Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Superb (Aside From Seizures, Lesions, Adrenaline Pens) scrubbed by Huffington Post AKA Big Brother thought police, Citizen Wells warned you in 2008

Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Superb (Aside From Seizures, Lesions, Adrenaline Pens) scrubbed by Huffington Post AKA Big Brother thought police, Citizen Wells warned you in 2008

“The Obama Campaign paid The Huffington Post $ 55,354 in 2008 according to the FEC.”…Citizen Wells

“The function of the press is very high. It is almost Holy.
It ought to serve as a forum for the people, through which
the people may know freely what is going on. To misstate or
suppress the news is a breach of trust.”…. Louis D. Brandeis

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!”“…George Orwell, “1984”

 

 

Citizen Wells began warning you in early 2008.

The handwriting was on the wall.

Big Brother and the Thought Police were active protecting and promoting Obama then.

Hillary Clinton now.

The Huffington Post scrubbed this article.

It can be viewed on the Wayback Machine or from David Seaman’s cache .

THE BLOG

Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Superb (Aside From Seizures, Lesions, Adrenaline Pens)

08/28/2016 01:36 pm ET | Updated 8 hours ago

Hillary Clinton: Stronger Together. How strong? Well, the great woman’s health is excellent, superb even. Her heart and mind one hundred thousand times stronger than the strongest beams of steel that built our great American cities more than a century ago. Her soul a shining exemplar of selflessness, service, and humility, her footing sound… wait, are we talking about the same person here?!

The same Hillary Clinton who recently became the latest unintentional star of YouTube, with a truly endless upload stream of videos purporting to show Hillary Clinton wildly seizing up when several reporters begin questioning her at once? Yes, the same Hillary Clinton who became the star of this Paul Joseph Watson video, attracting 3,554,177 views since it was uploaded on August 4th:

I realize some readers might be wondering after watching Paul Watson’s video… how is she strong, or healthy, after seeing all that?

Look guys, I need to keep my job and platform. A lot of people read the Huffington Post and AOL properties. We all know what happens when you speak a little too much truth about the Establishment-beloved Clintons.

Just ask longtime broadcaster Dr. Drew Pinsky. “CNN has canceled Drew Pinsky’s HLN show, Dr. Drew On Call, just eight days after Pinsky made comments on a radio show questioning the health of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Pinsky’s show, which is six years old, will air for the last time Sept. 22,” The Daily Beast reported.

But what do you think? Is Hillary Clinton strong and wise and healthy? If so, why does Paul Watson and the team at Infowars want to hurt her feelings? They should know better over there: Americans are allowed to vote for anyone they want this election season, and support anyone they want, so long as that person is Strong Hillary Clinton.

Stronger Together. Together, Stronger. Or something.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160828193647/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-seaman/hillary-clintons-health-i_b_11752226.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3ALwXcO-agP6sJ%3Awww.huffingtonpost.com%2Fdavid-seaman%2Fhillary-clintons-health-i_b_11752226.html%20&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Speaking of wayback.

Remember the video of Obama speaking to a crowd and saying why don’t you read the Huffington Post?

Remember Citizen Wells reporting that the Obama Campaign spent enormous sums of money paying the Huffington Post?

 

Advertisements

40 responses to “Hillary Clinton’s Health Is Superb (Aside From Seizures, Lesions, Adrenaline Pens) scrubbed by Huffington Post AKA Big Brother thought police, Citizen Wells warned you in 2008

  1. citizenwells

    “The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
    actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
    the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
    your own memory?”…George Orwell, “1984″

  2. citizenwells

    “And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
    –if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
    history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
    Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
    controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

  3. citizenwells

    Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”…George Orwell, “1984”

  4. citizenwells

    “The past is whatever the records and the memories agree upon.
    And since the party is in full control of all records, and in
    equally full control of the minds of it’s members, it follows
    that the past is whatever the party chooses to make it. Six
    means eighteen, two plus two equals five, war is peace,
    freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.”…George Orwell, “1984”

  5. citizenwells

    “If the party could thrust its hand into the past and say
    of this and that event, it never happened–that, surely,
    was more terrifying than mere torture and death.”…George Orwell, “1984″

  6. citizenwells

    “We control life, Winston, at all its levels. You are imagining that there is something called human nature which will be outraged by what we do and will turn against us. But we create human nature. Men are infinitely malleable.”…George Orwell, “1984″

  7. citizenwells

    Hillary’s health issues will get far more attention now than if they had left the article alone.

