of bad press for the agency.

“After that, each asset had to be certified as being ‘clean for human rights violations.’

“What this did was to put off limits, in effect, terrorists, criminals, and anyone else who would have info on these kinds of people.”

Roger says the CIA, even under new leadership, has never recovered from the “Human Rights Scrub” policy.

Perhaps that was the intention.

But we, the American people, Congress, and honest media need to examine all of these issues, now and quickly. If we don’t, we risk even more grave dangers than those that we just lived through.”

Read more:

http://www.newsmax.com/Pre-2008/CIA-Officials-Reveal-What/2001/09/11/id/663541/

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Advertisements

Senator Sleaze Lady Hillary Sets New Lows, Hillary Clinton vulgar mouth foul temper and reprehensible behavior, NewsMax January 26, 2001, White House staffers were employed for purely political purposes in furtherance of her self orchestrated campaign

Senator Sleaze Lady Hillary Sets New Lows, Hillary Clinton vulgar mouth foul temper and reprehensible behavior, NewsMax January 26, 2001, White House staffers were employed for purely political purposes in furtherance of her self orchestrated campaign

“Well, I don’t know if they read the NY Post. I think the Hillary appeal has always been somewhat about her mix of toughness and sympathy for her. Let’s not forget, and I’ll be brutal, the reason she’s a US Senator, the reason she’s a candidate for President, the reason she may be a front runner, is that her husband messed around.

That’s how she got to be a Senator from New York. We keep forgetting it. She didn’t win it on her merit, she won because everybody felt, “My God, this woman stood up under humiliation, right? That’s what happened! That’s how it happened.”…Chris Matthews

“I think the most compelling thing about Hillary is that she will stop at nothing to achieve her end and that she views the public as plebeians easily seduced into believing her point of view.”
“I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.”
“Hillary must NEVER become President”…Linda Tripp

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

From NewsMax  January 26, 2001.

“Sen. Sleaze, Lady Hillary, Sets New Lows”

“And put aside all of the numerous documented accounts of her vulgar mouth, foul temper, and reprehensible behavior.

Just look at the sleaze oozed by Lady Hillary both during her campaign, and since her election, as a U.S. senator from New York.

She used and abused official White House government-paid resources in the conduct of her own political campaign from the beginning.

Recall that White House staffers were employed for purely political purposes in furtherance of her self-orchestrated campaign from the very start. That is wrong and against the law.

Remember the use of Air Force aircraft – at taxpayer expense – to travel from Washington to New York for blatantly political “official” events, to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars scammed from the public treasury.

Then there was the use and abuse of White House facilities and events to actually raise campaign money for her Senate bid, from “special” invitations to state dinners to overnight stays in the Lincoln bedroom to trips on Air Force One – all for the express purpose of shaking down political contributions.”

“She refused to appear on any of the national Sunday political news talk shows and generally avoided real contact with the media throughout the campaign, always fearful of subjecting herself to tough questioning.

She ran television ads purportedly showing average New Yorkers, who were then exposed as Democrat partisans posing as unbiased voters, casting aspersions against her opponent, then-Rep. Rick Lazio.

Lady Hillary pushed, lobbied and secured the pardon and release of a dozen convicted murderers and conspirators, who had committed numerous atrocities in the name of Puerto Rican nationalism that resulted in the death and disfigurement of police officers and innocent victims, all in a sick attempt to appeal to New York’s sizable community of Puerto Rican heritage, which in itself is an insult to the very voters she clumsily hoped to woo.

Now it has been revealed that Lady Hillary personally also secured pardons for a host of convicted felons, all found guilty of either horrendous crimes and/or tremendous rip-offs of the government.

Among these was Susan Rosenberg, who participated in the murders associated with the infamous Brinks armored car robbery decades ago.”

“Her selling of pardons did not end there, however, as she also secured a pardon for Marc Rich, who fled the country, renounced his U.S. citizenship and absconded with some $100 million, nearly half of which was owed in taxes. This traitor also profited by illegally trading oil with Middle Eastern terrorist states in violation of U.S. Law.

