Ted Cruz another Harvard Law graduate and Harvard Law Review editor like Obama?, Ignoring constitution, Cruz states he is a natural born citizen when having a US mother only gives him citizenship, Let’s get a ruling from FEC and Supreme Court

Ted Cruz another Harvard Law graduate and Harvard Law Review editor like Obama?, Ignoring constitution, Cruz states he is a natural born citizen when having a US mother only gives him citizenship, Let’s get a ruling from FEC and Supreme Court

“The term, “natural born Citizen” has been so bastardized, that even logic, and precedence, play no part in the definition liberals use to circumvent the requirement for POTUS eligibility.”…Citizen Wells commenter bob strauss

“No matter what one thinks of his politics, Ted Cruz is NOT constitutionally eligible. And the two major political party lawyers Katyal and Clement can spin and put out disinformation to lend support to constitutionally ineligible people in both major parties, but they cannot change the original intent, meaning, and understanding of who is a “natural born Citizen” which comes from Natural Law and not man-made laws or acts of Congress. Both major political parties are out to dilute and abrogate the original intent, meaning, and understanding of the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of our Constitution and why it was put there. Being simply ‘born a Citizen’ was proposed and not accepted. The founders and framers added the adjective “natural”. And that adjective comes from Natural Law. Adjectives mean something. Look up the meaning of the adjective “natural” when it comes to legal meaning in front of a noun.”…CDR Charles Kerchner

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″

 

 

Presidential candidate Ted Cruz on an interview by Sean Hannity on March 23, 2015 stated that he is a natural born citizen. The argument that he used, having a US citizen mother, only makes him a citizen and not natural born citizen.

“I was born in Calgary,”

“My mother is an American citizen by birth … [and] by federal law, the child of an American citizen born abroad is a citizen at birth, a natural born citizen, which is what the Constitution requires.”

Starting at minute 4:47.

Ted Cruz continues to talk about the constitution but is ignoring and disrespecting it when he claims to be a natural born citizen.

If Ted Cruz believes in the US Constitution, is a patriot and intelligent, he will get this matter settled as soon as possible.

As I recently wrote, a simple request from the FEC for an advisory opinion as to his eligibility for federal matching funds will get the ball rolling. He has to be a natural born citizen to receive those funds.

Ultimately the US Supreme Court needs to do their job and settle the matter once and for all.

Getting a nod from your cronies at Harvard and the Law Review will not suffice.

We are not fooled.

We are also fed up with the chicanery of your fellow Harvard alumnus Barack Obama.

If you want our support, put your actions where your mouth is.

No more smooth talking attorney speak.

Wells

Citizen Wells Request of Cruz January 27, 2015.

“For the good of the country I am requesting that Ted Cruz, at the earliest possible moment, request an advisory opinion from the FEC about his eligibility for Federal Matching funds and therefore the presidency.”

https://citizenwells.com/2015/01/27/ted-cruz-eligible-for-presidency-ted-cruz-natural-born-citizen-cruz-a-patriot-ted-cruz-advisory-opinion-from-fec-natural-born-citizen-not-citizen-naturalized-citizen-abdul-hassan-not-eligibl/

Some recent comments at Citizen Wells.

CDR Charles Kerchner.

“No matter what one thinks of his politics, Ted Cruz is NOT constitutionally eligible. And the two major political party lawyers Katyal and Clement can spin and put out disinformation to lend support to constitutionally ineligible people in both major parties, but they cannot change the original intent, meaning, and understanding of who is a “natural born Citizen” which comes from Natural Law and not man-made laws or acts of Congress. Both major political parties are out to dilute and abrogate the original intent, meaning, and understanding of the term “natural born Citizen” in Article II of our Constitution and why it was put there. Being simply ‘born a Citizen’ was proposed and not accepted. The founders and framers added the adjective “natural”. And that adjective comes from Natural Law. Adjectives mean something. Look up the meaning of the adjective “natural” when it comes to legal meaning in front of a noun. See section 212 of this legal treatise on the Principles of Natural Law which was written in 1758 Vattel, the 1775 edition which was edited and published by Dumas and was much used by the founders and framers: http://lonang.com/library/reference/vattel-law-of-nations/vatt-119/ Read:http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html and http://jimsjustsayin.blogspot.com/2015/03/ina-post-on-harvard-law-review-forum.html and http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2015/03/a-response-to-neil-katyal-and-paul.html CDR Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org”

