Drew Johnson tweet confirms Ted Cruz cheating, Washington Times fires Johnson scrubs links, Why was Drew Johnson fired?, Big Brother thought police?

Drew Johnson tweet confirms Ted Cruz cheating, Washington Times fires Johnson scrubs links, Why was Drew Johnson fired?, Big Brother thought police?

“To his kind of judge, Cruz ironically wouldn’t be eligible, because the legal principles that prevailed in the 1780s and ’90s required that someone actually be born on US soil to be a “natural born” citizen. Even having two US parents wouldn’t suffice. And having just an American mother, as Cruz did, would have been insufficient at a time that made patrilineal descent decisive.”…Laurence H. Tribe, Harvard Law Professor

“Ted Cruz wrote the forward for U.S. Constitution for Dummies which clearly reveals that he is not a natural born citizen.”…IL ballot challenger Bill Graham

“”You’re a traitor!” yelled the boy. “You’re a thought criminal!”“…George Orwell, “1984”

 

***  Update Below  ***

 

Drew Johnson tweeted the following on March 25, 2016.

COMING CLEAN: From what I know, at least 2 of the women named as Cruz mistresses by the National Enquirer are accurate

The Washington Times responded

Drew Johnson responded.

. If we haven’t had a relationship in over a year, why do you still pay me for columns I write?

A internet search reveals this entry:

“Drew Johnson – Bio, News, Photos – Washington Times
http://www.washingtontimes.com › Topics
The Washington Times
Latest news and commentary on Drew Johnson including photos, videos, quotations, and a biography.”

And Wikipedia reports:

“Jason Andrew “Drew” Johnson (born August 5, 1979 in Johnson City, Tennessee)[1] is an American political commentator and former think tank executive. He was the founder and first president of the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, now known as the Beacon Center of Tennessee.[2] He later edited the editorial page of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. He was columnist at The Washington Times.[3], but was fired in March 2016[4] shortly after commenting[5] on allegations that Sen. Ted Cruz has had several mistresses.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drew_Johnson

From Nooga.com.

“How did the job with The Washington Times come about? 

After I was fired for criticizing Obama, The Washington Times, along with a number of other large conservative and libertarian-leaning publications and websites, reached out with their support. The Washington Times, in particular, gave me the opportunity to write a few editorials here and there over the last six or eight months when an issue came up that I wanted to sound off about. It was a wonderful platform to get my thoughts out at a time when I was working on some large projects for think tanks and didn’t have much of an outlet to respond to what was going on in the news.

A few weeks after my wife and I moved to D.C., the Times called and told me they liked my writing and very generously asked if I was interested in joining their opinion page as an editorial writer and columnist. Honestly, I’d been so busy writing for think tanks and developing my website project that writing daily editorials again hadn’t really crossed my mind. But The Washington Times is such an important publication with such a large audience—so many free market, limited government types like me read the Times’ opinion section online every morning—that I felt compelled to jump at the opportunity.”

http://nooga.com/printme/165987

More on the Ted Cruz cheating controversy.

“It wasn’t Donald Trump who spilled the beans as Ted Cruz expected. Instead, it was the National Enquirer who first ran the story about Cruz and his alleged mistresses. The magazine teased the story in a two-page spread, but for social media, it was all too easy to decipher the blurred profile images (through reverse image search). Drew Johnson claims to have inside information about at least two women who were implicated in the magazine.”

“While it’s still unclear who the women are, Twitter seems to have identified who 3 of the 5 are:”

Could this explain why Heidi Cruz was found in a park crying?

 

Read more:

http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=12237

Sounds like Big Brother and the Thought Police are active again.

***  UPDATE  ***

Here is the Bio of Drew Johnson at the Washington Times as of March 25, 2016 courtesy of the Wayback Machine:

“Drew Johnson is a columnist, editorial writer and government waste expert at The Washington Times. Mr. Johnson founded and served as president of Tennessee’s free-market think tank, is the former opinion page editor at the Chattanooga Times Free Press and serves a Senior Fellow at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20160325161544/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/

 

 

Advertisements

21 responses to “Drew Johnson tweet confirms Ted Cruz cheating, Washington Times fires Johnson scrubs links, Why was Drew Johnson fired?, Big Brother thought police?

  1. citizenwells

    “Now that a few months have passed and you’ve had some time to reflect on your departure from the Times Free Press, do you wish that you had done anything differently?