But what did Lady Hillary care? She received more than a million dollars in campaign contributions from Rich’s ex-wife.

Then there was her highly suspect and unethical book-deal scam, which netted her some $10 million in cash advances, after her election but before taking office, to avoid Senate ethics rules.”

Read more:

http://www.newsmax.com/Pre-2008/SenSleazeLady/2001/01/26/id/656223/

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

 

 

Clintons media advantage, Hillary’s Greed Covered Up by Press Before Election, NewsMax March 19, 2001, Mainstream press kept Hillary’s record for using taxpayer resources to feather her own nest a secret during last year’s election campaign

Clintons media advantage, Hillary’s Greed Covered Up by Press Before Election, NewsMax March 19, 2001, Mainstream press kept Hillary’s record for using taxpayer resources to feather her own nest a secret during last year’s election campaign

“Millions of cretinous and amoral Americans still admire Bill and Hillary Clinton, the two foulest amoral slimebags that have ever besmirched the White House. These two foulmouthed and lying psychopaths have been, and still are, blindly supported by masses of non-clinical morons, diehard Democrats, and whorish liberal journalists and their editors.

The Clintons’ habitual lies, gutter language, anti-Semitic outbursts, and anti-black slurs have been documented by reliable writers but have been — and still are — routinely suppressed by the so-called liberal media.”…Reinhold Aman, Ph.D.

“By July 1993, the Clintons and their associates had established
a pattern of concealment with respect to the Clintons’ involvement
with Whitewater and the Madison S&L. Because of the complexity
of the allegations of misdeeds involving these institutions, documents
and files are critical to any inquiries into the matter. Yet,
at every important turn, crucial files and documents ‘‘disappeared’’
or were withheld from scrutiny whenever questions were raised.…Senate Whitewater report June 13, 1996

“I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.”…Linda Tripp

 

The mainstream media is doing their best, as they have in the past, to cover for Hillary Clinton and attack her opponents. This time Donald Trump.

I am doing my part to resurrect articles about Hillary that have been scrubbed from the internet.

Here is another one.

From NewsMax March 19, 2001 via Citizen News.

“Hillary’s Greed Covered Up by Press Before Election

It’s too bad that the mainstream press kept Hillary Clinton’s
record for using taxpayer resources to feather her own nest a
secret from New Yorkers during last year’s election campaign.

After she was safely ensconced in her U.S. Senate seat, the dam
broke on Mrs. Clinton’s financial gluttoney, much to the surprise
of New York voters, if not NewsMax.com readers.

First came the reports that New York’s new senator had snagged
an $8 million book deal – a blatant conflict of interest given
that the Senate has regulatory power over her publisher’s parent
company.

Then America learned that Hillary had solicited friends through
a furniture fund of sort, whereby donors could buy her all sorts
of pricey goods through a bridal-like registery at her favorite
department store. (Denise Rich donated a $7,000 couch.)

Next came news that the sticky-fingered first lady had made off
with all sorts of furnishings when she departed the White House –
pieces donated by folks who thought they were helping to
redecorate “The People’s House.”

What a shame none of this news broke before New Yorkers
installed Hillary in the Senate, where she’s keeping up the fine
family tradition of cashing in at every turn.

Today New Yorkers awoke to discover they’ll be picking up the
cool half-million-dollar annual tab for Mrs. Clinton’s Manhattan
Senate office, which makes it the most expensive congressional
digs in the country.

“She’s like royalty. She’s the ex-president’s wife. She lived in
the White House for eight years, for crying out loud,” one real
estate agent told the New York Post, which first reported Mrs.
Clinton’s gold-plated rental. (See the full Post report on
NewsMax.com’s main page.)

Looking back, wouldn’t it have been nice if a reporter or two
had spent a moment before the election revisiting Cattlegate –
just so New Yorkers might have had a clue as to what they were
getting themselves into.

Would it have been too much to ask of the journalists Mrs.
Clinton deigned to speak to that they inquire about the lies she
told in 1994, regarding that scandal, in a press conference where
she claimed to have turned $1,000 into $100,000 by reading the
Wall Street Journal?