  8. Info Wars and most internet media is garbage, Alex Jones is literally comparable to the Media pig in “V for Vendetta”, a lunatic getting jollies to the sound of his own voice.

  9. citizenwells

    Careful on the messenger shooting.
    Messengers are also imperfect.

  10. citizenwells

    “Retired Green Beret Rages “How Can Hillary Still Be In The Running For President?””

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-30/retired-green-beret-rages-how-can-hillary-still-be-running-president

    Damned good question!

  11. When their message provides no answers, only questions they are subject to criticism. I can sift through garbage and ask myself a million questions like…. “Who ate this banana before it was thrown away, where was it grown, and do we like these so much because we came from monkeys?!” and that’s exactly what they are doing on channels like Info wars….sifting political and social trash instead of trying to clean it up.

  12. Pingback: 10 prominent doctors question Hillary’s health | Talk Wisdom

  13. ….. WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO DISRESPECT OUR FLAG…..

    The following citizen’s letter was lifted from another website and is re-posted here on Citizenwells.

    It pretty well describes what it means to be a citizen of this great land. It is not only directed at Mr. Keapernick for his open display of disrespect, but it should also stand as a stark reminder to every American of exactly what it cost in blood, sweat, and tears for those troubled people who wish to disrespect the very thing that gives them the freedom to act as they do…..

    The letter is re-posted here in all it’s contents. Not a single word has been changed or altered. The letter reads;

    “Dear Colin Kaepernick,

    You don’t have to stand at attention during the national anthem if you don’t want to. You live in a free country. Tens of thousands of Americans have died throughout our history in order to protect your right to protest in any way that you wish. Many people in this country such as yourself have a legitimate issue with recurrent prejudicial practices within our law enforcement system. A variety of means to address these concerns are readily available in a free society. You need to understand however that the symbolism of your recent gesture is grossly misguided.

    I can assure you without hesitation that the United States of America is not your problem. In fact, this great nation is the fearless gatekeeper that keeps the real nasty guys in this evil world at bay while we all work out our petty differences. I would recommend that you go over to Syria for a few months and then see for yourself where you rank “unfair police practices” on your overall list of sociopolitical concerns.

    You are a lucky man for many reasons tonight. You are lucky because you were born with raw athletic talent. You are lucky that you were born in the United States of America where you are allowed to profit wildly from that talent. But most importantly, you are lucky because our flag doesn’t give a damn about your antics this weekend. You can ignore that flag… you can turn your back on it… you can spit on it… and you can even burn that flag if you want to. The American flag and all of the amazing people that it represents will continue to protect you and your God-given right to express yourself in any way you see fit.

    But please understand how you appear to the rest of us when you express this open resentment towards our flag. You look like a fish that resents water, or a plant that resents sunlight. You appear too foolish to understand the very environment around you which has been keeping you safe and allowing you to flourish. The United States of America has been acting as your own personal diving cage in a world full of sharks. Some people might mistakenly think that it took courage to do what you did this weekend. The real courage was exhibited by brave Americans over the past 238 years who paved the way for you to be able to protest this weekend without fear of serious retribution. You were trashing our country while still hiding behind Lady Liberty’s skirt.

    We need to have a serious discussion about race relations, gun violence, and prejudicial police practices in this country. However, you are no longer qualified to lead this discussion. You trashed the American flag. You trashed the very same flag which protects all of our personal freedoms… and we all have the God-given constitutionally-protected right going forward to ignore your stupid sorry ass.

