US Supreme Court US courts fail in their duty, Same sex couple ruling exceeds bounds of federal government, Marriage is a contract between 2 people and the state defined by the states, Chief Justice John Roberts finally makes legal sense, No basis in the Constitution

US Supreme Court US courts fail in their duty, Same sex couple ruling exceeds bounds of federal government, Marriage is a contract between 2 people and the state defined by the states, Chief Justice John Roberts finally makes legal sense, No basis in the Constitution

“The government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined, and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be pruledassed by those intended to be restrained? The distinction, between a government with limited and unlimited powers, is abolished, if those limits do not confine the persons on whom they are imposed, and if acts prohibited and acts allowed, are of equal obligation. It is a proposition too plain to be contested, that the constitution controls any legislative act repugnant to it; or, that the legislature may alter the constitution by an ordinary act.

Between these alternatives there is no middle ground. The constitution is either a superior, paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, and like other acts, is alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it.”
“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each.

So if a law be in opposition to the constitution; if both the law and the constitution apply to a particular case, so that the court must either decide that case conformably to the law, disregarding the constitution; or conformably to the constitution, disregarding the law; the court must determine which of these conflicting rules governs the case. This is of the very essence of judicial duty.

If then the courts are to regard the constitution; and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature; the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.”
“The judicial power of the United States is extended to all cases arising under the constitution. Could it be the intention of those who gave this power, to say that, in using it, the constitution should not be looked into? That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises? This is too extravagant to be maintained.”
“Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government? if it is closed upon him, and cannot be inspected by him?”…Marbury V Madison

“We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”…Abraham Lincoln



Chief Justice John Roberts of the US Supreme Court and courts in general have failed to do their duty.

Roberts has acted irrationally in his opinions regarding Obamacare.

Our courts have failed to do their duty in regard to clarifying what natural born citizen means and the eligibility of Barack Obama to occupy the White House.

I was however pleased to see Justice Roberts step up to the plate with his dissent on the same sex marriage ruling.

When I heard the SCOTUS opinion I thought to myself how absurd.

A marriage contract is between 2 people and the state they get married in and the federal government has no damn business meddling in this.

“CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, with whom JUSTICE SCALIA and JUSTICE THOMAS join, dissenting. Petitioners make strong arguments rooted in social policy and considerations of fairness. They contend that same-sex couples should be allowed to affirm their love and commitment through marriage, just like opposite-sex couples. That position has undeniable appeal; over the
past six years, voters and legislators in eleven States and the District of Columbia have revised their laws to allow marriage between two people of the same sex. But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.” The Federalist No. 78, p. 465 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton) (capitalization altered). Although the policy arguments for extending marriage to same-sex couples may be compelling, the legal arguments for requiring such an extension are not. The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational. In short, our Constitution does not enact any one theory of marriage. The people of a State are free to expand marriage to include same-sex couples, or to retain the historic definition. Today, however, the Court takes the extraordinary step of ordering every State to license and recognize same-sex marriage. Many people will rejoice at this decision, and I begrudge none their celebration. But for those who believe in a government of laws, not of men, the majority’s approach is deeply disheartening. Supporters of same-sex marriage have achieved considerable success persuading their fellow citizens—through the democratic process—to adopt their view. That ends today. Five lawyers have closed the debate and enacted their own vision of marriage as a matter of constitutional law. Stealing this issue from the people will for many cast a cloud over same-sex marriage, making a dramatic social change that much more difficult to accept.
The majority’s decision is an act of will, not legal judgment. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent. The majority expressly disclaims judicial “caution” and omits even a pretense of humility, openly relying on its desire to remake society according to its own “new insight” into the “nature of injustice.” Ante, at 11, 23. As a result, the Court invalidates the marriage laws of more than half the States and orders the transformation of a social institution that has formed the basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs. Just who do we think we are? It can be tempting for judges to confuse our own preferences with the requirements of the law. But as this Court has been reminded throughout our history, the Constitution “is made for people of fundamentally differing views.” Lochner v. New York, 198 U. S. 45, 76 (1905) (Holmes, J., dissenting). Accordingly, “courts are not concerned with the wisdom or policy of legislation.” Id., at 69 (Harlan, J., dissenting). The majority today neglects that restrained conception of the judicial role. It seizes for itself a question the Constitution leaves to the people, at a time when the people are engaged in a vibrant debate on that question. And it answers that question based not on neutral principles of constitutional law, but on its own “understanding of what freedom is and must become.” Ante, at 19. I have no choice but to dissent. Understand well what this dissent is about: It is not about whether, in my judgment, the institution of marriage should be changed to include same-sex couples. It is instead about whether, in our democratic republic, that decision should rest with the people acting through their elected representatives, or with five lawyers who happen to hold commissions authorizing them to resolve legal disputes according to law. The Constitution leaves no doubt about the answer.
Petitioners and their amici base their arguments on the “right to marry” and the imperative of “marriage equality.” There is no serious dispute that, under our precedents, the Constitution protects a right to marry and requires States to apply their marriage laws equally. The real question in these cases is what constitutes “marriage,” or—more precisely—who decides what constitutes “marriage”? The majority largely ignores these questions, relegating ages of human experience with marriage to a paragraph or two. Even if history and precedent are not “the end” of these cases, ante, at 4, I would not “sweep away what has so long been settled” without showing greater respect for all that preceded us. Town of Greece v. Galloway, 572 U. S. ___, ___ (2014) (slip op., at 8). “

From the Center for Immigration Studies June 23, 2015.

