There have been many rumors and allegations about Obama doing drugs and being on the down low. Larry Sinclair alleged that he and Obama used drugs and had a gay sex encounter in a limousine in November 1999. A friend of Obama, Lawrence Lessig, was a former University of Chicago associate and is a big Obama supporter and advisor. Lessig is openly gay and has a radical gay agenda. A former Chicago restaurant owner heard persistent rumors about Obama. Here is her story:
As the Chicago-area chef and restaurateur mentioned in this posting, I’ve already provided information to Larry Sinclair’s attorney concerning the several dozen (at least) gay men who spoke with me about Obama’s sexual proclivities (specifically, his being on the “down low,” as they say). I began hearing these rumors in late 2000-early 2001, and continued to hear them until I closed my restaurant and dropped out of civilized society in 2003. These stories were from apparently unrelated sources, and the details in each, when such details were given, were consistent from story to story: always oral sex only, with Obama as the, well, I suppose “recipient” would be as good a word as any. Perhaps Rev. Wright failed to cover Acts 20:35, “it is more blessed to give than to receive.” In any case, the sheer volume of rumors was convincing enough for me… especially once the veracity of claims (some from some of the same men) regarding the similar proclivities of another area politician was subsequently confirmed to me several years later by an old reporter friend in Washington, DC. In my fairly long life experience, I’ve learned that bromides are so hackneyed precisely because they’re true, so… where there’s smoke, there’s generally going to be fire. These rumors seemed authentic to me, and the men telling them seemed quite sincere. Several of them claimed to have beeen with Obama, but most said that they’d learned of it through the firsthand experience of friends and acquaintances.
As for Lessig, he and Obama seem made for each other: two exceedingly pampered elitists clamoring for “genteel” socialism, with the bulk of us, not them, to pay the price. Lessig and Obama both portray themselves as Constitutionalists… in their cases I can only assume that means that they’ve read it and know it, not that they wholeheartedly support it. Personally, I’m so weary of the upending of the Constitution, that “goddamn piece of paper,” as Geo. Bush so, um, eloquently put it. Looking back, I think our founding fathers were quite right: “Government without a Constitution is power without a right” (Thomas Paine); “In Questions of Power, then, Let No More be Heard of Confidence in Man, but Bind him Down from Mischief with the Chains of the Constitution” (Thomas Jefferson).
And let’s not forget Ben Franklin: “I smell a rat.”
Citizen WElls 
I think that when dealing with the voting public; who for the most part form many of their impressions from sound bites, images, repetition of news headlines (which many times try to shape news), the reinforcement of views from their peer groups, etc. – the simple headline or analysis (true or not) has the most impact. It’s the drip, drip, drip of the same types of headlines that form and shape the depth of gut feelings about a politician. Before Rev. Wright, Rezco, Ayers, Blackwell, sweetheart land deals, etc. Sen. Obama was somehow above our definition of a politician. But, drip, drip, drip, he is now a typical politician on a downward glide path.
Unfortunately for Sen. Obama, there remain many stories that have not been allowed to make their way into the general public’s awareness. Have you noticed that a few of the blogs that are trying to advance such stories (the coming drip, drip, drip) are starting to get a lot of internet traffic. One such site is http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/ which went over 400,000 hits early in the evening on April 30th. The Larry Sinclair site primarily puts forth the accusation that in 1999, Sen. Obama and Mr. Sinclair shared crack cocaine and had gay sex. (Evidently, there were other gay lovers and damaging conduct.) Most people would dismiss this story as too far out there, but drip, drip, drip, and it becomes believable.
It has been my experience in trying to follow the Sinclair/Obama new story that many news and other organizations will not allow anything with Mr. Sinclair’s name to be posted in response to articles, etc. The more this happens, the more it reinforces the idea that the forces that be are not allowing the free expression of ideas on the internet. This is a troubling thought – the censorship of differing beliefs and opinions on the internet might also be a big news story. It seems that Google is also trying to limit access to postings (responding to mainstream articles) that contain Mr. Sinclair’s and Sen. Obama’s name together. Drip, drip, drip. The story will break into the main stream eventually and I would think the democrats would want it to come out sooner, rather than later so they can try to protect their down ballot choices.
drsampson.
Your diversions and personal attacks will not be allowed on this blog.
Sweet Jesus! That’s big news! I mean, use your imagination, and just picture deep-voiced, charismatic Barack pumping in the back of a limo, with another man!
Wooo! Michelle Obama seems like she is an aggressive, and possibly possesive type ; wait until she hears about this !?!
You would think that, by now, people would know that you can’t believe everything you read, or hear.
Barack may very well be on the down low, but he very well might not be….the point is, WE DON’T KNOW!!
There’s so many other important things to worry about in life, it’s sad that this is what a lot of people choose to invest their interst in.
Read the rest of the blog.
Larry Sinclair came out with the drug use allegations and the down low part just came out as part of the story.
Visit the Petition to Impeach Senator Obama site. Obama and his past are a serious concern.