Fox and Obama controlled by Saudis, Glenn Beck leaves with soul, Beck seeks honest system, I’m not going to play the game anymore.

Fox and Obama controlled by Saudis, Glenn Beck leaves with soul, Beck seeks honest system, I’m not going to play the game anymore.

“Why has Obama, for over 2 years, employed numerous private and government attorneys to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells and millions of concerned Americans

“Why did Bill O’Reilly use birth announcements as evidence of Obama’s birth in Hawaii and mislead the American public?”…Citizen Wells

Obama made his allegiance clear.

From Citizen Wells July 2, 2011.

“Did Fox make a deal with the devil?”

” The Saudi billionaire, Al-waleed bin Talal, is a friend of News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch and controls an influential number of voting shares in the company.”

” The second-largest holder of voting stock in News Corp. is Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, a nephew of the Saudi king. And through his philanthropies, Waleed has given generously to initiatives pursued by the imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf.”

“Khan says he asked Waleed about anger in some Arab circles about the rhetoric heard on Fox, and the prince replied this way:

Look, I’m not there to direct the news policy, I’m there to invest in News Corp.

— and hopefully they’ve got some sense to do news properly.”

“A disturbing trend has developed at Fox. Bill O’Reilly misled the American people for several years by stating that he had done research and that Obama was born in Hawaii. We recently got confirmation that he relied on the birth announcements. Now Jana Winter misrepresents what the Adobe software expert has said.”

Read more

Glenn Beck, on his radio show Thursday, June 30, 2011, made the following statements.

““You cannot solve anything if you are not dealing in an honest system,” Glenn said. While FOX is the most honest system out, Glenn said that he wanted to operate in a complete different fashion than every other cable news network.”

“I know enough now to know it doesn’t work.”

“Mark Halperin’s apology for making a disparaging remark about Obama is a perfect example of why traditional cable networks will fail. “I’m more offended that you’re apologizing for something that you actually believe.  Say it.  That’s why these systems are going to fail,” Glenn said. The fact that Halperin has now been suspended for telling the truth is baffling to Glenn.”

“I’m not going to play the game anymore.”

Glenn Beck stated he was  leaving with his soul on his last Fox TV show .


42 responses to “Fox and Obama controlled by Saudis, Glenn Beck leaves with soul, Beck seeks honest system, I’m not going to play the game anymore.

  1. Well Beck, it’s too bad you felt this way only AFTER Soros got your show canceled.

  2. There is absolutely no question that FOX news and Oreilly have been misleading us for the past 2 & 1/2 years by saying Obama (“the dick”) was born in Hawaii, when all of the evidence shows that even if he was, his father was NOT a natural born citizen. Obama is a liar, and our congress and senate are lying for him. That is a felony people, and we should go after them for it.

  3. After writing and calling nearly every congressmen and women in the entire government in reference to the legality of Obama (“the dick”), I have yet to receive an answer, pro or con about this. That should tell you that there IS IN FACT A COVER UP!!! There is so much corruption in our “government” now, that they don’t even trust each other.

  4. citizenwells

    I believe that Sean Hannity is a good man.
    I hope that he will become more outspoken.

  5. citizenwells

    Help me find more military officers who wlll speak out.
    What is the latest word from all of the generals who spoke out months ago?
    Were they placated by the image?

  6. observant viewer
  7. To fellow posters and CW,
    I have not been able to get verification that the documents submitted by the Hawaiian DoH are identical to those posted by the White House. However, without verification the documents and claims are suspect of any released PDF. Everyone can believe what they want, or even go with the odds, but the facts of proof remain elusive. Sadly, the media, outside of WND didn’t make the effort to got to Hawaii and force them to confirm that the PDF was originally created by them, or confirm the copies that have been provided by the public.

    The problem encountered is one of the releasing body. For instance, I don’t go and get a transcript from my school and then release a PDF document for proof of my perfect grades, it’s released from the source unaltered. Any disagreements here with this notion can quickly evaporate with individuals attempting to apply for say graduate school with a PDF transcript they bring in. The question really isn’t how the document was scanned, but why it wasn’t released to a group of reporters, including WND, by the Hawaiian DoH representative with Perkins Cole representatives present. Outside of that event, DoH officials should have immediately confirmed to all political bodies and news media the authenticity of the online PDF. I have yet to find a Perkins Cole representative claiming that the document PDF is a digital copy of what they received.

    Legally, and I am not a lawyer, it is claimed that Hawaii MUST release documents when they are public released, i.e. the privacy right is gone when someone makes a public release of these documents. They have now refused to verify the White House Documents and have refused to release copies.

    I made an attempt to prove that the online PDF was what it was claimed to be by the White House by verification and chain of evidence. I was unable to do so. Finally, I have witnessed outright fraud on the part of the White House before sometimes with disastrous results. LBJ and the Gulf of Tonkin being one burned into my memory with the subsequent misery that was Vietnam. Only to find later it was a staged event with the leaders of Congress, in both political parties, to afraid to tell the American people the truth about the administrations deceit. Theodore Roosevelt said that the President should be the person we as Americans question the most, not just give a pass. I questioned, and got no unequivocal verification.

