Are you sleeping well these days with the corrupt Obama in the White House and concerns about the H1N1 Swine Flu?
Flu epidemics or pandemics are scary enough under normal circumstances, but with the reputation of Obama and his long time ties to crime and corruption in Chicago, it is hard to trust anything coming out of his administration.
Remember Dr. Robert Weinstein? He pled guilty to corruption charges a few months ago, corruption charges that linked him to Stuart Levine, Tony Rezko, Rod Blagojevich and ultimately Barack Obama. Well, it turns out that there is a Dr. Weinstein that has ties to the CDC and possibly Baxter. Are these Dr. Weinstein’s related?
Now revisit the following article:
Obama baxter ties in corrupt Chicago
To refresh your memory:
Dr. Robert Weinstein Indictment
Governor Rod Blagojevich Criminal Complaint
Citizen Wells request to Patrick Fitzgerald, Indict Obama
Dr. Robert Weinstein pleads guilty
Dr. Robert Weinstein and the CDC
Past Issue
Vol. 7, No. 2
Mar–Apr 2001
“Controlling Antimicrobial Resistance in Hospitals: Infection Control and Use of Antibiotics
Robert A. Weinstein
Cook County Hospital and Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ilinois, USA”
“Dr. Weinstein is chair, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cook County Hospital; director of Infectious Disease Services for the Cook County Bureau of Health Services; and professor of medicine, Rush Medical College. He also oversees the CORE Center for the Prevention, Care and Research of Infectious Disease and directs the Cook County Hospital component of the Rush/Cook County Infectious Disease Fellowship Program. His areas of research include nosocomial infections (particularly the epidemiology and control of antimicrobial resistance and infections in intensive care units) and health-care outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS.
Address for correspondence: Robert A. Weinstein, Division of Infectious Diseases – Suite 129 Durand, Cook County Hospital, 1835 W. Harrison St.,Chicago, IL 60612, USA; fax: 312-572-3523; e-mail: rweinste@rush.edu”
Read more:
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol7no2/weinstein.htm
October 24, 2006
“Yet the CDC refuses to endorse search and destroy. It is sticking to the mantra that hospital workers should wash their hands more carefully and frequently, and that in most cases patients should be isolated only after symptoms of infection with MRSA appear. Routine surveillance to find patients who may not be symptomatic, but are still contagious, is rarely practiced, and not recommended in the CDC’s new hospital infection-fighting guidelines, which were released last week after five years of deliberations. The guidelines do not include a routine recommendation for search and destroy.”
“This is a bitter pill for many infectious-disease experts, who have been joined by the relatives of dead patients, Consumers Union, and even a few Congress members in pressing the CDC. “Why are we spending millions if not billions on bird flu, a ghost that might not happen, when you have thousands being colonized by MRSA and dying of it?” asks Dr. William Jarvis, a top CDC hospital-infection expert until he resigned in 2003. At a March 29 hearing on hospital infections—which, all told, kill an estimated 90,000 patients each year—Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., charged that the CDC had stood by, despite a steady rise in infections since the early 1970s. “During that time, hospital stays have grown dramatically shorter yet infection rates continue to go up,” Stupak said. “What do we have to do to motivate CDC?””
“The counterargument is made by Dr. Robert Weinstein, a hospital-infection expert at Cook County Hospital in Chicago, and a leader on the CDC advisory committee that issued last week’s guidelines.”
Read more:
Citizen WElls 
ACORN Shell Game – Glenn Beck
Off topic but I just posted this over at TRSOL regarding eligibility and I feel I’ve stumbled across the real problem for pro Soetoro goons.
We’ve been going about this all wrong. What we need to be doing is holding the Democratic National Convention accountable for failing to vet the candidates using Article II of the Constitution. Why? Because they qualified their boy Adolf Soetoro using Amendment XIV. This is an open and shut case because you can’t vet candidates using Amendment XIV. The solution is simple and it’s staring right at us in the face. Here’s an abbreviated list of reasons:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Amendment XIV does not define Natural Born Citizen anywhere in the amendment.
2. There is a clear distinction between citizen and natural born citizen because of the citizenship requirement in Article I section 3 for Senators and section 2 for Representatives (Citizen of the United States, which also matches nearly identical to ‘citizens of the United States’ in Amendment XIV – one is singular, one is plural).
3. Amendment XIV only guarantees eligibility for Senators and any other position that state ‘citizen of the United States’ in the Constitution. Article II states ‘Natural Born Citizen’, not ‘citizen of the United States’, except for the exception clause in Article II that went defunct well before 1868.
4. Amendment XIV states that anyone born in the United States is a citizen of the United States. That means anyone born or naturalized in the United States can become a senator or representative ONLY based on its stated authority in the amendment.
5. Since the phrase ‘born or naturalized’ equates to the phrase ‘citizen of the United States’ in Amendment XIV, it CAN NOT be used to define Natural born citizenship because of the ‘or naturalized’ clause in section 1. We all know naturalized citizens are NOT natural born citizens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There you have it folks. Amendment XIV does not clarify or define natural born citizenship because of the ‘or naturalized’ clause in its text. We simply glanced right over it every time. Two words make all the difference in the world. Wong v Kim, the holy grail for Obots just got tossed right out the window.
Can anyone here VERIFY — with reputable, trustworthy reference(s) — the assertion posted previously on this site that Obama/Soetoro does — in fact — own stock in Baxter?
Is it indeed a FACT or did someone merely state it to be so?
I cannot find confirmation in any of the provided links.
This is an EXTREMELY serious allegation, and if true should be publicized way more widely than here.
If it is not true, than that should be acknowledged, for obvious reasons.
JeffM
I got a letter from Sen. Bunning (R) KY who mentioned the 14th amendment as obama being eligible. My phone call to his office wasn’t very nice.
I also heard someone long ago mentioned that the 14th is what obama and his lawyers will be using to justify his eligible.
I think the 14th is immaterial because it deals with, as you say, naturalization of citizens. Nothing about NBC.
Anonymouse,
It was posted on this site that he had stock. I believe CW posted something about that. Dont recall what he said but he did post.
Rocknee,
It’s not going to work. The ‘or naturalized’ clause is going to stop them dead in their tracks. It’s a contradiction that even a junior justice would see plain as day.
