Philip J Berg lawsuit, New filings, T B Bradley, Jane Doe, October 7, 2008, Legal source says filings suspect

There were two filings in the Philip J Berg lawsuit on Tuesday, October
7, 2008. A legal source I spoke to a few minutes ago said that court
contacts indicated they had no merit. Repeat, I have no official response
from Philip J Berg on these filings. Here are parts of both:

First filing:

“IN THE UN LTED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENl\SYLVANIA

CASE NO. 02-08-CV-04083
PHILLIP BERG, ESQ.
PLAIl\T1FF

V.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, JR., AKA BARRY SOETORO, CITIZEN OF
INDONESIA
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
DEFEl\DANTS

MOTION FOR APPLICATION TO INTERVENE WITH COMPLAINT

AND
PETITION fOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS UJRECTED TO THE AGENCIES
OF THE UNITED STATES
AND MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
COMES NOW, Ur. T.B. Bradley, Psy.D., (hereinafter “Applicant”) hereby
formally applies to the Court for leave to intervene in the instant case with
Complaint and Petition for Writ of Mandamus Directed to the Agencies of
the United States and Motion for Injunctive Relief previously filed August
28,2008 at the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and
petitions this Honorable Court for a Writ of Mandamus Directed to the
Agencies of the United States. If leave is granted by this Court, Applicant
requests this Court provide written notice to all interested parties of same.

Applicant hereby states:

1. Applicant is a Forensic Psychologist who works for the Criminal
Justice System and the Courts.
2. Upon reading all of the books written by or about Barack Hussein
Obama, Jr. aka Barry 50etoro, (hereinafter Obama) Applicant
discerned that Obama was not a natural born citizen of the United
States or if he was a natural born citizen that he had lost his
citizenship when his biological mother married Lolo Soetoro, a
citizen of Indonesia. And, Obama then became a citizen of Indonesia
as a result of his mother’s expatriation of herself and her son, by selfdeclaration
on legal public educational records that Obama was
formally known as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia.
3. Hence, Applicant discerned that Obama was not US Constitutionally
qualified to hold the Office of the United States Senator from Tllinois
or the Office of the President of the United States.

4. Without any knowledge whatsoever of the instant case filed August
21,2008, Applicant filed the Complaint at the United States District
Court -See Exhibit A.
5. Later, Plaintiff discovered a similar action, the instant case, and
provided Judicial Notice to the US District Court of same-See Exhibit
B.
6. Shortly thereafter, Applicant discerned that Obama’s Mother
engaged in a pattern of illegal and fraudulent conduct as a result of
both of her two children’s birth outside of the United States: (1)
Obama, Jr. born in Kenya Africa and (2) Maya Soetoro born in Jakarta
Indonesia, but the mother, a US Citizen, raced to Hawaii after each of
her children’s birth where she engaged in fraudulent conduct upon
the United States by declaring a late registration birth for both
children claiming that they were born in Hawaii.
7. In fact, this pattern of fraudulent conduct is evidenced by the fact that
Obama, Jr. was born in Africa and her second child, Maya Soetoro,
was born in Jakarta, Indonesia; however, both children are allegedly
registered with birth certificates as born in the United States.
8. Obama’s mother defrauded the United States not once, but twice due
to her out of US births of her children that she desperately sought to
protect by late registration births with false and fraudulent
information declaring that both children were born on US soil.

9. If in fact, Obama was born on US Soil, he lost any US citizenship he
may have held when his mother married Lolo Soetoro, moved to
Indonesia, expatriated bother herself and her son as a result of her
marriage and by self-declaration on legal, public, educational records
that Obama was the step-son of Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia,
and that Obama ‘s name was changed to Barry Soetoro, now a citizen
of Indonesia.
1O.For all intents and purposes, Obama, remains a citizen of Indonesia
to this day.

I1.Unless he has applied for naturalization of US Citizenship after the
age of 18 and pledged an oath of allegiance to the US, Obama is, in
fact, an illegal alien living in the United States.

12.He should be deported and stripped of his US citizenship and
immediately stricken from the ballot for those natural born citizens
qualified to hold the Office of the President of the United States.
13.The quickest route to obtain facts would be for this Court to direct the
Agencies of the United States to obtain the Indonesia passport for
Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka, Barry Soetoro.

14.Mr. Berg has requested additional documents from Obama; however
the illegal games that this sophisticated and intelligent “master
manipulator” may engage in over the next several weeks will caUse
great turmoil to the upcoming US Presidential elections and a
constitutional crisis that may cause irreparable harm and damage to
the United States, its agencies and its US citizens, including its
registered voters who have relied upon the Federal Election
Commission and the Democratic National Committee to fully
investigate and vet its candidates before engaging in the national
disgrace of Obama, illegal alien and citizen of Indonesia being placed
on the ballot of the United States Presidential Elections of 2008.

IS.Applicant respectfully requests this Court review the solutions
available to it by commanding the pertinent agencies of the United
States as set forth in Exhibits A and B herein to take action to fully
investigate the allegations contained in Exhibits A and B herein, in
addition to the facts and documentary evidence in support of Mr.
Berg’s claims in his Complaint and Response to Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss.

16.Both the Applicant and Mr. Berg have standing as natural born
United States Citizens and registered voters to apply to the United
States District Court and the US court systems as the only avenue to
obtain relief in regards to the issues and claims of each party’s
Complaint.

17.To protect all US Citizens and registered voters, this Court is
compelled to uphold its oath to protect its US Citizens from harm,
including the name of an Indonesian citizen, an illegal alien, Barack
Hussein Obama,Jr. aka Barry Soetoro, who has diligently sought to
obtain the highest office of the United States government and its

agencies although he is not US Constitutionally qualified.

