Amber Lyon CNN Obama Administration pays for CNN content, Fake stories, Unfriendly stories deleted, Nick Robertson Egypt report suppressed, George Orwell 1984

Amber Lyon CNN Obama Administration pays for CNN content, Fake stories, Unfriendly stories deleted, Nick Robertson Egypt report suppressed, George Orwell 1984

“If I had my choice I would kill every reporter in the world but I am sure we would be getting reports from hell before breakfast.”… William Tecumseh Sherman

“Propaganda must not serve the truth, especially not insofar as it might bring out something favorable for the opponent.”… Adolf Hitler

“As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of the Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in it’s stead. This process of continuation alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound tracks, cartoons, photographs–to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance. Day by day and almost minute by minute the past was brought up to date. In this way every prediction made by the Party could be shown by documentary evidence to be correct; nor was any item of news, or expression of opinion, which conflicted with the needs of the moment, ever allowed to be on record.”…George Orwell, “1984″

We warned you early in 2008.

From Citizen Wells June 4, 2008.

“Reverend James Manning has a new video out today, Tuesday, June 3, 2008.”

“He also says to boycott the CNN Network until Januray 2, 2009. He says to boycott CNN for the biased, Godless and tyrantical way they swayed public opinion against Hillary.”

George Orwell warned you in “1984.”

Communist News Network.

From the Obama Hustle February 16, 2013.

“Breaking News – The Obama Administration pays for CNN content”

“Within this Canadian video report you will find footage of a CNN story on Egypt and Mohammed Al Zawahiri. It was produced by well-known CNN Journalist Nick Robertson. The entire video is excellent, but the pertinent aspect is at the 1:30 mark.

In the previous thread I asked two central questions. The Second Question was:

Why would CNN [or CNNi] refuse to air the Nick Robertson report with Muhammed Al Zawahiri (brother of Ayman Al Zawahiri) that clearly shows the Egyptian uprising was 100% in response to his call for protests for release of the Blind sheik on 9-11.? Why would the “most trusted name in news“, hide the report showing the truth, and instead allow the false narrative to be sold, by them, to the American electorate?

Amber Lyon provides the answer(s).

CNN never aired the Nick Robertson report in Egypt because it completely contradicted the Obama Administration, and Hillary Clinton State Department, Egyptian assertions. In short, it proved they were lying – BIG TIME. The refusal to air the real reasoning for the Egyptian Embassy assault was intentional protection ofPresident Obama specifically orchestrated by the CNN News group. Specific, intentional, lying.

Apparently they have a history of this no-one knew about. UNTIL NOW.


Amber Lyon is an award-winning journalist who worked for CNN.

She says she was ordered to report fake stories, delete unfriendly stories adverse to the Obama administration (like the Nick Robertson report), and construct stories in specific manners while working for the left-wing network.

CNN is paid by foreign and domestic Government agencies for specific content.

Let me repeat that.

CNN is paid by the US government for reporting on some events, and not reporting on others. The Obama Administration pays for CNN content.”

Read more:

Huffington Post: A paid arm of the Obama Campaign.

From Citizen Wells May 25, 2010.

“In 2008, the Obama Campaign used a great deal of money from undocumented donors, a legion of paid bloggers, internet thugs and a complicit press to spin their Orwellian lies. The Obama Campaign paid The Huffington Post $ 55,354 in 2008. That of course is what was reported to the FEC and  is the tip of the iceberg. I have heard Obama refer to The Huffington Post on several occasions. The last time was the last straw. The Citizen Wells blog has written about The Huffington Post acting as an arm of the Obama camp to smear opposition to Obama. You can expect more.

Listen to the following Obama speech, if you can stomach it. He mentions The Huffington Post at around 1 minute 57 seconds. The speech is cleverly (in the wicked sense) written. It mixes truths, half truths and lies.”

“Why does The Huffington Post do the bidding of the Obama camp?

Here is one of the reasons.

Remember, the monetary payments below are only from Obama For America and those reported to the FEC. Based on the services provided by The Huffington Post to the Obama camp, the actual total paid should be significantly higher.”



2008 year end   55,354.00

2009 third quarter    5,000.00″


32 responses to “Amber Lyon CNN Obama Administration pays for CNN content, Fake stories, Unfriendly stories deleted, Nick Robertson Egypt report suppressed, George Orwell 1984

  1. Saw this on Facebook.

    Of all tyrannies a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

  2. with a record like this….is it any wonder that the government is 16.5 TRILLION in debt?