“If Ted Cruz (and/or his CruzBots or the Obots pumping indirectly to help Cruz to help provide cover for Obama in case it surfaces that Obama really was not physically born in HI) wish to point to the 1790 or 1795 Naturalization Acts as a way of claiming “natural born Citizen” status, then they also are admitting that Cruz is a “naturalized” Citizen by the very title of those man-made laws. “natural born Citizens” are created by the laws of nature and natural law and need no statutory law or act of Congress to recognize them as such. See again how the 1795 naturalization act repealed and replaced the 1790 act removing what children born overseas to U.S. citizen parents are considered to be at to type of Citizenship: http://www.indiana.edu/~kdhist/H105-documents-web/week08/naturalization1790.html CDR Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org”

Commenter bob strauss.

““Again, at first glance this appears to provide a neat little soundbite for Obama supporters. But it doesn’t. The quote above is taken out of context. The Court’s opinion goes on to state:”

“Under the power to adopt a uniform system of naturalization Congress, as early as 1790, provided…that the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens. These provisions thus enacted have, in substance, been retained in all the naturalization laws adopted since.”

Here, the Minor Court cites the first naturalization act of 1790 to the effect that persons born of US citizen parents – outside the jurisdiction of the US – are “considered as natural-born citizens”. So, here we can see that while the Minor Court only recognizes two paths to citizenship, birth and naturalization… it is clear that some persons who, at the time of their birth, are US citizens, require naturalization for such status.

So, it’s clear that while there are only two paths to US citizenship, birth and naturalization, those two paths sometimes merge. But naturalized citizens are not eligible to be President. (The Minor Court failed to mention that the words “natural-born” were repealed from the naturalization act of 1795.)

Additionally, the current US Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual, at “7 FAM 1131.6-2 Eligibility for Presidency“, comments on the 1790 act as follows:

“This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.”

https://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/06/21/us-supreme-court-precedent-states-that-obama-is-not-eligible-to-be-president/

Read more comments here:

https://citizenwells.com/2015/03/24/wnd-article-omits-critical-words-from-us-constitution-on-presidential-eligibility-cheryl-chumley-replaces-at-the-time-of-the-adoption-of-this-constitution-with-why-joseph-farah-seen-this/

Advertisements

22 responses to “Ted Cruz another Harvard Law graduate and Harvard Law Review editor like Obama?, Ignoring constitution, Cruz states he is a natural born citizen when having a US mother only gives him citizenship, Let’s get a ruling from FEC and Supreme Court

  1. citizenwells

    “no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”

  2. “A bridge too far” with Ted Cruz. Papers Discussing Natural Born Citizen Meaning to Constitutional Standards: https://www.scribd.com/collections/3301209/Papers-Discussing-Natural-Born-Citizen-Meaning-to-Constitutional-Standards CDR Kerchner (Ret) – ProtectOurLiberty.org and cdrkerchner.wordpress.com

  3. “Government is not reason. It is not eloquence. It is force.” – George Washington.
    – feeling the squeeze. . .
    FEMA Will Deny Funds to States Without Global Warming Plans
    Beginning next year, states that do not acknowledge the risk of man-made global warming in their emergency preparedness plans will be denied disaster…
    freedomjournalism.com|By Perry Jones

    http://freedomjournalism.com/2015/03/24/fema-will-deny-funds-to-states-without-global-warming-plans/

  4. Since aka 0bama arrived on the national scene there’s been a propaganda war regarding the definition of citizenship:

    There is naturalized citizen or a citizen born on foreign soil.

    There is native born citizen or a citizen born on US soil.

    There is a citizen born with a birthright or a person born with the right to claim citizenship inherited from one of their parents or both parents.

    And then there is a natural born citizen or a citizen who is free of foreign state obligations.

  5. Replying to Kelly on what makes him think he is qualified to be POTUS, Cruz says his ‘love of the Constitution’. Really, each part save Article II?
    Is Liberty so easily squandered? What is wrong with Americans?

