DNC and CrowdStrike refuse to provide subpoenaed records requested by Attorney Ty Clevenger for Ed Butowsky, Leaked internally or hacked by Russians?, Seth Rich involvement?

DNC and CrowdStrike refuse to provide subpoenaed records requested by Attorney Ty Clevenger for Ed Butowsky, Leaked internally or hacked by Russians?, Seth Rich involvement?

Mueller, as a matter of determined policy, omitted key steps which any honest investigator would undertake. He did not commission any forensic examination of the DNC servers. He did not interview Bill Binney. He did not interview Julian Assange. His failure to do any of those obvious things renders his report worthless.”…Craig Murray

“Unfounded links between Clinton and the Rich killing predate the July 13, 2016, “bulletin” and coverage of it by a sketchy site called WhatDoesItMean.com. What’s more, the “hit team” story, which Sines says was repeated several weeks later, wasn’t the primary Rich-related conspiracy that gained traction.”…Washington Post July 9, 2019

“Who murdered Seth Rich and why?”…Citizen Wells


Just in from Attorney Ty Clevenger on LawFlog.

“DNC and CrowdStrike refuse to provide records about alleged Russian email hack”

“Last night, attorneys for the Democratic National Committee and CrowdStrike formally objected to subpoenas from Ed Butowsky, refusing to provide any records about whether DNC emails were leaked internally or hacked by Russians. The FBI also missed a deadline yesterday for providing records about Seth Rich.

Surprise, surprise. Three years after the purported Russian attack on DNC servers, and nobody outside the DNC or its contractors has seen those servers. Why not?

Frankly, I expected the DNC and CrowdStrike to balk, and I’ll be filing motions to compel in the next few weeks.

You will recall that Roger Stone forced federal prosecutors to admit in late May that neither the FBI nor Special Counsel Robert Mueller had investigated the DNC servers that allegedly were hacked by Russians. Instead, Mueller and the FBI relied exclusively on a redacted report from CrowdStrike.

To my knowledge, the U.S. Department of Justice had never before handed off a computer crime investigation to a third-party contractor hired by the alleged victim. Instead, the FBI (or some other law enforcement agency) had always investigated those crimes. Obviously, the DNC doesn’t want any independent investigation of its claims that Russian hackers — as opposed to a DNC employee like Seth Rich — were responsible for transferring DNC emails to Wikileaks.

Here’s another subject to ponder. More than a year ago, the DNC filed a kamakaze lawsuitalleging that the Trump campaign and the Russian government had conspired to hack its servers, apparently in hopes that the lawsuit would keep the Russian collusion hoax alive through the 2018 elections. At the time, President Trump welcomed the lawsuit, saying it would finally allow for an independent inspection of the DNC’s servers.

Why hasn’t that happened yet? The Trump campaign and some of the other defendants are represented by major law firms (as you would expect), and those firms have dutifully filed motions to dismiss, but it seems that none of those firms have demanded discovery, e.g., an opportunity to inspect the servers. Why not? And why didn’t some of the Congressional committee chairmen subpoena the servers when the House was under GOP control? Why isn’t Sen. Lindsey Graham doing it now?”

Read more:



More here:





14 responses to “DNC and CrowdStrike refuse to provide subpoenaed records requested by Attorney Ty Clevenger for Ed Butowsky, Leaked internally or hacked by Russians?, Seth Rich involvement?

  1. citizenwells

    “From Attorney Ty Clevenger.

    “Subpoenas issued for FBI, Crowdstrike, and DNC records on “Russian hacking” and Seth Rich

    This afternoon I issued subpoenas to the FBI, CrowdStrike, and the Democratic National Committee for their records on murdered DNC employee Seth Rich. The subpoenas further demand all evidence that Russian hackers were responsible for obtaining DNC emails in 2016 that were later published by Wikileaks.”