Yes, Rocknee, CW posted, on the 6th, the writing of a contributor who stated that Obama/Soetoro owned stock in Baxter. The contributor was “the retired military officer || March 18, 2009”
The retired military officer wrote:
=== Part of it almost happened within the last few weeks as Baxter (based out of Chicago and BO owns stock in this company)was found to have “mysteriously” gotten bird flu virus (the one that’s been specially made to kill) mixed up with vaccines. Canada broke that story. Dr. Ott stated that Baxter Headquarters is in Chicago. ===
In the rmo’s several references, are you, or anyone, able to find one shred of evidence that Obama/Soetoro bought stock in Baxter? Did I overlook the fact stated as such . . . or did the rmo PERSONALLY conclude that in the course of trying to connect the dots of his narrative’s various components?
If there is a FACTUAL reference that states Obama/Soetoro owns, or ever owned, Baxter stock, either the retired military officer failed to explicate it or, if he did, I failed to perceive it.
It is dangerous to believe people’s conclusions if those conclusions are not based on clear, verifiable fact.
I would look through all of Judicial Watch site!
http://www.judicialwatch.org
They have alot of info!
Jeff M: Yes there it is.
The bots have been desperate to label US Citizen as the same thing as Natural Born Citizen…but it’s clearly differentiated in Article II as not the same thing by the word “OR”!
No matter. It looks like the government is out to kill us. Either financially or with little viruses released in vaccines.
How many dead or flat broke and destitute people do we need in this country before people really start doing what they are supposed to do and get back our lives and our money from the ingrates who continue to steal them from us?
This is sinister, criminal, and evil at its core and make Hitler look like Mother Theresa in white garments.
We don’t need tea parties. We need
“minutemen” parties…ones where we mosey on in to Washington and get our money and our lives back. Tea parties aren’t going to protect our future…
How did we miss this? Update on Colonel Pohl vs Soetoro’s regime:
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/breaking-news/story/1035103.html
It’s a couple of weeks old but newsworthy nonetheless.
More Pohl news:
The chief judge for the Pentagon’s Military Commissions has bowed to a White House request and postponed until late September a war court hearing at Guantánamo Bay for a Saudi man accused of aiding al Qaeda, according to a document obtained by The Miami Herald.
The judge, Army Col. James L. Pohl, ruled Tuesday that the four-month delay in a pre-trial hearing for Ahmed Darbi would ”serve the interests of justice” because of ongoing reviews of detainee policies and prosecutions by the Obama administration….
Full article is found below:
http://www.miamiherald.com/509/story/1056293.html
Anonymouse
Obama definitely owned stock in a company owned by Baxter.
Thanks, CW. Can you provide the reference URL or, if it’s not online, a reference to documentation my university librarian can help me reach?
Also, you say “Obama definitely owned stock in a company owned by Baxter.” What is the name of that company? For instance, Baxter owns Stuart Medical, Inc., which is a medical supply company. Is the company in which Obama invested merely a supplier of, say, instruments, prostheses, gurney paper?
Besides being very concerned about every entity and every person with which the Alien Resident connects, I also don’t want to mislead friends into believing more than is actually the basic fact(s).
Trying to connect to WND this morning and I got this:
Host ‘ch-ny-wnd-app1’ is blocked because of many connection errors; unblock with ‘mysqladmin flush-hosts’
Is this happening to anyone else?
JeffM // May 19, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Off topic but I just posted this over at TRSOL regarding eligibility and I feel I’ve stumbled across the real problem for pro Soetoro goons.
We’ve been going about this all wrong. What we need to be doing is holding the Democratic National Convention accountable for failing to vet the candidates using Article II of the Constitution. Why? Because they qualified their boy Adolf Soetoro using Amendment XIV. This is an open and shut case because you can’t vet candidates using Amendment XIV. The solution is simple and it’s staring right at us in the face. Here’s an abbreviated list of reasons:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Amendment XIV does not define Natural Born Citizen anywhere in the amendment.
2. There is a clear distinction between citizen and natural born citizen because of the citizenship requirement in Article I section 3 for Senators and section 2 for Representatives (Citizen of the United States, which also matches nearly identical to ‘citizens of the United States’ in Amendment XIV – one is singular, one is plural).
3. Amendment XIV only guarantees eligibility for Senators and any other position that state ‘citizen of the United States’ in the Constitution. Article II states ‘Natural Born Citizen’, not ‘citizen of the United States’, except for the exception clause in Article II that went defunct well before 1868.
4. Amendment XIV states that anyone born in the United States is a citizen of the United States. That means anyone born or naturalized in the United States can become a senator or representative ONLY based on its stated authority in the amendment.
5. Since the phrase ‘born or naturalized’ equates to the phrase ‘citizen of the United States’ in Amendment XIV, it CAN NOT be used to define Natural born citizenship because of the ‘or naturalized’ clause in section 1. We all know naturalized citizens are NOT natural born citizens.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There you have it folks. Amendment XIV does not clarify or define natural born citizenship because of the ‘or naturalized’ clause in its text. We simply glanced right over it every time. Two words make all the difference in the world. Wong v Kim, the holy grail for Obots just got tossed right out the window.
===================
JeffM—This sounds like a huge break through,
is it?? Good job!
Last week went to the library and checked
out everything I could get on the Constitution
and Supreme Court cases. Not that I know
what I’m reading, but I’ll try.
Thanks, JeffM, this sounds fantastic!
Sandy,
I quit note —I could download WND—
big headlines about America going “bonkers”
for the billboards….
Maddie, thanks I am getting it now.
Jeff….just like the best inventions make you wonder why they were not thought of sooner……….
GOOD JOB…spread it far and wide guys
Oh no!
Because all of the bad ideas from Europe are promoted by the left here….guess what will soon be coming to YOUR town?
When did we leave our true dimension and end up here? Once again I scratch my head over my morning coffee and find myself asking WTH……only lately it has been a little more WTF.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1183796/Town-halls-hire-citizen-snoopers-young-SEVEN-spy-neighbours-report-wrongs.html
Good morning!
Just checking in. Zach
WND is back up now.
Rocknee, everyone in Ky. received the same standardized letter..you do know we’re replacing Bunning and Mcconnell even if porcupines run against them in 2010, 2012………porcupines may know the Constitution better than those two.