    Sincerely,

    An American Citizen
    —————————————————————————————————-
    I do not know who wrote this letter, but this ‘old veteran’ would walk a hundred miles to shake his hand because he has put into words exactly how the vast majority of American’s fell about our flag and our anthem.

    As a warning to those with the same feelings Mr. Kaepernick recently displayed, if you do not want to get on the ‘fighting side’ of most American’s, then I strongly suggest you do not step on either our flag or our song, but keep your resentment to yourself, or shared among those of similar feelings as you.

    After all, we, real American’s, have rights and feelings too, and our flag and our anthem are both constantly on our minds and etched deeply in our hearts for a million good reasons.

    This letter and comments can be re posted anywhere the reader wishes, permission is not needed or required.

    God Bless America and God bless the flag that waves proudly over our land.

  14. Does anyone know what that hole in Cankles’ tongue is?

  15. …………if there is a hole in Mzzzzzzzzzzzz. Clint’s tongue it is probably something which she herself had done way back in her college days for the purpose of accommodating some sort of EROTIC sexual stimulation device which she probably used in her alleged trysts with other females.

  16. ……….I am reasonably certain that her creator didn’t put the hole there.

  17. ……..on the other hand what appears to be a hole could easily be a throat lozenge which happened to be where it was by pure accident. Just a GUESS.

  18. oldsoldier80

    Sue K……hello my friend,

    You ask….”Does anyone know what that hole in Cankles’ tongue is?”

    It’s where her brain use to be…..but alas, that went when she was live- borned/ or hatched….or maybe all reptilians have that feature…….either way, it does nothing to improve her looks…..

    You can candy coat a dog turd..it may look good but it’s still a dog turd. That’s her problem, there is nothing humanly possible they can do to improve her looks or her actions…..

    It is what It is !!!!!

  19. Bradlee Dean

    Clinton and Obama Refused to Hear Intelligence that “did not fit their ‘happy talk’ narrative about the Middle East”

    Retired General: Clinton and Obama Refused to Hear Intelligence that…

    For months now, one official after another, whether retired or still in the administration, pops up accusing Hussein Soetoro and/or Hillary Clinton…
    sonsoflibertymedia.com

    http://sonsoflibertymedia.com/retired-general-clinton-obama-refused-hear-intelligence-not-fit-happy-talk-narrative-middle-east/

  20. Sue K,
    Regarding the hole in Hilliary’s tongue.

    I hope it spreads fast.

  21. citizenwells

    I have uncovered another David Schippers doc from the impeachment, the 15 counts he was allowed to present.
    I will report this in an effort to educate younger voters about what Slick Willy’s prosecution was really about.

  22. oldsoldier80

    BOB SRAUSS….

    you said….”Clinton and Obama Refused to Hear Intelligence that “did not fit their ‘happy talk’ narrative about the Middle East”

    Retired General: Clinton and Obama Refused to Hear Intelligence that…”
    ————————————————————————————————–
    Looks like all the ‘armchair generals’ are coming out of hiding now that the clock is ticking down to H-hour…my question is a simple one ……

    Where the hell were these ‘self-decorated hero’s’ 8 years ago….or even 1 year ago when the country was pleading for their help ? …..it’s easy to “shoot a lame duck” that is squatting on the ground, but to get credit as a hero, you must shoot take it down when it’s airborne , not walking around lost and confused…….

  23. oldsoldier80

    Now I do not want anyone to misread my last post…….I am talking about D U C K S…that’s ducks……I’m a big duck hunter and a good sportsman will not take down a lame duck on the ground….only in the air.

  24. oldsailor84 | August 30, 2016 at 1:53 pm |
    oldsoldier80 | August 30, 2016 at 2:39 pm |

    Hi GW and RM,

    No, that’s a man-made hole; it’s too perfect to be any kind of defect.

    The responses made me laugh :).

    I’m thinking that it’s some sort of communication device embedded in there; when activated, the mother ship will come down and beam this PoC aboard and take it back to its home planet in a universe far, far away (I borrowed that). Just, please, get it off this planet and NOW!