  6. Audio: Fmr. San Diego Mayor & Veteran Broadcaster: Obama Birth Certificate A Clear Forgery

    Read more at http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/03/audio-fmr-san-diego-mayor-veteran.html#OHD7RU8t7lUw8EzL.99

  7. Nothing here, move on and don’t ask questions.

    US Army Special Ops Command to conduct massive military drills in Southwest
    ————————————————————————-
    From July 15th to September 15th, 2015, the U.S. Army Special Operations Command is conducting a massive military drill in an area covering the entire American Southwest. At first glance, I thought this drill was a response to the massive military drills being conducted by Russia. I wrongly assumed that Jade Helm 15 was a drill designed to protect the Southwest from an invasion by Russian-backed Latin American military forces (i.e. Red Dawn). However, after reading the operational plan of Jade Helm, it is clear that this drill is about the brutal martial subjugation of the people of Texas, Utah and Southern California who have risen up against some unspecified tyranny. Further, this drill is also about martial law being used as a preventative measure in states which “might” lean towards civil war against the United States government (i.e. California, Nevada, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico).

    read more

    http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2015/03/18/the-jade-helm-15-drill-is-a-martial-law-civil-war-and-red-list-extraction-drill/

    Bottom line……….
    Is Obama planning for martial law and a third term?

  8. Everywhere I look I see stories about Ted Cruz, and quotes from various people stating Cruz is not eligible because he wasn’t born in the USA.

    I see Dean_M expose himself, spouting false information about The act of 1790, which was replaced, with the mistake corrected, by the Act of 1795, that does not grant foreign born citizens, natural born Citizen status.

    We have seen Minor v Happersett revisited with its’ definition of natural born Citizen, because of Ted Cruz, and his entry into the Presidential race.

    I even heard Whoopi Goldberg say Cruz was not eligible because he was born in Canada, so she’s on record.

    So, what if some universe shattering info came out, that showed the usurper was not born in the USA? These people are all on record as to what the remedy is for Ted Cruz, and that is, he is not eligible!

    When they find out the truth about the usurper being foreign born, all of these liberals will have been suckered in, by Ted Cruz, and thoroughly educated as to why the usurper is also ineligible, birthers are vindicated, and the usurper goes away.

    At least that’s what I hope happens.

  9. “no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”

    Sadly, Americans are so lacking in grammar, they don’t get the significance of the comma after ‘states’.

  10. MUST READ…
    The Overlooked Truth about Citizenship, the Presidency and Rafael Cruz
    March 17, 2015 3 Comments
    Ted Cruz will be running for the office of President of the United State, -an office that is open to all American citizens who were born in America, or to all American citizens who were born of American parents, or either of those two, -or who was not one or the other but both!
    Which is it???

    The answer determines whether or not Barack Obama, Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindhal and Marco Rubio are constitutionally qualified to be the U.S. President. The Constitution mandates that “No person, except a natural born citizen,…shall be eligible to the office of President…”

    “NO PERSON” is clearly an exclusionary qualification, not inclusionary, so the authors were ordering that certain citizens were to not be allowed to serve as President. In ignorant-land, the question is raised; “Does that include all citizens except naturalized citizens, or are other citizens excluded as well?
    The correct answer will reveal who is and who is not eligible to be President.
    Who also might be excluded? There are five other possibilities, and they are:

    the foreign-born children of immigrants who become naturalized citizens;
    the U.S. born children of foreign immigrants,
    the U.S. born children of non-immigrants,
    the foreign-born children of American couples, and
    the foreign-born children of only one American parent.

    Each of those groups individually constitute a very small percentage of the people in the United States, and all together might make up maybe 5%. If the Constitution excluded all of them, the numbers in today’s world would be significant, but the percentage would be almost insignificant.

    But in the case of Ted Cruz, the circumstance of his birth situation puts him, like Barack Obama, in a category that is almost unique. Are such unique situations allowed by the Constitution’s prohibition of “no persons, except…”?

    More…
    https://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/the-overlooked-truth-about-citizenship-the-presidency-and-rafael-cruz/

  11. citizenwells

    “Why do Americans get the Constitution so wrong?”

    “There is no good reason for the Constitution to be misquoted. Its genius is its simplicity. In slightly more than 7,500 words, it lays out the framework for the greatest way of life and most just legal system in the world. And its 39 courageous signers, in their wisdom, handed the nation’s ordinary citizens tremendous power. But never absolute power.

    The Constitution is smart enough to not trust the president, either Democrat or Republican. It eschews dictatorship, laying out a tripartite government. It safeguards justice. The Constitution pioneered the do-over, allowing for amendments dictated by the will of us, the people.

    If not for the First Amendment, you might not be reading this essay. And every champagne toast should begin with a nod to the 21st Amendment. I’m grateful for the 19th Amendment, which came too late but arrived just in time, giving me the right to vote.