    Much like Citizens Wells question of “Why has Obama spent millions on teams of Lawyers to hide his documents?” I must add “Why has Obama released a document in such a way as to prevent easy verification?”.


  8. Citizen Wells: I truly believe that since the Lt. colonel Lakin was put in jail for refusing to obey an order from the illegal “president”, that every one of the military men of any rank are in total fear of the same thing happening to them. This communist socialist regime must be taken down at any cost. I fear that very soon, there is going to be an armed conflict against the present “government” if for no other reason than to have the senate and congress do what they are paid to do, and that is to “protect and serve” the citizens of this country, and investigate the fraud that is being perpetrated against us. If they refuse to do that, there should be alternatives to removing the fraudulent usurper from office.

  9. bob strauss

    CW, this is one of my favorite military Generals, and he is already involved in the NBC issue.

  10. Gianni | July 2, 2011 at 5:27 pm |
    Beck did say all those things on Thursday. You are not mistaken. I heard it too. That’s what I was referring to when I mentioned earlier that Beck was muzzled by FoxNews about the eligibility issue and Obama’s background.
    I’ve been unsuccessful at locating an audio or transcript of Beck’s June 30th radio broadcast but I saw this post over at Free Republic that gives a brief synopsis of Glenn’s comments. ……………..

    Am listening to Beck.(6/30/2011) At approximately 9:08…

    Holy crap. He’s bringing up the lack of investigating 0bama’s background. Coming out of nowhere…..

    Parentage (doesn’t question BC)
    FM Davis
    Indonesian life
    College $$
    Occidental as Moscow of S. California
    Marxism at college
    Friends at college
    Joe the Plumber statement

    I have never heard Beck do this. He has said this lack of investigative media is one of the reasons he is leaving Fox.
    # # # # #

  11. I just requested a transcript or audio copy of Glenn’s 6/30 RADIO broadcast.
    Here are EMAIL CONTACTS if you want to do the same.

  12. Rosemary Woodhouse

    Glenn refuses to sell his soul. I hope everyone supports his endeavors.

  13. Pete…………………..

    While the pertinent documents have probably already been scrubbed they WERE published on CW blog many months back. They clearly showed that the wording had been altered. The part which refers to Constitutional eligibility was deleted,and that the wording stated only that he had been determined to be eligible by the HDNC. I didn’t download these documents,but now I very much regret it.

  14. Pete

    If FREE REPUBLIC website still exists you might be able to get a look at the pertinent documents there.

  15. Pete……………….
    I feel confident that somebody out there DID DOWNLOAD the COE documents of the HDNC. The person who gave final approval is now the Lt.Governor of Hawaii. The verbally altered document also bears MMMMMSSSSS. IMPORTANT’S (Pelosi) signature.

  16. Rosemary Woodhouse……………………….
    I would like to point out that while Glenn Beck IS WHO<AND WHAT HE IS, he was simply under the constraints of a BINDING AGREEMENT with FOX to stay within a certain pre determined latitude with regard to what he would or,would NOT discuss on his show. If this makes him a deceitful person then so be it. While I knew this for a long time I felt then,and still feel that there was certain grammar within his reach which would have reflected the truth, even though he did not come out and verbally alude to the truth.

  17. Norman………………….
    I don’t know if you have ever been in the military or not, but I have. I would like to offer the notion that any commissioned officer serving in ANY of our military services has an OBLIGATION by virtue of his SWORN oath to UPHOLD the Constitution. Lakin saw fit to exercise the requirement, and was penalised through a KANGAROO GENERAL Courts Martial for having done so. He simply QUESTIONED the VALIDITY of the (alleged) CINC. They refused to determine Soetoro’s legal validity,and prosecuted Lakin WITHOUT the RIGHT of SELF DEFENSE. (KANGAROO COURT). Ultimately Lt Colonel Lakin WILL be vindicated,after which the bastards who perpetrated the kangaroo court, will FIND THEMSELVES VISITING LEAVANWORTH for possibly a MUCH longer duration.