    I wouldn’t have done a thing differently. I was fired for doing exactly what I was hired to do: writing in a way that promoted free markets, individual liberty and limited government. The paper invented some silly story about me being fired for the headline of the Obama jobs speech piece, which was a funny little take off of the country song “Take This Job and Shove It,” but that’s not the reality. I was told that, as the editor, I had final say over what went on that page, so the headline wasn’t the problem.
    There were a few issues at play. First and foremost, some of the liberal higher-ups at the paper thought it was our obligation as a city to pucker up and kiss Obama’s rear since he was in town. Those people were embarrassed that I used the opportunity to criticize his policy failures. That was the biggest reason I was canned.”

    http://nooga.com/printme/165987

  2. citizenwells

    The Washington Times ‏@WashTimes 11h11 hours ago
    To all who point out the Internet is forever, we get it. Hence Drew was able to perpetuate his employment when it ended long ago.

    In reply to The Washington Times
    Drew Johnson ‏@Drews_Views 6h6 hours ago Las Vegas, NV
    .@WashTimes -You never updated my bio page when I stopped writing editorials full-time. Don’t blame me. It’s not my job to update your site.

  3. citizenwells

    Bing search on “drew johnson washington times”

    “Drew Johnson
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson
    We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.”

  4. citizenwells

    Yahoo:

    “Drew Johnson
    ww.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson
    We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.”

  5. citizenwells

    Here is the Bio of Drew Johnson at the Washington Times as of March 25, 2016 courtesy of the Wayback Machine:

    “Drew Johnson is a columnist, editorial writer and government waste expert at The Washington Times. Mr. Johnson founded and served as president of Tennessee’s free-market think tank, is the former opinion page editor at the Chattanooga Times Free Press and serves a Senior Fellow at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance.”

    https://web.archive.org/web/20160325161544/http://www.washingtontimes.com/staff/drew-johnson/

  6. CW…………….
    while the sacking of people by the upper echelon folks is their right as such, it sometimes tells a really sad story about those in leadership positions. In their haste to get even with somebody they OFTEN INADVERENTLY CUT OFF THEIR NOSE TO SPIT THEIR FACE. I have personally witnessed such events by business competitors, and I ended up with the chance to hire two very skilled people. I did just that ,and I NEVER REGRETTED having done so. As luck would have it I had just completed the installation of another web fed press, and was contemplating the hiring of some additional people to operate the machine. Later it was one of these people who I placed in charge of overseeing the entire workflow through the plant. Again I never regretted promoting him to plant manager. He earned every raise that I gave him.
    ………and I personally think that Drew Johnson will undoubtedly benefit by having been let go by the Times. Their LOSS will probably become a competitor’s GAIN.

  7. in spit of their face= NO…………should have been “IN SPITE OF THEIR FACE”. Old Chinese proverb; “key finger forgot to push key”.

  8. FURTHER………..
    ………I would be remiss if I failed to mention that it appears as though the “KEY FINGERS” OF THE GOP are also forgetting what their FUNCTION truthfully is.

  9. Happy Easter, CW and CWers,

    So far, I’ve not read a complete denial that Cruz did *not* have affairs.

    I’ve also not seen an immediate libel law suit filed by Cruz against the Enquirer; you’d think that would have been done pronto if the allegations aren’t true.

    Other than not being qualified to be POTUS, there was always something smarmy about Cruz; sometimes, it’s those who hold the Bible the highest who have the most to hide.

    Buh bye, Ted; go run for Prime Minister of Canada.

  10. Pingback: Is the Media Protecting Certain Presidential Candidates… | The Post & Email

  11. AND………
    …….Happy Easter to everyone here at CW blog. ……..as for me I will be spending Easter thinking about the things that concern me most, and reflecting upon the spiritual food of the Easter holiday. A holiday is what it is, but without the spiritual feeling which should accompany the special day it would not have much meaning.

  12. Ted Cruz lost his jacket…One of his sweeties was wearing it … Both showing off their tattoo’s. Hope this turns out! My new computer is a pain in my back door trying to figure things out.

    Happy Easter…EVERYONE

    http://redstatewatcher.com/article.asp?id=12418

  13. Again it did not post my link about Cruz’ jacket, Tato’s he shared with his sweetie. Well one of many. I hear it is going on eight. 🙂

  14. Happy Easter Everybody……..

    Thinking about sending Senator Cruz a pair of Trump boxer shorts.

    https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&rlz=1C1GIGM_enUS682US683&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=Trump+boxer+shorts&tbm=shop

  15. Shell Company That Sold House To Rubio Dissolved 9 Months After Sale

    —–>>>>This article has shades of the Obama/Rezko home purchase doesn’t it?????