    This is all taxpeyer money funded…down the drain

    The complete list of faltering or bankrupt green-energy companies:

    • Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
    • SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
    • Solyndra ($535 million)*
    • Beacon Power ($43 million)*
    • Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
    • SunPower ($1.2 billion)
    • First Solar ($1.46 billion)
    • Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
    • EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
    • Amonix ($5.9 million)
    • Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
    • Abound Solar ($400 million)*
    • A123 Systems ($279 million)*
    • Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
    • Johnson Controls ($299 million)
    • Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
    • ECOtality ($126.2 million)
    • Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
    • Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
    • Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
    • Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
    • Range Fuels ($80 million)*
    • Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
    • Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
    • Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
    • GreenVolts ($500,000)
    • Vestas ($50 million)
    • LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
    • Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
    • Navistar ($39 million)
    • Satcon ($3 million)*
    • Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
    • Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)


    Reports surfaced marines were ordered to remove the bolts from their rifles. The video included with this article is documented proof of more shameful fraudulent activity.

  4. Does the subject matter of this thread surprise anyone? We all here know the media is chained to Obama and co. Too bad the other 300,000,000 Americans don’t have a clue this is going on. Obama’s handlers know that fact, so they just keep doing whatever unethical, illegal and underhanded things they want because they know there is no one to stop them. How long will this go on America? Where is everybody? Who is going to stand up and say “No More”?

  5. cjzak
    If we were to assume, for instance, that over half of the eligible voting population is aware of what is going on. They are also aware that a corrupt administration has control of the military and other means of suppression. So…, with the understanding that the first to rise up will indeed be the first to die, either politically or physically, as this administration has most carefully and skillfully alluded to.
    We are currently at a familiar crossroads …we’re damned if we do and we’re most certainly damned if we don’t. As the common board game of strategy would depict, we are now in “check”!
    The public has yet to fully grasp both the lesson and the urgency of this dilemma. We are so far gone now that it will certainly take an uprising of the public, of some certain magnitude, to even begin to restore political order to this nation. Unfortunately, we are now left with only the hard choices…and no one wants to make them.

  6. RMinNC
    I guess a question could be…are there ANY green companies, still functioning, who received taxpayer/government cash?

  7. Yes Coldwarvet. We need numbers now, big numbers coming together as one voice and it must be a very loud voice. I wish I was as optimistic as you on the number already aware and who will join us. We shall see very soon I think, who will stand for freedom and America.



  9. protectourcivilrightsfreedoms


    March 23, 2007
    by Marko Kloos

    “HUMAN BEINGS ONLY HAVE TWO WAYS TO DEAL WITH ONE ANOTHER: REASON AND FORCE. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. REASON FOR FORCE, THAT’S IT.

    In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

    When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

    The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gangbanger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

    There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat – it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

    Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

    People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst.

    The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weightlifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

    When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded.

    I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation…and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.”

    2ND AMENDMENT Archive:

  10. protectourcivilrightsfreedoms


    March 23, 2007
    by Marko Kloos

    “HUMAN BEINGS ONLY HAVE TWO WAYS TO DEAL WITH ONE ANOTHER: REASON AND FORCE. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. REASON OR FORCE, THAT’S IT.”

    Continue Reading Here:

  11. I guess Joe forgot he was in the real world and not his own…
    Biden: No Ordinary American Cares About Their Constitutional Rights

    The latest moronic statement from Joe Biden… Share with your friends!

  12. “Catastrophe when America’s twin gave up guns”

    “SYDNEY, Australia – In the country that has some of the most restrictive firearms legislation in the world, law-abiding citizens must obtain police permission before purchasing a gun and subject themselves to public ridicule, surprise searches without warrants, arbitrary confiscation and burdensome government regulations.

    It’s a fate that could befall America, some warn, if citizens willingly surrender their firearms – and with those guns, an entire nation’s hard-won freedom.”


  14. Coldwarvet2………….
    You are right ,but I would hasten to say that while there are millions who are soon going to face a very bitter truth……..But, I respectfully disagree with you that WE ALL are going to have to make up our minds. I am happy to say that I along with many others have read the handwriting on the wall accurately from DAY ONE,and we have already made our choices,and stand ready to COMMIT.