“The Supreme Court recently issued a decision in an immigration-related case Kerry, Secretary of State, et al. v. Din. The decision reaffirms that although people have the right to marry anyone they like, if the spouse is a foreigner, he or she has no intrinsic right to enter the United States when excludable under any of the grounds laid out by law.

To people like myself, it is one of the rare victories these days in an increasingly beleaguered national immigration system under peril from open borders advocates who persistently push the boundaries of sovereignty and common sense.”

“Despite the salutary outcome, there are several disturbing things about this case that merit mentioning:

  • First, of course, is that the 9-CCA ruled as it did. One sometimes wonders whether they ought to be impeached, en banc. Perhaps they could take up residence as appellate court judges somewhere else more appropriate to their extreme views? Like Venezuela.
  • Next, is that four of the nine Supreme Court justices also held that Din’s rights had been infringed because of her husband’s visa denial, and that she was somehow entitled to additional due process review because of it. Imagine the loophole that would have been caused but for one slim vote. Terrorists, narcotraffickers, and sundry other villains would be lining up to join the marriage fraud queue so that their spouses could avail themselves of their “constitutional right” to live in the United States with them.
  • Then there is the curious case of Din herself. She came to the United States as a refugee from Afghanistan in 2000 when the Taliban was in the full glory of its power, sheltering the likes of Osama bin Laden and conducting public maimings, stonings, and executions under Sharia law at the main soccer stadium in Kabul. But where did she find her husband? In Afghanistan, where she traveled in 2006. And whom did he work for? The Taliban, from whom she presumably sought refuge. Did none of this seem curious or anomalous to the folks at USCIS — the ones who had granted her the refugee status in the first place, who were adjudicating her petition for her spouse, and who could have, who should have, taken a second look at whether her refugee application was fraudulent instead of proceeding to naturalize her? Nah, apparently not.

Kind of disturbing to think that USCIS and courts like the Ninth Circuit are the thin line protecting us from terrorists seeking benefits to live in the United States.

38 responses to “US Supreme Court US courts fail in their duty, Same sex couple ruling exceeds bounds of federal government, Marriage is a contract between 2 people and the state defined by the states, Chief Justice John Roberts finally makes legal sense, No basis in the Constitution

  1. oldsoldier79


    Life is like a jar of jalapeno peppers. What you do today might burn your butt tomorrow .

  2. oldsailor83

    AND NOW………..
    …….the WHACKEY HOUSE LOOKS REALLY WHACKEY TONIGHT. “QUEERSVILLE”. Now the country is even more divided.

  3. oldsailor83

    Americans whose HEART,MIND, AND SOUL is solidly embedded in Christianity might be dwindling, but you can rest assured they will leave Earth as HETROSEXUALS,……NOT HOMOSEXUALS. Homosexuals will eventually pay the FIDDLER! Liberace, and Rock Hudson both PAID THE FIDDLER! You do not go against God’s plan.

  4. oldsailor83

    ……So if the so called leader can light up the Whackey house with QUEERSVILLE colors, then South Carolina can fly the Confederate flag. Both are ICONS of a CAUSE.

  5. Franklin Graham’s comments on homosexual marriage

    One of the nation’s most prominent evangelical leaders issued a dire warning for the nation in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling on homosexual marriage.

    “I believe God could bring judgment upon America,” said Franklin Graham in an exclusive interview.

    Graham told me that Christians should be prepared for persecution in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling on homosexual marriage.

    “You better be ready and you better be prepared because it’s coming,” Graham said just moments after the court handed down its ruling. “There will be persecution of Christians for our stand.”

    Graham, the president and CEO of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association and Samaritan’s Purse, said he was disappointed in the 5-4 Supreme Court ruling.

    “I’m disappointed because the government is recognizing sin,” he said. “This court is endorsing sin. That’s what homosexuality is – a sin against god.”

    Graham said regardless of the ruling, he will refuse to marry any same-sex couple.

    “I will never recognize it in my heart because God gave marriage between a man and a woman and that’s what marriage is,” he said. “And I don’t think the court – since it never defined marriage – doesn’t have the right to redefine it. God gave us marriage. Period. And God doesn’t change his mind.”

    The Supreme Court’s decision means gay rights now trump religious liberty. And if you think the cultural purging of the Southern States has been breathtaking, wait until you see what LGBT activists are about to unleash on American Christians.

    “If pastors are going to be forced to provide marriage services for gay couples, I’m not going to do it,” Graham declared.

    Churches and faith-based business should prepare for lawsuits and government investigations. Pastors who refuse to perform gay marriages and preach from the Bible should prepare for hate crime charges. All dissent will be silenced by the government and the activists.

    But I believe that an overwhelming number of Christians will defy the law.

