John Kerry ignored pre 9/11 warning in May 2001, Logan Airport and nationwide screening issues, FAA special agent Brian Sullivan, Why NY Post article removed?

John Kerry ignored pre 9/11 warning in May 2001, Logan Airport and nationwide screening issues, FAA special agent Brian Sullivan, Why NY Post article removed?

“With the concept of jihad, do you think it would be difficult for a determined terrorist to get on a plane and destroy himself and all other passengers?” he warned. “Think what the result would be of a coordinated attack which took down several domestic flights on the same day. With our current screening, this is more than possible. It is almost likely.” The toll from such an attack would be economic, as well as human, he predicted with chilling accuracy.”…NY Post March 15, 2004

“His warning now looks like prophecy: At least 82 Kerry constituents were murdered aboard American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175.”…WND March 19, 2004

“The past, he reflected, had not merely been altered, it had
actually been destroyed. For how could you establish, even
the most obvious fact when there existed no record outside
your own memory?”…George Orwell, “1984″

 

Robert Mueller is being criticized for his cover up in the 9/11 investigations.

However, in a very much under reported and scrubbed story, John Kerry was warned of likely terrorist success at Logan Airport and airports across the country due to minimal screening of passengers.

From WND March 19, 2004.

“Official: Kerry failed to act on pre-9/11 tip

A third federal aviation-security agent, one still with the government, has stepped forward to say he also warned Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry about security lapses at Boston’s Logan International Airport before the 9-11 hijackings there.

Earlier this week, two former FAA agents said the Democratic presidential hopeful failed to take effective action after they gave him a prophetic warning that his home airport was vulnerable to multiple hijackings.

Brian Sullivan, a retired special agent from the Boston area, advised Kerry in a May 7, 2001, letter (page 1page 2) that Logan was ripe for a “jihad” suicide operation possibly involving “a coordinated attack.” He cited serious breaches at Logan security checkpoints exposed by an undercover investigation he and another former agent helped a Boston TV news station conduct.

Sullivan says he had a copy of the undercover videotape hand-delivered to Kerry’s office.

It turns out the person who delivered it was a senior FAA agent in Washington who’s now with the Transportation Security Administration. The agent, Bogdan Dzakovic, headed covert testing of airport security across the country before TSA took over aviation security from FAA after 9-11.

In an exclusive interview, he says he gave the tape to Jamie Wise, a Kerry staffer at the time.

After the office visit, “I received no feedback from anyone there,” Dzakovic told WorldNetDaily.

Kerry boasts in campaign ads he “sounded the alarm on terrorism years before 9-11.”

But he waited three months to reply to Sullivan’s letter. And his July 24, 2001, letter, a copy of which was obtained by WorldNetDaily, merely offers to pass Sullivan’s warning on to the Transportation Department’s inspector general – even though Sullivan had made it clear in his letter that going to his old agency was a dead end. He and other agents, including Dzakovic, had complained about security lapses for years and got nowhere.”

Read more:

https://www.wnd.com/2004/03/23792/

The NY Post also had an article about this story posted on March 15, 2004.

It no longer is available on the NY Post site.

A search on the Wayback Machine finds the article saved on April 2, 2004.

The article can be viewed here.

http://citizenwells.net/2019/09/15/john-kerry-ignored-pre-911-warning-for-logan-international-airport-brian-sullivan-faa-agent-personally-warned-kerry-may-2001/

The next saved version on Wayback is June 6, 2004.

However, it yields the following:

“Page Not Found The page you are looking for cannot be found or does not exist on NYPOST.COM.”

What happened to the NY Post article?

It was an election year.

Perhaps this is one of the reasons for this.

NY Times September 15, 2004.

“Five Widows of 9/11 Attack Endorse Kerry”

https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/15/politics/campaign/five-widows-of-911-attack-endorse-kerry.html

Perhaps some of the victims of 9/11 who are part of the lawsuit against Saudi Arabia will read this and direct some of their outrage against John Kerry who ignored the clear and present danger.

Brian Sullivan’s letter to John Kerry.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

 

Advertisements

13 responses to “John Kerry ignored pre 9/11 warning in May 2001, Logan Airport and nationwide screening issues, FAA special agent Brian Sullivan, Why NY Post article removed?