    Infamous gunfighter poem…” Be not afraid of any man no matter what his size, for you only need to call on me and I WILL EQUALISE.”

  16. Good morning CW et al.,

    I would like to see Amber Lyon testify to a congressional hearing on this subject matter. I would also like to see her open her own news blog if she hasn’t already.

  17. hawk | February 24, 2013 at 3:49 pm |


    I tried numerous times to watch the video yesterday. It either wouldn’t load,
    or I got “currently unavailable” or “error”. I tried one last time this morning on the regular youtube site, and was finally able to download. Not only did they look sloppy, but their uniforms didn’t seem to fit correctly in some cases, and some were in disrepair. This so-called CiC must be hugely paranoid. Thanks for posting.

  18. Good morning William!

  19. Good morning William, et al.

  20. protectourcivilrightsfreedoms

    hawk | February 24, 2013 at 3:49 pm |


    Obama’s Inaugural Marines Were FAKE

    February 23, 2013 By Bobby Powell

    Obama’s Marines Replaced With Ringers; Rifle Bolts Removed On Order Of Paranoid Administration

  21. FEC Report: Obama’s Campaign Paid Over 5 Million
    To Law Firm… To Keep His Records Sealed?
    By Red Flag

    Source: Federal Elections Commission (FEC) H/T: The Obama File

    The following is information that was compiled from the official Federal Elections Commission (FEC) website for disbursements from the Obama campaign to Robert Bauer’s law firm of Perkins Coie, which represents Obama in various eligibility and records suits.

    Perkins Coie does not appear in the pre-general election filing. You are free to pursue any further information that is of interest. But one would assume that the official FEC website to which the Obama and other campaigns must report their financial activity would be taken by even the most skeptical among us as valid documentation of the reported $1 million to $6 million, or anything in between, figure illegally expended to defend the eligibility suits.

    This information is about the legal fees AND RENT(?) only of that one law firm, not the Department of Justice attorneys that have also represented Obama in several courts, court fees, or other related costs.​

  22. As if they’re telling us something we didn’t know:

    Washington State Responds To Linda Jordan’s Motion To Modify
    Sanctions: Attorney General Admits They’re Trying To Stop Linda Jordan
    From Challenging Obama’s Felony Identity Document Fraud

    As reported here homemaker Linda Jordan was sanctioned nearly $13,000 for challenging Obama’s identity fraud and placement on the ballot in Washington State. Linda retained former Washington Supreme Court Justice Richard Sanders to fight the outrageous fees levied against her. Attorney Sanders filed a motion to modify the ruling and provided the Washington State Supreme Court with proof the state of Washington overcharged Linda Jordan nearly $10,000. The AG for WA filed an answer to the motion.


    In short the say “a substantial sanction is necessary” in order to silence those that challenge Obama’s identity document fraud.

  23. “Hollywood’s Pious Hypocrisy”

    “Hypocrisy is endemic in Hollywood. That is one reason Barack Obama and other Democrats feel so welcome there. Hypocrisy is a wide spectrum disorder in Hollywood. Similar to a virus, it has many types and mutates as time goes by. There are the obvious displays.”

    “U.S. first lady Michelle Obama made a surprise and unprecedented appearance on Sunday’s Oscars telecast when she presented the award for Best Picture, the first time a president or first lady has ever presented an Academy Award.

    Appearing live on screen from the White House in Washington, almost 3,000 miles from the Oscars ceremony in Hollywood, Obama praised the work of the movie industry before announcing the Iran hostage drama “Argo” the Best Picture winner.”

  24. CW,

    Related to your above article…………

    Juan Williams: Liberal media will ‘shut you down, stab you, kill you, fire you’ if you disagree [VIDEO]

    Read more:

  25. “Corps” men standing as props behind the FLOTUS at the awards last night………..interesting. Bolts removed, I’m sure.

  26. The trouble with the $$ figures to Perkins Coie is that it doesn’t stipulate for what reasons and I doubt if anyone can get those exact figures.

  27. Who’s paying these actors? Who do they work for?

    Obama Busing in People for NRA Protest … Is It Legal?

  28. Observer.
    I just called the FEC.
    Based on the answer I got, when I get a chance, I will review the amounts paid to Perkins Coie.
    To add to the confusion, the reports have been “updated.”
    I noticed one from 2008 updated in 2011.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s