Senator Sherrod Brown, Ohio, US Constitution Hall of Shame, Obama not eligible, US Congress, Electoral College Votes, Obama’s eligibility must be challenged, OH Senator

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and
domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”
Congressional oath of office

US Constitution

Hall of Shame

A letter received from Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio
regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility issues:

“Thank you for contacting me regarding President-Elect Barack Obama.

President-Elect Obama has provided several news organizations with a
copy of his birth certificate, showing he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii
on August 4, 1961. Hawaii became a state in 1959, and all individuals
born in Hawaii after its admission are considered natural-born United
States citizens. In addition, the Hawaii State Health Department
recently issued a public statement verifying the authenticity of
President-Elect Obama’s birth certificate.

Thank you again for contacting me.

Sincerely,
Sherrod Brown”

Senator Sherrod Brown, as a US Senator, the public expects for you to be
well informed on important matters and a presidential election certainly
qualifies as important.

Every word of your paragraph was wrong!!

Obama has provided no one a copy of his birth certificate.

Mr. Brown, do you know what “natural born citizen” means in the
eligibility provision of the US Constitution?

Being born in Hawaii does not make one a natural born citizen of the US.
If it did, then British citizens vacationing in Hawaii and delivering
a child would enable that British child to be president.

The Hawaii Health Department Official stated that they had Obama’s
birth certificate. Read more below. You should have already learned this.

Why Obama is not eligible

What Hawaii Health Official really said

From the Alan Keyes lawsuit

“A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department
of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she
had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of
Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to
resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts.
Being “on record” could mean either that its contents are in the computer
database of the department or there is an actual “vault” original.”

“Further, the report does not say whether the birth certificate in the
“record” is a Certificate of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth.
In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation,
including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a
Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certificate of
Hawaiian Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness
and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up
to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value
as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the
allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained.
The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176
allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in
Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question,
whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country. Therefore,
the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified
copy or the original vault Certificate of Live Birth and compare the name of
the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor against the
birthing records on file at the hospital noted on the Certificate of the
Live Birth.”

ohbrown

Advertisements

33 responses to “Senator Sherrod Brown, Ohio, US Constitution Hall of Shame, Obama not eligible, US Congress, Electoral College Votes, Obama’s eligibility must be challenged, OH Senator

  1. Is there a template somewhere for a letter or email to be sent? I think if they were somewhat consistent it would be helpful (albeit not guaranteed!). Also, if it were drafted by someone on a blog such as this, the facts would at least certainly be accurate. I did a search on the site, as I thought I had seen one before, but can’t find one. Anyone have a link or a sample?

    Thanks,
    Lizzi

  2. Regarding the lame letter from Sen Brown, must be a standard letter that senators are mailing out, as I received an almost identical letter from Sen Sessions of Alabama. Pathetic.

  3. Open letter to Member of Congress
    URGENT REQUEST FOR ACTION – TO PRESERVE OUR CONSTITUTION

    Dear Member of the U.S. Congress;

    On January 8th, 2009, you will be meeting in a joint session of Congress in order to perform the final step of COUNTING and CONFIRMING the electoral votes for the President of the United States (POTUS).

    This urgent letter is a request by your (and Mr. Obama’s) employers, We The People, for you to submit an OBJECTION to those votes being counted due to the Constitutional INELIGIBILITY of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. to serve as POTUS:

    1. No proof that he was born on U.S. sovereign territory, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution (the posting of his forged & fraudulent Certification of Live Birth (C.O.L.B.) only proves fraud – and that he’s INELIGIBLE;

    2. No proof that he ever applied for U.S. citizenship, when reaching the age of majority, following his years as a citizen of Indonesia (this would make him ‘naturalized’, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

    3. No proof that he was born of two parents of U.S. citizenship, with both owing allegiance to and being under the jurisdiction of the U.S., as required by law and/or the Constitution, in order to be a ‘natural-born citizen’. (actually he has freely admitted the opposite to be true, and therefore INELIGIBLE);

    4. No proof that he was authorized, as a ‘natural-born U.S. citizen’ with a U.S. Passport, to travel to Pakistan in 1981 (he could not by law), or that he re-applied for ‘naturalized’ U.S. citizenship on his return, which would also make him INELIGIBLE;

    5. No certified proof that he registered for the draft/Selective Service between the ages of 18 and 26, as required by law, thereby rendering him ineligible, by law, for employment in the Executive Branch of our government, and therefore INELIGIBLE for POTUS. (NOTE: over a year of multiple FOIA requests produced a forged and blatantly fraudulent Selective Service Registration form that should be cause for indictments and arrests);

    6. No proof that he is, in fact, not an illegal alien, and therefore subject to the same penalties that would befall all illegal aliens in his situation. Therefore, INELIGIBLE;

    Constructive Knowledge would inform and confirm to all who have examined the facts of this collossal fraud being perpetrated upon We The People of America (see http://www.DrOrly.Blogspot.com – ‘Open Letter to C.J. Roberts’) that confirming the electoral votes and thereby furthering the act of installing Mr. Obama as POTUS could possibly be construed as failure to honor one’s oath of office.