  18. For the record of where I stand I will repeat some of the facts that I see as extremely importatnt,particularly in the FUTURE. Fact #1 Kapiolani STILL refuses to certify that Soetoro was born at their institution. Fact#2 If he had been born there he would have AUTOMATICALLY been in possession of a HOSPITAL generated BC (LONG FORM), therefore he would not have needed to post two forged documents. He would be in possession of a CERTIFIED long form BC that would look EXACTLY LIKE the documents iassued to the Nordyke twins. He would not have needed to spend over 1.5 million $ to hide his personal data, and in my own way of thinking……he wouldn’t have. Remember he
    is a NARCISSIST personality,which makes him a SOCIOPATH. Therefore he would have FLAUNTED the original BC over everyone’s headand posted it on the WH website just as he did with

  19. HonorFirst

    I have always been a supporter of Glenn Beck. And I have stated many times, that as soon as he can prove to his wide swath of an audience that Obama is a fraud he will be the first to do so. He is a man of honor and integrity and has a vast team of researchers. He has everything to lose and nothing to gain by speaking untruths. He mentioned on his last episode at Fox, that he left little breadcrumbs along the way about his future in general. I picked up on several “breadcrumbs” when he alluded to Obama and his questionable past and brought it to the attention of this site. In my opinion, GB is just beginning to unravel the webs of deceit. Stay tuned…….

  20. …………..just as he did with the TWO forged BCs. ……….Sorry to have to use the second comment but I have no way to back up and look at my comment for correction. Sadly this was taken away when the format was changed by whoever now owns the blog. The scroll button is no longer present at the right of the comment box.

  21. HonorFirst

    agreed Oldsalt….where is the scroll button?

  22. Honor First………………
    You will now find yourself limited to about 250 characters. But still if you have to make a correction you must first place the cursor there. If you are already past the number of characters you CANNOT use either the cursor or the backspace. You must eliminate in some cases a lot of already typed words,just to make a spelling correction. I personally think it SUCKS!

  23. An Very Excellent Comment that I agree with.


    “Carl Manning
    July 1st, 2011 @ 8:38 pm

    With so much corruption in the federal courts, I have to wonder why it appears that no lawyers have tried to sue Obama in the State courts for perjury when he signed State records, which is precisely what happened when Obama signed State documents stating he was qualified to be on the State ballots. Obama didn’t just violate federal laws; he, Pelosi, and the Democrat National Committee committed perjury to all 50 Secretaries of State. The most problematic of these perjuries for Obama with the best chance of passing “technical legalese” muster in State court would be the statements he signed for the States of Arizona and, of course, Hawaii.

    The federal government at all levels and in all departments is so hopelessly corrupt and devoid of statesmen that I honestly believe it is a waste of time to expect any justice from any of them. The federal government, at this juncture with so much systemic corruption, being the criminal cabal that it is of leviathan proportions, can only be redeemed or dissolved by the States through hardball tactics of nullification, establishment of State militias per the Constitutional prerogative – answerable to only the Governor of the State, a clandestine “unannounced” Constitutional Convention for the express purpose of the formation of a new federal government and dissolution of the current one by Conservative Governors and/or State legislatures.

    Nullification is useless if a State allows the federal courts to strike down any law it passes to nullify nullification, which is always the case. Nullification needs to be followed with threats of State prosecution of federal officials trying to enforce anything not within the federal government’s Constitutional authority. The way so many States have been handling nullification lately only shows they haven’t the spine for putting any teeth into it.

    State militias of the Constitutional variety (NOT THE NATIONAL GUARDS) send a clear message to DC that the States will enforce their sovereign border security if the federal government refuses to do so. States have a sovereign right to protect their own citizens from all enemies foreign and doemstic as well. In fact, I would like to see non-border States who have been overrun with illegal immigration work in conjunction with their sister border States sending supplementary State militia troops to the border to relieve other State troops and provide added firepower if needed. The State militias can work in conjunction with each other without the federal government if that federal government is a danger to their security. This will send a clear message to DC that the States mean business.

    To follow proper protocol, the clandestine Constitutional Convention of Conservative States ONLY should be preceded, at first, by a letter jointly signed by all State Governors, State House Speakers, and State Representatives listing the usurpations of the federal government just as our forefathers pleaded with the Crown. It should demand a plan of action by the federal government to address the numerous usurpations. It should demand a response within one week to the charges. When no such reply or an inadequate response is received, a 2nd Declaration of Independence (COMPLETE NULLIFICATION)should be jointly signed by all parties previously mentioned. After these formalities of protocol, the clandestine Constitutional Convention of Conservative States should be held at which time a new federal government is to be planned with concomitant Articles of Secession from the existing dysfunctional Union that has only served to threaten the survival of the Sovereign States; that has outlived its usefulness by threatening the economic solvency of the American People; and that apparently no longer intends to honor the Compact it made with the Several States many years ago known as the Constitution.”

  24. Three Excellent Comments From:

    “naturalborncitizen Says:

    July 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM

    ed. There is an argument I’ve been asked about which claims that the Supreme Court in Minor v Happersett condoned Presidential eligibility for those born abroad to US citizen parents by the Court’s discussion of the “Act To Establish A Uniform Rule of Naturalization” in 1790, the nation’s first naturalization act. The contention is false.

    Justice Waite cited Article 2 Section 1, affirming the clear language that none but a natural-born citizen may be President. Waite pointed to that clause as well as the Naturalization clause empowering Congress as evidence that new citizens may be created by birth or naturalization. Clearly, persons who gain their citizenship from a naturalization statute are thereby NATURALIZED.