WHEREFORE, Applicant Bradley, respectfully moves this Court to enter
its Orders directed to the agencies of the United States as set forth in the
claims for relief in Counts I (pages 21-24) Count II (pages 26-29) and such
other relief as this Court deems just and necessary given the gravity of the
facts, witnesses (Grandmother, step-sister, step-brother who claim Obama
was born in Africa), and the documentary evidence in support provided by
Mr. Berg to this Honorable court to avert a US Constitutional crisis.
Further, the Applicant respectfully requests this Court utilize its power and
its authority given the gravity of the facts and documents in support of the
fact that Obama, Jr. is not US Constitutionally qualified to hold neither the
Office of the United States Senator from Illinois nor the Office of the
President of the United States as it is clear that he relinquished his US
Citizenship, if any, by becoming a citizen of Indonesia and traveling on an
Indonesian Passport from age 6-age 18, and after the age of 18. In fact,
Obama is an illegal alien attempting to fool the registered US voter in the
November 2008 Presidential elections. Applicant requests this Court to
enter its Writ of Mandamus directed to the third party agencies of the
United States to seek out, investigate and obtain third party documentary
evidence and the facts providing its report and documentary evidence to
this Court. The facts can be quickly discerned by by any and all passports
issued to Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka Barry Soetoro, his biological
mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), his biological father (Barack Hussein
Obama, Sr. , and any and all public records available to this US Court or

cooperating countries and intcmLltional agencies of the world,

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of October 2008″

Second filing:

Visit Philip J Berg’s site and help hold Obama accountable:

http://obamacrimes.com

15 responses to “Philip J Berg lawsuit, New filings, T B Bradley, Jane Doe, October 7, 2008, Legal source says filings suspect

  1. Who is T.B. Bradley? As based on the filing, didn’t they not want to be named?

  2. Okay, I’ve looked up some of the unfamiliar terms in this document in order to make sense of what has happened. Is this correct:

    Bradley (who requests to be listed as Jane Doe)files to join Berg’s lawsuit and is asking the U.S. government to take over the whole complaint/lawsuit and command the requested documents to be produced.

    ?

  3. Why is it suspect?

  4. She is essentially alleging the same facts that Berg is alleging, although she does rely on Techdude to support the forgery claim, while Berg relies on Polarik.

    Other than that, and the different way of framing the prayer for relief, they look pretty much the same, no?

  5. Thank you for the information.

    Odd. T.B. Bradley asks the court for Obama’s birth certificate, but does not provide his full legal name, which must figure on his own birth certificate.

  6. A Jane Doe is a fictituous name for a female party to a legal proceeding, used because the party’s true identity is unknown or withheld.

    A John Doe is the same, but for a female. (see Black’s Law Dictionary)

    I don’t understand how a private person, using his or her legal name, can John or Jane Doe himself or herself. It does not make any sense.

  7. Second paragraph should read: but for a male. Sorry.

  8. wonder how many Jane’s and John’s can be added ???

  9. mrje:

    One assigns them numbers: e.g. John Doe 1 to 20, Jane Doe 1 to 20. I’m not being silly.

  10. Has anybody seen an image of Maya Soetoro’s birth certificate? Wikipedia says she wasborn in Jakarta but rumors say she has a US birth certificate.

  11. “A legal source I spoke to a few minutes ago said that court contacts indicated they had no merit.” Would those “court contacts” be the judge’s law clerks (the only ones in a position to pre-judge the “merits” of filings)? Federal law clerks are usually recent graduates of top tier law schools like Harvard, Yale, UC Berkeley. Probably not very objective sources.

  12. I am waiting on a comment from Mr. Berg, the expert. I agree with Jeff Schreiber that we do not need to remove our focus away from Mr. Berg’s efforts. I only reported on the two new filings because of my obligation to report the news, since the MSM has failed to inform the public.

  13. It seems that TDBradley’s claims, while framed in slightly different format, are essentially the same. Thus, the merits of her CLAIMS are, essentially, neither better nor worse than the merits of Berg’s case. However, it is appropriate to consider the merits of her DECISION to intervene. Why was that necessary? Intervention is an appropriate step for when Party B believes that Party A will not effectively advocate Party B’s position. There appears to be no new allegations in TDBradley’s complaint. If she thought that she framed her prayers for relief better, and was truly only interested in justice (as her papers allege), why not work WITH Berg, rather than “compete” with him for the judge’s attention. Seems to me that that is the “problem” with her filing.

  14. hillary clinton = jane doe, imo's avatar hillary clinton = jane doe, imo

    its very possible the JANE DOE is a prominent female as in Hillary Clinton who wishes to remain anonymous until necessary?

  15. Whatever Dr Bradley’s motivations in seeking to join this case, she seems to share Mr Berg’s view that the US is governed by Indonesian law. Quite an odd declaration to seek from a judge in the US.

    For instance, Mr Berg claims that under the Hague Convention, “Indonesian law takes precedence”. That shows a significant misunderstanding of the Master Nationality provisions of the Convention (Article 4, cited by Mr Berg), and expressly ignores Article 3 of the Convention. Fortunately, they’re both very short articles, and easily comprehensible:

    Article 3

    Subject to the provisions of the present Convention, a person having two or more nationalities may be regarded as its national by each of the States whose nationality he possesses.

    Article 4

    A State may not afford diplomatic protection to one of its nationals against a State whose nationality such person also possesses.

    In other words, the fact that an individual may be considered by one country to be one of its nationals in no way prevents another country from treating her or him as one of its nationals. US law doesn’t prohibit dual nationality, so the US isn’t bound by any determination of the authorities in Indonesia regarding someone with US citizenship (which cannot be lost other than by express reununciation).

Leave a comment