    Governor Mike Huckabee posted this message on Facebook: “I will not acquiesce to an imperial court,” vowing to “resist and reject judicial tyranny.”

    In closing, I am reminded of something the late Charles Colson wrote: “If we’re not willing to fight this, even to the point of breaking the law, or refusing to recognize the law, then we will lose everything.”

    Given the choice of obeying God or the government, I believe Christians will obey God – even if there is hell to pay.

  6. oldsailor83

    TO ALL……….
    ………in recent history the foundation for another civil war was slowly being laid. The level of power that states have has been steadily diminished. Yesterday’s ruling by the SCOTUS laid the FINAL BRICK. Now the states should turn all marriage applications over to the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The fed will not be able to manage the volume of marriage applications, and all marriage will descend into TOTAL CHAOS. The state leaders for some unknown reason cannot see what is happening,,,,,,every state is SLOWLY BEING FEDERALISED, and soon states will exist in NAME ONLY. They will be seen as DISTRICTS by the FED. Now the fundamental justification for all out CIVIL WAR EXISTS. Once again it has become an issue of states rights…….but it will be largely about the QUEER CROWD. Franklin Graham is right. If people do nothing there will be absolute hell to pay. Persecution will now be rampant, and the QUEER LIFESTYLE will be rammed down everyone’s throat. Hope EVERYONE ENJOYS the taste of a QUEER’S genitals. Maybe that will provide INCENTIVE for the DO NOTHING CROWD TO FINALLY GET OFF THEIR A$$ES and act. The Christian church will be attacked now like never before. UP is now DOWN, and the QUEERS intend to EMPHASISE IT. The last civil war was bad, but that which is coming will make the last one look like a child playing with his lead soldiers. When queers move into a neighborhood there will be localised neighborhood wars everywhere. Married sexual deviates will NOT BE WELCOME in most neighborhoods, particularly where there are large numbers of children. Parents will have to provide nearly 24 hour guards for their children. Particularly when they are outdoors. For those whose hearts,minds and souls are in Christianity you must now PREPARE FOR A WAR LIKE NO OTHER WAR. The IDIOTIC AND QUEER LIGHTING OF THE WACKEY HOUSE WAS THE FIRST SHOT FIRED IN THE COMING QUEER WAR.

  7. citizenwells

    Justice Scalia dissenting:

    “Those civil consequences—and the public approval that
    conferring the name of marriage evidences—can perhaps
    have adverse social effects, but no more adverse than the
    effects of many other controversial laws. So it is not of
    special importance to me what the law says about marriage.
    It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it
    is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and
    the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a
    majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The
    opinion in these cases is the furthest extension in fact—
    and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the
    Court’s claimed power to create “liberties” that the Constitution
    and its Amendments neglect to mention. This
    practice of constitutional revision by an unelected committee
    of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant
    praise of liberty, robs the People of the most important
    liberty they asserted in the Declaration of
    Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the
    freedom to govern themselves.”

    Click to access 14-556_3204.pdf

  8. citizenwells

    Justice Thomas dissenting:

    The Court’s decision today is at odds not only with the
    Constitution, but with the principles upon which our
    Nation was built. Since well before 1787, liberty has been
    understood as freedom from government action, not entitlement
    to government benefits. The Framers created our
    Constitution to preserve that understanding of liberty.
    Yet the majority invokes our Constitution in the name of a
    “liberty” that the Framers would not have recognized, to
    the detriment of the liberty they sought to protect. Along
    the way, it rejects the idea—captured in our Declaration of
    Independence—that human dignity is innate and suggests
    instead that it comes from the Government. This distortion
    of our Constitution not only ignores the text, it inverts
    the relationship between the individual and the state in
    our Republic. I cannot agree with it.”

    Click to access 14-556_3204.pdf

  9. citizenwells

    Justice Alito dissenting:

    “Until the federal courts intervened, the American people
    were engaged in a debate about whether their States
    should recognize same-sex marriage.1 The question in
    these cases, however, is not what States should do about
    same-sex marriage but whether the Constitution answers
    that question for them. It does not. The Constitution
    leaves that question to be decided by the people of each

    Click to access 14-556_3204.pdf

  10. CW………
    ……at least 3 members of the SCOTUS are still SANE. All three GOT IT RIGHT!

  11. CW,
    A ray of hope. I woke up last night and got to thinking.
    So, I thought if anyone else had the same thought and Whoooa Look what can up……….

    Scott Walker calls for Constitutional amendment to let states define marriage
    By DANIEL STRAUSS 6/26/15 11:55 AM EDT
    Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, seizing the moment after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling legalizing same-sex marriage, called Friday for a Constitutional amendment that would allow the states to decide whether gay marriage should be legal.
    Walker’s call came shortly after the high court ruled 5-4 that same-sex couples could marry across the country, overturning a number of state same-sex marriage bans.
    Story Continued Below
    The ruling was “a grave mistake,” the Republican governor said, touting his support for amending his state’s constitution “to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism.”
    “As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage,” Walker said in the statement.