    At the time of their birth, naturalized persons under the Naturalization Act of 1790 were entitled to US citizenship BECAUSE they were simultaneously naturalized by the statute at the time of their birth.

    Hence, they are not natural born. They require a statute to grant them citizenship.

    see it here

    In 1795, Congress repealed the words “natural born” from that statute and those words never returned. So, in 1875 when Minor was decided, the current naturalization act did not contain the words “natural born”, which had been previously repealed in 1795. It simply made those born abroad “citizens”.

    Justice Waite also stated:

    “These provisions thus enacted have, in substance, been retained in all the naturalization laws adopted since.”

    The key words here are, “in substance”. While the words, “natural born” were repealed in 1795, the following naturalization statutes granted “citizenship”, and “citizenship” is the “substance” of all naturalization acts of the US, not Presidential eligibility.

    That was the only time in our national history where a federal statute contained the words “natural born citizen”.

    On this issue, the current Foreign Affairs Manual at 7 FAM 1131.6-2 states:
    “c. The Constitution does not define “natural born”. The ―Act to establish an Uniform Rule of Naturalization‖, enacted March 26, 1790, (1 Stat. 103,104) provided that, ―…the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born … out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

    d. This statute is no longer operative, however, and its formula is not included in modern nationality statutes. In any event, the fact that someone is a natural born citizen pursuant to a statute does not necessarily imply that he or she is such a citizen for Constitutional purposes.”

    Click to access 86757.pdf

    Even the Obama administration State Department recognizes that there is a big difference between statutory citizens and Constitutional citizens. Recognizing that difference is not a new concept created by those who understand Obama is not eligible.

    Also note that the Obama administration has altered other passages of the Foreign Affairs Manual, but not this one: see for example, my previous report, entitled: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION QUIETLY SCRUBBED THE FOREIGN AFFAIRS MANUAL IN AUGUST 2009 TO EXPAND THE HOLDING OF WONG KIM ARK.

    Congress does not have the power to amend the Constitution or to define any term therein by statute. This may only be done by an Amendment, and, as the official US Constitution indicates, the natural-born citizen clause has never been amended, modified or repealed.

    Justice Waite stated that citizens may be born, citing Article 2 Section 1 for that authority. Chief Justice Waite also noted that new citizens may be naturalized by federal statute. Persons, who at their birth, require a naturalization statute are not natural born, but they are “born citizens” due to their naturalization at birth. Therefore, while there are only two paths to citizenship, birth or naturalization… some persons who are not “natural-born citizens” are “born citizens” due to having received their citizenship by virtue of a statute such as the naturalization statute of 1790, 1795, etc.

    So, under the 1790 act, while those persons might be “considered as” natural born citizens, such consideration derives via statue, not from the Constitution. Hence, regardless of the statutory terminology, those persons are naturalized and therefore do not meet the qualifications to be President. Justice Waite did not say that naturalized persons were eligible to be President. He noted that the Constitution provided citizenship to natural-born citizens and to naturalized citizens, but in his opinion he states directly that only natural-born citizens may be President.

    This is a very important point we take from Minor v. Happersett, that some “born citizens” are not “natural born”.

    I have seen an even more ridiculous argument on this point where it is claimed, “Just because the statute states in the title that it is a naturalization statute doesn’t mean the title has any effect.”

    I don’t need to explain that one to you. It’s a classic example of Seussian hooplah, the native tongue of desperation. Seriously, folks, be prepared for all sorts of Seussian hooplah (a form of argument which makes absolutely no sense by entangling the reader in semantical physiognominious correlative conjunctifisionography) by the other side now that the fact of US Supreme Court precedent stating Obama (and McCain) are not eligible for POTUS has been clearly identifed.

    Justice Waite made it clear, by recognizing the naturalization statute – that even though citizens may only be born or naturalized, not all born citizens are natural born. Some born citizens, like those who received their citizenship from naturalization statutes, are not natural born.

    Naturalization is a process by which those who would not otherwise be US citizens, may become US citizens by an act of Congress.


    * * * *

    “itooktheredpill Says:

    June 30, 2011 at 2:14 PM

    Great job, Leo.

    If Obama had been born a natural born Citizen of the United States, under Article II Section 1, then he never would have needed the 14th Amendment to claim U.S. citizenship.

    … And yet he did claim his citizenship was based on the 14th Amendment!

    The Obama campaign initially claimed Obama:
    “became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment”:

    The truth about Barack’s birth certificate

    Obama Is Not a Natural Born Citizen

    Senator Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, after it became a state on August 21st, 1959. Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

    But then they scrubbed that text and replaced it with this:

    The Truth About Barack’s Birth Certificate

    Smears claiming Barack Obama doesn’t have a birth certificate aren’t actually about that piece of paper — they’re about manipulating people into thinking Barack is not an American citizen.

    The truth is, Barack Obama was born in the state of Hawaii in 1961, a native citizen of the United States of America.

