Attorney John Gleeson for Judge Sullivan Devils Advocate for which devils?, Michael Flynn case, Judge Sullivan cannot charge Flynn with perjury, Deep state desperate

Attorney John Gleeson for Judge Sullivan Devils Advocate for which devils?, Michael Flynn case, Judge Sullivan cannot charge Flynn with perjury, Deep state desperate

“Immediately after President Trump won election, opponents inaugurated what they call ‘The Resistance’ and they rallied around an explicit strategy of using every tool and maneuver to sabotage the functioning of the executive branch.” …Attorney General Barr

“Instead of doing so, the government has continued to defy its
constitutional, ethical and legal obligations to this Court and to the defense, and to hide evidence that it knows exonerates Mr. Flynn. As is the essence of the problem here, instead of protecting its citizens, the “government” is protecting its own criminal conduct and operatives.”…Attorney Sidney Powell October

“Under the separation of powers established by the Constitution, criminal charges are brought by the executive branch and adjudicated by the judiciary. Thus, any actual prosecution of Flynn under federal statutes for perjury would have to be brought by the Department of Justice.”…Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon


The Deep State is getting desperate.

They have been exposed in the General Michael Flynn persecution and are about to be indicted by the Justice Dept.

Attorney John Gleeson is representing Judge Emmet Sullivan (and God only knows what other devils of the deep state).

From his Amicus brief filed June 10, 2020.

“B. This Court Should Punish the Defendant’s Perjury by Factoring It into the
Sentence for the False Statements Offense to Which He Has Pleaded Guilty

As set forth above, there is more than sufficient evidence in the record to support theissuance of an Order to Show Cause why Flynn’s false statements do not constitute criminal contempt. That the Court possesses such authority, however, does not mean that the interests of justice require the Court to wield it. Given the case’s posture, with the defendant having entered a guilty plea and awaiting sentencing, the better course is the course typically taken: to decline to
issue an Order to Show Cause and consider the contemptuous conduct in sentencing on the offense of conviction.

This Court has appropriately indicated that it wishes to treat this defendant and this case like any other. See e.g., ECF No. 94 at 7. In cases like these, involving plea-related perjury, courts typically vindicate the interests of the judicial branch by factoring a defendant’s contemptuous conduct into the sentence imposed on the offense of conviction,70 not by holding the defendant in criminal contempt for perjury.71 There is much to be gained—for the judicial system and for our country—by treating the defendant like any other defendant, and this case
like any other case, to the greatest extent possible.

The Department of Justice has a solemn responsibility to prosecute this case—like every other case—without fear or favor and, to quote the Department’s motto, solely “on behalf of justice.” It has abdicated that responsibility through a gross abuse of prosecutorial power, attempting to provide special treatment to a favored friend and political ally of the President of the United States. It has treated the case like no other, and in doing so has undermined the
public’s confidence in the rule of law. I respectfully suggest that the best response to Flynn’s perjury is not to respond in kind. Ordering a defendant to show cause why he should not be held in contempt based on a perjurious effort to withdraw a guilty plea is not what judges typically do. To help restore confidence in the integrity of the judicial process, the Court should return
regularity to that process. And the Court can best do that by denying the government’s Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss, adjudicating any pending motions, proceeding to sentencing, and factoring the defendant’s contemptuous conduct into the appropriate punishment.”

Read more:

General Flynn was never charged with perjury.

His entire prosecution persecution was based on lies and executed illegally.

From Attorney Leslie McAdoo Gordon.

“Sullivan Lacks Authority to Charge Flynn with Perjury

A court issues a show-cause order for contempt as a prelude to possibly punishing a person for alleged misconduct. It describes the misconduct and requires the person to defend against that allegation. It is similar to an indictment except the court, rather than a prosecutor, initiates it. The person receiving a show-cause order must appear and defend the accusation but has certain due process rights, such as the right to notice, the right to counsel, and the right to present a defense.

Sullivan has not yet issued a show-cause order to Flynn, but he has directed Gleeson to advise him as to whether he should do so. The answer is absolutely not, because Sullivan lacks the authority to sanction Flynn for perjury.

Under the separation of powers established by the Constitution, criminal charges are brought by the executive branch and adjudicated by the judiciary. Thus, any actual prosecution of Flynn under federal statutes for perjury would have to be brought by the Department of Justice.”

“Leslie McAdoo Gordon is the principal of McAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C., founded in 2003. She graduated cum laude from the Georgetown University Law Center in 1996, and is licensed to practice law in Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia, and numerous federal trial and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior to entering the field of law, Leslie McAdoo Gordon served as a Special Agent for the Department of Defense, Defense Investigative Service (now the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency).”

Read more:

John Gleeson was appointed as a district judge by Bill Clinton in 1994.

