Unemployment rate drop coincides with white American labor force plummet, 6 million gain under Bush, 1.5 million drop under Obama, Why is media hiding this US Labor Dept. fact?, Protecting Obama continues
“In December 2014 there were 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country who had arrived since January 2000. But job growth over this period was just 9.3 million — half of new immigration.”…Center for Immigration Studies February 2015
“There’s no other way to say this. The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.”…Gallup CEO Jim Clifton
“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells
Don’t take my word for it, go straight to the US Labor Dept. website and look for yourself.
Why haven’t you heard this?
The mainstream media is still protecting Obama and the Democrat presidential candidates.
So, the unemployment rate is 4.9% ???
Here is one of the reasons why.
The White American labor force plummeted 1.5 million under Obama.
Under George Bush, the White American labor force rose 6 million.
There has been the expected net growth in White Americans of employment age, millions.
But they are not getting jobs.
A high percentage of the over 30 % of millennials living with family members are white.
Donald Trump, you should be shouting this from the rooftops.
From Citizen Wells September 4, 2015.
Regardless of the unemployment rate and jobs data provided by the US Labor Department this morning, September 4, 2015, the real employment situation can also be found in their data.
White employment.
Hispanic employment.
I found this article by Business Insider from February 10, 2011.
“No One Looking At This Chart Could Possibly Call It A Recovery”
“Currently the problem in the US jobs market mainly lies with, what I call, the maintenance rate. This is the minimum monthly job creation rate that our enormous system–our economy and government with its revenues and liabilities–must have in order to maintain itself as population grows. Getting lost in the weeds, therefore, of monthly unemployment rates is a waste of time. After having lost 8+ million jobs from the top of the last expansion, nitpicking one’s way through the additions, revisions, and changes to the presumed size of the work force misses the point. And that’s this: any month in which the US does not create at least 125,000 jobs, from a systemic point of view, is negative. It’s less than zero.”
“Now you know why annual government budgets have blown out into the the trillions: the economic flows normally provided by a functioning economy are now provided through unemployment checks, food stamps, FDR style spending and other distributions. In short, the “economy” cannot be experiencing a recovery when, after 10 years of population growth and growth in future liabilities, the number of people employed is hovering around levels last seen in 2002-2004. Whether you chose to look at just Non-Farm Employment, or Total Employment, the US Labor Market is essentially flat-lining since a deep trough was reached in late 2009, early 2010.
Those who would make sweeping claims about a recovery in the entire economy should place these two charts shown here in their printed columns, along with the fact that the US population has grown by over 25 million people since the year 2000.”
Citizen WElls 
“Exposing The Lie Behind The “Strong Jobs Recovery” In One Chart”
“With all eyes glued to Friday’s payrolls report, we thought it worth reiterating some ‘facts’ about US employment data. As ECRI notes, the sustained decline in the official jobless rate – now approaching the Fed’s estimate of “full employment” – is a misleading indicator of labor market slack. The data shows that the so-called jobs recovery has been spearheaded by cheap labor, with job gains going disproportionately to the least educated — and lowest-paid — workers.”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-02/exposing-lie-behind-strong-jobs-recovery-one-chart
“Economists say ‘wow’ to below-5% unemployment”
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/economists-say-wow-to-below-5-unemployment-but-call-payroll-gains-weak-2016-02-05?dist=lcountdown
What a bunch of morons.
Mental midgets.
“70% Of Jobs Added In January Were Minimum Wage Waiters And Retail Workers”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/70-jobs-added-january-were-minimum-wage-waiters-and-retail-workers
…….There MUST BE a competitive marketplace existing for a producer to sell to; there MUST BE a producer who is NOT TAXED TO DEATH; there must be producers who are free to offer whatever wage scale they choose. As each day passes more corporations are moving to the Irish Republic, or to Mexico. Good reason=to regain control of their companies, and are free from Federal Government crapola.