    Next time someone talks about Barack’s birth certificate, make sure they see this page.

    Why did the Obama campaign take a “14th Amendment” defense, but then scrub all references to the 14th Amendment?

    Perhaps because they realized that claiming “Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment” OUTED HIM AS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!

    ed. Their scrubbing is very telling. At the very least, you have to take notice that so called “Factcheck” seems to change their facts quite a bit. – Leo

    I quote the United States Supreme Court, in Minor v. Happersett:

    “The Fourteenth Amendment did not affect the citizenship of women any more than it did of men. In this particular, therefore, the rights of Mrs. Minor do not depend upon the amendment. She has always been a citizen from her birth and entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizenship. The amendment prohibited the state, of which she is a citizen, from abridging any of her privileges and immunities as a citizen of the United States, but it did not confer citizenship on her. That she had before its adoption.”

    Someone who is a “natural born citizen” does not need the 14th amendment to claim U.S. citizenship.

    The only reason for the Obama campaign to claim that “Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment” is because he was not, and is not, a natural born citizen.”

    * * * *

    “loren Says:

    July 1, 2011 at 7:00 PM

    Have you located any books that clearly say the President must have two citizen parents?

    Because here are three that say otherwise, with no mention of a parental citizenship requirement:

    ed. There are various references in publications, but they don’t really matter when there is US Supreme Court precedent stating the definition of nbc to include two citizen parents, as was stated in Minor. That is national law. The books aren’t. – Leo”

    * * * *

  25. Are Republicans losing their way? We need to focus on the debt, but they are not taking about jobs too. The GOP needs to focus on jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. When people have jobs, they buy more stuff and the economy gets helped. Otherwise, when they focus on debt they are just scaring old folks that they will lose their social security payments. We’ve gone from being compasionate conservatives to the slash and burn conservatives. I think the message is messed up.



    By James Lewis
    July 3, 2011


    “The window of opportunity for attacking Iran’s fast-moving nuclear and missile development has now closed. This is equivalent to the Allies in World War II allowing Hitler to develop nuclear weapons and long-range missiles. In the field of nuclear proliferation, if you don’t preempt, you are enabling proliferation. Obama has now reversed sixty years of American and Western efforts to reverse rogue nuclear proliferation. The horse of Armageddon is out of the barn.

    Read that sentence again if you didn’t quite get it the first time, because it’s the biggest, wildest gamble an American president has ever taken.

    It is a world catastrophe, and as far as I can tell, it has been done with malice aforethought.

    At the same time, Obama has demanded, in public, that Israel give up defensible borders. The so-called “1967 borders” are in fact the ceasefire lines of the 1948 War of Independence, which left Israel nine miles wide at the waist. Obama has therefore actively legitimized sixty years of radical Islamist assaults designed to destroy Israel.

    This must be purposeful.

    When Obama publicly pushed Mubarak out of power, in the most flagrant act of public imperialism since the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia, scuttlebutt is that there was a heated argument with Hillary behind the scenes. Obama must have been told what he was really doing in pushing over the biggest pillar of peace in the Middle East. I’ll bet he was told a hundred times by Admiral Mullen and General Petraeus, even by Hillary, and he did it anyway. Malice aforethought.

    Obama is thereby active aiding and abetting the whole “Death to Israel!” movement in the Muslim world. The mullahcracy in Tehran celebrated the fall of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty, by sending two modern warships through the Suez Canal, where their anti-ship missiles can now deny maritime superiority to American and NATO vessels in the Eastern Mediterranean, where Israel happens to live. At the same time, another phony “peace flotilla” against Israel’s coast is being organized, with Code Pink and Hamas elements involved. One of the ships is named The Audacity of Hope — against which Obama has made no public protest. It is filled with Obama’s personal and political friends, just like the last one was. Egypt is no longer enforcing the arms blockade against Gaza, so that Hamas will get a flow of missiles if the “peace” flotilla succeeds. The Israeli Navy that protects the coast is now vulnerable to Chinese anti-ship missiles positioned in Egypt, Gaza, and Lebanon.

    Lt. Col (ret) Chuck Devore projects a coming blockade against Israel’s two main Mediterranean ports, cutting the major lifeline to Israel’s economy. Egypt has stopped natural gas deliveries already.

    Against American Jews, Obama is running his usual Big Lie game. Liberal Jews are falling for it, because they never look at facts. They just listen to the feel-good rhetoric. When war comes, they will blame the victim, because they will not be able to face themselves.” (snip).

    “If Obama wanted to deliberately sabotage American power and Western security in the Middle East, he could have done nothing more destructive. What Obama has done to the American economy, he has now done to the Middle East. The only rational purpose for this strategic sabotage is to place all the decision power in Obama’s own hands. The irrational purpose, if there is one, is to destroy the security of the United States and its closest allies in the Middle East and southern Europe.