What other “devils'” interests does he represent?


More here:



30 responses to “Attorney John Gleeson for Judge Sullivan Devils Advocate for which devils?, Michael Flynn case, Judge Sullivan cannot charge Flynn with perjury, Deep state desperate

  1. And I’ve now found a witness who says the original 302 did in fact say that Flynn was honest with the agents.”…Attorney Sidney Powell

  2. oldsailor88

    ……FANTASY is obviously still KING.

  3. oldsailor88

    …….Sullivan cannot adjudicate a charge which was NEVER made.

  4. oldsailor88

    …….it now appears that police officers in Atlanta will be required to keep their weapons in their vehicle rather than on their hip. If an officer suddenly must defend himself he will have to return to the patrol vehicle to obtain his defensive weapon. This is typical FEMALE rationale. I hope the female Chief of Police is mentally prepared for the number of officers who will now die as a result not having their defensive weapons at hand when the weapon was needed. I believe that she is UNFIT to be a Chief of Police. She keeps talking about an executive order from Obama. APPARENTLY SHE BELIEVES THAT HE IS STILL THE POTUS.

  5. oldsailor88

    ………..the female Atlanta police chief thinks that a cornered murderer can be orally reasoned with. LOTS OF LUCK……CHIEF……you will need a lot of the latter.

  6. Not sure what ‘typical female rationale’ is.

    Atlanta’s Chief of Police, Erika Shields, resigned on Saturday.

  7. CW,

    Of course Flynn was honest with the agents!

    We already know that virtually everything is a setup these days.

    I’m liking Atty. Powell more and more; I hope she’s being *very* careful.

  8. SueK……….
    ………I hasten to explain my words of “female rationale”. I have found throughout my life that most women are CARING AND NURTURING. I think this might be the rationale that the creator intended for women.

  9. SueK…….
    ……….law enforcement in America seems to be headed towards one of appeasement instead of traditional enforcement. Now for the first time officers in Atlanta might soon be working without a defensive weapon within reach. Do you think that this might be something that law Atlanta officers will accept? This was the idea of the Atlanta Chief of Police.

  10. When law enforcement officers find themselves facing an armed criminal there is a possibility that officer might not walk away from the encounter. If he is UNARMED there is a huge chance he won’t make it past the encounter. For a Chief of Police to act to disarm the policemen is close to idiotic.

    ………is what it is. In law enforcement it is rare when an officer can orally change the mindset of an armed criminal.

  12. SueK……..
    ………..there are some jobs which I think women are not suited for. One is being the Chief of Police, Another is a combatant infantry soldier. Our culture seems to think that women are equal to men on the battlefield. Yes they can fire a weapon, and do all of the things of the male counter part. I do not believe that God ever intended for women to be soldiers. I think that our grand military social experiment will one day lead to the world’s worst TRAGEDY. This is not meant as an offense against women. Rather it is meant as a word of simple reality. During WW2 a huge number of women demonstrated the fact that they could do men’s work. Without them our defense factories, our shipyards, and aircraft builders along with our DEFENSE EFFORT would have failed. I try hard to never to lose sight of this fact. During WW2 the home front was as big of a battlefield, as those trod upon by our soldiers.

  13. SueK…….
    ………..and right, wrong, or indifferent that is what, and how I think. I was born, and raised in a time when such beliefs existed. I think that in God’s word it is reality. If believing as I do makes me less of a human then so be it…….I will continue to believe in the same values. NO OFFENSE MEANT. I AM SURE you know that.

  14. AND……..
    ……..General Flynn has found an extremely rare attorney to represent him. Sidney Powell is an amazing LEGAL SOLDIER. It is quite clear that she didn’t sleep through her classes. To compound her academic ability, she has shown that she is willing to stand and fight the POS who are trying to imprison an innocent man. She deserves every commendation. I too stand behind her…….I believe there are millions of folks who would stand with her……Godspeed Sidney Powell. !!!!

  15. So. 6th amendment says you have a right to a fair hearing and an opportunity to face your accusers.

    How can you possibly confront your accuser when he/she is the judge of your trial? Sullivan has his friend accuse Flynn of a new charge, Perjury, and he denies him the right to an impartial hearing. This is why the Judge CANNOT be the prosecution, the jury, and the Judge. Any IDIOT can see that this is judicial misconduct, and a power grab.

    Further, how can a judge advocate AGAINST the Constitutional rights of an American Citizen. The DOJ has ADMITTED that Flynn was illegally wire tapped, how long is still not known, a violation of his fourth Amendment rights and clearly ‘fruit of the poisonous tree’.

    Flynn has numerous other Constitutional violations against him by the FBI, including fabricating evidence, denying Brady material, as well as threatening-coercion of his family. All of this is Judicial Misconduct and violations of his Constitutional and Civil rights.

