hid Obama eligibility deficiency?, Investigator Charles Johnson hired by Andrew Breitbart, Orly Taitz report, Obama using all bogus ID’s hid Obama eligibility deficiency?, Investigator Charles Johnson hired by Andrew Breitbart, Orly Taitz report, Obama using all bogus ID’s

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

“Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not.”…Judge Roy Moore interview by WND

“Why did Donald Young, Bill Gwatney, Christopher Kelly, Andrew Breitbart and others with information about Obama all die under mysterious circumstances?”…Citizen Wells



From Attorney Orly Taitz May 18, 2014.
“Breaking news: secret revealed.”
“Attorney Orly Taitz was a speaker at an event with writer Charles Johnson.”

“Johnson revealed that early on Andrew Breitbart hired him to disprove birther claims, to show that birthers are lying and Obama is eligible for presidency. Johnson, an accomplished investigative journalist, engaged in extensive research and found that Taitz and others are correct, that birther claims are true, that Obama is indeed a fraud and using all bogus IDs. Johnson went back to Breitbart and other editors of advising them that birther claims are 100% correct and they should write about it. editors refused to write about it as they were afraid of persecutions by the IRS and other government agencies.

So, Johnson confirmed at a public meeting that, which fashions itself as a political dissident publication, was as complicit in the cover up of the biggest fraud in the US history, as the other main stream media publications, high ranking officials and a number of judges.
Johnson wrote to Taitz in one of his books: “To Orly. Keep telling the truth. Charles C Johnson””

Read more:



From Citizen Wells May 24, 2012.

“My gut feeling was strong when I first crafted this question & continued to publish it.

“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense,  to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells

It is ultimately about Obama’s pattern of lies and deception and his disregard for the US Constitution and American people.

It is all about Obama.

Why wouldn’t any legitimate, earnest news organization question Obama on using taxpayer dollars to hide his records?

Isn’t this a big news story”


Thanks to commenter GORDO.

12 responses to “ hid Obama eligibility deficiency?, Investigator Charles Johnson hired by Andrew Breitbart, Orly Taitz report, Obama using all bogus ID’s

  1. citizenwells

    “Who benefited most from the suicide/murder of Orlando Jones?
    Who benefited most from the murder of Donald Young?
    Who benefited most from the murder of Lt. Quarles Harris Jr.?
    Who benefited most from the suicide/murder of Christopher Kelly?
    Who benefited most from the murder of Bill Gwatney?
    Who benefited most from the death/murder of Andrew Breitbart?
    And now
    Loretta Fuddy?”…Citizen Wells

  2. From >>> March 17, 2012

    “Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro: We’re Going to Vet Obama Except His Forged Selective Service Registration and Forged Birth Certificate”

  3. oldsailor81

    Given the increasing number of murdered people with respect to Soetoro, you don’t need much of a sniffer to detect the same stink,as that which seemed to permeate the atmosphere when you were in close proximity to CLINT. In Clint’s case there was a string of over thirty people who were more than casual friends all of whom ended up dead,by strange cirmcumstances…….obviously because they KNEW TOO MUCH. …..but the Clints must still face their MAKER,…..and as each day passes they are one day closer to their JUDGEMENT DAY. They think that they are going to live forever……har har har! Who knows I might even live to see God’s judgement on them,and who knows maybe even God’s judgement on Soetoro as well. The trail of dead bodies is getting longer,and longer.The WEED OF CRIME BEARS BITTER FRUIT!

  4. oldsailor81

    It seems as though the LIBERAL SCUM of our alleged society have only one way in dealing with potentially damaging evidence …..”destroy it” whether it is living, or on paper. This play is in the LIBERAL PLAYBOOK.

  5. Good Morning CW. I’ve wondered about what the guy (forgot his name – Wayne Root?) said about a Breitbart reporter with evidence of Obama’s Indonesian citizen.

  6. oldsailor81

    There was another past leader who has been linked to several murders,……his name sounds a little like “JOHN’S-SON.” This individual took a trip to Italy,only to discover upon his arrival there that he had been DENIED all perks as a head of state. This denial was brought about by the IRISH leader at the time,who made a special telephone call to Italy, and advised them NOT TO PROVIDE Mr.John’s-Son,any of the perks that is customarily afforded to a head of state. When Mr. John’s -son discovered the truth he was INFURIATED,and at that point in time vowed to GET EVEN.

  7. oldsailor81

    Hopfully we will see much more of what Mr.Root has to say…..and CERTIFY. His CERTIFIED DEPOSITION could be extremely damaging to Soetoro. I personally believe that Mr.Root knows MUCH MORE than he has given privvy to the public thus far.

  8. oldsailor81

    I will terminate my BLATHER so that those with DOCUMENTED fact can get a word in as well. I promise that from this point forward I will not over extend my comments,and will limit them to no more than three, in each thread. I apologise to all whose visit to CW blog I might have ruined for them. It will NOT HAPPEN AGAIN……….GOODAY!