  25. bob strauss | August 30, 2016 at 2:51 pm |

    …and reduces the whole being to nothing, Bob.

    I’ve seen a few pics of spontaneous human combustion. We can hope…..

  26. SueK…………….
    ………..unknown values have a strange way of originating from LEFT FIELD, or nowhere……….yet there is no relative, or logical equation with which an accurate answer can be mathematically extrapolated. Perhaps the ultimate solution will be provided for all of us to see by either our creator himself, or by mother nature herself. Either way it will probably be Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Clinton’s waterloo……..before our very eyes. When one lives by the sword there is a strong liklihood that person will also perish by the sword………..and the sword having been founded by ONE OF HER OWN LIES.

  27. ………those of us who remember the Wizard of Oz, will probably remember the meltdown of the wicked witch. Wouldn’t it be neat to watch Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Clint evaporate just like the witch. I am not sure if I would ever have the courage to ask our creator if he saw the movie for fear he might choose to have his buddy (OLD ZUESS @ Mount Olympus) whip up a lot of billion volt lightning bolts and launch them at me just to demonstrate his own powers relative to those of the witch.

  28. oldsoldier80

    JUDICIAL WATCH SUBMITS WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO HILLARY CLINTON, WHICH SHE MUST ANSWER, UNDER OATH, NLT 29 SEPTEMBER 2016…..

    Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, UNDER OARTH, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.

    Here is the list of 25 questions as submitted by Judicial Watch:

    1. Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.

    2. Describe the creation of your clintonemail.com email account, including who decided to create it, when it was created, why it was created, and, if you did not set up the account yourself, who set it up for you.

    3. When did you decide to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business and whom did you consult in making this decision?

    4. Identify all communications in which you participated concerning or relating to your decision to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business and, for each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

    5. In a 60 Minutes interview aired on July 24, 2016, you stated that it was “recommended” you use a personal email account to conduct official State Department business. What recommendations were you given about using or not using a personal email account to conduct official State Department business, who made any such recommendations, and when were any such recommendations made?

    6. Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned, was it ever suggested, or did you ever participate in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws. For each instance in which you were so advised, cautioned or warned, in which such a suggestion was made, or in which such a discussion took place, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the advice, caution, warning, suggestion, or discussion.

    8. Your campaign website states, “When Clinton got to the Department, she opted to use her personal email account as a matter of convenience.” What factors other than convenience did you consider in deciding to use a personal email account to conduct official State Department business? Include in your answer whether you considered federal records management and preservation requirements and how email you used to conduct official State Department business would be searched in response to FOIA requests.

    9. After President Obama nominated you to be Secretary of State and during your tenure as secretary, did you expect the State Department to receive FOIA requests for or concerning your email?

    10. During your tenure as Secretary of State, did you understand that email you sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business was subject to FOIA?

    11. During your tenure as Secretary of State, how did you manage and preserve emails in your clintonemail.com email account sent or received in the course of conducting official State Department business, and what, if anything, did you do to make those emails available to the Department for conducting searches in response to FOIA requests?

    12. During your tenure as Secretary of State, what, if any, effort did you make to inform the State Department’s records management personnel (e.g., Clarence Finney or the Executive Secretariat’s Office of Correspondence and Records) about your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business?

    13. During your tenure as Secretary of State, did State Department personnel ever request access to your clintonemail.com email account to search for email responsive to a FOIA request? If so, identify the date access to your account was requested, the person or persons requesting access, and whether access was granted or denied.

    14. At the time you decided to use your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business, or at any time thereafter during your tenure as Secretary of State, did you consider how emails you sent to or received from persons who did not have State Department email accounts (i.e., “state.gov” accounts) would be maintained and preserved by the Department or searched by the Department in response to FOIA requests? If so, what was your understanding about how such emails would be maintained, preserved, or searched by the Department in response to FOIA requests?