Jeffm……………Sounds as though you might be onto the stone to throw at Soetoro’s glass house. I hope that it isn’t bulletproof glass. I have a gut feeling that his lawyer goons have already seen it and prepared an illegal maneuver to make the world believe that it doesn’t apply to the Messiah. Perhaps someone can get all of his goons out on a limb and saw it off before they realise their mistake. By the way, Good for you JeffM! At least you are trying! Now let us see what happens! Keep up the great work!
http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/05/18/echoes-of-germany/
Where’s the birth certificate billboards:
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98589
This is Bush’s 3rd term we were warned about by the LIEberals and their bedmates in the Muddy Stream Media, Obushama is Bush’s 3rd term on STEROIDS.
1- Duadruple Deficits
2- Never ending war
3- Crooks and Lobbyists in gov’t
4- Doubled unemployment
5- Delinquencies at a never seen before Level, EVER.
6- Foreclosures Galore
7- Dark Transparency
8- LIES, LIES, LIES
9- Laughing at our economic misery
10- Air Farse One Scare
11- Demonizing Americans and Praising Terrorists and Foreigners
12- Wizards of uhhhs, uhhhs.
13- Teleprompter in Chief
14- Still no documents we may have a Foreigner as president at the very least “A Bastard Child of yet Unknown Legal Name or Roots.
15- Pretender-in-Thief and Chief Financial Orificer of Government Motors (GM). Screwed the American investors to benfit the Unions and Foreigners, can you say OUTSOURCING GM.
And MANY, MANY MORE………..
BTW when you buy a Franchise you paid for those rights and you own them. If you do something to devalue the name brand you are liable BUT it is a two way street and when the name brand (Headquarters) does something to devalue you Franchise the Company is also Liable. START the CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS and name Obama/Soetoro as a Defedant. GM, Chrysler, etc devalued overnight the Franchisees investment and they are LIABLE. They should judicially pursue Obama/Soetoro and his lawyers for giving the wrond advice, just like Obama/Soetoro is doing with the previous administration on EIT’s.
If a Burger King franchisee is doing everything right and Headquarters messes up and devalues each Franchise by their actions they are Liable. Now if BK further injures those franchisees by taking down their signs and licensing and product the loss is huge to the franchisees and they need to be compensated. The same for auto dealerships.
Lets not forget all the WORKERS that will be jobless and suffering.
Obama/Soetoro: Mission Accomplished….Socialism Shock and Awerror.
Don’t tell me ANYMORE about INHERITED CRISIS these LIEberal CONS including the existing Pretender-in-Thief were there for the last 2 plus years VOTING for this CRISIS. They brought it on or are at least Responsible for being in the Majority with a lame duck president and Not Solving anything.
Ohhh how I’m starting to miss Bush’s first 6 yrs when Republicans had a majority and they were fixing the economy, unemployment was low, investments high, etc …they would look really good right about now.
Hope and Change or Dope & Chains?
Rise Up, Stand UP, Organize……we all need to become Community Organizers…TOGETHER WE CAN bring this USURPER to an END.
JeffM,
Attorney Mario Apuzzo said on his blog on January 29, 2009 at 11:53 p.m.:
“This ‘natural born Citizen’ formulation was affirmed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890 (1898). The Court in Wong Kim Ark declared a person born on U.S. soil to two non-U.S. citizen parents who were legal residence of the United States to be a citizen under the 14th Amendment. It is important to understand that the Wong Kim Ark only addressed what a 14th Amendment birth citizen is and not what an Article II ‘natural born Citizen’ is. Even Justices Fuller and Harlan in their dissent doubted that the Framers would have allowd a child born on U.S. soil of parents who were not U.S. citizens to be Article II eligible for the Presidency.”
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/01/new-case-filed-kerchner-et-al-v-obama.html
Attorney Apuzzo also comments on the difference between “natural” and “native” as applied to the U.S. Constitutional requirements to become President under Article II:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html
To me, it is significant that on Obama’s Fight the Smears web site, his campaign says that:
“The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.”
Note that it says “native citizen” and not “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
http://fightthesmears.com/articles/5/birthcertificate
Jeff M: Your observation is brilliant and so simple!!!
In brief…
(Let’s assume Obama was born in Hawaii of a Kansan mother and Kenyan father for sake of discussion cough cough)
Obama is defined as a US Citizen per the 14th Amendment, which does not define a natural born citizen anywhere.
Article II excludes modern US citizens as eligible for president (it really does!).
So since Obama is a US Citizen, and not a natural born citizen, he is ineligible for president.
So why keep trying to use the 14th Amendment for Article II when it excludes the 14th and the 14th doesn’t define a natural born citizen?
“Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Besides the BC issue, I believe a bigger problem is his Indonesian citizenship. We have seen the school records & his mother’s divorce papers.
Indonesia has strict rules for foreigners(I spent some time studying there) so I am sure that it is correct that he had to become a citizen in order to attend school there.
OldSalt -on a previous post you said you researched a name change & found no record of it. In H.S. & college he went by the name of Barry. In his book he talked about doing drugs as a young adult -I can’t see this irresponsible person having the wherewithal to reestablish his U.S. citizenship. So,what are the legal ramifications for a person going under an illegal name?
Peter, I agree we need to organize. Besides the TeaParties I think we need to educate ourselves & then others on Economics, history, evils of Socialized medicine etc. This man won because of ignorance & Republicans having a poor candidate.
Maddie, Previously you said “we need a candidate with a spine” here is our man:
Obama Claims People Who Won’t Vote For Him Are Racists: But It’s Not Going To Work
In response to Obama’s claim that Republicans will use race to stoke fear, Lt. Col Allen West, candidate for Congress in Florida’s 22 District issued this release:
“My advice to Senator Obama is to run as a Man and Leader, and the American people will evaluate you as such, not as a victim. This is a Presidential race, based solely on a capacity to lead the United States of America. It is not about skin tone…however; perhaps we should come to expect these immature statements.
It also seems rather humorous that the Presidential candidate who was supposed to be such a ‘uniter’ and transcend race is the one talking about it the most. If Senator Obama was confident in his abilities and character, he would not need to create a crutch for failure. Senator Obama has just tipped his hand, any criticism of him and his policies will be directly attributed to racism. I congratulate Senator Obama for taking race relations in America back some 30 years.” Allen West, he is running in Florida. http://www.allenwestforcongress.com/
I forgot to give credit to this blog: http://obamawtf.blogspot.com/2008/06/col-allen-west-condemns-obama-for.html
http://boards.msn.com/thread.aspx?threadid=907394
“Obama’s Victory: A British View”
venice….I LOVE THAT ARTICLE…..