Or how about a story that foreshadowed in spades Mrs. Clinton’s
cavalier attitude toward the hard-earned money of New York
taxpayers.

When NewsMax revisted reports nine months before the election
that Hillary had personally bilked New Yorkers out of $100,000 in
education funds way back in 1991, the establishment press kept
obediently silent.

Personal entreaties to newspaper editors went nowhere, despite
the fact that some of their own reporters had broken the story in
1994 and covered it again in 1996, when New York governor George
Pataki launched an official investigation.

How unfortunate that New York voters weren’t told how Hillary
aced a sweetheart deal 10 years ago that allowed her to collect
$8,000 a month from the state’s taxpayers, courtesy of a
bureacratic boondoggle created by New York’s then-Democratic
governor Mario Cuomo.

It was called “The National Center on Education and the Economy”
and Hillary milked it for all she could until her husband
announced he was seeking the White House.

Investigators never did figure out just what Sen. Clinton did
for all that money. There were no time sheets or any other record
of her labors. Unless you count travel expenses, for which she
was reimbursed an additional $11,000.

Perhaps the establishment press thought it would be unfair to
report this sort of thing before the election – lest Americans
get the impression their first lady was, well, a money-obsessed,
greedy gold digger with a sense of entitlement Queen Victoria
would have envied.

Better New York voters learn that now, when it’s too late.”

http://citizenwells.net/2016/06/19/hillarys-greed-covered-up-by-press-before-election-newsmax-march-19-2001-mainstream-press-kept-hillarys-record-for-using-taxpayer-resources-to-feather-her-own-nest-a-secret-during-last-years/

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

 


							

Hillary Clinton emails obstruction of justice in Travelgate inquiry, Independent Counsel Robert Ray final report January 5, 2001, Appendix 3 the White House’s non compliance with subpoena requests for electronically maintained documents

Hillary Clinton emails obstruction of justice in Travelgate inquiry, Independent Counsel Robert Ray final report January 5, 2001, Appendix 3 the White House’s non compliance with subpoena requests for electronically maintained documents

“By July 1993, the Clintons and their associates had established
a pattern of concealment with respect to the Clintons’ involvement
with Whitewater and the Madison S&L. Because of the complexity
of the allegations of misdeeds involving these institutions, documents
and files are critical to any inquiries into the matter. Yet,
at every important turn, crucial files and documents ‘‘disappeared’’
or were withheld from scrutiny whenever questions were raised.…Senate Whitewater report June 13, 1996

“Mrs. Clinton personally was involved in the discussions regarding the White House’s handling of documents in Vince
Foster’s office following his death. Mrs. Clinton made known her views that investigators should be denied ‘‘unfettered access’’ to Foster’s office prior to the search of the office on July 22, 1993.”…House Investigation of the White House Travel Office Firings,  September 26, 1996

“The fact that the Secretary exclusively used and maintained a private email server, leaving her with sole and unfettered access to the complete universe of her emails, raises a number of transparency and accountability issues. The fact that the Secretary’s attorneys selfselected the emails to be shared with the State Department raises numerous questions about the completeness of the production of Secretary Clinton’s emails to the Committee, as well as more generally in response to other oversight inquiries by the House with which the Committee has been charged. These questions, which have been raised solely due to the actions of the former Secretary, necessitate a third-party review of the server to ensure that all responsive documents have been produced to the Committee.”…Trey Gowdy, Select Committee on Benghazi update May 8, 2015

 

 

Reported at Citizen Wells on April 29, 2015.

“From the NY Times June 23, 2000.

“Statement on Travel Office Inquiry

WASHINGTON, June 22 — Following is the statement today by the independent counsel Robert W. Ray on his investigation of the firings at the White House travel office in 1993:

The office of the independent counsel has concluded an investigation commonly known as the travel office matter. This matter concerned allegations that David Watkins, former assistant to the president for management and administration, and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton made false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001, committed perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1621, or obstructed justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503, in connection with their statements and testimony concerning the May 19, 1993, firing of seven employees of the White House travel office. Independent counsel has concluded that the evidence was insufficient to prove that Mr. Watkins or Mrs. Clinton made any knowingly false statements, committed perjury or obstructed justice in this matter.”