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/25/shell-company-that-sold-house-to-rubio-dissolved-9-months-after-sale/

  16. Easter blessings to everyone and CW…

  17. Waiting for my reparations.

    *******************

    With Saint Patrick’s day coming up nippin’ at our heels; here’s an Irish/American history lesson…. Enjoy.

    The Irish slave trade began when James II sold 30,000 Irish prisoners as slaves to the New World. His Proclamation of 1625 required Irish political prisoners be sent overseas and sold to English settlers in the West Indies. By the mid 1600s, the Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat. At that time, 70% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves.

    Ireland quickly became the biggest source of human livestock for English merchants. The majority of the early slaves to the New World were actually white.

    From 1641 to 1652, over 500,000 Irish were killed by the English and another 300,000 were sold as slaves. Ireland’s population fell from about 1,500,000 to 600,000 in one single decade. Families were ripped apart as the British did not allow Irish dads to take their wives and children with them across the Atlantic. This led to a helpless population of homeless women and children. Britain’s solution was to auction them off as well.

    During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.

    Many people today will avoid calling the Irish slaves what they truly were: Slaves. They’ll come up with terms like “Indentured Servants” to describe what occurred to the Irish. However, in most cases from the 17th and 18th centuries, Irish slaves were nothing more than human cattle.

    As an example, the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period. It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.

    African slaves were very expensive during the late 1600s (50 Sterling). Irish slaves came cheap (no more than 5 Sterling). If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce. Even if an Irish woman somehow obtained her freedom, her kids would remain slaves of her master. Thus, Irish moms, even with this new found emancipation, would seldom abandon their kids and would remain in servitude.

    In time, the English thought of a better way to use these women (in many cases, girls as young as 12) to increase their market share: The settlers began to breed Irish women and girls with African men to produce slaves with a distinct complexion. These new “mulatto” slaves brought a higher price than Irish livestock and, likewise, enabled the settlers to save money rather than purchase new African slaves. This practice of interbreeding Irish females with African men went on for several decades and was so widespread that, in 1681, legislation was passed “forbidding the practice of mating Irish slave women to African slave men for the purpose of producing slaves for sale.” In short, it was stopped only because it interfered with the profits of a large slave transport company.

    England continued to ship tens of thousands of Irish slaves for more than a century. Records state that, after the 1798 Irish Rebellion, thousands of Irish slaves were sold to both America and Australia. There were horrible abuses of both African and Irish captives. One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.

    There is little question that the Irish experienced the horrors of slavery as much (if not more in the 17th Century) as the Africans did. There is, also, very little question that those brown, tanned faces you witness in your travels to the West Indies are very likely a combination of African and Irish ancestry. In 1839, Britain finally decided on its own to end its participation in Satan’s highway to hell and stopped transporting slaves. While their decision did not stop pirates from doing what they desired, the new law slowly concluded THIS chapter of nightmarish Irish misery.

    But, if anyone, black or white, believes that slavery was only an African experience, then they’ve got it completely wrong.

    Irish slavery is a subject worth remembering, not erasing from our memories.

  18. Haven’t posted anything here for quite a while, but I follow your conversations almost daily. Always glad to read them. I’ve been quite busy on Facebook lately trying to educate the general public about the natural born citizen requirement in the Constitution and why Cruz and Rubio, before he dropped out, are not eligible. Also why Obama has never been eligible. As you can imagine, I’ve been getting some pretty rude responses to my comments, asking for my law degree, etc. etc. You don’t need a law degree to read. I’ve been researching eligibility for over 8 years now, so I’ve been quoting articles and persons much more qualified than I to the people discussing this topic, both online and in real life. I’ve noticed that the Cruz supporters tend to refer me to the Harvard law review article which discusses natural born citizen, insisting that Cruz is eligible, and also the Naturalization law of 1790, which Cruz quotes as his reason for being eligible, but which was repealed in 1795. Both of them are lying, the Harvard article because they feel a need to support Cruz because of Obama, both of them supposed alumni, at least Cruz was. The 1790 law was repealed by our founders, so I explain that to other people, but Cruz lies because he doesn’t tell them it was repealed. Anyway, does anybody have any hints about how to explain this subject?? Thank you and Happy Easter, everybody!

  19. “Ted Cruz Is NOT Eligible!” Mary Brigid McManamon Constitutional Law Professor
    January 25, 2016 MSM News http://MOXNews.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s