    Read more:

  12. PS
    and while were at it………

  13. oldsoldier79

    Let me try a recent post in another way….since moderation won’t let me post it in the original way………

    For those who are 60 years old or older, you will understand my post…..

    WELCOME TO THE FUTURE: ….by way of 1984

    • Our Phones are – Wireless
    • Cooking is – Fireless
    • Cars are – Keyless
    • Food is – Tasteless
    • Tires are –Tubeless
    • Dresses are – Sleeveless
    • Our Youth is – Jobless
    • Our Leaders are – Shameless
    • Relationships are – Meaningless
    • Attitudes are– Careless
    • Babies are – Fatherless
    • Feelings are – Heartless
    • Education is – Valueless
    • Children are – Mannerless
    • Our Country is – Godless

    We are now all – SPEECHLESS,
    The Government is – CLUELESS,
    Our pResident is – BRAINLESS
    Our Politicians are WORTHLESS

    And I’m scared – ……CRAPLESS !

    And this post is -“PRICELESS” !!!
    This pretty well explains the positions we face today, as opposed to what we, as hard working, l;aw abiding, citizens have known in the past…….they are many more areas I could have covered, but I think everyone gets the message with those which I did post above.

    Under Obama , the “American Dream has now become the “American Nightmare”…..Welcome to 2015.

    Those who read this are encouraged to add their favorite LESS’s to this list.

  14. citizenwells

    “November 30, 1804
    Senate Prepares for Impeachment Trial

    On November 30, 1804, for the third time in its brief history, the Senate began preparations for an impeachment trial. In 1798 and 1799, the Senate had tried a senator previously expelled on grounds of treason. Because that senator no longer served, the Senate dismissed the case citing lack of jurisdiction. The second impeachment trial, in 1804, removed a federal judge for reasons of drunkenness and insanity. More than the first two proceedings, however, this third trial challenged the Senate to explore the meaning of impeachable crimes.
    Samuel Chase had served on the Supreme Court since 1796. A staunch Federalist with a volcanic personality, Chase showed no willingness to tone down his bitter partisan rhetoric after Jeffersonian Republicans gained control of Congress in 1801. Representative John Randolph of Virginia, at the urging of President Thomas Jefferson, orchestrated impeachment proceedings against Chase, declaring he would wipe the floor with the obnoxious justice. The House voted to impeach Chase on March 12, 1804, accusing Chase of refusing to dismiss biased jurors and of excluding or limiting defense witnesses in two politically sensitive cases. The trial managers (members of the House of Representatives) hoped to prove that Chase had “behaved in an arbitrary, oppressive, and unjust way by announcing his legal interpretation on the law of treason before defense counsel had been heard.” Highlighting the political nature of this case, the final article of impeachment accused the justice of continually promoting his political agenda on the bench, thereby “tending to prostitute the high judicial character with which he was invested, to the low purpose of an electioneering partizan.”
    On November 30, 1804, the Senate appointed a committee to “prepare and report proper rules of proceedings” for the impeachment trial. When they took up the case against the Federalist justice in January 1805, the Senate consisted of 25 Jeffersonian Republicans and nine Federalists. Chase appeared before the members on January 4, 1805, to answer the charges. He declared that he was being tried for his political convictions rather than for any real crime or misdemeanor and requested a one-month postponement to prepare a defense. The Senate agreed and the trial began in earnest on February 4.
    Chase’s defense team, which included several of the nation’s most eminent attorneys, convinced several wavering senators that Chase’s conduct did not warrant his removal from office. With at least six Jeffersonian Republicans joining the nine Federalists who voted not guilty on each article, the Senate on March 1, 1805, acquitted Samuel Chase on all counts. A majority voted guilty on three of the eight articles, but on each article the vote fell far short of the two-thirds required for conviction. The Senate thereby effectively insulated the judiciary from further congressional attacks based on disapproval of judges’ opinions. Chase resumed his duties at the bench, where he remained until his death in 1811.”

  15. oldsoldier79

    I was NOT a Ted Cruz fan until I heard him make this speech……if we must ignore the Constitution requirements on who is, or is not, a natural born citizen in the run for president in 2016…..then based on this one speech, I will vote for Cruz because he


    If Obamacare is not stopped, it will be “the killer of our country”…

    then exactly who do we lynch? Ovomit?, Congress and all democrats?, Mitch McConnell and all those damn RINO’s who have ignored the wishes of the majority of the people?, or all the lawless SCOTUS, who as as*kissing members of the highest court in the land who decided to WRITE new laws on this subject instead of following the law as it was written?

    I say they are all guilty of carrying Obama’s tainted water and they all should pay accordingly.

  16. oldsoldier79


    Chase didn’t die soon enough !!!

    The old bastard should have “checked out of the net” long before 1811 thereby saving the Senate all the grief and exposure of prostituting itself, as it did then and still does now !!! ………

  17. oldsoldier79

    And while I’m at it, let me voice my opinion and the opinion of the majority of people in America on the “Queer Right Issue” decision which just came out of our “LAW REWRITING”…… SCOTUS on Friday……..after I vomit first…

    Yesterday, was a significant setback for all Americans who believe in the Constitution of the United States of America, the rule of law, democratic self-government process, and the definition of marriage as a union of ONE man and ONE woman and the Holy Bible as it is written..