    All of America’s allies, including Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea, must be worried sick. If the United States destroys its own European defenses, what is to stop it from destroying its Asian defenses? Just as the Arab countries will soon go nuclear, so will Japan, South Korea, and possibly Taiwan.

    By meeting with Ahmadinejad, Russia and China have jumped on what they judge to be the winning side. They have been sitting on the fence, because they don’t want an Islamic martyr regime with nukes next door. Iran is only one hour’s flight by airplane from Russia. Yet today, they have switched to an active pro-Iranian position. It is the biggest communist gamble since World War II and Mao’s Great Leap Forward.

    Obama’s only skill is to be a community agitator, Alinsky-style. To that end he has his own house Jews, like Southern plantations used to have their own house blacks. They pop up all over leftist fronts like J Street and other fronts. The media try to legitimize those frauds, just like they legitimized a small minority of radical feminists decades ago.

    What we are seeing today with Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin today is a “high-tech lynching,” just as Clarence Thomas said at his Senate hearing about the way the media abused him with rumors of sexual misbehavior. High-tech lynching. Keep that in mind, because that’s who these people are. They don’t lynch people by accident, but with a very clear purpose. They are ruthless, and they have no decency. Domestically their purpose is to intimidate you and me, just as the KKK did in the Jim Crow South.

    Media lynchings create an atmosphere of fear by hanging specific scapegoats from a tree. Watch it happen to Palin, Bachmann, Herman Cain, and everybody who becomes uppity against Obama. That is how the left aims to win a second term that Obama desperately wants.

    Obama’s Jewish problem is the existence of millions of Jews who feel loyal to (a) a genuine belief in God, or (b) a genuine love for Israel, or (c) both.

    Obama is fine with self-labeled Jews if they are atheist leftists, and they are willing to risk Israel being erased from the planet. Some of his best friends are Jews In Name Only, as long as they are detached from Israel. And other religions, natch.

    For Obama, America and Israel should not exist. They get in the way of his utopian nightmares. That’s Obama’s Final Solution to the Jewish Problem.

    It’s also his solution to every other problem.”

    Read More Here:


    By Clarice Feldman
    July 3, 2011


    “Obama entered office on a groundswell of a disconcerting mania, a mania in which voters imagined on this blank slate of a candidate all sorts of truly fantastic abilities and policies, none of which were warranted in his paltry, truly shabby history.

    The man with no available school records, for example, was painted as a genius and his brief time as a University of Chicago adjunct (basically teaching assistant) puffed up to a professorship in constitutional law. The guy who cannot speak a logical, coherent, grammatical sentence on his own was pawned off as a literary genius to unsuspecting, foolish voters. It was inevitable that the reality of his time in office could never match the dream. It was unfortunately equally inevitable that he would prove inadequate to the difficult job of the presidency.

    Still, which of those who voted for him could have envisioned the hash he’s made of things in every respect? Unemployment far exceeds what he warned it would reach if we didn’t pass his stimulus package; the housing market shows no sign of lift off; the dollar sinks more each day; manufacturing is at a virtual standstill, and Americans grow more pessimistic about the economy each day. The landmark legislation of his first (and I hope final) term, ObamaCare, is so badly conceived and drafted that Americans are likely to see the best medical service in the world destroyed unless it is soon repealed or ruled unconstitutional. In the meantime, as uncertainty about its future grows, more and more businesses are paralyzed and unable to plan for their futures.

    Internationally, we keep alienating our allies and boosting our enemies. Like the Duke of York* in the nursery school rhyme, he had “10,000 men marched them up the hill and then marched them down again.” He ordered a surge in Afghanistan, the place he argued in 2008 we really should be instead of Iraq, and then order pulling them out before the job is done, and in a manner sure to increase the danger to them. Without Congressional authorization, he’s committed our troops and weaponry to a rather pointless fight in Libya; pushed Mubarak out of office in favor of heaven knows what successors; failed to do a thing to prevent Iran from going nuclear; done nothing to stop Syria’s Assad from daily slaughtering his own people; and each and every day puts the life and welfare of our staunch ally Israel at risk.

    This week’s press conference revealed him as a man desperately clinging to the same rhetorical devices that have long worn thin: demagogic false choices, class warfare and a preposterous description of himself as the reasonable adult in the legislative process.

    Fill in the blanks here, for this is the same speech we have been hearing for his entire term:

    Republican leaders need to ask their constituents if they are willing to sacrifice the [ health, safety, welfare, future ]of their children for [you name it].

    As William Jacobson writes:

    This was typical throughout the press conference. He’s the only reasonable one, the only one who cares about people, the only one trying hard to reach a “balanced” debt deal, and so on and so on, the facts be damned. Of course, if it seems to some that he’s been detached, it’s only because he’s been so busy working on the Taliban, and bin Laden, and the Greece crisis.