How true!
Stephanie,
Republican did not have a eligible candiate in John McCain. I do believe the US would have been in better hands with him and Palin.
Also, if he is still an Indonesian citizen, he was not even eligible for the IL State seat and the US Senate seat.
Is he is a World of Hurt?
Stephanie…………….Barry Soetoro is the last name used by Obama that is KNOWN to be his legal name because he was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro who married Stanley Anne Dunham after she divorced Obama Sr. The adoption done two things;it changed his legal name to Soetoro, and he became a citizen of Indonesia. The past published grade school records show his surname as Soetoro. and Islam as his religion. This is in part the reason why I see his legal name as Soetoro. Now this translates to election fraud if he never had his birthname legally restored. He registered as a presidential candidate as Barrack Hussein Obama which is not true. Americans voted for that NAME, not Soetoro. He was elected under the name Obama which is not his legal name therefore the person holding the legal name Soetoro is occupying the Whitehouse illegally, and is not the POTUS. In reality the election was totally invalid, and to date we do not have a LEGAL POTUS as such. We have a possible alien who thinks he is the POTUS, and is pretending to be the POTUS. Again he is not the legal POTUS. There can be no other!
Rocknee, I do not believe he was vetted in Chicago -the most corrupt city in the U.S.
Thanks everyone!
It dawned on me last night like deer and the headlights.
annelynn, I’m going to go a step further and make a few more succinct connections:
1. Amendment XIV cannot be used to satisfy Article II requirements because the “or naturalized” clause contradicts “Natural Born”.
2. A birth certificate can ONLY be used to satisfy citizenship requirements in Amendment XIV because it’s the only place in the Constitution that defines citizenship based solely on birth.
3. Therefore Soetoro has not provided any evidence whatsoever showing he is eligible to be POTUS based on Article II.
That much is 110% certain. Birth certificates are not suitable proof of eligibility because they only satisfy the citizen of the United States criteria in Amendment XIV.
Therefore, there is additional criteria to being natural born and it can not be obtained from Amendment XIV due to the ‘or naturalized’ clause. And that criteria is:
The citizenship of a candidate’s parents at the time of the birth of the candidate
That is the only difference as Amendment XIV covers everything else re. citizenship.
Simple and to the point. Soetoro must provide suitable proof that his parents were U.S. citizens on August 4, 1961. If he can’t he’s not eligible. That’s why Chester Arthur tried so hard to bury his paperwork. And that’s why Soetoro is in trouble along with the DnC. They claimed the COLB or even BC was sufficient to satisfy the criteria when they knew full well it didn’t. Why? Because of the Senate Resolution for McCain. They knew enough then about the requirement. There is simply no denying it now.
That’s fraud. Case closed. No need to see the BC, the colb or anything else. We’re done.
JeffM & Old Salt, If it true that he has a BC proving that he was born in the U.S. & let’s say his father was a U.S. citizen; if he was adopted & became an Indonesian citizen & never restored his U.S. citizenship when he came of age then these lawsuits need to be asking for all info on him. It can not just be about the BC.
OldSalt -have you seen the adoption papers?
I can not believe so many people in power have allowed this to happen.
Stephanie,
It matters not what happens after birth. It matters what the citizenship status was at birth.
It really doesn’t matter. Soetoro knew he did not have ample proof his parents were U.S. citizens at the time of his birth. That’s why he didn’t furnish anything that would be used against him and he supplied a COLB instead.
He is praying that the BC is not released because the courts are going to say to him: “not good enough Mr. Obama. You have attempted to deceive the public and that is fraud”. When he knows Amendment XIV is insufficient but passes it off as proof, he’s vetted himself under false pretense.
I firmly belief he’s hiding his records for other reasons of a criminal nature, not because of natural born citizenship. Records reveal things like who his buddies are and how much money he was receiving without any work.
aka, german sleeper agent secret son of malcolm x
http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?page_id=284
Today I watched the goings on in the Senate. I heard some of the most idiotic reasoning regarding Guatanamo that I have EVER heard. One Senator reasons that AlQuada uses the name Guatanamo as a recruiting tool for terrorists. He says all terrorists REMEMBER this name and it is a symbol of their zeal. I beg to differ. If terrorists were not ever told the name of the facility it couldn;t be used to recruit terrorists.As for the hate that is the hallmark of the terrorists, it is TAUGHT to them, and has been going on for many CENTURIES before Guatanamo was ever buit. If they did not have the name “Guatanamo” to use it would be some other US institution. Sure ,it can be a recruiting tool but you can be sure that Hell would freeze over before I would close it. It would remain open for as long as it takes for these bastards to realise that their bullsh## will NOT effect what the US thinks or does. I listened to the Senator whine ,and moan,that leaving it open ENDANGERS our troops. I wonder what the hell he thinks our soldiers are? For everyones information they ARE SOLDIERS,and as such they know exactly why they carry a RIFLE.As he spoke I wondered if he had ever carrird a rifle in armed conflict. Many of our Senators don’t have the slightest idea what is happening on the battlefield. Yet they try to manage a war that rightfully should be in the hands of those who do know. And when it is in their hands they should have total control over it’s conduct as well. That is why we were victorious in WW2. It was largely managed by our top brass. The politicians only played political strategy role..
like father, like son
http://octaman.com/comments/MalcolmO.html
Stephanie, There are no adoption papers but there is a divorce paper stating the children.
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/01/02/obamas-parents-divorce-decree-stanley-ann-soetoro-lolo-soetoro-child-custody-obama-indonesian-obama-not-natural-born-citizen-obama-born-in-kenya/
This what determines Zero’s citizenship at birth. The British Nationality Act of 1948
Part II
Citizenship of the United Kingdom and Colonies.
Citizenship by birth or descent.
Citizenship by birth.
4. Subject to the provisions of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and Colonies after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by birth:
Provided that a person shall not be such a citizen by virtue of this section if at the time of his birth—
(a) his father possesses such immunity from suit and legal process as is accorded to an envoy of a foreign sovereign power accredited to His Majesty, and is not a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies; or
(b) his father is an enemy alien and the birth occurs in a place then under occupation by the enemy.
Citizenship by descent.
5.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth:
Hi Anonymouse,
Are you the “same” Anonymouse who used
to post regularly on Gretawire during the primaries?
Thanks, Stephanie, I’ll check info on Allen
West–sounds interesting.