    There is NOTHING written in our Constitution about what a marriage is, or is not. Therefore it is not a federal matter, and according to the Constitution, the definition of what a marriage is, or is not, is a subject that falls under each individual states “right to define” and write laws about.

    There is NO question about this decision which this U.S. Supreme Court got terribly wrong: and they had no legal rights whatsoever,according to our Constitution, to mandated all 50 states to redefine their marriage laws.

    This is nothing short of judicial democrat activism: nothing in our Constitution requires the redefinition of marriage, and the highest court has now imposed its judgment about a policy matter that should be decided by the American people and their elected representatives in each state.

    The court got marriage and the Constitution wrong today just like they got abortion and the Constitution wrong 42 years ago with Roe v. Wade. Look where that got us…..Millions and Millions of babies being murdered….Yes, MURDER is the correct word here.

    Today in my morning “democrat rag sheet”, the Charlotte Observer, I read where Franklin Graham predicts God’s wreath upon the lawless America….I think he may be right.

    One other thing that now comes to mind….what happens when 2 men decide to marry another man, or 2 women decide to marry a horse? Were does this madness end?

    The united States of America is really turning into “Babylon, the whore” that was described over and over in the Bible…..but who reads that outdated book anymore?……apparently our leaders and our courts do not./

    Five un-elected judges have now assumed the power to change the laws about marriage, and to prostitute the truth about the real law, our Constitution, and go against the will of the people and most importantly……
    Go against the Will of GOD……..

    Someone is going to pay dearly for this….GOD does not like to be MOCKED..

  18. bob strauss

    oldsoldier79 | June 27, 2015 at 2:22 pm |

    RMinNC, (oldsoldier79)
    Thanks for the Cruz video, everyone should be equally infuriated, at the way this law was rammed up the A$$ of the Citizens.

  19. oldsoldier79


    For millions, the Confederate Flag is a symbol of their love for the New South, which has risen out of the ashes of the Old South.

    The HOMOSEXUAL RAINBOW flag flies wherever it is wanted without a thought pursuant to how people who oppose homosexuality may feel, or what they may think about it. Muslims are now flying their black flags of ISIS in America but now it is only the Confederate Flag that is worthy of condemnation in America.

    From time to time I wear a Confederate bandana on my head when I’m riding the Harley Davidson. My friends do the same. I might add to that I have never feared the Confederate Flag.

    I have always been ambivalent about it.

    The Confederate Flag has never called me a nigger, but white liberals and uncothed blacks have.

    The Confederate Flag has never threatened me with physical harm and called me sellout, Uncle Tom, or any of a host of other vitriolic racial pejoratives, but white liberals, Muslims, and blacks have.
    It’s not the flag that bothers me….it’s the person who is carrying it…..

    The Confederate flag is a part of our history and no Usurper president, or knee-jerking liberal can change that…so get over it.

  20. oldsoldier79


    Washington (AFP) –

    The dean of Washington National Cathedral called Thursday for two stained glass windows that depict the controversial Confederate flag to be replaced.

    Reverend Gary Hall said the windows — installed in 1953 and depicting Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson — were no longer appropriate

    “It is time to take those windows out,” Hall said in a statement, eight days after a young white supremacist murdered nine blacks in an African-American church in Charleston, South Carolina.

    “Here, in 2015, we know that celebrating the lives of these two men, and the flag under which they fought, promotes neither healing nor reconciliation, especially for our African-American sisters and brothers.”
    It looks like the hatred for American history has spread to the Nation’s Capitol and the National church and it’s pastor, supposedly a man of God……

    If we follow the words of Mr. Gary Hall…we can no longer look upon Robert E Lee and Stonewall Jackson as men of honor and respect……

    Where does all the flag Sh*t end? What’s next on their agenda?

    Will Lee and Jackson’s name be stricken from all monuments and all other places of public notice?

    If these knee-jerking liberals and blacks are not careful, I’m afraid they will really be stepping on toes and people don’t like to have their toes stepped on.

  21. oldsoldier79

    And by the way…as a note of interest….

    Both Robert E Lee and Thomas (Stonewall) Jackson were strong men of GOD and most likely both of these honorable men had more religion in their little fingers than most professed Christians Reverends have today……

    Both prayed the first thing in the morning, both prayed the last thing in the evening…..most people calling for the destruction of the honor of these great leaders and their memory and rightful place in history don’t even pray, they just march, protest, and burn….period.

    Right Reverend Al?…You can answer that also Reverend Jesse Jackson.

  22. oldsoldier79

    Black Middle School Kid Gets It…..Obama Doesn’t….

    1) Lessons Learned: In 1933, Hitler took all the private weapons from the citizens of Germany…….look what it got those law abiding citizens…..

    2) If all the guns from law abiding citizens are confiscated ….Criminals will still have their guns…then who will protect the citizen? The police only work after the fact……

    3) If Obama is successful in taking all weapons…..we have not seen hell like that which will be unleashed upon the American people.

