The deadline for Obama and the DNC to respond to the lawsuit filed and served from Philip J Berg is Wednesday, September 24, 2008. Will Obama ask for the lawsuit to be dismissed? If not, will he ask for a continuance?
Jeff Schreiber, a law student, legal writer and blog owner has provided some thoughts on what may occur. Here are some exerpts:
“Answers from defendant Sen. Barack Obama and defendant Democratic National Committee to the original complaint filed on August 21st by attorney and former Deputy Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Philip Berg are due on Wednesday, September 24.
Both sides have a number of options available at this point in time, not the least of which is the expected motion to dismiss for lack of standing which will inevitably be filed by Obama or the DNC by the deadline. Judge R. Barclay Surrick will be hard-pressed to deny such a motion, but the most interesting part may not be whether he grants it or denys it but rather the language surrounding such a decision.”
“As for possible strategy with regard to action or inaction on the part of Obama and the DNC come Wednesday, Berg has mentioned some things to me off the record, and I must respect that.”
Read more from Jeff Schreiber here:
Don’t wait for the judicial system to act, visit:
Citizen WElls 
Well that’s tomorrow, have they responded yet? Does anyone have a guess as to if they will respond or not? Does anyone want to put money on it? 😉
I just posted comments from Jeff Schreiber.
I agree that Obama will push for dismissal.
However, in my humble opinion, any response other than proof of citizenship, is a guilty plea in the court of decency and common sense.
Should be interesting.
Pingback: Philp Berg’s Lawsuit Against Senator Obama: September 24, 2008 « Dianej’s Weblog
Clinton will be president, Obama will be “forced” to exit.
“Highly Probable ineligible McCain” included more to let masses swallow “Obama “forced” to exit” act rather than to prove End Times Prophet wrong.
All has been explained long ago:
http://last-antichrist.blogspot.com/2007/05/hillary-clinton-2008-for-dummies-two.html
http://end-times-data.blogspot.com/2008/02/loser-john-mccain-to-clinton-horrible.html
http://end-times-prophet.blogspot.com/2008/02/hours-before-hillary-clinton-will-be.html
http://end-times-computers.blogspot.com/2007/05/ronpaul2008com-barackobamacom.html
Racking my brain to remember WHO on cable news (recently), mentioned questions about his citizenship… it’s “out there” but need to bring it OUT THERE!
Time is running out – we must get someone to ASK THE QUESTION during an interview… the right question.
CW
looking forward to slogans (per twitter)
CHAINS WE CAN BELIEVE IN !!!
CW… BRILLIANT !!!
(I’m so slow)
We need to pick a date for this headline/slogan.
CW…GREAT SLOGAN!!
“Obama, chains we can believe in (ball & chain)”
So, no rotten tomatos to be thrown at me?
Thanks.
(If I have any talent at this it comes from my mind rambling in school when I was young and watching Rocky & Bullwinkle)
Nope…no rotten tomatoes for you. 🙂
“The Enemy of My Enemy is my Friend”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKgkBV-XBVs
I’m telling you, it’s a winner. Even if we have different strategies (on different blogs), it resonates SPECTACULARLY! Great Job – Great Slogan.
I will be sending you my e-list and proposal via email. You hit the nail on the head.
Hey folks, here… take a chance and register with Newt.org and make a comment regarding the BAIL OUT of those who are now being investigated by the FBI… we have already felt the pain… do you want to “save face” in the world by bailing out wall street AND foreign enterprise?
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/gingrich-mccain.html?cid=131961280#comment-131961280
Ahmadinejad is on LARRY KING!! WTF?!
Pingback: Ron Polarik “Some more reasons why the smaller file sizes are not just about bandwidth” « Rosettasister’s Weblog
When and where did Obama’s grandfather, Stanley first meet Frank. Seattle? How often did Frank visit the west coast on behalf of the union whose newspaper he worked for?
was posted on fox & friends this morning
“You can hear the frustration from the public regarding the media protecting Obama. All these stories about him lead to crime and lies.
Why have you not reported on this law suit filed by Phillip J Berg (Obama supposed to respond to it today to meet the deadline). It seems that a law suit that has been filed against a Presidential candidate, would be considered newsworthy.
They say factcheck.org is biased and has history with Obama camp… is this true?”