Piers Morgan educated by 22 year old lady on guns, Feinstein is no Einstein, Obama left et al ignorant and hypocrites, Guns protect innocent from criminals and crazies
“Dianne Feinstein is no Einstein but she is a hypocrite.”…Citizen Wells
“Never do anything against conscience even if the state demands it.”
“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.”…Albert Einstein
“Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA – ordinary citizens don’t need guns, as their having guns doesn’t serve the State.”…Heinrich Himmler
Dianne Feinstein and Albert Einstein both have Jewish ancestry.
Anyone who is Jewish and is for gun control is a damned fool.
However, Feinstein just wants gun control for you. She has a concealed weapon permit and her new bill exempts government employees.
Obama’s children have armed guards.
From WND January 28, 2013.
“22-YEAR-OLD EDUCATES PIERS MORGAN ON GUNS”
“CNN host Piers Morgan’s push for a ban on so-called “assault” weapons has led him to confront a host of gun-rights advocates on his program, including Republican Newt Gingrich and Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt, who Morgan actually blasted as “an unbelievably stupid man” for disagreeing with him.
Which makes the response of a pair of young women on Morgan’s program all the more noteworthy.
Aubrey Blankenship and Celia Bigelow are part of the leadership team of the national conservative organization American Majority Action and had recently written together a column in National Review online about why young women prefer the AR-15 semi-automatic rifle with 30-round magazines for self-defense.
“In the wake of mass murders like Sandy Hook and the horrific rapes and murders of thousands of women each year,” the ladies explained in their column, “pepper spray, mace or five-round handheld pistols aren’t going to cut it.”
Morgan, however, challenged the women when they were guests on his show last week: “One of my arguments against guns is you don’t need assault weapons for self-defense. … Explain to me why you believe you need an AR-15 style assault rifle.”
“One, they’re lightweight,” the 22-year-old Bigelow responded. “They’re quite accurate. I can shoot them much more accurately than a handgun or a shotgun. And three … I want a gun that can hold a lot of ammo, because if I’m faced with an intruder or multiple intruders that come into my home, I want to make sure I have enough ammo to get the job done, especially if they’re armed. … I don’t have to take the time to reload.”
Bigelow also brought up an example: “We saw a situation in Georgia just a couple weeks ago where a mom was hiding in her attic with her two children when an intruder entered her home. She had a handgun that only had six rounds in it. She fired all six rounds, missed the intruder once, hit him five times in the face and in the neck. And he still lived.”
That’s when Morgan repeated a line of questioning he had used with other guests – including Gingrich – who for the most part had failed to present a significant answer.
“How many of the three million Americans that own AR-15s have ever used them to defend themselves at home?” Morgan asked.
“There are … many examples,” Bigelow countered, “but are the media willing to cover them?”
“Do you know one?” Morgan persisted.
Gingrich had botched that same question, suggesting he would do some research and get back to Morgan on it.
The ladies, however, were prepared.
“Yes, absolutely,” Bigelow responded. “In 2010, in Houston, Texas, there was a 15-year-old boy alone at home. And he was – he was home alone with his 12-year-old sister when two intruders tried to enter in the front door and in the back door of his house. He grabbed his AR-15 and shot at them and they ran away.”
Bigelow’s summary of the June 2010 news story in Houston was, in fact, accurate.”