Ted Cruz by law not US citizen at birth, Not natural born citizen, Cruz lied, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, 1 US citizen parent and not born after November 14, 1986

Ted Cruz by law not US citizen at birth, Not natural born citizen, Cruz lied, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, 1 US citizen parent and not born after November 14, 1986

“According to the  US Citizenship and Immigration Services Ted Cruz was not a US citizen at birth and consequently not a natural born citizen.”…Citizen Wells

“no Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President . . . .”…US Constitution

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed
–if all records told the same tale–then the lie passed into
history and became truth. “Who controls the past,” ran the
Party slogan, “controls the future: who controls the present
controls the past.”…George Orwell, “1984″



Ted Cruz is a graduate of Harvard Law School.

He must have known the truth.

I, like Donald Trump, had good teachers.

Therefore I have good reading comprehension skills.

But this is really simple. The law has 2 parts connected by “and.”

Why did Byron York of the Washington Examiner write this?

“Then there are the people who are born outside the United States to parents who are both American citizens, provided one of them has lived in the U.S. for any period of time. And then there are the people who are born outside the United States to one parent who is a U.S. citizen and the other who is an alien, provided the citizen parent lived in the United States or its possessions for at least five years, at least two of them after age 14.”

“That last category covers Cruz, making him a citizen at birth. Last year, Theodore Olson, the former Bush solicitor general who successfully defended John McCain in a 2008 lawsuit alleging McCain was ineligible to be president, told me, “My conclusion would be that if you are a citizen as a consequence of your birth, that’s a natural-born citizen.”  That would likely be the conclusion of any challenge to Cruz’s eligibility, as well.”



From Citizen News March 30, 2015.

From the US Government.

US Citizenship and Immigration Services

Citizenship Through Parents

There are two general ways to obtain citizenship through U.S. citizen parents, one at birth and one after birth but before the age of 18.  The term “parents” includes:  the genetic father, the genetic mother, and the non-genetic gestational mother, if she is the legal parent at the time of birth under the law of the relevant jurisdiction.  For more information, seeUSCIS Policy Manual guidance on Children of U.S. Citizens.

There are two general ways to obtain citizenship through parents, one at birth and one after birth but before the age of 18. For more information, see USCIS Policy Manual guidance on Children of U.S. Citizens.

Citizenship at Birth for Children Born Outside the U.S. and its Territories

For information on who qualifies as a “child” for citizenship purposes, see USCIS Policy Manual guidance on Children of U.S. Citizens.

In a general, a Child Born Outside the U.S. is a Citizen at Birth when the Child’s Parents Are Married to each other at the Time of Birth IF… AND…
Both parents are U.S. citizens at the time of birth, At least one parent lived in the U.S. or its territories prior to the birth.
One parent is a U.S. citizen at the time of birth and the birthdate is on or after November 14, 1986 The U.S. citizen parent had been physically present in the U.S. or its territories for a period of at least five years at some time in his or her life prior to the birth, of which at least two years were after his or her 14thbirthday.If the U.S. citizen parent spent time abroad in any of the following three capacities, this can also be counted towards the physical presence requirement:

  • Serving honorably in the U.S. armed forces;
  • Employed with the U.S. government; or
  • Employed with certain international organizations.

Additionally, time spent abroad by the U.S. citizen parent while the U.S. citizen parent was the unmarried son or daughter and a member of the household of a person who meets any of the three conditions listed above can also be counted.




Ted Cruz had 1 US citizen parent but was not born after November 14, 1986.

Cruz became a citizen after birth.

Cornell Law School.

“Natural born citizen

A phrase denoting one of the requirements for becoming President or Vice-President of the United States. Anyone born after the adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1787 must be a “natural born Citizen” of the United States to constitutionally fill the office of President or Vice-President. See U.S. Const. art. II, § 1; id. at amend. XII.

Some debate exists as to the meaning of this phrase. Consensus exists that anyone born on U.S. soil is a “natural born Citizen.” One may also be a “natural born Citizen” if, despite a birth on foreign soil, U.S. citizenship immediately passes from the person’s parents.”

Ted Cruz did not immediately receive citizenship on birth from parents and is NOT a natural born citizen.

Case closed!


Once again, that’s an “and” 




25 responses to “Ted Cruz by law not US citizen at birth, Not natural born citizen, Cruz lied, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, 1 US citizen parent and not born after November 14, 1986

  1. citizenwells

    to be honest, they had me going for awhile.
    Then I came to my senses (like Winston in “1984”) and realized he was not a citizen at birth.
    The Orwellian brainwashing does work.