  1. ““Enhanced security would have prevented the hijackings, virtually without question,” Elson now insists. If nothing else, it might have discouraged ringleader Mohamed Atta, who monitored security procedures at Logan weeks before the hijackings.

    Yet the warnings apparently did stick in Kerry’s mind: In the days after 9/11, Kerry told the Boston Globe that he’d triggered an undercover probe of Logan security by the General Accounting Office in June 2001.

    But he wrote Sullivan no such thing in his July letter, stating only that he passed his warning and tape on to Transportation, not GAO. And GAO, though it is the investigative arm of Congress, didn’t seem to know what the senator was talking about. The agency had tested security at two airports before 9/11, but neither one was Logan. And Kerry confessed he didn’t know the outcome of the probe he says he triggered.

    Some follow-up, senator.”

    Scrubbed NY Post article

  2. CW………
    …….and it is all AFTER THE FACT !!!! In reality there has not been a repeat of 9-11, but nothing guarantees it won’t happen again only using a modified vane of public conveyance.

  3. oldsailor87, et al.

    If I knew of traitor Kerry’s ignoring glaring warning in 2001, I forgot it.
    One of my good friends reminded me & then I searched & found little.
    It is important to remember that the internet was not fully fleshed out in 2001
    & of course like most, I was working for a living.
    The article getting scrubbed on NY Post was enough for me to go into anti “1984”
    rectification mode.
    Also, it is timely with the 9/11 victims lawsuit.

  4. CW Sept 26, 2018.

    “Similarly, one moment the New York Times — just coming off an embarrassing lie in reporting that U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley had ordered new $50,000 office drapes on the government dime — reported that Kavanaugh’s alleged accomplice, Mark Judge, had confirmed Ford’s allegation. Indeed, in a sensational scoop, according to the Times, Judge told the Judiciary Committee that he does remember the episode and has nothing more to say. In fact, Judge told the committee the very opposite: that he does not remember the episode. Forty minutes later, the Times embarrassing narrative vanished down the memory hole.”

    https://citizenwells.com/2018/09/26/we-are-living-nineteen-eighty-four-1984-citizen-wells-position-since-2008-history-scrubbed-rectified-truth-due-process-evidence-rights-swept-aside/

    NYT today.

    “NYT Forced To Issue Major Correction To Kavanaugh Hit-Piece; Trump Says ‘They Should Be Sued!'”

    “While digging into an unsupported allegation by a woman named Deborah Ramirez that Kavanaugh waved his penis in her face during the 1983-1984 academic year at Yale, the Times’s Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly claimed to have uncovered another alleged incident in which Kavanaugh’s penis was thrust into a female student’s hand.”

    “The only problem – which Pogrebin and Kelly omitted from their NYT article, yet is contained in their new book “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation.”- is that the woman has no memory of the incident.”

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyt-forced-issue-major-correction-kavanaugh-hit-piece-trump-says-they-should-be-sued

  5. CW Sept 26, 2018.

    “When a second accuser, Deborah Ramirez, followed Ford seven days later to allege another sexual incident with the teenage Kavanaugh, at Yale 35 years ago, it was no surprise that she followed the now normal Orwellian boilerplate: None of those whom she named as witnesses could either confirm her charges or even remember the alleged event. She had altered her narrative after consultations with lawyers and handlers. She too confesses to underage drinking during the alleged event. She too is currently a social and progressive political activist. The only difference from Ford’s narrative is that Ramirez’s accusation was deemed not credible enough to be reported even by the New York Times, which recently retracted false stories about witness Mark Judge in the Ford case, and which falsely reported that U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley had charged the government for $50,000 office drapes.”

    https://citizenwells.com/2018/09/26/we-are-living-nineteen-eighty-four-1984-citizen-wells-position-since-2008-history-scrubbed-rectified-truth-due-process-evidence-rights-swept-aside/

  6. CW………
    …….and on and on goes the lunatic raving and ranting of such POS people whose only goal in life is spinning filthy stories about others which the story tellers themselves more than likely actually indulge in. These kind of people usually possess three words in their dirty little vocabularies, IQs of 10 or less, personally smell like feces, and never do anything constructive. It will all come home to roost for them. As each one of them finally is washed down the sewer I will take very special pleasure in watching, and hearing them scream for help as they disappear forever. Filthy liars male or female, are what they are……and their creator has a very special place for them waiting.