    He had the audacity to say with a straight face that his administration is trying to remove burdensome regulations, when in fact Obamacare and Dodd-Frank alone impose vast regulations (most of which have not been written yet, which freezes business investment) on virtually every area of the economy.

    Not only does he not get it, he is ideologically incapable of getting it. He views the economy as a zero sum game, a point I have made before.

    This reminds me of the failed luxury tax on yachts years ago, which devastated the shipbuilding industry in Rhode Island, leading to substantial layoffs; the choice was not between yacht owners and children, but between job creating industries or not.

    The thumbs down on the address was rather universal, from National Review’s Yuval Levin to Time’s editor Mark Halperin.

    It all had the feel of a childish tantrum by a person who desperately wishes he were living in a different reality – one in which he is the heroic man of action and his opponents are irresponsible and weak. But the fact is, the president and congressional Democrats have so far utterly failed to offer any path out of our fiscal problems – problems that they have greatly exacerbated. The president proposed a budget in February that would have increased the deficit, and then he retracted it in April and proposed nothing in particular in its place. Senate Democrats have not proposed a budget in two years; they now suggest they finally have one, though apparently it won’t really be brought to a vote. Republicans, meanwhile, have proposed a specific path out of our fiscal mess – averting a debt crisis and setting the budget on a course toward balance through discretionary cuts, budget-process reforms, and gradual but significant entitlement reforms. Rather than negotiate over that budget, the president has chosen to play the demagogue, simultaneously insisting that the budget offers nothing and that it goes too far in cutting government services (medical research, food inspectors, and the weather service are apparently in particular danger, he said yesterday, providing a kind of Salvador Dali map of postmodern lifestyle liberalism).”

    Read More Here:

    The thumbs down on the address was rather universal, from National Review’s Yuval Levin to Time’s editor Mark Halperin.

    It all had the feel of a childish tantrum by a person who desperately wishes he were living in a different reality – one in which he is the heroic man of action and his opponents are irresponsible and weak. But the fact is, the president and congressional Democrats have so far utterly failed to offer any path out of our fiscal problems – problems that they have greatly exacerbated. The president proposed a budget in February that would have increased the deficit, and then he retracted it in April and proposed nothing in particular in its place. Senate Democrats have not proposed a budget in two years; they now suggest they finally have one, though apparently it won’t really be brought to a vote. Republicans, meanwhile, have proposed a specific path out of our fiscal mess – averting a debt crisis and setting the budget on a course toward balance through discretionary cuts, budget-process reforms, and gradual but significant entitlement reforms. Rather than negotiate over that budget, the president has chosen to play the demagogue, simultaneously insisting that the budget offers nothing and that it goes too far in cutting government services (medical research, food inspectors, and the weather service are apparently in particular danger, he said yesterday, providing a kind of Salvador Dali map of postmodern lifestyle liberalism).

    Read More Here:

  28. Some Comments From:

    “Hotlanta Mike
    July 1, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    July 1, 2011 at 8:53 am

    Get educated
    Get real. This goes far beyond someone’s qualifications to hold office. There is strong evidence of multiple felonies committed including election fraud, identity fraud, social security fraud, forgery…

    You want to focus on someone’s qualifications [only when he is committin many Outrageous Daily Serial Felonies of MANY, MANY KINDS, Daily High Crimes, Daily Frauds, Daily Grand Thefts, Daily RICO Racketeering Frauds, & Many Daily Outrageous High Treasons that are literally tearing apart & destroying the USA & our USA Constitutional Forever Living God-given inalienable Civil Rights, Freedoms, & Liberties]??!!!”

    * * * *

    July 1, 2011 at 9:02 am

    He’s also up to his eyeballs in the conspiracy between the 2008 Democratic Party of Hawaii (“DPH”), the 2008 Democratic National Committee and the 2008 Hawaii Office of Elections (“HOE”) to circumvent Hawaii law requiring the “Official Certificate Of Nomination” submitted by the DPH to the HOE to include “…under provisions of the United States Constitution.” That was election fraud…ALSO A FREAKIN’ FELONY!!!”

    * * * *

    July 1, 2011 at 6:10 pm

    I totally agree, Troy. And I wonder about being “directed” to ignore this obvious forgery. Why in the world would someone do that?

    I know Leo would rather attention be given to his website, and his latest project, but it would be ridiculous to just drop this FELONIOUS birth certificate, to solely take up something that has FAILED MISERABLY so far.

    We can, however, keep our irons in both fires, and work as hard as we can to get this fraud out of office in whatever legal way we can. There are so many ways to choose from – Social Security fraud, real estate fraud, passport fraud, student loan fraud, identity fraud…need I go on?

    I suggest that people who are shilling for Leo take a breath, and think twice about whether ignoring Barack Hussein Obama committing a crime on national television on April 27th of this year is a good idea. He’s not from Hawaii. The proof is his working so hard to lie his azz off, to no avail, to make us think he’s from there, and not producing one iota of believeable documentation to that effect. Nothing!”