  2. oldsoldier79


    Cruz’s day was a CUBAN citizen with an american “green card”…….that does not make Ted Cruz a United States citizen at birth……

    Cruz is playing the same game that Obama played.

    Now we are getting ready to have another ‘non-natural born citizen’ jump into the game……Rubio is coming next with his citizenship claim.

    It is quite apparent to me that our SCOTUS WILL NOT TOUCH this issue with a ten foot pole…..otherwise they expose the GREAT USURPER.

    Our Constitution is dead, for all practical purposes and they will rule only on what they are told to rule on……….to “cherry pick” the only document that means anything to the rule of law is to openly admit there is no law.

    I predict there will be nothing said or done by the judical branch to qualify who is and is not qualifyed to be POTUS….

    SCOTUS is a joke……POTUS is a joke….and the whole damn CONGRESS is a joke……

    We have no “rule of law” any more because we have no Constitution any more……so all these wannabe politicians are in our face 24/7 telling us to “accept it and learn to deal with it” !

    Now it’s easy for me to understand why our forefathers had a revolution…when enough is enough… and your up to your eyeballs in alligators….it’s time to drain the swamp !!!

    And make some alligator shoes !

  3. oldsoldier79

    sorry….day should have been dad.

  4. citizenwells

    To CW commenters.
    This was a trick.
    Can you figure it out?

  5. citizenwells

    You have to really be paying attention but a clue was given recently.

  6. citizenwells

    The assertion is true but not for the reasons most people think.

  7. oldsoldier79


    My inner self says it has ….all to do with the ‘nine omitted words”……..

  8. oldsoldier79

    Because at the time the Constitution was approved…..there were only two kinds of people living in the United States……..(1) natural born citizens (children who were born in this country) of parents who lived here at the time the Constitution was adopted and….(2) others who were born in England or some other country, at the time the Constitution was adopted…….

    thus the reason for……the comma followed by those NINE little WORDS.

    There was no naturalized citizens…..period.

  9. citizenwells

    and, from the prior post:

    “There are 2 important concepts from the above cases.

    1. It was clearly understood at the time the Constitution was written that in this country natural born citizen meant a child born on US soil to 2 US citizen parents.

    2. That the requirement of natural born citizen has not been changed by an amendment. You are being bombarded by misinformation about this law and that law affecting the natural born citizen requirement but nothing has changed it since the Constitution was ratified. This was noted in Hassan v FEC;

    “Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail.””

    The verbage and the meaning of the constitution as written stand until amended.
    Citizenship laws passed later only clarify how citizenship is attained.

  10. citizenwells

    ergo Cruz, as defined by the US Constitution, was neither a citizen or natural born citizen at birth.

  11. citizenwells

    “Reuters Asks “Who Is More Of A Threat: Obama Or Putin”, Surprised By The Answer”

    ” A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds a third of Republicans believe President Barack Obama poses an imminent threat to the United States, outranking concerns about Russian President Vladimir Putin and Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.”


  12. Excellent articles, CW; I’ll have to go over them again.

    We’ve been sold a bill of goods; an illegal bill of goods…

  13. oldsoldier79

    this may help explain where we are right now……from Wikipedia;

    On July 5, 2011, presidential candidate Abdul K. Hassan asked the United States Federal Election Committee to issue a ruling as to his rights and obligations under the various federal election laws including the Federal Election Campaign Act.

    After an open meeting on September 1, 2011, during which the issues were intensely deliberated, the FEC unanimously voted (6-0) the next day.

    The FEC ruled that he CAN run for president and can solicit and receive contributions.

    The FEC also ruled that he is covered by FECA and am required to comply with the record-keeping, contribution and expenditure requirements of the FECA but that he is not eligible to receive matching funds.[4] In addition to seeking a ruling from the Federal Elections Commission, presidential candidate Abdul K. Hassan has asked the election authorities in several states for a ruling on whether he would be allowed presidential ballot access as a naturalized citizen.

    The rulings were sought from the state authorities because even though the Presidency is a federal office, ballot access in presidential elections is generally controlled by the states.
    Now my question is;

    Just who in the hell gave the Federal Elections Commission authority to OVERRIDE and TRUMP the United States Constitution?