  7. nytimes says kavanaugh committed heinous act.

    Leaves out the part that the accuser was a clinton attorney. Also leaves out the part that the person kavanaugh allegedly committed the act against can’t remember it ever happening.

    Why is the Nytimes still open?

    Why hasn’t Trump put Nytimes executives in prison like Lincoln did?

    Why isn’t the nytimes flagged as fake news by facebook and twitter?

  8. fhl…….
    ……..there are no adjectives which can adequately describe the POS @ NY Times. While we pride ourselves as being a bit more civilized today than in Lincoln’s day it appears that Abe had the right idea. In addition I suspect that the people in America have lost a great deal of SPINE. Today the PLAYGROUND LOUDMOUTH BULLIES ABOUND…….simply because everybody is afraid to go back to REALITY and punch out the LOUDMOUTHS to such a degree that THEY BECOME AFRAID of WE THE PEOPLE. SORT OF PUTS ME IN MIND OF THE “98LB WEAKLING” WORDS THAT WERE ONCE USED IN THE OLD CHARLES ATLAS ADVERTISMENTS. Today a person can sneak up behind somebody and yell BOOOO real loud and the individual sneaked up on will literally jumps out of his/her skin…………SAD!!!!

  9. AND NOW……
    ……….THE SLIMY NEW YORK D.A. (FRIEND OF DEBLASIO) HAS ATTEMPTED TO SUBPEONA TRUMPS TAX RETURNS. HERE WE GO AGAIN. TRUMP DOES NOT HAVE TO TURN HIS TAX RETURNS OVER TO ANYONE, OR TO THE STATE OF NEW YORK. HIS TAX RETURNS ARE PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. THERE IS NO REASON WHY THE STATE WOULD NEED HIS RETURNS. THE RABID FOAMING AT THE MOUTH LIBERAL CRAZIES APPARENTLY HAVE NO IDEA THAT THEY CANNOT SUBPOENA THE PERSONAL RECORDS OF TRUMPS WITHOUT A COURT ORDER. THE NEW YORK D.A. DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE A SUBPOENA OF SUCH RECORDS……….HE MUST HAVE A COURT ORDER.

  10. I’d never read the Federalist or the anti-Federalist papers, but i read an article today that talked about one of their arguments.

    The Articles of Confederation apparently had a clause in it saying that in order to change it, there must be agreement among ALL of the states. It must be unanimous.
    This would include not only amending it but also disbanding it.

    Well, it turns out they did not have the agreement of all the states. But they disbanded it anyway. Because, as the first thing that comes up in a google search of ‘how did they get rid of the articles of confederation’ is:

    “……….. They were discarded because they made the central government too weak. … The Constitution took power away from the states and gave it to the central government, giving Congress much more power……”

    So they’ve been pulling this stuff since day one in this country.

  11. At the wikipedia article on the Articles of Confederation, it summarizes each of the articles. The last article, number 13 is summarized as follows:

    -Declares that the Articles shall be perpetual, and may be altered only with the approval of Congress and the ratification of all the state legislatures-

    But the new Constitution took effect with only nine state legislatures ratifying it. I guess because it was so important to give new powers to the federal gov’t.

  12. CW……….
    ………..I AM PRAYING THAT KAVANAUGH FINALLY TAKES NY TIMES TO THE CLEANERS. 1 billion ought to do nicely !!!! The nose picking liberal slime are all now screaming IMPEACH KAVANAUGH, IMPEACH KAVANAUGH, IMPEACH KAVANAUGH OVER AND OVER LIKE A PACK OF HALFWITS. IN 2020 IT WILL ALL COME HOME TO ROOST.

  13. AND,
    ……. the liberals are now so crazed they believe that they can impeach anyone in government they dislike whenever they like, and without trial. It is now time for the highest court in the land to get involved and start by reading the RIOT ACT to the crazed snotnoses. It is time for the courts to make examples of a few of the childish political radicals by rewarding a few of them with a mandatory visit to the woodshed. or some extended slammer vacations. Their YAMMER gets them the SLAMMER…….might peel them away from their childish fantasy worlds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s