    15. On March 6, 2009, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Eric J. Boswell wrote in an Information Memo to your Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, that he “cannot stress too strongly, however, that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars.” A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, you approached Assistant Secretary Boswell and mentioned that you had read the “IM” and that you “get it.” Did you review the March 6, 2009 Information Memo, and, if so, why did you continue using an unclassified BlackBerry to access your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Copies of the March 6, 2009 Information Memo and March 11, 2009 email are attached as Exhibit A for your review.

    16. In a November 13, 2010 email exchange with Huma Abedin about problems with your clintonemail.com email account, you wrote to Ms. Abedin, in response to her suggestion that you use a State Department email account or release your email address to the Department, “Let’s get a separate address or device.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after agreeing on November 13, 2010 to “get a separate address or device?” Include in your answer whether by “address” you meant an official State Department email account (i.e., a “state.gov” account) and by “device” you meant a State Department-issued BlackBerry. A copy of the November 13, 2010 email exchange with Ms. Abedin is attached as Exhibit B for your review.

    17. Email exchanges among your top aides and assistants in August 30, 2011 discuss providing you with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or State Department email address. In the course of these discussions, State Department Executive Secretary Stephen Mull wrote, “[W]e are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Department issued BlackBerry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning (possibly because of her personal email server is down). We will prepare two versions for her to use – one with an operating State Department email account (which would mask her identity, but which would also be subject to FOIA requests).” Similarly, John Bentel, the Director of Information and Records Management in the Executive Secretariat, wrote, “You should be aware that any email would go through the Department’s infrastructure and [be] subject to FOIA searches.”

    18. Did you request a State Department issued Blackberry or a State Department email account in or around August 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your personal device and clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business instead of replacing your device and account with a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email account? Include in your answer whether the fact that a State Department-issued BlackBerry or a State Department email address would be subject to FOIA affected your decision. Copies of the email exchanges are attached as Exhibit C for your review.

    19. In February 2011, Assistant Secretary Boswell sent you an Information Memo noting “a dramatic increase since January 2011 in attempts . . . to compromise the private home email accounts of senior Department officials.” Assistant Secretary Boswell “urge[d] Department users to minimize the use of personal web-email for business.” Did you review Assistant Secretary Boswell’s Information Memo in or after February 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Include in your answer any steps you took to minimize use of your clintonemail.com email account after reviewing the memo. A copy of Assistant Secretary Boswell’s February 2011 Information Memo is attached as Exhibit D for your review.

    20. On June 28, 2011, you sent a message to all State Department personnel about securing personal email accounts. In the message, you noted “recent targeting of personal email accounts by online adversaries” and directed all personnel to “[a]void conducting official Department business from your personal email accounts.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business after June 28, 2011, when you were advising all State Department Personnel to avoid doing so? A copy of the June 28, 2011 message is attached as Exhibit E for your review.

    21. Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned about hacking or attempted hacking of your clintonemail.com email account or the server that hosted your clintonemail.com account and, if so, what did you do in response to the advice, caution, or warning?

    22. When you were preparing to leave office, did you consider allowing the State Department access to your clintonemail.com email account to manage and preserve the official emails in your account and to search those emails in response to FOIA requests? If you considered allowing access to your email account, why did you decide against it? If you did not consider allowing access to your email account, why not?

    23. After you left office, did you believe you could alter, destroy, disclose, or use email you sent or received concerning official State Department business as you saw fit? If not, why not?

    24. In late 2014, the State Department asked that you make available to the Department copies of any federal records of which you were aware, “such as an email sent or received on a personal email account while serving as Secretary of State.” After you left office but before your attorneys reviewed the email in your clintonemail.com email account in response to the State Department’s request, did you alter, destroy, disclose, or use any of the email in the account or authorize or instruct that any email in the account be altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used? If so, describe any email that was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used, when the alteration, destruction, disclosure, or use took place, and the circumstances under which the email was altered, destroyed, disclosed, or used? A copy of a November 12, 2014 letter from Under Secretary of State for Management Patrick F. Kennedy regarding the State Department’s request is attached as Exhibit F for your review.