JeffM—
half joking about this question…. but, does
being “adopted” in an American Indian
ceremony by an American Indian couple
have any “standing” —or does this action
have no consequence as it has nothing to do
with citizenship at time of birth?
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/waiting_for_obamas_godot.html
I do pray the world will be ready for this.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/revolution.html
One commenter (historian) states America is ready for a military coup.
They scrubbed Wiki!Our founding father John Bingham from the state of Ohio defined Natural Born Citizen!To hold highest office you must be a natural born citizen which means to be born on US soil and BOTH PARENTS to be BORN on US soil with no Foreign or Domestic Soverigty from any of them!It doesn’t matter where he is born his father was NOT BORN HERE!!!John Bingham put that there to protect WE THE PEOPLE!!!Look it up at the library!
Yeh John Bingham from OHIO!! There’s one
good Buckeye:)
Maddie: Obama was adopted last spring by Crow Indians. He did this because he was not even a US Citizen AT ALL. Now at least he can claim he is a US Citizen. However, he lost his US citizenship as he was an Indonesian, and he was not born a natural born US citizen. Even if he’s the son of FMD Obama Sr. is shown as his legal father, so he’s the legal father, and if FMD or MX are related, then he’s just a colossal fraud and traitor, either way he’s a traitor.
Republican did not have a eligible candiate in John McCain. I do believe the US would have been in better hands with him and Palin.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rocknee, not sure Mccain wasn’t in on this plan….he was too laid back and complacent for my taste. Just saying,
Old Salt….This is in part the reason why I see his legal name as Soetoro. Now this translates to election fraud if he never had his birthname legally restored.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I read lots of blogs, etc. and I distinctly remember a response (and it was italicized like a quote from the dumbo) that said he had his name changed in Hawaii, and something about a lawyer of a friend taking care of it for him??
Anyone else?? But, I am cautious of every word I read..was it his?? Who knows and you’d never find it now since crews are cleaning up the net!!
Check this out at
http://www.recovery.gov
(Go to the Investment tab then by State)
This is the website for the “stimulus” bill allocations. From each state’s allotment except Kansas and Montana there are millions of dollars going to Hawaii.
Here is Wisconsin’s:
CDBG State’s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii $7,533,775
Another huge blow for free speech, free men, and the free world. Wilders defines courage.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/
I was watching Seinfeld and a scene in the restaurant came up. Then it hit me! Obama used this same spot during his fake campaign. George called the waitress sweet heart, then the waitress came over and stuck her middle finger at the menu trying to make it look normal. Well George was outraged and said to Gerry see that! Like no one would notice. Obama did the same thing calling the reporter sweety. Then he stuck his middle finger a few times making it look normal during speeches. once towards john mcain,hillary. This guy sits around and watches these shows to look american. It was all to real!
How about the fake fossil find. just another propaganda spin to take God out of the equation .
Thanks, Annelynne, for the info. on the importance of the Crow Indian “adoption.”
I knew Obama had gone through something
with the Indians, but didn’t realize the exact
outcome!
++++++++++++++++++
One of the library books I found:
“Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution” by Joseph F. Menez and John R. Vile, 14th ed., 2004.
an interesting comment on the Fourteenth Amendment… “In recent cases the Supreme Court has become increasingly wary of congressional “interpretations” that effectively “rewrite” or “reinterpret” the amendment. This issue is at the cutting edge of arguments as to the degree to which constitutional interpretation is vested chiefly in the judiciary and the degree to which the responsibility for such interpretation should be shared with the other branches. ”
Another comment on 14th Amend.: “The Consitution nowhere defines the meaning of the word ‘citizen’ or ‘natural-born citizen’ by way of either inclusion or exclusion. The meaning of the phrase must therefore be interpreted in the light of the common law. The fundamental principle of the common law was birth within the allegiance of the king. Children of foreign ambassadors or diplomats or of alien enemies were not natural-born subjects since they were born outside the obedience of the king. This was the rule in all the English colonies up to the Declaration of Independence.”
Article II, Section 1, #7:
of the Constitution…
“Before he (referring to the President) enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation:–‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.'”
IMHO–hasn’t Barack Hussein Obama broken
this oath that he took? He is NOT protecting nor preserving nor defending the Constitution
by his own actions both prior to taking the oath and after taking the oath.
John Bingham our founding father stated to hold highest office the President to be born on US soil and Both parents to be born on US soil with No Foreign or Domestic Allegiance.
Sorry and also JOHN JAY!!!!!WAKE UP AMERICA!SPREAD THE WORD!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98589
Billboard signs anyone????Donations!!!!
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6064
Yes, but besides billboards, we each have little printers, and you can just go to the hardware store, buy some wallpaper paste and a big flat brush and with a stack of 500 sheets with descriptions of the problems with Obama’s eligibility and 500 telephone poles, many can slap up more information than the media will EVER put forth! Heck, the arborist and local painter do it!
I read another interesting thisg about our Constitution and the NBC clause. Citizen is capitalized while “natural born” is not.
Why? Because Citizen is a legal term and natural born is simply a fact. “Citizen” implies legal status while “natural born” factually describes one born with a status that requires no doubt or question to define. It is fact. One who would encounter any doubt is simply NOT “natural born.”
From MommaE blog radio:
Hi,
I just want to tell you that Phil Berg will be the Guest on tonight’s show!! It is important that we do all we can and leave no stone unturned to get rid of the Usurper Soetoro/Obama that is occupying our Whitehouse and thumbing his nose at OUR Constitution!
All kinds of good things to talk about and it will be 60 minutes of hot topics updates and fun. It should be a HOT rocking show as well as interesting.
Please post this on your Website, Blogs or any Blogs you are associated with or have access to and send to everyone in your address book.
Link, schedule, call in number and times for the Show is below!
http://blogtalkradio.com/My-Two-Cents
Call In # 347-202-0443
6:00 PM Pacific Time
7:00 PM Mountain Time
8:00 PM Central Time
9:00 PM Eastern Time
I hope to see you all there. There are 3 ways to listen to the show they are as follows:
1. When you get to the Show page if the show doesn’t immediately start playing for you, you can click on the radio on the right, minimize the page and listen while doing something else.
2. You can enter the chat as a Guest and read what is being said while listening.
3. You can register/log-in and chat while listening.
The choice is yours.
I hope to see you all there.