  23. BUSTED: Massive Obama Family Tie to Slavery Gets Exposed for America to See

    The liberal mainstream media has been trying to hide this for years, but race-baiter-in-chief President Barack Hussein Obama’s own family used to own slaves.

    Specifically, Obama’s great-great-great-great grandfather on his mother’s side, George Washington Overall, owned two slaves — a 15-year-old black girl and 25-year-old black man.

    Obama’s great-great-great-great-great-grandmother, Mary Duvall, also owned two slaves — a 60-year-old black man and 58-year-old black woman.

    Furthermore, the Duvalls, who lived in the 1800s, can be traced back to Mareen Duvall, a land owner in the 1600s who owned 18 slaves.

    When this revelation initially broke in 2007, an Obama campaign spokesperson tried to deflect from it by arguing that Obama also had ancestors who “fought for the Union in the Civil War.”

    And you can best believe that, according to The Baltimore Sun, Obama made no mention of these slave-owning relatives in his 1995 memoir, “Dreams of My Father.”

    He and his pals in the mainstream media tried for years to hide his own family’s slave-owning past while they continued hammering white Americans for their ties to slavery and vestigial racism.

    That Obama’s ancestors owned slaves in all reality does not matter. What matters are his own actions in the present.

    However, because of the politically charged climate in which we live — one in which liberals are pining to erase the Confederacy from our history books — it’s important that all Americans be aware of President Barack Hussein Obama’s own past.

    Please share this post on Facebook because every American citizen deserves to know that even our own president has direct ties to the most horrific part of our history: slavery.

    Friday, June 26th, 2015

  24. Liberal heads to explode in 3… 2… 1…

    THIS was the Founding Fathers Warning About the Supreme Court…Powerful

    My, my, my!

  25. Whooooa, what about this…….

    Impacts of Supreme Court Decisions – Things we have not thought of yet !!

    Have we considered the impact on the Military on this whole gay marriage thing. When will military family housing be open to LGBT couples? Will married LGBT couples be allowed to co-habitate in bachelor dorms or on deployment? Will straight males be forced to co-habitate with homosexual roommates? What if a straight male feels uncomfortable about it?

  26. AND NOW………..
    the US capitol lighted with the QUEER colors is becoming the LAUGHING STOCK of the world. The heads of state of several countries have PUBLICALLY stated that America seems to respect our HOMOSEXUALS more than they do their allies. The whackey house has never been so flagrantly DISRESPECTED by such so called decorations, by any of our past presidents. By so doing Soetoro has brought a crescendo of laughter from our allies. One country has made verbal reference to the PANTY WAIST at the whackey house. Neville Chamberlain’s behavior was NOTHING when compared to Soetoro. At least there has never been any evidence that Chamberlain was a QUEER…….he was just STUPID.


  28. oldsailor83

    good thought………in the 1950s we didn’t have such a problem or even the potential for it. Homosexuals when discovered were either awarded Section 8 discharges, or transferred to duty stations which were less effected by the presence of such persons. Their presence aboard combat ships was NOT TOLERATED.

  29. oldsoldier79

    Here’s what I know to be right….

  30. bob strauss

    American Support for Gay Marriage Study Faked

    By Russ Hepler

    We’ve heard it over and over again in the main stream media – a majority of Americans now support “same-sex” marriage. It is the rationale those pushing for this radical change to U.S. culture are using to press ahead with their agenda.

    But, a new report just out shoots down this assumption being hammered home by the left. The Daily Caller reports:

    A study purporting to show that people’s views on gay marriage could change simply by meeting gay people has been retracted following revelations that its data was fabricated.

    The study was published last December in Science, and prior to publication drew a great deal of attention from the American media. Vox, for instance, described the findings in the study as “kind of miraculous.” As it turns out, that’s exactly what they were, because they were apparently made up.

    According to the study, people from communities hostile to gay marriage could have their opinions shift dramatically after spending just a few minutes speaking with a gay person who canvassed their neighborhood promoting gay marriage. Not only that, but this could have a spillover effect, making not just the people themselves more pro-gay but also other people who lived in the same household.

    The study, among other things, lent support to the notion that those opposed to gay marriage simply don’t know or interact with open homosexuals. More broadly, it was seen as an important development in the science of how people can be convinced to change their minds on ideologically-charged issues.

    I don’t know why this should surprise us. The left always plays “fast and loose ” with the facts to spew their propaganda. Perception is reality as far as they are concerned.

    The Daily Caller provides more details:

    The study began to fall apart when students at the University of California at Berkeley sought to conduct additional research building off of it, only to find major irregularities in how its research was apparently conducted. For example, thermometers used to measure participants’ attitudes produced consistent, reliable information, even though they are known for producing relatively unreliable numbers.

    Also, the data recovered had an exceptionally consistent distribution, with not a single one of the 12,000 supposed participants providing anomalous or unusual results. In other words, the study’s data was too perfect to be believable.

    Donald Green, a professor at Columbia University and a co-author of the paper, made the decision to retract it after having a confrontation with co-author Michael LaCour, a graduate student at UCLA. While LaCour maintained that he hadn’t fabricated the data, he was also unable to produce the original source files supposedly used to produce it. When he failed to write-up a retraction, Green took the initiative and did so himself.

