Yearly Archives: 2017

Obama job legacy: Grade F, White american employment down over 725k, down 107k last month, Hispanic up 5 million almost 25 percent, 94% of all new jobs under Obama were part time

Obama job legacy: Grade F, White american employment down over 725k, down 107k last month, Hispanic up 5 million almost 25 percent, 94% of all new jobs under Obama were part time

“In December 2014 there were 18 million immigrants (legal and illegal) living in the country who had arrived since January 2000. But job growth over this period was just 9.3 million — half of new immigration.”…Center for Immigration Studies February 2015

“The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons (sometimes referred to as involuntary part-time workers) was little changed in September at 7.1 million. These individuals, who would have preferred full-time employment, were working part time because their hours had been cut back or because they were unable to find a full-time job.”…US Labor Dept. September 2014

“The official unemployment rate, which cruelly overlooks the suffering of the long-term and often permanently unemployed as well as the depressingly underemployed, amounts to a Big Lie.”…Jim Clifton, CEO of Gallup

 

 

Obama just completed his last full month in office.

His much touted jobs added as portrayed by the fake news mainstream media?

Obama gets a grade of F for his jobs performance.

Unless of course you are an illegal alien.

From December of 2007 to December of 2016 the following occurred:

White Americans.

More than 725,000 fewer employed.

In the last month alone 107,000 fewer employed.

Almost 11 million more not in the labor force.

Hispanics.

Almost 5 million more employed.

That’s almost a 25 percent increase.

From Zero Hedge December 25, 2016.

“Top Ex-White House Economist Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

Just over six years ago, in December of 2010, we wrote “Charting America’s Transformation To A Part-Time Worker Society“, in which we predicted – and showed – that in light of the underlying changes resulting from the second great depression, whose full impacts remain masked by trillions in monetary stimulus and soon, perhaps fiscal, America is shifting from a traditional work force, one where the majority of new employment is retained on a full-time basis, to a “gig” economy, where workers are severely disenfranchised, and enjoy far less employment leverage, job stability and perks than their pre-crash peers. It also explains why despite the 4.5% unemployment rate, which the Fed has erroneously assumed is indicative of job market at “capacity”, wage growth not only refuses to materialize, but as we showed yesterday, the growth in real disposable personal income was the lowest since 2014.

When we first penned our article, it was dubbed “fringe” tinfoil hattery, or in the latest vernacular, “fake news.”

Fast forward 6 years, when a report by Harvard and Princeton economists Lawrence Katz and Alan Krueger, confirms exactly what we warned. In their study, the duo show that from 2005 to 2015, the proportion of Americans workers engaged in what they refer to as “alternative work” soared during the Obama era, from 10.7% in 2005 to 15.8% in 2015. Alternative, or “gig” work is defined as “temporary help agency workers, on-call workers, contract company workers, independent contractors or freelancers”, and is generally unsteady, without a fixed paycheck and with virtually no benefits.”

“Krueger, who until 2013 was also the top White House economist serving as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under Obama, was “surprised” by the finding.

Quoted by quartz, he said “We find that 94% of net job growth in the past decade was in the alternative work category,” said Krueger. “And over 60% was due to the [the rise] of independent contractors, freelancers and contract company workers.” In other words, nearly all of the 10 million jobs created between 2005 and 2015 were not traditional nine-to-five employment.”

Read more:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-23/top-white-house-economist-admits-94-all-new-jobs-under-obama-were-part-time

 

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/

Meet the press January 8, 2017 Chuck Todd uses idiots John McCain and Lindsey Graham for argument on Russian interference in election, Sean Hannity nails McCain and Graham, Both are RINOs at best

Meet the press January 8, 2017 Chuck Todd uses idiots John McCain and Lindsey Graham for argument on Russian interference in election, Sean Hannity nails McCain and Graham, Both are RINOs at best

“I don’t believe Lindsey Graham’s a true Republican,”
“I don’t even believe he’s just a RINO,”
“I believe he’s a Democrat.”…Talk show caller, The Atlantic June 10, 2014

“Our Podesta & DNC leaks now authenticated by WikiLeaks, CIA, FBI, NSA and ODNI (aka Hillary’s “17 intel agencies”). Now that’s team work!”…Julian Assange on Twitter

“We are being lied to on a scale unimaginable by George Orwell.”…Citizen Wells

 

 

Chuck Todd, of the fake news program “Meet The Press” used idiots John McCain and Lindsey Graham to help make the argument that the Russians interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

It should have the opposite effect for any rational person who has been paying attention.

Like these folks:

Who Does America Believe? 84,000 Votes Later, Here Is The Answer

 

From Meet The Press.

“CHUCK TODD:

He’s at odds with members of his own party.

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN:

Every American should be alarmed by Russia’s attacks on our nation.”

“SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM:

Yeah, I really– because he said, “It’s time to move on.” Remember when he was asked about, you know, I think maybe on New Year’s Eve? “You know, let’s just get on with our lives.” Here’s my retort to that. Our lives are built around the idea that we’re free people. That we go to the ballot box. That we, you know, have political contests outside of foreign interference.

You can’t go on with your life as a democracy when a foreign entity is trying to compromise the election process. So Mr. President-elect, it is very important that you show leadership here. Let me say this: if after having been briefed by our intelligence leaders, Donald Trump is still unsure as to what the Russians did, that would be incredibly unnerving to me because the evidence is overwhelming. All I’m asking him is to acknowledge that Russia interfered, and push back. It could be Iran next time. It could be China. It was Democrats today. It could be Republicans in the next election.”

“SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN:

I think you could only draw the conclusion if they were celebrating that they obviously wanted the outcome to be what it was. And then the question is, “What did they do to try to achieve that outcome?” And it’s pretty obvious that they were heavily engaged. And we need to come to grips with it and get to the bottom of it and overall come up with a strategy in this new form of warfare that can basically dismantle our– harm our economy, harm our elections, harm our national security.”

http://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meet-press-january-8-2017-n704481

Sean Hannity December 15, 2016.

“Hannity: “Lindsey Graham, The Idiot. What Is He Citing? Except That He Hates Trump””

“What did WikiLeaks do? OK, they exposed how corrupt America’s media is. Every big network, every major newspaper, how they colluded with the Clinton campaign. It exposed how they helped — how they cheated to beat Bernie Sanders. It exposed racism within the Democratic National Committee and sexism within the Democratic National Committee. Anti-Semitism within the Democratic National Committee They exposed all of that. It exposed just how deeply corrupt, and what a liar Hillary Clinton is, we already knew that but confirmed it was at a deeper level. I would argue with you that if this were about — and I’ll ask Julian [Assange] in the next hour, if it was about Donald Trump would he have done the same thing? Because I suspect the answer is yes.

And I’ll also tell you this: in many ways he’s the modern day Woodward and Bernstein. They’ve not been wrong — WikiLeaks has not been wrong in 10 years. A perfect track record. And Julian Assange says “no, we didn’t get it from them. We didn’t get it from any state. We didn’t get it from Russia.” So what evidence does, you know, Lindsay Graham, the idiot, what is he citing? Except that he hates Turmp. Just like McCain hates Trump. Like Kasich hates Trump. Like the Bushes hate Trump. Let’s just be honest here. The only people doing this are people that have always hated Trump and wanted to undermine and sabotage him anyway. WikiLeaks did what Woodward and Bernstein did. They exposed a level of corruption in government. That’s what they did. I’ve been saying, where is — where are the ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, where are the Woodward and Bernsteins of this age? Martha Raddatz crying on TV? For crying out loud?”

http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/12/15/sean-hannity-goes-after-idiot-lindsey-graham-refute-claims-russia-was-involved-election-hack/214833

From The Burning Platform July 23, 2015.

“McCAIN THE HERO NEARLY SUNK AN AIRCRAFT CARRIER & KILLED 134 SAILORS”

“McCain, when a Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy was a Navy pilot (they call themselves aviators). July 29, 1967 while on the deck and in his plane on the carrier U.S.S. Forrestal he managed to screw up procedures (officially denied and covered up by him and the Navy and also even promoted on Wikipedia if you care to look–reason to follow). He did a smart ass punk attention getting trick by doing a “wet start” up of his jet.

When a pilot wants to be a wise ass or show off, this type of engine start creates a large startling flame and lots of surprise noise from the rear of a jet engine on start up–this was no accident. This and the large subsequent electrical surge and apparent (incorrect and against policy) weapon arming (by the pilot) caused the launching of a powerful Zuni rocket across the carrier’s deck hitting other parked planes (photo below) that were packing 1,000 high-explosive pound bombs. The subsequent massive explosions, fire and destruction went several decks below and nearly sunk this major 82,000 ton U.S. aircraft carrier.

This stunt and aftermath caused the deathof 134 sailors and seriously injure (blow off arms legs, cause blindness and burns to another 161 sailors) and took the ship off the battle line for extensive repairs. Any other Navy pilot causing this type of death and destruction the Navy would have raped him and he would probably still be in the brig. Why not McCain? Well, first with many powerful connections this “little infraction” was covered up by the Navy (our most politically involved/connected service by the way).”

Read more:

https://www.theburningplatform.com/2015/07/23/mccain-the-hero-nearly-sunk-an-aircraft-carrier-killed-134-sailors/

I personally lost all respect for John McCain in 2008, when his country needed him the most, and he handed over the election to Barack Obama.

 

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/