MommaE and Matt
sandy // May 21, 2009 at 7:48 am
I read another interesting thisg about our Constitution and the NBC clause. Citizen is capitalized while “natural born” is not.
Why? Because Citizen is a legal term and natural born is simply a fact. “Citizen” implies legal status while “natural born” factually describes one born with a status that requires no doubt or question to define. It is fact. One who would encounter any doubt is simply NOT “natural born.”
================
Sandy—I love it. If there ever is a “doubt”
then the person is NOT NBC; it’s not complicated, right?
Thanks. This is becoming more and more
“interesting” as a person who has no legal
background whatsoever, it is fascinating to
learn all of this:)
Thanks GBAmerica
Here is my primary ref to John Bingham:
https://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/28/natural-born-citizen-obama-is-not-eligible-obama-birth-certificate-us-constitution-founding-fathers-intent-lawsuits-obama-kenyan-vattel%e2%80%99s-the-law-of-nations-john-jay-berg-donofrio-k/
** Notice **
GBAmerica commented on 2009/05/20 at 4:06pm that Wiki scrubbed the ref to
Natural Born Citizen by John Bingham.
If anyone has a copy of that Wiki article before scrubbing, provide and I will post it.
Thanks.
Last night, Bill O Reilly had a story, connecting GE corp, Obama , NBC, and MSNBC, all connected, to promote Obama for President. GE to get Billions after we get gouged for carbon taxes. GE owns NBC and their “reporters” have been ordered to have nothing but pro Obama reporting, to get him into position to repay GE. Pay to play, on a massive scale, all at our expense. Bill says he will have more on this story! Maybe he will tie everything together, including the fraud, that got Barry Soetoro, into the position of usurper in chief.
CW….I read that a lot of libs have bought into the internet rumor that birthers added the phrase about both parents being citizens to Bingham’s quote.
However, someone else posted that they actually went to the library and read the original and it was indeed there.
Wikki will buy any left wing garbage
PS. The fraud continues and is getting deeper.
The quote can be found in the Library of Congress’ copy of the “Congressional Globe” which provided this account of the 39th Congress’ 1st session dated 03/09/1866……..
CW, here is a link to the page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Bingham&diff=278117261&oldid=276290691
Here’s what was removed:
John Bingham confirms that understanding and the construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:”[http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/impeach/imp_account2.html”]
–
– {{cquote|[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that ”every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is”, in the language of your Constitution itself, ”a natural born citizen”…. . .}}
If you go to the article’s “history” page, it says that Wiki user AmesG “Remove quote unsupported by the cited source, and added by a biased “birther” user. Get a life, Birthers” at 15:08 on 18 March 2009:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Bingham&action=history
I just finished reading this story. I need to go take a shower. It’s a mind boggling look inside Chicago politics and those that are now in DC.
Chicago Straight
The arrest of Governor Rod Blagojevich in December cast a shadowy light on the relationships among four leading players in the Illinois Democratic Party—Blagojevich, Barack Obama, Rahm Emanuel, and David Axelrod.
The new president and his two aides would like to minimize their dealings with the disgraced ex-governor. But the record tells a more complex story
http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/June-2009/Chicago-Straight/
More interesting quotes from former congressional members and a court ruling:
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Langdon Cheves, in February of 1814:
The children have a natural attachment to the society in which they are born: being obliged to acknowledge the protection it has granted to their fathers, they are obliged to it in a great measure for their birth and education. … We have just observed that they have a right to enter into the society of which their fathers were members. But every man born free, the son of a citizen, arrived at years of discretion, may examine whether it be convenient for him to join in the society for which he was destined by his birth.
Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:
When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him.
And then there is this ruling:
Savage v. Umphries (TX) 118 S. W. 893, 909:
As a man is a “citizen” of the country to which his father owes allegiance, it was incumbent on one alleging in an election contest that a voter was not a citizen of the United States to show that such voter’s father was not a citizen thereof during his son’s minority.
These were all posted on the Federalist Blog….
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22743.html
Krauthammer is Obama’s biggest critic and most effective. He states it clearly: it’s Obama’s character that is disturbing.
CitizenWells, Donofrio talks of John Bingham http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/03/13/open-letter-to-united-states-attorney-jeffrey-taylor/ POINT II: Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirmed the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House of Representatives on March 9, 1866:
[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]
The 14th Amendment was interpreted by Justice Horace Gray for the holding of the US Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101-102(1884), as follows:
“The persons declared to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other…Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States…although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more “born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government…” (Emphasis added.)
Fourteen years later, Justice Horace Gray did a complete about face on this issue in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) although the holding in the Elk case was not reversed. Regardless, the direct holding in Wong Kim Ark was restricted to the children of foreign parents permanently domiciled in the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was never permanently domiciled in the United States. I urge you to read both decisions in light of the following recent historical discovery.
POINT III: The recent historical revelation that Chester Arthur was a usurper to the office of President.
Chester Arthur faced an identical scandal as Barack Obama when Arthur ran for Vice President. It was alleged he had been born in Canada or Ireland and that he was a British subject at birth and therefore wasn’t eligible to be President. Recently, my research team discovered, via the official New York State naturalization record of Chester Arthur’s father – available at the Library of Congress – that his father did not become a naturalized citizen until 14 years after Chester Arthur was born. So, at the time of his birth, Chester Arthur was a British subject due to his father’s heritage and failure to be naturalized before Chester Arthur was born even though history has proved Chester Arthur was actually born in Vermont.
Our research also proved that Chester Arthur actively concealed this fact b
POINT II: Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the Fourteenth Amendment, confirmed the understanding and construction the framers used in regards to the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House of Representatives on March 9, 1866:
[I] find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…[6]
The 14th Amendment was interpreted by Justice Horace Gray for the holding of the US Supreme Court in Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, 101-102(1884), as follows:
“The persons declared to be citizens are “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” The evident meaning of these last words is not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other…Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States…although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more “born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government…” (Emphasis added.)
Fourteen years later, Justice Horace Gray did a complete about face on this issue in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) although the holding in the Elk case was not reversed. Regardless, the direct holding in Wong Kim Ark was restricted to the children of foreign parents permanently domiciled in the United States. Barack Obama Sr. was never permanently domiciled in the United States. I urge you to read both decisions in light of the following recent historical discovery.
POINT III: The recent historical revelation that Chester Arthur was a usurper to the office of President
i see the AH in the WH
was standing in front of the Constitution replica
today
what a disgrace to the framers that this fraud has the auditicity to use this as a front for his perverted agenda
Sandy, Thank you for the great quotes.