    25. After your lawyers completed their review of the emails in your clintonemail.com email account in late 2014, were the electronic versions of your emails preserved, deleted, or destroyed? If they were deleted or destroyed, what tool or software was used to delete or destroy them, who deleted or destroyed them, and was the deletion or destruction done at your direction?

    26. During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.

    27. Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.

    “These are simple questions about her email system that we hope will finally result in straight-forward answers, UNDER OATH, from Hillary Clinton,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

    In his opinion ordering Clinton to answer written questions under oath Judge Sullivan wrote:

    “The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business”.

    In its July 2016 request to depose Hillary Clinton, Judicial Watch argued:

    “Secretary Clinton’s deposition is necessary to complete the record. Although certain information has become available through investigations by the Benghazi Select Committee, the FBI, and the State Department Inspector General, as well as through Plaintiff’s narrowly tailored discovery to date, significant gaps in the evidence remain. Only Secretary Clinton can fill these gaps, and she does not argue otherwise”.

    To [Judicial Watch’s] knowledge, Secretary Clinton HAS NEVER TESTIFIED UNDER OATH why she created and used the clintonemail.com system to conduct official government business. Her only public statements on the issue are UNSWORN.

    Judge Sullivan also ordered that Judicial Watch may depose the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat (“S/ES-IRM”) John Bentel by October 31.

    The questions and deposition arise in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan first filed in September 2013 seeking records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

    Judicial Watch has already taken the deposition testimony of seven Clinton aides and State Department officials.
    —————————————————————————————————–
    If Clinton lies or evades these questions, I believe that Judge Sullivan will cut her campaign short and she will immediately be measured for an ‘orange worksuit’…….her answer will be very interesting and they better be TRUTHFUL !!! …if she knows what that word means.

  29. oldsoldier80

    SUEK

    You said….”I’ve seen a few pics of spontaneous human combustion. We can hope…..”

    I had a very good friend many years ago who’s brother went into a closet and did in fact have a “spontaneous combustion” death…..there was nothing left of him, but his shoes and feet…the clothing and other things in the closet did not burn, but had blackened, I guess the burning of his body…..it was strange, very strange….this is the only occasion I have even had with someone close that has done this…… it was NOT published in the local newspapers at that time either…..this was back around 1960.

  30. G’NITE ALL …………HAVE A REALLY GREAT DAY TOMORROW!

  31. When will the media admit that Hilliary is a disgrace to America and all females? What kind of role model is she to young girls? The media is saying that it is okay to lie and be corrupt as long as you can say you were the first female President? Outrageous!!

  32. Here we go, usurper’s, and the Muslim Brotherhoods, last gasp at stealing the election for their pardoner in chief, and preventing America from electing Trump. We must do everything we can to insure against rigged elections!!!!!!

    ***********************

    Homeland eyes special declaration to take charge of elections

  33. Here we go, usurper’s, and the Muslim Brotherhoods, last gasp at stealing the election for their pardoner in chief, and preventing America from electing Trump. We must do everything we can to insure against rigged elections!!!!!!

    ***********************

    Homeland eyes special declaration to take charge of elections

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/homeland-eyes-special-declaration-to-take-charge-of-elections/article/2600592

  34. AND………
    ………..electronic theft of votes is something which our illiterate, nose picking, drugheads haven’t the slightest idea even exists. They think everything is COOL. Until the MORONS among us decide to obtain an education the same shi# will continue. All America has to do to stop electronic interference with voting is to return to the systems in place in the 1920s,1930s,1940s,and 1950s. These were mechanically operated, and when the vote was cast it was printed out in the same operational manner which mechanical calculators of the day operated. These machines cannot be HACKED. While it might require a few more hours to determine the outcome it sure as hell didn’t seem to bother anybody in those days.