    * * * *



    By Sharon Rondeau

  30. Rosemary Woodhouse

    oldsalt79 | July 3, 2011 at 12:28 pm |

    I agree. He articulated what he could within the parameters set by Fox. Does this make him “deceitful”? Perhaps that could have been said if he had remained in the employ of Fox.

  31. Rosemary Woodhouse

    HonorFirst | July 3, 2011 at 1:03 pm |

    Wrong TalkingHead, I know, but “Ditto”

  32. Old Salt & Honor First,
    Use your arrow keys to go up, down, right and left. I’m pretty sure there’s not a limit on the amount of characters written, it’s just that the scroll bar seems to be disabled. The arrow keys work for me to find my spot to edit, etc.

  33. I hope I don’t offend anyone, but I am so sick of hearing about gay marriage every single day in the news, hour after hour. While I don’t like discrimination, I am offended by how hard the media is pushing this issue when Christians are being killed all over the world, and anti-semitism is rising to dangerous levels, and the media completely ignore this.

  34. Rosemary Woodhouse

    @ Tina- Two are on God’s side. The other is on the side of His adversary. Is there any question as to which side of the equation is at the forefront?

    Soddom and Gomorrah- not just a fairy tale.

  35. Rosemary Woodhouse

  36. reply to Rosemary Woodhouse:
    “Glenn refuses to sell his soul.”
    It’s too late for Beck to “refuse” – He sold out a long time ago. Speaking just for me: He’s got a LOT of “buyin’ back” to do before I’ll ever give him the time of day again. He denigrated a lot of people while he was at Fox – and he must’ve known what the evidence was – he is NOT a stupid man. As the song goes – “Forgiveness – Look it up; It’s what Jesus has in store for you but I don’t – no matter what” (almost – I can forgive Beck – but he’s got a lot of crow to eat first.




    By Jeffrey H. Anderson
    July 3, 2011

    “When the Obama administration releases a report on the Friday before a long weekend, it’s clearly not trying to draw attention to the report’s contents. Sure enough, the “Seventh Quarterly Report” on the economic impact of the “stimulus,” released on Friday, July 1, provides further evidence that President Obama’s economic “stimulus” did very little, if anything, to stimulate the economy, and a whole lot to stimulate the debt.

    The report was written by the White House’s Council of Economic Advisors, a group of three economists who were all handpicked by Obama, and it chronicles the alleged success of the “stimulus” in adding or saving jobs. The council reports that, using “mainstream estimates of economic multipliers for the effects of fiscal stimulus” (which it describes as a “natural way to estimate the effects of” the legislation), the “stimulus” has added or saved just under 2.4 million jobs — whether private or public — at a cost (to date) of $666 billion. That’s a cost to taxpayers of $278,000 per job.

    In other words, the government could simply have cut a $100,000 check to everyone whose employment was allegedly made possible by the “stimulus,” and taxpayers would have come out $427 billion ahead.

    Furthermore, the council reports that, as of two quarters ago, the “stimulus” had added or saved just under 2.7 million jobs — or 288,000 more than it has now. In other words, over the past six months, the economy would have added or saved more jobs without the “stimulus” than it has with it. In comparison to how things would otherwise have been, the “stimulus” has been working in reverse over the past six months, causing the economy to shed jobs.

    Again, this is the verdict of Obama’s own Council of Economic Advisors, which is about as much of a home-field ruling as anyone could ever ask for. In truth, it’s quite possible that by borrowing an amount greater than the regular defense budget or the annual cost of Medicare, and then spending it mostly on Democratic constituencies rather than in a manner genuinely designed to stimulate the economy, Obama’s “stimulus” has actually undermined the economy’s recovery — while leaving us (thus far) $666 billion deeper in debt.

    The actual employment numbers from the administration’s own Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the unemployment rate was 7.3 percent when the “stimulus” was being debated. It has since risen to 9.1 percent. Meanwhile, the national debt at the end of 2008, when Obama was poised to take office, was $9.986 trillion (see Table S-9). It’s now $14.467 trillion — and counting.

    All sides agree on these incriminating numbers — and now they also appear to agree on this important point: The economy would now be generating job growth at a faster rate if the Democrats hadn’t passed the “stimulus.” ”

    Read More Here:

    * * * *

  38. Its too bad that Beck didnt have enough “soul” to out Obama on his last show-or even hint that he was not Constitutionally eligible-too bad so sad-wont miss Beck the wuss.

  39. Pingback: Keep The Change, Hank Williams Jr., Glenn Beck plays song and blasts Fox and ESPN, Fox and friends hypocrisy, Beck keeps soul | Citizen WElls

  40. Pingback: Mike Lindell exposes Fox News: “They are criminals to our country! “, Glenn Beck left with his soul, Attorney Ty Clevenger: “full story will come out, and it will be very ugly for Fox News and the Murdoch family” | Citizen WElls

  41. Who is controlling Fox?
    Murdoch family?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s