Here is one by Jefferson in 1777: “We can say with confidence that a natural born citizen of the United States means those persons born whose father the United States already has an established jurisdiction over, i.e. born to fathers who are themselves citizens of the United States.”
Sorry about the repeat. I am cut & paste challenged.
Came across this blog for Hillary when I was searching for more info on Obama’s Indonesian citizenship http://alegrescorner.soapblox.net/showDiary.do;jsessionid=608C61
BA88B70B6569B8A9306719D47C?diaryId=611
this is one comment on the citizenship issue
“If he has dual citizenship, (4.00 / 6)
wouldn’t that be on record? I just don’t understand why some attorneys aren’t going after him?
Anyway, if something’s there, I wish it would all come out in full force before the convention. If we’re stuck with BHO as the nominee, the Repubs will throw this at him big time, and then we’re down the tubes.”
So why didn’t McCain throw this at Barry?
Stephanie, you ask why didn’t McCain throw the dual citizenship issue at Barry during the campaign. I suspect that it’s because McCain himself was in a precarious position with regard to his own “natural born citizenship”, because he was born in Panama.
I suspect that it’s because McCain himself was in a precarious position with regard to his own “natural born citizenship”, because he was born in Panama.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That little play in Congress one week took care of that issue, after all, his father fought for this country……..but was the objective of that piece of paper something bigger?? I always wondered and still do.
JJ, wasn’t that resolution co-authored or co-sponsored by Obama and Hillary Clinton? I do believe that the objective was more to help Obama than it was to help McCain. At a minimum, it helped to deflect attention away from Obama and onto McCain.
The Bots on Wiki and Yahoo Answers actively delete any references to John Bingham.
Here is an example of Wikipedia censorship:
“(→Later life: Remove quote unsupported by the cited source, and added by a biased “birther” user. Get a life, Birthers) (undo) ”
Actually the quote from John Bingham defining a natural born citizen is from Congressional Globe, 39th Congress (1866) pg. 1291
Here’s an example of YA censorship:
” Obama is defined as a US Citizen as per the 14th Amendment which does not?
In Elections – Asked by —-… – 11 answers – 1 day ago
– (Question has been removed)”
This one they missed:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuymSOz1VvSQ96pJy_FTGhXty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20090517124131AAjr6zB
Now that Pelosi is a bonafide liar, isn’t it time to see her justification for certification of candidateObama?
She’s a certified liar.
They are actively agitated over questions about the CONSTITUTION, they don’t mind emotional questions. See YA questions come up in many search engines, so they’re of high value if left on the web. Some of the ones deleted somehow wind up still on other countries’ YA and so stay up there.
In any case YA is fascistic, censoring, and has always been aggressively pro-Obama/anti-American.
The Bingham quote is baaaack.
Let’s see how long it stays before they censor and try to rewrite history.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bingham
Okay…..Cheney was on a hunt today and this time he did not miss!
He spoke through the crosshairs of truth and nailed Ovomit right between his eyes!
Amazing speech! He made Obie look like a T-ball player trying to compete in the Major Leagues
Obama did co-author the bill. One could conclude it was out of good sportsmanship but if I remember right Obama wanted the bill to include him in some way and that was denied.
Kim,
To be fair I went to recovery.org and took the amount of stimulus money for HA, IL, and my home state of NH. NH and HA rank 41 and 42 respectively in the us while IL ranks 5th. If I break it out to a per capita figure it come out pretty close.
Pop Stimulus PerCapita
HA 1257608 511000000 406
Ill 12653544 5055000000 399
NH 1287687 493000000 383
Sandy, Cheney was great! Cheney in 2012 bad heart or not he should run. Have him run with someone young & healthy -Palin.
Annelynn, just tried wiki & Bingham’s quote, thank you.
Patriot Dreamer, I guess a better question is why didn’t the Republicans vet McCain more thoroughly. And how much power does a party have in saying to a candidate you can not run?
This a good reference for why John McCain is also not a NBC
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1157621
http://thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2009/01/mindboggling-conspiracy-by-mccain-obama.html
MINDBOGGLING CONSPIRACY BY McCAIN, OBAMA, McCASKILL, LEAHY, CLINTON AND COBURN TO CIRCUMVENT ARTICLE TWO, SECTION ONE OF THE US CONSTITUTION
**********
We were all played, by BOTH sides, this enormity of this treason is indescribable!
My own personal opinion is that McCain was “chosen” by the mainstream media – not the voters. It was their biased coverage of him that put him into the position of Republican party candidate, and then the media turned on him once the primaries were over.
I came across that article from January, and it makes sense in every way.
Both McCain and Obama were in on a conspiracy to circumvent Article II of the US Constitution.
Palin, though I like her in many, many ways, had to have known McCain wasn’t eligible either, but political ambitions surmounted that Constitutional trip-up for her.
McCaskill wanted VP and she did all kinds of illegal things with SR 511, getting prosecutors, troopers to harass McCain supporters in MO, but she got tossed under the Obama bus despite her nefarious illegal activities to get him elected. Then Biden using his son to harass Larry Sinclair won him the spot. Was he more privy to Obama’s sodomite problems?
The two bills to redefine Natural Born Citizen, were all sponsored by Obama, Clinton, and McCaskill. Menenedez and Coburn added to the first, and Leahy for the second.
Ironically Leahy is on record defining a natural born citizen concurrent with John Bingham (both parents US citizens, child born on US soil), and also that definition is in S.R. 511 with which Obama agrees.
This is such high level treason it’s indescribable, and I know it rankles the supporters of Palin and Clinton, but there it all is. It involves BOTH sides, or does it really considering McCain was such a RINO, it sounds like it was a 100% Democrat concoction.
MINDBOGGLING CONSPIRACY BY McCAIN, OBAMA, McCASKILL, LEAHY, CLINTON AND COBURN TO CIRCUMVENT ARTICLE TWO, SECTION ONE OF THE US CONSTITUTION
**********
http://thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2009/01/mindboggling-conspiracy-by-mccain-obama.html
bob strauss // May 21, 2009 at 10:08 am
Last night, Bill O Reilly had a story, connecting GE corp, Obama , NBC, and MSNBC, all connected, to promote Obama for President. GE to get Billions after we get gouged for carbon taxes. GE owns NBC and their “reporters” have been ordered to have nothing but pro Obama reporting, to get him into position to repay GE. Pay to play, on a massive scale, all at our expense. Bill says he will have more on this story! Maybe he will tie everything together, including the fraud, that got Barry Soetoro, into the position of usurper in chief.