    “I am deeply embarrassed by this turn of events and apologize to the editors, reviewers, and readers of Science,” Green told Retraction Watch, a science watchdog website.

    How much damage this “fake” study has already inflicted on America is not known, but don’t look to anyone in the main stream media to correct the record. They are completely sold on the idea of “same-sex” marriage and all of the “transgender fluidity” nonsense now being pushed by the same people who pushed for acceptance of homosexual behavior as normative.

    It may take the American people some time to see through this most recent fraud, but truth has a funny way of coming out; especially when all of the lies start to fall like a house of cards.

  31. Bob
    Since they want to change money to put a woman on our currency, why not change the inscription:
    “United States of America” to
    “Queer States of America”

  32. Obama’s 25 Charges Of Treason: Where’s Darrel Issa?

    “The administration has repeatedly put its partisan agenda above the rule of law,” committee chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said. “In doing so, it has eroded the constitutional and legal foundation that have kept America prosperous and free for over 200 years.”

    Smith enumerated other instances of alleged presidential overreach, including Obama’s decision to stop enforcing parts of U.S. immigration law to allow illegal aliens to stay in the country legally if they meet certain criteria and waivers issued to the No Child Left Behind Act and welfare reform bill that Smith said “effectively rewrite the law instead of enforcing it.”

    “Just because you don’t like a law, doesn’t mean you can ignore it,” Smith said. “Many people have gone to jail for doing just that.”

    Constitutional Experts Call Obama’s Abuse Of Executive Power Historic
    Top Democrat Democrat Elijah Cummings May Serve Prison Time For His Role In IRS Scandal. June 2015

    Contact Darrell
    Oversight Committee Chairman Darrel Issa
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
    Mailing address: 2347 Rayburn House Office Building, Washington DC 20515-0549

    DC Office Phone: 202-225-3906
    CA Office Phone: 760-599-5000

    1. Article 1, Sect. 1: Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
    DOJ’s Eric Holder Knew All About Fast & Furious In 2009


    2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.

    3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration – Article 1 Section 1, ALL Legislative power held by Congress.

    Amnesty For 11 Million Will Increase Debt By $6.3 Trillion: Amnesty Scheme For Slavery ID Cards To Banking System ~ Amnesty For Bernie Madoff First.

    4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated.

    Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments.
    White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009

    5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.

    Executive Order 13603 – How Dangerous Is It?

    6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.

    7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress

    Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,

    8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a FELONY.

    9. Attempt to tax political contributions –

    1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    Article I Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
    Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7

    More Bells Ringing: Obama To Send $1 Billion Of U.S. Taxpayer’s Money To Ukraine In Violation Of The Foreign Assistance Act, While Detroit, Michigan Plans Mass Water Shutoffs For $260 Million!

    10. Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Law – Obama directed DOJ ( Dept. of Justice ) to ignore the Constitution and separation of powers and not enforce the law.

    Article III, Section 3 – Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
    White House: ‘War on terrorism’ is over Thursday, August 6, 2009

    Defending Marriage In An Age Of Unreason: Theology Professor Gives Natural Law Argument Against Homosexual ‘Marriage’

    11. Drone strikes on American Citizens – 5th Amendment Due process Rights negated.

    Article II Section 2. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917) ] 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241
    Violations: Art. 2 sect.2 , 5th amendment, 18 USC 241 – Sec. 241

    Obama Fomenting Terrorism Against The United States With Drones & Illegal Immigrants!

    12. Bypassed Congress and gave EPA power to advance Cap-n-Trade

    Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

    CFACT Takes EPA To U.S. Supreme Court: EPA Emissions Rules Violate Constitution’s Separation Of Powers ~ Contrived Rules Are Harmful, Arbitrary, Capricious And Fraudulent.

    13. Attempt for Graphic tobacco warnings (under appeal) –

    Art. 1 sect. 8 Section 8. The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; (see list)
    1st Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    Violations: 1st Amendment. Art. 1 sect. 8

    14. Four Executive appointments – Senate was NOT in recess (Court has ruled unconstitutional yet the appointees still remain)

    Art. 1 sect 2 Section 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
    Art. 1 sect . 5 Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members, and a Majority of each shall constitute a Quorum to do Business; but a smaller Number may adjourn from day to day, and may be authorized to compel the Attendance of absent Members, in such Manner, and under such Penalties as each House may provide.
    Violations: Art. 1 sect 2 & 5 ,

    Federal Court Unanimously Rules Obama Appointments Violated U.S. Constitution: Obama Ignores!
    Obama’s Coup d’etat Of America: What If The Citizens Of The United States Knew The Truth?

    15. Obama took Chairmanship of UN Security Council –

    Art 1 Sect. 9. Section 9. The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
    Violation: Art 1 Sect. 9.

    16. Obamacare ( A.C.A. ) mandate – SCOTUS (U.S. SupremeCourt ) had to make it a tax because there is no Constitutional authority.

