Mathematical proof Obama birth certificate a forgery, Software engineer analysis, Stanley Ann Dunham Obama signature
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans
“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″
From World Net Daily July 5, 2011.
“Mathematical ‘proof’ Obama birth certificate a forgery
Prominent software engineer presents ‘self-evident’ analysis”
“The signature of President Obama’s mother on the White House-released long-form birth certificate provides a mathematically certain proof of forgery, according to a prominent software engineer who works as a high-level programmer for a state government.
The source spoke on condition his name not be used, fearing he might lose his job. He asserted that revealing his name is not necessary, because the analysis is self-evident.
Many computer experts have noted that the PDF Obama birth certificate released April 27 has nine layers when viewed in Adobe Illustrator.
Get the New York Times best-seller “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President,” autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.
Notably, the name “(Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama” is in two separate layers. “(Stanley) Ann D” is contained in Layer 8 while “unham Obama” is in Layer 9, as seen below in Exhibit 1.”
“”One of the changes, reflected by Layer 8, had me wondering the most,” the software engineer told WND. “If you recall, this layer showed the mother’s signature, along with the other two signatures on the image. Everything else was omitted, meaning the signatures were added as their own layer.”
However, the last part of the mother’s signature can only be seen in Layer 9, where it shows up, in bold as “unham Obama,” distinct in appearance from the lighter “(Stanley) Ann D” in Layer 8.
In other words, the mother’s signature is a composite image, formed when the image in Layer 8 is combined with the image in Layer 9.
“Graphics artists combine images day in and day out, taking parts of one image and over-laying another,” he explained. “After adding multiple text layers, the composite image is saved to be placed into the final.”
The key analysis focuses on the Ann Dunham signature contained in Layer 9.
“It’s a disappointing signature,” the software engineer said, “in that it cannot be Stanley Ann’s unless she has perfect handwriting.””
“”If the forger had wanted a perfect forgery, it would have been better to have a human being write in the ‘unham Obama’ part of the signature,” he concluded. “Sometimes perfect detail can draw attention, and in this case, the hand-writing in Layer 9 was too perfect. No human being writes that mathematically perfect.””
Read more:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=319221
Citizen WElls 
Ok
Let’s see this BC sig compared to the one on the new SS 5 doc FOIA released to Orly. That should tell us one way or the other. Any software geeks out there?
Just for fun I converted SAD’s ss5 from Orly to pdf and drew a staight line below the sig.
Try it yourself and see what you get……. hmmmmmm LOL
BREAKING!!!! THIS IS BIG. Exclusive: Court Subpoena for Obama’s Original Birth Certificate Served to Hawaii Health Departmet
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/07/breaking-this-is-big-exclusive-court.html
marmar | July 6, 2011 at 9:31 am |
No it’s not, nice try…
Pat 1789…what is with the sarcasm? I was only posting a link…sheesh.
“AFFIDAVIT FROM DOUG VOGT UNCOVERING FALSE STATEMENTS MADE AT APRIL 27 WHITE HOUSE PRESSER!…”
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2011/07/affidavit-about-white-house-news.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/59433362/Affidavit-About-White-House-News-Conference-of-4-27-2011
This is brought forward from the previous thread.
jbjd says this subpoena for Obama’s records means nothing, and Fuddy is not bound to obey, or produce the documents. I always thought Hawaii law says the birth certificate must be released if a subpoena makes the certificate part of a legal proceeding, or the BC must be released upon a court order. What more is required to get to the bottom of this heap of BS?
jbjd | July 6, 2011 at 1:46 am |
bob strauss | July 6, 2011 at 1:23 am |
U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN HONOLULU SUBPOENAS LORETTA J. FUDDY, HAWAII HEALTH DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
by Sharon Rondeau
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii issued and served a subpoena on July 5, 2011 to the director of the Hawaii Health Department for Obama’s original birth certificate
(Jul. 5, 2011) — A process server has delivered a Hawaii court-issued subpoena to Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health, commanding her “to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying testing, or sampling of the material:”
************************************************************************************
Again, as I instructed above, this means absolutely nothing.
bob strauss and others,
Almost anyone can obtain a subpoena from a federal court; it’s in the Rules. Understand, the mere issuance of this subpoena is not tantamount to an actual court order of compliance.
From the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Rule 45. Subpoena
…
(3) Issued by Whom.
The clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it. That party must complete it before service. An attorney also may issue and sign a subpoena (emphasis added by jbjd) as an officer of:
(A) a court in which the attorney is authorized to practice; or
(B) a court for a district where a deposition is to be taken or production is to be made, if the attorney is authorized to practice in the court where the action is pending.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule45.htm
Did you not understand my explanation of the deceptive nature of this hype? See, anyone can obtain a subpoena from the court clerk, and serve this on the opposing party in a case. So what? This does not mean, the opposing party has to produce anything, or that the court, asked by that opposing party to refuse to order enforcement of such subpoena, would deny such request.
So, why are you (of all people) repeating the (alleged) fact Orly generated a subpoena which she might have picked up from (any staffer working in) the office of the clerk of courts and paid to serve on her opponent in the case she filed as if it means, the judge in the case is now ordering the production of documents she requested from an official in HI?. It means no such thing; and now that I have again pointed this out, from now on, we all know, you know better.
Just wondering, why hasn’t all of the documentation under-gone the digitial forensic examination and analysis. There’s a fairly long laundry list of uncovered information besides the fraudulent b.c. released from the (red/white) house. I had heard of one report on Lucas Smith’s document by some less then reputable examiner, something about kerning, in the title. The passport files, were the comments pasted in, also? Send in, (the scrutinizer) and cut this phony off at the knees !!!!
Congress Refuses to Investigate Obama’s Illegal Presidency Because They Fear “Black People Behaving Like Animals” Sentiment Among Congressional and Judicial Leadership Insults Black Americans While They Ignore a Greater “Silent” Threat From Vintage American Wrath more
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/07/congress-refuses-to-investigate-obamas.html
The signature on Stanley Ann Dunham’s SSN application looks perfectly aligned as well. Too perfect IMO. Who signs their full name straight as an arrow? Check it out!
AS A BORN UNITED STATES CITIZEN, BORN DEC 05 1924,
hARRISBURG hospital, raised in steelton, pa……………………..
DRAFTED WHILEM A JUNIOR AT JOHN HARRIS HIGH SCHOOL,
HARRISBURG, PA……ENTERED US ARMY 7 APRIL 43 TRAIN-
ED INFANTRY, WENT OVERSEAS TO ENGLAND APRIL 44
TRAINED IN ENGLAND, D-DAY 6TH JUNE 1944 20 DAYS
LATER I LANDED ON OMAHA BEACH, JOINED GEN GEORGE
PATTON’S 3rd US ARMY, WITH THE 94TH INF DIV M.P.’s
I SAY HAVE MR PRESIDENT ( obamma) show his birth c.
and remove him from 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE
alpat