  9. From >>> August 8, 2012

    “Hannity Further Proves Fox Eligibility Blackout: Obama Classmate; Obama Indonesian Citizen”
    At YouTube:

    “Hannity Interview with Obama Classmate Wayne Allyn Root : Breitbart Reporter Charles Johnson in Indonesia Has Documented Proof Obama is Indonesian Citizen”

    Published on August 7, 2012

  10. In reply to:

    oldsailor81 | May 19, 2014 at 4:54 am |

    I am wondering if somehow the world has been tossed backward in time to 1099. I have the feeling that we are entering a CRUSADES era once again.
    Old Sailor, here are just a few excerpts from a very good article on the whole re: the history of the Crusades which facts should have but haven’t informed the bigoted PC revisionist history taught and continuing to be taught by our very useless, in so many ways, school system….as well as the popular media. From the very beginning it’s been basically someone necessarily attempting to fight back against the “religion” of conquer by the sword:

    The Crusades: When Christendom Pushed Back

    ………Ah, the Crusades. Along with the Galileo affair and the Spanish Inquisition (both partially to largely misunderstood), they have become a metaphor for Christian “intolerance.” And this characterization figures prominently in the hate-the-West-first crowd’s repertoire and imbues everything, from movies such as 2005’s Kingdom of Heaven to school curricula to politicians’ pronouncements. In fact, it’s sometimes peddled so reflexively that the criticism descends into the ridiculous, such as when Bill Clinton gave a speech at Georgetown University and, writes Chair of the History Department at Saint Louis University Thomas Madden, “recounted (and embellished) a massacre of Jews after the Crusader conquest of Jerusalem in 1099 and informed his audience that the episode was still bitterly remembered in the Middle East. (Why Islamist terrorists should be upset about the killing of Jews was not explained.)” Why, indeed. Yet, it is the not-so-ridiculous, the fable accepted as fact, that does the most damage. Madden addresses this in his piece, “The Real History of the Crusades,” writing:

    Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics. They are supposed to have been the epitome of self-righteousness and intolerance, a black stain on the history of the Catholic Church in particular and Western civilization in general. A breed of proto-imperialists, the Crusaders introduced Western aggression to the peaceful Middle East and then deformed the enlightened Muslim culture, leaving it in ruins. For variations on this theme, one need not look far. See, for example, Steven Runciman’s famous three-volume epic, History of the Crusades, or the BBC/A&E documentary, The Crusades, hosted by Terry Jones. Both are terrible history yet wonderfully entertaining.

    But what does good history tell us? Madden continues:

    Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War…. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western [sic] Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.

    [The Crusades] were not the brainchild of an ambitious pope or rapacious knights but a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be subsumed by Islam. The Crusades were that defense.

    The reality is that in our modern conception — or, really, misconception — of the word, it is the Muslims who had launched “crusades” against Christendom. (In the true sense of the word, the Moors couldn’t be Crusaders, as the term means “those who are marked with a cross,” and the Muslims just wanted to erase the cross.) And like Martel before them, who ejected the Moors from most of southern Gaul, and the Spaniards, who — through what was also a Crusade — would much later wrest back control over Iberia, the Crusades were an attempt to retake conquered Christian lands. So how can we describe the view taken by most academics, entertainers, and politicians? Well, it is the Jihadist view. It is Osama bin Laden’s view. It is a bit like ignoring all history of WWII until December 8, 1941 — and then damning the United States for launching unprovoked attacks on Japan.

    …………… This brings us to the “ambitious pope” and “rapacious knights” bit, the 20th-century myths about 11th-century motivations. Let’s examine these one at a time.

    First we have the notion that the Crusaders were imperialists. This is an understandable perspective for the modern mind, as the not-too-distant past has been one of a dominant West colonizing a world of backwaters. Yet this was a recent and relatively short-lived development. Do you remember how Abdul Rahman Al Ghafiqi considered the eighth-century Europeans barbarians? It was no different in the 11th century; Dar al-Islam was the burgeoning civilization. It was the imperialist force — and this wouldn’t change for another 600 years.

    Next we have two myths that contradict each other; although, considered individually, they may seem tenable. One is that, despite the Crusaders’ purported religiosity, they were just seeking riches by the sword. The other myth is, they were so darn religious that they were seeking to convert Muslims by the sword. It seems unlikely that both could be true, and, as it turns out, neither is.

    Today we like to say “Follow the money.” Well, if you followed it in the 11th century, it led right back to Europe. The reality is that most Crusader knights were “first sons,” men who had property and wealth — much to lose (including their lives) and little to gain. And just as the United States can drain the public treasury funding Mideast interventions today, medieval warfare was expensive business. Lords were often forced to sell or mortgage their lands to fund their Crusading, and many impoverished themselves. It also doesn’t seem that the average knight entertained visions of becoming “the man who would be king” in a faraway land, either. As Madden said in an October 2004 Zenit interview, “Much like a soldier today, the medieval Crusader was proud to do his duty but longed to return home.”

    As for conversion, the Crusaders were warriors, not missionaries. They had no interest in converting Muslims; in fact, I doubt the notion ever entered their minds. They viewed the Muslims as enemies of God and His Church and a threat to Christendom, nothing more, nothing less


  11. citizenwells

    Good morning Zach, et al.

  12. Only the loonies and this completely incompetent thug govt. are to be trusted with the means of “protection” guaranteed as citizen’s right:

    Targeted? Gun sellers say ‘high risk’ label from feds cuts off banking options, restricts business

    Read more:
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s