“In contrast to the cooperation received from the White House in the F.B.I. files investigation, concluded in March of this year, this office experienced substantial resistance in its efforts to obtain relevant evidence in the travel office matter.

For example, the White House asserted unfounded privileges that were later rejected in court.

White House officials also conducted inadequate searches for documents and failed to make timely production of documents, including relevant e-mails, in their possession.”

https://citizenwells.com/2015/04/29/hillary-clinton-lies-obstruction-of-justice-documented-in-legal-documents-and-ny-times-article-senate-whitewater-report-independent-counsel-robert-w-ray-statement-june-22-2000-ny-times-january-8/

From the Final Report of the Independent Counsel Robert Ray January 5, 2001.

Appendix 3 – White House’s non compliance with subpoena requests for electronically maintained documents.

“I. INTRODUCTION

As of the date of the filing of this Final Report, the White House has failed to produce all documents to which this Office is entitled. Grand juries in the Eastern District of Arkansas and the District of Columbia between March 4, 1994 and December 10, 1998 issued 216 subpoenas to the White House and its affiliates, which required the search of records responsive to those
subpoenas, including all electronic records and e-mails. The Independent Counsel first learned from news accounts in February 2000 that the White House may not have conducted complete searches of records within its custody. It was not until several months later that this Office fully realized the scope of the White House’s lack of compliance with lawfully issued subpoenas.

II. THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL LEARNED IN FEBRUARY 2000
THAT ELECTRONIC RECORDS FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE
ADMINISTRATION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SEARCHED
IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAWFULLY ISSUED SUBPOENAS.

The Washington Times published a story on February 15, 2000 that first alerted the public and the Independent Counsel that, due to a glitch in the White House’s computer server, over 100,000 e-mails were never searched in response to subpoenas. The Independent Counsel, as well as several Congressional investigations issued these subpoenas to the White House. The Washington Times article reported that Northrop Grumman Corporation (“NGC”) contractors
working at the White House discovered that one of the four White House Lotus Notes e-mail servers handling the e-mail for about 500 computer users had been mislabeled, preventing these e-mails from being properly managed.1 The contractors first discovered the problem in May 1998 and determined that it affected servers dating back to August 1996.2 The problem was not
fixed until November 1998 according to the article.3

The White House Counsel sent a letter to the Independent Counsel on March 15, 2000 detailing the problems with its computer system and its failure to capture certain incoming e-mails for certain periods of time.4 These records had not been reconstructed, and therefore, White House Counsel Beth Nolan was unable to determine whether any responsive documents to grand jury subpoenas had been affected.5 The White House Counsel recently revealed on October 30, 2000 that “incoming e-mail” could include any e-mail not a part of the Executive
Office of the President’s (“EOP”) Automated Records Management System (“ARMS”), such as the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the various units which report to the White House Military Office, the White House Access and Visitor Entry System (“WAVES”), any user of the All-in-One system, and the Quorum system.6

This Office initiated an investigation as a result of the White House’s failure to notify this Office of the problems with its computer system and its inability to certify that all responsive documents to lawfully issued grand jury subpoenas have been produced. The investigation continues at the time of the filing of this Final Report. However, this Office has determined that the White House’s failure to search all records within its care, custody, and control, in response
to lawfully issued subpoenas, could be broken down into seven categories of records:

1. Failure to search reconstructed e-mail for the time period of January 1993 through June 1994;
2. Failure to search incoming e-mails to 526 users for the time period of August
1996 through November 1998;
3. Failure to search incoming e-mails of approximately 200 users for the time period of November 1998 through May 1999;
4. Failure to search over 600 backup tapes of former employees’ hard drives;
5. Failure to search incoming e-mail from the Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative, White House Military Office, WAVES system, and any user of
the All-in-One system;
6. Failure to search a correspondence database system known as Quorum; and
7. Failure to search the internal e-mail system in the Executive Residence.”