  2. It brought back memories of this news.

    Brazile: After Hacking, DNC Replicated Server Then ‘Destroyed …
    Dec 13, 2017

    Only 1 reason DNC destroyed server, says U.S. intel expert – WND
    Dec 17, 2017

    U.S. lawmakers stunned at claim DNC ‘destroyed’ server – WND
    Dec 21, 2017

    They are all completely corrupt. Even if Brazile was lying, i seriously doubt we’ll ever get to see the server. About as much chance as seeing obuthole’s birth certificate. Everyone in Washington DC is scared spitless of what those two things would show.

  3. oldsailor87

    ………..we no longer need to see his phony Hawaii BC. He visited Kogele Kenya some months back, and during his speech he said “I am the first American PRESIDENT to have come from Kenya”. These were Soetoro’s own words. Yet nobody seems to even give a damn what his words confirm.

  4. oldsailor87

    ………….Lil Barry Soetoro (aka Obama) is to this day, and moment still is NOT A US CITIZEN !!!!

  5. oldsailor87


  6. A magazine in Europe named Campaign did a cover story on Farage, who’s Brexit party won their recent elections. A group of high ups from Google, Twitter and other big tech companies wrote a letter to the editor of Campaign and told them they should not do interviews with someone like Farage and let him have a platform. Because he’s a nationalist and they should not interview nationalists.

    These are the people who are deciding what goes on google and twitter platforms.

    I’m pretty sure that in those companies 10-k and other sec docs they have a section on what they allow on their platforms. I’m also pretty sure that whatever it says, it does not say that nationalists should not be allowed to speak on platforms that liberals control. **cough –crime—cough**


  7. The radio today leads with the story that mule will be questioned about Russian interference in our election.

    Will anyone in this hearing bring up that a judge told mueller to stop blaming russia when they have no evidence they had anything to do with social media posts?

    Will anyone bring up that the evidence they have for the russian’s hack is a redacted draft report that is contradicted by real evidence put forth by vips?

    What a farce of a hearing.

  8. fhl……..
    ……….there is a lot of evidence to show that the Russians had little to no involvement in the alleged collusion. The so called story is one that was FABRICATED, and expanded upon by many of the Washington POS. which includes Mzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Piggy herself.

  9. oldsailor87

    AND NOW………
    ………….PENCILNECK is reading his insane literature this afternoon. Poor little Marty, his BUGGY EYED facial expressions tell on him.

  10. oldsailor87

    AND NOW…….
    …………..Juan Williams has showed up at Fox. Now he is once again twisting everything around to suit his idiot level standard. Fox would gain a lot of viewers if they re assigned him to the janitor squad. REAL MORON !!!

  11. oldsailor87

    ………I was hoping, and praying that somebody with some trick photographic ability would put Marty Feldman’s head on Adam Schiff’s shoulders. It probably would have CRACKED UP A MILLION PEOPLE BIG TIME.

  12. CitizenWells,
    I was attempting to refrain posting on the Seth Rich, Wikileaks, Mueller findings, until the Congress had a chance to question Mueller on his investigation. Specifically, in his report, Mueller says that Wikileaks started the rumor that Seth Rich had been killed by the DNC to confuse people about Russian collusion. No specifics into the investigation were provided, yet I had many questions that I though should be sought out in a REAL investigation into the events before the 2016 election.

    1. Did Mueller attempt to contact the NSA to see if they could provide data about the DNC security breach by the Russians?
    2. Did Mueller contact the NSA to see if Seth Rich and his family had been in contact with Wikileaks to deliver files?
    3. Did Mueller order the DNC server to be investigated by the FBI and DOJ to confirm Crowdstrikes (Google and Soros) preliminary findings (they never issued a final report) about DNC hack.

    To make a conclusion without seeking evidence, especially with a potential politically motivated murder, is not an accident. This is deliberately not looking for information that you already know the answer to, and don’t like.

  13. citizenwells

    Pete: Correct

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s