    Art. 2 sect. 1 Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
    Violations: Art. 2 sect. 1 , Amendments 1, 2, 9, 10, & 14, Art. 1 sect. 7

    Did Justice (sic) Roberts Sell His Soul To The Devil: The 16th. Amendment Constitutionally Prohibits The IRS Taxing Personal Income Because One Does Not Purchase A Government Insurance & Is Therefore Legally Avoidable!
    United States Supreme Court Doesn’t Issue “Rulings”: They Only Publish Their Opinions ~ Treat Them As Such!

    17. Dispensed


    18. Healthcare waivers – No president has dispensing powers

    1st Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
    2nd Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
    9th Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution (narrative), of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
    10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
    14th Amendment: The Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal protection for all citizens, was necessary to secure for freed slaves the same rights as whites. Simply ending slavery was not enough. Prior to the Civil War, it was automatic in many states to treat blacks, whatever their status, as second-class citizens. A ruling by a court in Virginia in 1824 stated, without any effort at dissimulation, that,

    “And, yet, nobody has ever questioned the power of the legislature to deny to free blacks and mulattoes one of the fist privileges of a citizen — that of voting at election.”

    Art 1: Sect. 7 All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.
    Violations: 1st, 2, 9,10, & 14th Amendment, Art 1: Sect. 7

    19. Refuses to acknowledge state’s 10th Amendment rights to nullify Obamacare ( Affordable Care Act ).

    Article I Section 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
    Violation: Art. 1 sect. 1 , Art. 2. sect. 1 , 10th Amendment

    20. Congress did not approve Obama’s war in Libya.

    Article I, Section 8, First illegal war U.S. has engaged in. Impeachable under Article II, Section 4. Obama falsely claims UN can usurp Congressional war powers.
    Violations: Article I, Section 8, Art.2 sect. 1

    21. Obama has acted outside the constitutional power given him – this in itself is unconstitutional.

    Violations: Art. 2 sect 1

    22. With the approval of Obama, the NSA and the FBI are tapping directly into the servers of 9 internet companies to gain access to emails, video/audio, photos, documents, etc. This program is code named PRISM. NSA also collecting data on all phone calls in U.S.

    Violation: 4th Amendment.

    23. Plans to sign U.N. Firearms treaty – 2nd Amendment.

    Violation: 2nd ,4th, 9th, 10th , & 14TH Amendment, Art.1 Sect. 4 , Art. 2 sect. 1

    24. The Senate/Obama immigration bill (approved by both) raises revenue – Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives;

    Violations: Art. 1 sect 4th, 7 , & 8th, Art. 2 sect. 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,

    25. Obama refuses to uphold the Business Mandate Law (ACA) for a year. President does not have that authority – Article. I. Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. The president ”shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed” Article II, Section 3.

  33. oldsailor83

    “Queer States of America”…….come ye all queers……come to America where you can have IT ALL (either at the back door or the front door)……69=96 ……TOP OR BOTTOM!…….RAINBOW SPECIAL!

  34. oldsailor83

    For all immigrating queers, you only need to find a big building on Pennsylvania Ave. to obtain everything you want………..FREE!

  35. oldsoldier79

    Something is very bad wrong here !!!!!

    WALMART OK’s an ISIS Cake but refuses to make one with the CONFEDERATE FLAG……
    Wal-Mart is apologizing after a store in Louisiana rejected a customer’s request for a cake decorated with a Confederate battle flag, but gladly baked him a cake with a Islamic State flag on it.

    Chuck Netzhammer told ABC News that his order last week for a Confederate flag cake with the words, “Heritage Not Hate,” was rebuffed at the bakery department of a Wal-Mart in Slidell, Louisiana. He said the store didn’t apply the same rule to imagery for Islamic State, the terrorist army also known by the acronyms ISIS and ISIL.

    “I went back yesterday and managed to get an ISIS battle flag printed. ISIS happens to be somebody who we’re fighting against right now who are killing are men and boys overseas and are beheading Christians,” Mr. Netzhammer said.

    Wal-Mart apologized and blamed it on a misunderstanding.

    Read more:
    Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
    Who’s side is Walmart on ? Not America’s……

  36. bob strauss

    Lord Monckton: Congress Allowed Commie Obama, With A Forged Birth Certificate,

    Lord Monckton: Congress Has Allowed Communist…

  37. bob strauss

    CAIRO (AP) — A car bomb killed Egypt’s chief prosecutor Monday in the country’s first assassination of a senior official in 25 years, marking what could be an escalation in a campaign by Islamic militants toward targeting leaders of a crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Hisham Barakat led the prosecution of members of the Brotherhood and other Islamists, including former President Mohammed Morsi, who was overthrown by the military in July 2013. The courts have been handing out mass death sentences against them in trials harshly criticized as lacking due process.

    Monday’s assassination of the 65-year-old Barakat came on the eve of the second anniversary of the mass demonstrations against Morsi that led to his ouster.

    A car laden with explosives was detonated by remote control around 10 a.m. as Barakat’s motorcade left his home in the eastern district of Heliopolis, police said. He suffered multiple shrapnel wounds and was pronounced dead at 12:30 p.m. following surgery, medical officials said. Five guards, two drivers and one civilian also were injured in the blast.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s