    No real American can accept the injustices put forth in this proven innocent government servant. This sickness, reckless disregard of the Constitution for political gain, is deeply troubling.

    Finally, since we assume that the judge has a fundamental understanding of the Constitution, what is the motivation for so brazen a deviation??? Could it be that the same ‘wiretapping’ and surveillance program used against Flynn was broadly used by Obama to spy and blackmail government officials as well as political opponents?

    Perhaps we already have more than we know, and it only takes minutes to piece together the obvious…Obama used government against the Citizens for political and his own economic gain.

  16. oldsailor88

    Good morning Pete;
    ……… my own mind the same exact reasoning dwells. I believe that it is all plain to see.

  17. oldsailor88

    ………in our country judges are often ignored by the law for wrongdoing. It is obvious now, and to some folks HAS BEEN OBVIOUS FOR A LONG TIME that all judges MUST be placed under a very heavy warranty bond. Particularly those who are adjudicating important cases. This might serve to guarantee that a judge will find within the structure of the law as written. NO WORDS CAN BE TWISTED, AND THE MEANING OF THE LAW CANNOT BE INTERPRETED…….which is now what is happening to Constitutional law. The Constitutional law is written soas to be applied as written. Younger legal minds have been taught in school that Constitutional law is CASE LAW, and therefore MUST BE INTERPRETED. There is one of the largest failings of our alleged courts today.

  18. oldsailor88

    ……..and YES when you follow each and every path of evidence regarding General Flynn et al, the paths all converge at the Soetoro White House.

  19. oldsailor88

    AND …..
    …….this morning the EMERGENCY CALL by police regarding the Atlanta shooting was released. I believe the officer was JUSTIFIED in firing upon Mr. Rayshard. The suspect became violent when the police attempted to administer a sobriety test. A scuffle ensued, and he grabbed one of the officers’ tasers. Tasers ARE a potentially lethal weapon if not used correctly. The officer was justified in using lethal force against a potentially lethal force.

  20. oldsailor88

    AND NOW……

  21. oldsailor88


  22. oldsailor88


    ……….we learn that in several US localities a 911 call for police response to a ongoing criminal act may no longer be answered. Other localities might redirect your emergency call to a community action organization.(without police powers). Looks as though the law of the gun, and the oak tree is soon to return.

  24. “The law of the gun, and the oak tree”….

    When people believe the system is corrupt, the will not venture to protect it, nor abide by it. So it was with Rome, so it will be here.

    I ponder, if people who are protesting really understand what that means. Do cities survive such turmoil. How many empty hulks of cities…..have you ever seen the American southwest or remnants of the Maya? Do they think that when survival becomes the day, that civil rights will matter? They march forward to anarchy, without understanding what the voyage will bring. Like petulant children, not seeing there own hubris, they risk it all for feelings and attention. Slavery, violence, genocide, the horseman will follow. They risk all that has been achieved for 1000 years, because they cannot accept the Constitution of the United States, and the process to peacefully make change.

  25. Pete…….
    ……….it is always a pleasure to read your posts. Your observations seem to confirm my own beliefs. Humanity meanders aimlessly through life, making one mistake after another. When we fail to learn from our mistakes we are bound to repeat them. Then our young people compound the injury out of their childish behavior.

    ………of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results each time.

  27. SADLY……
    …….These days we watch our young people walk around with their PATENT BRAIN in their hand, and talking into it. Every couple of years they replace the old PATENT BRAIN with a new one, and the owner does the same as before for another 2 years. Would that be an imbecile?

  28. Pete………
    ……….now we know where the term ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ORIGINATED.

  29. oldsailor85++
    More news from Commiefornia. Think I’m going to declare the Capitol Rotunda a CHOP zone.

    Christopher Columbus statue to be removed from California Capitol at direction of top Democrats (BREAKING)

    Top California lawmakers on Tuesday ordered the removal of a marble sculpture depicting explorer Christopher Columbus and his patron, Queen Isabella, from the Capitol Rotunda.The statue has been in the Capitol for more than a century. Top lawmakers called for its removal a day after a statue showing white settler John Sutter was taken down in front of the Sacramento hospital that bears his name.“Christopher Columbus is a deeply polarizing historical figure given the deadly impact his arrival in this hemisphere had on indigenous populations.The continued presence of this statue in California’s Capitol, where it has been since 1883, is completely out of place today,” the lawmakers said in a joint statement.The statement was signed by Senate President Pro Tempore Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Lakewood, and Assembly Rules Committee Chairman Ken Cooley, D-Rancho Cordova.The removal of the statue shows that Columbus “will no longer be glorified,” said Ida Rodriguez, a member of the Statewide Coalition Against Racist Symbols

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s