    So, today, on the 223rd anniversary of the signing of the Constitution, the preamble is printed here, for those young enough to need a refresher:

    “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2010/0917/Why-do-Americans-get-the-Constitution-so-wrong

  12. CW……The answer to your last comment is one that has several facets,but has a common point of origin, which is CLEARLY the failure of our educational system to teach the important aspects of the Constitution which it’s mandate of NBC is definitely very important. However I believe that there are a significant number of TEACHERS who themselves have NO IDEA what the mandate says,and refuse to even try to define it to students. From grade 1 through high school many of our teachers,BUT NOT ALL, are DISMAL FAILURES AS SUCH and should be permanently removed from teaching.

  13. Bob Strauss…….
    …..it appears that WHOOPI Goldberg (kissin cousin to the INFAMOUS RUBE GOLDBERG) might just have a better understanding about NBC than ANY of her peers.

  14. oldsoldier79

    CITIZENWELLS…..

    Good morning north Carolina….I’m back on ‘;terra firma’ again……it’s great to be back home!

    You ask;….’Why do Americans get the Constitution so wrong?”

    You will get many different answers to that question. Here is mine.

    I think it’s a well worn tactic of the left to ‘muddy the water’ to confuse the dumb down the citizenry …which is about 95% of the people living in America…

    When most Americans do not even know one of their Senators which they elected to serve them in Washington, it’s easy to understand how, and why they cannot understand a document that is so simple it speaks for itself.

    Our Constitution was designed that way, in order that common folk could and would participate in the greatest human experiment in the history of the world……

    But in order to participate in this thing called a republic, you must be able to read, then comprehend what you have read…..and put into practice what you have read and understood…..

    I’m sorry to say, America has fallen into a ‘black hole’ of ignorance and intolerance……and most Americans really don’t give a damn about ‘protecting and defending’ their Constitution any more than they care about looking out after their individual health and welfare……after all, they have ‘Uncle Sugar’ for that…….

    Ever socialist county that has risen and fallen throughout history has gone through this same process of leaving everything up to a government of men who only wish to enslave their minds, bodies, and souls.

    As you said, today should be a day of great celebration in honor of one of the greatest document which should stand along side of the Magna Carta as the protector of human rights of all civilized peoples….but sadly today will be just another day to the masses of the ignorant and the deliberately stupid, who want nether liberty or justice for all…….but will loudly protest for another free handout which they have not earned or need.

    But this is America now, and it’s the only county we have. Thank God there are still those who understand the Constitution and are willing to fight for it and for ‘the rights of man’ contained therein……

    You Sir are numbered in that select grouping of men….thank you for all you done to keep the home fires burning.

  15. Bob Strauss……..
    …..where Cruz is concerned this has only just begun to be brought out, and I have my doubts that it ever will be fully explored ,,,,,simply because if it applies to him then there will be one hell of a backlash for it to also to apply to Soetoro. Perhaps if the media is forced to address this issue,then it could have far reaching significance…..perhaps even the eventual PROSECUTION of EVERYBODY who was even involved with the FRAUD which was perpetrated. This would also include ALL of the BASTARDS in Congress who knew but refused to do anything………yes they too deserve complete prosecution,right alongside of the CHIEF PERPETRATOR HIMSELF. This could be the defining moment in our history……we need for CRUZ to go forward, it helps our case astronamically. Keep in mind that there IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS ON FELONY CRIME,,……particularly where it relates to the US Government. In 20 years it could still be prosecuted just as vigorously as if the crime happened just yeasterday,BUT will any POLITICIAN,LIBERAL,or CONSERVATIVE ever ALLOW the LAW of the land to prevail in the future. The first step to rendering the Constitution INVALID has already been allowed to happen, by a LARGELY UNCARING,and otherwise IGNORANT MASS OF AMERICANS,who were ,and STILL ARE too busy with their own agenda to even GIVE A DAMN about WHO becomes the LEADER OF AMERICA……but these same people will be SCREAM BLOODY MURDER that their CIVIL RIGHTS have been violated when a NEIGHBOR PASSES GAS.

  16. oldsoldier79

    This is a little late for St. Paddy’s Day….but it came in an email from a friend…….and I share it with you this morning….have a good laugh !
    ———————————————————————————————-

    8-year-old Mohammad entered his classroom on the first day of school.
    “What’s your name?” asked the teacher.
    “Mohammad,” he replied.
    “You’re in Ireland now,” replied the teacher. “So from now on you will be known as Mike.”

    Mohammad returns home after school.

    “How was your day, Mohammad?” his mother asked.
    “My name is not Mohammad. I’m in Ireland and now my name is Mike.”