  35. ABSENTEE BALLOT………
    ………..for those of us who cannot travel to a polling site. BEWARE the absentee ballot can be altered by unscrupulous bastards where they are received in the mail. To combat this potential I have a complete photocopy of my ballot made, and certified by paid witness before I send it through the mail.. After the election I request a copy of my ballot, and I compare it with the original. So far I have never discovered any alterations, or attempted alterations. The upcoming cycle will be the third time for me using an absentee ballot. If the election officials refuse to tender a copy of my ballot, I will simply ask for a court order……..to which they must comply.

  36. Usurper stole his SS number too.

    ******************

    IRS FAILS TO NOTIFY 1MILLION TAXPAYERS THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS HAVE BEEN STOLEN BY ILLEGAL ALIENS !!!!

    IRS doesn’t tell 1 million taxpayers that illegal immigrants stole their Social Security numbers

    The IRS has discovered more than 1 million Americans whose Social Security numbers were stolen by illegal immigrants, but officials never bothered to tell the…
    washingtontimes.com|By Stephen Dinan

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/30/irs-doesnt-tell-1-million-taxpayers-that-illegal-i/

  37. NEW REPORT on Obama corruption has even liberals stunned

    By Allen West11:35am August 31, 2016

    The jury is in: the Obama administration will go down as the biggest criminal presidential administration in U.S. history. Laundering $400 million cash into Swiss francs and Euros, palletizing, and shipping off to Iran. Illegally wiring billions to Iran — and these two incidents are just in the last three weeks or so. But there is clear proof, to go along with Hillary Clinton’s pay for play scheme at the State Department — which also occurred under the Obama purview.

    As reported by the Daily Caller, “The Obama administration has quietly funneled millions (and potentially billions) of dollars to leftist organizations and politicians that promote liberal policies and win political elections at the entry-level of government, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    The funneling mechanism for these funds is the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities Working Group (RMBS), a collaborative effort by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice (including many United States Attorneys Offices), the New York State Attorney General’s Office, and many others.
    Advertisement – story continues below
    Related Stories
    Huma’s marital problems just got UGLIER…
    Hillary hits new high in poll; conservatives are cheering
    As Trump heads to Mexico, drug lord UNLOADS threat on Twitter

    The RMBS was created in 2012 following the mortgage-backed securities scandal that ultimately led to the Great Recession. The group is focused on finding “evidence of false or misleading statements, deception, or other misconduct by market participants (such as loan originators, sponsors, underwriters, trustees, and others) in the creation, packaging, and sale of mortgage-backed securities.”

    Over the past four years, The RMBS, along with the Department of Justice, has reached “multibillion-dollar settlements with essentially every major bank in America,” the Journal reports. Goldman Sachs received a $5.06 billion settlement from the Department of Justice regarding conspicuous packaging, marketing, and sales of mortgage-backed securities the company sold consumers from 2005 to 2007.

    Bank of America received the single largest civil settlement ever in American history to the tune of $16.65 billion dollars to “resolve federal and state claims against Bank of America and its former and current subsidiaries.”

    All in all, these banks (and many others) were required to pay some $11 billion in consumer relief–a program that requires banks to pay back funds to consumers who lost assets due to mismanagement.

    What one finds after inspecting the trail of consumer relief funds is interesting, and anything but relief to the consumer.

    Bank of America was able to reduce the penalty imposed by the government by simply “giving millions of dollars to liberal groups approved by the Obama administration,” according to the Washington Examiner. Allegedly, the Justice Department created a provision wherein every dollar a bank gives to nonprofits, it can claim at least two dollars off its settlement.”

    In plain language, the Obama administration shook down private sector banks in order to funnel cash into the coffers of left wing groups it approved.

    “For example, Bank of America skirted $194 million off its $16.65 billion dollar settlement by giving nonprofits just $84 million in donations, the Examiner reports. Among those groups receiving the funding were Hispanic civil rights council, the National Urban League, and the Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America.

    Other liberal organizations to receive the consumer relief funds (intended to go directly to the victims of fraud or mismanagement) include: the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, La Raza, and many others, the Journal reports. One of the many problems with this practice is that many of these groups are heavily involved in voter drives, community building and organizing, and “lobbying on liberal policy priorities at every level of government,” according to the Journal.”