When major corporations leave, so does major money! A major corporation WILL quickly avail themselves of a CHEAP LABOR MARKET. Since labor cost is part of overall manufacturing cost, it can quickly take away margin without which most companies soon die. ANNUAL SALES IS NOT NET PROFIT. THERE MUST BE A NET PROFIT for a company to survive. “MORE ,MORE,MORE”,UNION DEMANDS, AND STRIKES are a very big incentive for American business to LEAVE. As long as American people cannot control their spending habits and try to blame their employer for their overspending, there will be NO END to companies leaving America. As it stands now everything the autoworkers gain is handed right back to them, in the form of cost increases to the buying public. Soon a product is so badly overpriced in the marketplace that the product no longer sells. Many people think this is BS. So let them think what they want but FACT IS FACT, and while organized labor tries to say it is all BS. THEY ARE STILL FULL OF SHI# clear up to their eyebrows. Small companies are more prone to high cost than are major corporations. Few companies large or small can afford to absorb increasing operating, and manufacturing costs, they simply pass it on to the consumer. In reality, when you buy a new car you are actually paying for a year of retired autoworker’s healthcare costs…… average of which is close to $2500.00 per year…….in many cases much more! Has anyone looked at the 2016 prices for new vehicles?………it will knock your socks off.! How long before you look for a cheaper vehicle? Used market is even now increasing, because the used car operators are being forced to pay more for their stock. You don’t need to be a genius to add and subtract. With respect to automobile prices UP IS UP, and there is NO DOWN.
“An Update On The Waiter And Bartender Recovery”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/update-waiter-and-bartender-recovery
“Don’t Show Trump This Chart: All U.S. Job Gains Since December 2007 Have Gone To Foreign-Born Workers”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/dont-show-trump-chart-all-job-gains-december-2007-have-gone-foreign-born-workers
I personally drive a 2009 vehicle……….bought it in late 2011 with 23,000 miles on it. It has been a real champ………..now approaching 60,000. All I have done so far is replace the battery, and put a set of more desirable tires on it. Brakes will soon be completely renewed. Timing belt, engine ,and tranny will be serviced at same time. I expect to drive vehicle to at least 250,000 miles. With a proper maintenance schedule it will be EASY!
CW……..
………..liked the BARTENDER VS FACTORY WORKER chart………tells it like it is………..but doesn’t specify hours per week, or the labor cost…… Probably not easy to accurately discern!
“Robust Job Growth Doesn’t Make Sense And The Numbers Show Why”
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/robust-job-growth-doesnt-make-sense-and-numbers-show-why
Trump should campaign on, forcing the government to tell the truth when releasing statistics to the Citizens, and ending the propaganda game.
What an embarrassment!
oldsailor83
How bout this. For sale my 02 Ford F250 with 804256 miles and driving with new wheel bearing.
Retired Navy Commander Charles Kerchner reports:
Breaking News: Mike Volin of WOBC Website Launches Petition Campaign to Stop the Constitutionally Ineligible Canadian-Born Ted Cruz from Continuing to Deceive the American Electorate as to Who is a “natural born Citizen” of the United States.
Ted Cruz, Who Was Born in Canada to a Non-U.S. Citizen (Cuban) Father, is Definitely Not One! Click Here to Get a Copy of the Petition. Call Mike Volin if You Would Like to Help Do More: 570-284-7477
http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/02/breaking-wobc-launches-petition-to-stop.html#more
What’s up with this?
Illinois and New Hampshire Agree Cruz is a Natural Born Citizen
By Daniel John Sobieski
Donald Trump, his aura of invincibility shattered by Iowa caucus voters he once called “stupid,” is throwing a tantrum these days, convinced that Ted Cruz “cheated” and continues to maintain the untenable proposition that in any event he is a not eligible to be President of the United States.
Cruz did not cheat in Iowa. Cruz supporters may have indeed cited to supporters of Dr. Ben Carson CNN news reports and tweets that Carson was skipping New Hampshire and South Carolina, so draw your own conclusions, but where were the Carson president captains to shepherd their flock? If you’re a serious presidential candidate, you don’t leave Iowa to head to Florida to “change clothes”?
Ironically, the Carson Trump cites as a victim of Cruz dirty tricks, was once the main target of Trump’s slash-and-burn rhetoric. Back when Carson was threatening Trump in the Iowa polls, Trump brutally attacked Carson. As the Boston Globe reported:
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, brushing aside any recent claims of civility, has equated Ben Carson’s childhood ‘‘pathological temper’’ to the illness of a child molester, questioned his religious awakening and berated voters who support him.
‘‘How stupid are the people of Iowa?’’ declared Trump during a rally at Iowa Central Community College. ‘‘How stupid are the people of the country to believe this crap?’’ For more than an hour and a half Thursday night, the billionaire real estate mogul harshly criticized not only Carson, but many of his other competitors in the race for the GOP presidential nomination….
Trump previewed his attack line in an interview with CNN Thursday in which the businessman pointed to Carson’s own descriptions of his ‘‘pathological temper’’ as a young man.
‘‘That’s a big problem because you don’t cure that,’’ Trump said. ‘‘That’s like, you know, I could say, they say you don’t cure — as an example, child molester. You don’t cure these people. You don’t cure the child molester.’’ Trump also said that ‘‘pathological is a very serious disease.’’