—————————————–
Also interesting to note: NBC offered Blago a payed role in “I’m a Celebrity, Get Me Out Of Here”. This would help defray his costs to defend himself, which he desperately needs. The judge said no go. So now they offered the role to his wife Patti. She is not even any kind of celebrity.
This is blatant pay to play. Obama is having GE (thru NBC) pay Blago to keep his mouth shut.
I would love to see an expose on this.
I put that Wiki page up A LONG TIME AGO and it showed it.Now can’t find but I did in past archives put it up.
http://theidfc.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/obama%E2%80%99s-natural-born-delima/
Here’s an article that explains everything!Read it all please.It really doesn’t matter where he was born due to his father holding Foreign allegiance.
That’s why John Jay and John Bingham from Ohio put in to hold highest office to protect US!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98724
The first billboard.
GBAmerica, that’s basically what attorney Mario Apuzzo is saying in his lawsuit. Thanks for sharing that article!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bingham#Politics
Here’s where I started on Wiki before.
Your welcome Patriot Dreamer.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/its_going_to_get_worse_says_fe.html
As one commenter stated “this is a surprise? To whom?”
venice, it’s probably a surprise to the Kool-Aid drinkers who thought that the government would be paying their mortgages by now as well as giving them a new car, paying for their gas, etc. LOL! 😉
http://news1.newsmax.com/obama/?PROMO_CODE=7870-1&gclid=CJPi19_vzZoCFUIM3godFARH4A
Start voting!Asking how he’s doing in Office!
O’Reilly stated yesterday that they are investigating ACORN and will see if there is an Obama admin connections!!!
We all know the answer to that !!!!
e-mail Bill with all info O’reilly@foxnews.com
When Larry’s book comes out maybe some can get extra books and mail them to as variety of influncial people from the media to congress to college students,entertainers etc!!!
http://www.larrysinclair-0926.blogspot.com
Any investigations into the numerous addresses,in a variety of spellings of Obama??
The list had been on http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
What was going on at all the numerous addresses??
The Faker in Chief –
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/05/fascimile-con-1.html
Greg Gross, you don’t understand. http://Recovery.org
Look in the the Investment tab for NH. NH has to pay money TO Hawaii out of NH’s stimulus money.
All states have money going to Hawaii except Kansas and Montana.
This is where it’s going: CDBG State’s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii.
More payoff to Hawaii to keep Onocchio’s secret?
Sorry, wrong link. Here it is:
http://www.recovery.gov/
Oops again, I read that all states have money going to Hawaii except Kansas and Montana, but NH doesn’t either. I am checking them all now and will give a full report.
#
Patriot Dreamer // May 21, 2009 at 2:01 pm
My own personal opinion is that McCain was “chosen” by the mainstream media – not the voters. It was their biased coverage of him that put him into the position of Republican party candidate, and then the media turned on him once the primaries were over.
******************************************************
McCain is showing more and more that he is not a true Republican……he has too many LIBERAL leanings…..the reason he didn’t win…….a true conservative would have beaten the IMPOSTER hands down……a true conservative would have pointed out all of OVOMIT’S flaws…..McCain was as you said picked by the media because they knew he wouldn’t stand a chance against the IMPOSTER!!!!
OK, so far I’ve checked WI,MN,MI,IA,IL,IN,OH,TX,NY,ME,PA,CO, and I did find it in NH. Money coming out of each state’s stimulus money going to “CDBG State’s Program and Non-Entitlement Grants in Hawaii”
Obama Billboard Ads
While driving back from LA today via the 405 parking lot, I noticed that many commercial Ads were posted on high rise buildings. Why not carry WND billboard campaign a step further and get banners made up exposing Obama. I’m sure the expense would be significantly less!
One drawback to this approach, this may cause Obots to get into accidents or to trigger Obot road rage.
Maddie (May 20, 2009 at 3:28 pm) asks:
=== Are you the “same” Anonymouse who used to post regularly on Gretawire during the primaries? ===
No, Maddie, is that Greta’s blog? I read at Greta’s blog some months ago, but never posted there.
Unfortunately, after I chose ‘Anonymouse’ to hide behind 🙂 I discovered that MANY others have that alias. I didn’t agree with a lot of their posts, so I was going to change my alias, but then I got to thinking that maybe the confusing anonymity would be a better camouflage.
One clue to my identity, if my post smacks of digging (like my pursuit of the truth about what stock Obama owns), that Anonymouse is more likely me than another. Having spent more than a decade immersed in a form of textual research, I’ve been conditioned to spotting things, and would rather spend time pursuing elusive facts than partying.
The other way to ID me is my 1,000 percent loathing of the Won who (allegedly) hijacked the White House and now seems well on his way to hijacking the entire United States — breaking laws in order to gift Chrysler to the UAW; trying to control the press; trying to take over the US census; forcing all US taxpayers to underwrite infanticide (making us complicit in his advocation of murder); his “health care” goal of involuntary euthanasia for seniors (the older one is, the less value to the ‘state’); his attempts to wrest volunteerism from churches and charities; his designating America a NON Judaeo-Christian nation(!!); his inviting Gaza Palestinians to come here and dwell in our neighborhoods; and his imperiling every US citizen — from foetus to wheelchair inhabitant — by debilitating our defense while inviting Iran to spend the next several months advancing their nuclear capabilities unchecked.
By his actions we know his loyalties, his allegiance. Who needs the proof his lawyer farms have been blocking? Obama himself is living, ACTING proof.
thanks for the clarification, Anonymouse.
Actually after I asked you, I saw another
user name identical to a user here except without the numbers. I was totally surprised
at first, because “our” blogger would not be
posting typical obot propaganda as that one was.
To Maddie (May 24, 2009 at 1:32 pm)
You’re welcome, Maddie. When you observed that “‘our’ blogger would not be posting typical obot propaganda as that one was,” you noted an important component of identifying who is behind a post’s words. A person’s idiolect can be almost as branding as fingerprints.
I read elsewhere that you’ve been going through some severe discomfort. I never heard of Kenalog, so looked it up at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a601124.html
After reading that, I think you must be in agony! You didn’t mention why you needed the Kenalog. Is it anything that acupuncture might help?