    First of all, let’s be honest, the whole financial crisis and mortgage industry meltdown resulted from the insidious 1978 progressive socialist policy called the Community Reinvestment Act, courtesy of Jimmy Carter. And it was left wing community organizing groups that pressured banks into giving loans that were truly going to fail.

    The federal government started the whole crisis that ended up in subprime mortgages and the practice of mortgage-backed securities was indeed a nefarious means for banks to profit off something they knew to be a failure.

    However, it was the government incursion into the mortgage industry — basically nationalizing the industry on the backs of the American taxpayer – via the rise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac along with the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act ending the separation between commercial and investment banking that fueled the 2008 collapse. But this practice by the Obama administration is reflective of good ol’ Al Capone Chicago-style politics — after all Obama did state back in 2008 after his election that “Chicago is coming to D.C.”

    Now, boys and girls, put on your thinking caps and ask yourself, what if this were a GOP presidential administration that was “shaking down” banks and funneling dollars to conservative organizations — Tea Party, Numbers USA, Think Tanks, or you name it. Yes, you know the left and the liberal progressive media would be going apoplectic – in other words, stark raving mad.

    This story, if about Republicans, would be plastered all over the liberal progressive media, front page, top story for days, months — you know, Abu Gharaib style. But let’s see how much coverage this story gets on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, or any liberal print media. And if they do, it will be buried, and maybe you’ll hear a one-minute sound bite on broadcast news.

    Bottom line, criminal activity is acceptable for the left – that’s just how they roll. Their declared lack of standards, decency and character preclude them from being held accountable — you know, what difference at this point does it make?

    So get this, the left created a policy in 1978, the Community Reinvestment Act. They forced banks to abide by the policy under punishment of fines or legal action. The banks did what the government said and sought to make a profit — you know, that free market concept.

    The government created agencies and strengthened them in order to implement their original policy. The practice of crony capitalism resulted in an impending collapse. But government blamed it all on the banks, who were threatened into following their policy. The government demonized the banks and imposed fines on them. Then the government shakes down the banks to fund their ideological agenda in order to have their fines reduced. Remember ACORN and its role in getting Obama elected? Doggone, what a great racket huh? No wonder D.C. is considered a cesspool, and in all of this, the folks who were misled got no relief.

    And you know what’s funny? The government is back at it again — many of those original policies that got us into the mortgage crisis are being reinstated.

    There you have it, and it cannot be debated, the Obama administration will go down as the largest criminal organization in our history. And I didn’t even mention the IRS intimidation scandal. I didn’t have time to address the VA scandal where many of our veterans have died. I didn’t want to bore y’all with the details of providing taxpayer funds in the form of grants to sanctuary cities. And you know what, Obama is from Chicago, and so is Hillary Clinton…you want more of this? Money laundering, lies, deceit, mishandling of classified information, sexual escapades and intrigue, financial indiscretions….

    Sometimes we get the government we deserve — a criminal organization.

    http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/shake-down

  38. citizenwells

    “Now, I don’t get upset when foreign and national journalists fail to mention Tony Rezko, or the Daley boys, or how the Chicago machine plans to staff the Department of Justice, and the new Department of Homeland Casinos.”…John Kass, Chicago Tribune July 30, 2008

  39. AND………..
    ………..every working person in America felt the pain of the financial catastrophe resulting from MORONS playing games with the subprime. They called it DERIVITAVES. We are still feeling the effects of that financial collapse. Our young people suffer while people like BAWNEY FWANK do their DEVIANT SEX. He was supposed to be the watchdog over FANNIE MAE………to busy doing his BUDDY’S BACK DOOR…………as for LaRAZA it has been plain to see for a long time that LaRaza is a Latino HATE GROUP…….to which Judge Curiel is an active member. His association with such an organization should be strength enough for his REMOVAL FROM THE BENCH.

  40. BTW BAWNEY FWANK was also tied to the Maxine Waters corruption.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s