Physician Trump, heal thyself. Trump needs to be the center of attention all the time. He is offended that the media is actually covering other candidates now. His ego, bruised by his Iowa loss and the rise of Sen. Marco Rubio, forces him to seek scapegoats and excuses and grasp at straws such as the roundly debunked Cruz citizenship issue.
Trump persists that Cruz’s citizenship is still an open question. It is not, and the election boards of two states, New Hampshire and Illinois, have now ruled, in response to complaints, that Sen. Ted Cruz is indeed, under the laws and Constitution of the United States, a “natural born citizen” fully eligible to be President of the United States. As the Washington Examiner reported:
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz secured two major victories Monday, winning the Republican Iowa caucuses and also receiving a favorable decision from the Illinois Board of Elections, which confirmed his U.S. citizenship met the state’s primary ballot requirements….
“The Candidate is a natural born citizen by virtue of being born in Canada to his mother who was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth,” the board said, explaining Cruz met the criteria because he “did not have to take any steps or go through a naturalization process at some point after birth.”
During the case, Cruz’s lawyers argued that he was no different than previous Republican candidates, including Sen. John McCain of Arizona and former Michigan Gov. George Romney, who were also born outside of the U.S. to an American citizen.
A ballot commission in New Hampshire also ruled in favor of Cruz in January, but the language in Monday’s decision by the Illinois board took a stronger tone than the previous ruling, warning other skeptics, “Further discussion on this issue is unnecessary.”
Indeed, it is unnecessary. The question of Cruz’s citizenship has been asked and answered. Is Trump saying that a baby born in Paris to a vacationing American family is not eligible to run for president and must be “naturalized” like some illegal alien from Guadalajara?
Some noted legal scholars would beg to differ from Trump’s concern that Cruz is not in fact a “natural born” citizen.
Jonathan Adler, who teaches courses in constitutional, administrative, and environmental law at Case Western University School of Law, writes in the Washington Post:
Ted Cruz was born in Canada. His mother was a U.S. citizen. His father, a Cuban, was not. Under U.S. law, the fact that Cruz was born to a U.S. citizen mother makes him a citizen from birth. In other words, he is a “natural born citizen” (as opposed to a naturalized citizen) and is constitutionally eligible.
Also agreeing with Cruz’s eligibility are two constitutional scholars who have argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. As the Washington Post reported:
Writing in the Harvard Law Review, two former top Supreme Court litigators, Neal Katyal and Paul Clement, said: “All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase ‘natural born Citizen’ has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.” The fact that Ted Cruz’s mother was a citizen, by this standard, means that despite his birth in Canada, he is eligible.
Now two state boards of election have certified Cruz’s eligibility, which is beyond dispute, no matter how much Trump whines, pouts, and throws out groundless accusations.
Bob Strauss……….
………….while I wish Mike Volin all the best, I KNOW that any action must be so massive that it overwhelms the slimey judges, who are sitting in the center of it. They know the words well which repel SINGULAR, or PAIRS of plaintiffs, but when there is at least a MILLION PLAINTIFFS there will be hell to pay for an ABUSIVE judge, going against the Constitution. That is also why the scotus can step on people like bugs. But when a million highly angered, and well armed citizens converge simultaneously upon the odorous dens of INEQUITY, forcefully remove the criminal perpetrators and vigorously prosecute each and everyone of them, then and only then will sanity return to our judicial system. As it stands now the entire judicial system is CORRUPT, and as such……….EXTREMELY DIFFICULT to penetrate. I said EXTREMELY DIFFICULT, but I DIDN’T say IMPOSSIBLE. This is what our Declaration of Independence suggests must happen when a TYRRANOUS GOVERNMENT IS IN POWER. Such a government MUST BE AFRAID OF the PEOPLE.
hapnHal………..
there they go again………..saying the Constitution MUST BE INTERPRETED. Therein lies their SLIMEY JOKE. The Constitution was not written to be INTERPRETED. Nobody wants to follow the Constitution, instead they want to make it mean what they WANT IT TO MEAN,VIA CASE LAW. In the final analysis this TWISTED CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR BY THOSE WHO KNOW BETTER, will eventually require them to PAY THE FIDDLER. PAYMENT should include a 6′ by 8′ permanent slammer CELL.
“Rise of Rubio” – never trusted him – http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/05/phyllis-schlalfy-issues-rubio-betrayal-memo/
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-05/bloodbathery