  14. oldsoldier79

    permit me to answer my own question:……

    No one gave the FEC or FECA the authority to override the United States Constitution…..here is what the FEC is authorized to do:

    “In 1975, Congress created the Federal Election Commission (FEC) to administer and enforce the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA).

    The statute that governs the financing of federal elections.

    The duties of the FEC, which is an independent regulatory agency, are to disclose campaign finance information, to enforce the provisions of the law such as the limits and prohibitions on contributions, and to oversee the public funding of Presidential elections”.
    The FEC does not have the LEGAL authority to say who can, and who cannot, run for federal offices, especially the one office denoted in the Constitution of the United States which states that person MUST be a “natural-born” citizen……

    So…we are back to the square of ZERO again.

  15. citizenwells

    The FEC has the authority to control who gets federal matching funds.
    They do not restrict running for office.

  16. oldsoldier79

    Yes CW…I understand that…….but apparently there are many people who do not, to include Mr. Ted Cruz, and soon Mr. Rubio also….and the whole damn media press corp……

    Mr. Hassan went to the FEC and the FEC gave him a green light to run for POTUS, which they had no authority to rule on, one way or the other, concerning that matter…….the FEC only had authority to say if he would got federal funds for his bid.

    Therein is where the rub lies….now we have Cruz also asking the FEC for an exact same ruling as Mr. Hassan got, which they do not have any constitutional authority to rule on….

    The correct ruling from FEC should be……” Mr. Cruz, when you have demonstrated that you possess the qualifications for the office you are seeking according the the Constitution…then we will rule on your request for federal funds”….

    It appears the FEC has intentionally put “the cart before the horse” and everyone, especially the media, accepts their version of the law.


    I think we need a greater power involved here…like maybe SCOTUS…. but I won’t hold my breath on their getting involved.

  17. TOMORROW: Don’t forget to watch our “Hillary Clinton’s Email Scandal” panel live from 1-2 PM ET!

    You can watch the live stream here:


  18. The usurpers regime is traitorous.

    Even far left WashPost writes that Kerry and Obama are de facto in Iran’s pocket. Russian foreign minister left talks being disgusted at how much Kerry and Obama are willing to give to Iran in exchange for nothing


  19. There are two entities called “the United States” — the Continental United States comprised of fifty (50) geographically defined nation states acting as a federation (The “United States of America” was never a sovereign nation, just a business association, folks.

    It is CRUCIAL that everyone understand the basic structure that was created by the Founders

    Before Things Get Out of Hand……

    Judge Anna von Reitz, Alaska
    March, 2015

    There are two entities called “the United States” — the Continental United States comprised of fifty (50) geographically defined nation states acting as a federation (The “United States of America” was never a sovereign nation, just a business association, folks. It’s the land-based States that are separate sovereign nations.) and the Federal United States comprised of fifty-seven (57) states—the fifty Federal States plus the Federal Territories and Possessions which are counted as “States” of their union which is supposed to operate exclusively in the international jurisdiction of the sea.
    • Continental United States = 50 Separate Nation States operating “as” a nation on the land jurisdiction.
    • Federal United States = 50 Incorporated Franchises of the “United States of America, Inc.” operating the international jurisdiction of the sea, plus seven “nation states” — Guam, Puerto Rico, etc., operating as “the United States of America (Minor)”—for a total of 57 states.
    This is the way it is, and the way it has always been!

    Read More:http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2015/03/there-are-two-entities-called-united.html

  20. Bob Strauss……..
    ……I believe that I would be one of the first to remind Judge Von Reitz that only the 50 incorporated states VOTE IN OUR ELECTIONS,and adding all of the rest of the TERRITORIES only MUDDIES THE WATER,so I would look upon Judge Reitz as a Democratically oriented Judge…….who I would regard as a WORDSMITH. Even though she is probably correct.!

  21. …..another of which would be American Samoa, which for some reason she listed as ETC. Now that she has thoroughly trounced everyone, and shown us how “EDUCATED,and IMPORRRRTANT” she is,……maybe we can get back to the subject at hand. I think most of us were,and are ALREADY aware of the legal status of the various territories. In fact some of us might have known this before Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.Reitz did.

  22. Bos Strauss…….
    …….do you know if it will be on C-SPAN?

  23. Pingback: Ted Cruz is not a natural born citizen and not eligible for presidency, Not a citizen at birth, Not born after November 14, 1986, Media and Democrats are waiting to challenge Cruz, Ted Cruz must request advisory opinion from FEC | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s