    “Are you ashamed of your name? Are you trying to dishonor your parents, your heritage, your religion? Shame on you!” And his mother beat the hell out of him. Then she called his father, who beat also beat the hell out of him again.

    The next day Mohammad returned to school. The teacher saw all of his bruises.
    “What happened to you, Mike?” she asked.

    “Well shortly after becoming an Irishman, I was attacked by two f***ing Arabs.”

  17. oldsoldier79…..
    ………..welcome back to the SEPTIC TANK………we call America! Our country did NOT start out as a SEPTIC TANK…..rather it has been made into one by those who think that they ARE “SOOOOOOO SUPPPPPPERIOR” to everyone else. They claim that because THEY ARE SOOOOOOO educated,they should GOVERN EVERYONE ELSE on earth,while in reality they have become CRIMINALS,AND OTHERWISE PREPOSTEROUSLY STUPID. Their mentalities have become spiritually,and morally corrupted to such a point that they are no longer willing to follow the law of the land, rather, their own chosen vacuum in which UP is DOWN, the law is twisted to mean what they want it to mean,and they will expend all of their resources trying to ram their INSANITY down the throats of all the rest of us. Sadly far too many so called Americans WANT to be dictated to by people who PROMISE them UTOPIA,but DELIVER NOTHING BUT HELL,MURDER,RAPE ,ROBBERY,DRUGS USE ETC, ….because they are far to stupid to know the difference anyway. I say to such people iF THAT SORT OF LIFE IS YOUR CHOICE THEN ……go for it,AND enjoy,at age 25 LYING UPON YOUR DEATH BED,WRITHING IN PAIN. If you percieve that as UTOPIA…..GO FOR IT YOU CHOSE IT,and once more I say to you ENJOY IT.

  18. oldsoldier79

    It’s good to be home, oldsailor82…….

    Costa Rica is a country of contrast….the locals who live there who are ‘well off’ wall themselves inside a high fence and live well….but 95% of the people of that county are extremely poor…..

    Those people would make the poverty level of America look like rich people, but there is little crime in that country……the weather was great, not a cloud in the sky…and NO CHEMTRAILS….

    However i would not recommend anyone living in America try to drive in that country……roads are substandard and NO road signs…I guess thats because everyone living there knows where they are.

    But I’m glad to be home…to help carry the fight.

  19. Famous words from our usurper.

    ” There’s not a smidgeon of corruption”

  20. Oldsoldier79
    ……..sadly there are very few Americans who know what real poverty looks like. In late 1952 I was serving aboard a ship which visited the Carribean, after a 3 month overhaul at Norfolk. After a week of steady drills the ship steamed into Ciudad Trujillo(Santo Domingo) in the Dominican republic for R&R. When I went ashore I was particularly taken by the huts which people were living in and called home. Most of these huts were on the order of 10’x 10′, and very often at least four people slept on dirt floors of these huts. Most were covered with corrugated sheet metal, for roofs and siding. Doors were largely NON EXISTENT. It looked like there was about a hundred of such shacks. This sight made me appreciate even the quarters in which the crew lived aboard my ship. Santo Domingo is also a US Naval Gunnery range,or more correctly…..was THEN a Naval gunnery range. Of course the gunnery range was at the far end of the Island. About the largest ordnance which was fired at it was 5″x38, and mostly non explosive target rounds. Those people had next to nothing. I bought a small tobacco humidor which was hand made. I liked the craftsmanship. I paid $1.75 for it. I probably would have paid more had the vendor asked for more. I still have the humidor,but it is used today as a container for unworn wrist watches, service ribbons,jewelry etc. I would dare any of our kids to spend a week in Santo Domingo. They would return changed people.

  21. oldsoldier79

    oldsailor82…..

    If obama wants to make anything MANDATORY…it should be that every citizen MUST spend at least six months living in a foreign land…somewhere like the DR, Costa Rica, or some other poor central or south American country……

    If they did, perhaps they would have a greater appreciation for what they have in America…….if not, maybe they won’t have to wait to long before they experience it forever…..here in the USA..

  22. Right Wing News

    The queen of America wastes millions on undeserved “vacations.”

    Michelle Obama Has Cost Taxpayers Over $44.4 Million in ‘Vacation’ Travel Expenses

    It must be nice to be an emperor’s wife. By one account, Michelle Obama has spent over $44.4 million of the taxpayer’s money in transportation costs alone for…
    rightwingnews.com

    http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/michelle-obama-has-cost-taxpayers-over-44-4-million-in-vacation-travel-expenses/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s