    Therefore, we are calling on you, as a member of Congress, sworn to uphold, protect, and defend that Constitution, to OBJECT to the counting and confirmation of those electoral votes until proof of his eligibility or ineligibility can be determined, and to call for indictments in regard to any and all alleged violations of U.S. laws and one’s sworn oath.

    Please let us know if you intend to stand with We The People in this epic battle to defend and preserve our Constitution. Our Nation can survive four years of any President. It cannot survive without a Constitution.

    Sincerely;

    We The People of the United States of America

  4. Very distressed with letter from Representative Whitfield of Ky.

    Excerpt:
    I have heard some of the reports that you mention about Mr. Obama. Of course, the voters have spoken pretty clearly, and so now we will move on. I do expect that the news media and the proper authorities will look into any reports which have caused people concern, and that any evidence of legitimate concern will be appropriately addressed. I will continue to monitor these issues closely, as well.

    (best part) I recognize that my voice is only here in Washington to represent my constituents.

  5. Believe me the staff members are sending the majority of these out and they all have got the same form letter they are working from.

  6. CW,

    I just wrote to Joseph Farah, but who knows if he’ll get it. Maybe everyone should write to him too. This needs to be broadcast loud and clear.

    thanks

  7. I’m going to check WalMart today and see if there’s a “Senatorial Bullshit the Public” guide they are selling. Every one of these emails look almost identical?

    They’ve got to be copying and pasting from somewhere.Not one of them has one drop of accuracy or sense to them.

    These Senators ( if that’s what you want to call them ) all seem to have the equivalent to a third grade education when it comes to the United States Constitution as well as their duties and jurisdiction in this manner.

    I especially love the letters that say “Please feel free to contact me if a problem arises that i have some jurisdiction over”

    What a CROCK-OF-SHIT !!!!!!!!!!

    Do any of these idiots understand that they would be an American Hero if they would only stand up for America and uphold their Constitutional duty?

    For Gods sakes, one of you idiots “stand up” for once in your life and show some COURAGE !!!!

  8. Judy Frank.
    Please provide the entire letter.
    Thanks.

  9. Thank you! Just sent off my email to Rep. LaTourette.

  10. ** Update **
    I have the Hall of Shame page up now at the top of the blog.

  11. December 10, 2008

    Dear xxxxxx:

    Thank you for taking the time to contact me regarding President-elect Obama’s citizenship. It was good to hear from you and I appreciate the opportunity to respond.

    As you may know, on December 8, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court turned down an emergency appeal filed by a New Jersey man who claimed that Barack Obama is ineligible to be president based on questions regarding his citizenship. At least one other appeal over the president-elect’s citizenship remains pending with the U.S. Supreme Court. As you may also be aware, Hawaii state officials say they have checked health department records and confirmed that there is no doubt that the president elect was born in Hawaii.

    There have also been several lawsuit on the state level regarding this issue. The Secretary of State of each state holds the responsibility of verifying that each presidential candidate meets the requirements as outlined in the U.S. Constitution. A man from Ohio sued Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner in October of 2008, claiming she had to prove Barack Obama citizenship or remove him from the ballot. However, the magistrate ruled that the evidence in the case was based on hearsay and speculation, not admissible evidence, therefore, the case was thrown out. You may wish to contact Secretary Brunner’s office at 877-767-6446 to voice your concerns.

    Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. If you should have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office again. I remain

    Very truly yours,

    Steven C. LaTourette
    Member of Congress

  12. perhaps you can post the addresses too of the senators posted in your hal of shame. everytime someone sends you one of these lame bogus letters, we the readers of citizen wells should bombard them with follow up letters to their bullsh*t. furthermore there must be some other place you can send these shameful letters to that would give these “politicans” an even bigger public thrashing. perhpas you can bundle them up and send them on to chief justice roberts before they hear the BERG cas on Jan9th with a cover letter saying that we wont stand for misinformation and lies from our senators. and–as is the reason for our checks and balances system need now for the 9 justices to clarify what seems to be rampant misinformation regarding Obamas eligibiity. this is really outrageous behavior on the parts of these senators.
    please, post every senators governement email or snailmail and let us flood their offices.

  13. p.s. can you contact newspapers? TV stations. i do know that in Toledo, Ohio they did do a segment on the entire BERG case a few months ago.. on the Toledo, Ohio, Fox Station. Perhaps they would do a segment on your HALL OF SHAME!!! it is worth a try…have to publicly shame these seantors further. perhaps take out ads in the smallest types of newspapers in these senators cities/communities…let the people of their state know who they have voted in to represent them

  14. This is the syllogism —

    If lawless Congress, then lawless President.

    If lawless President, then lawless Citizens.

    Therefore, if lawless Congress, then lawless Citizens.

  15. I have a hall of shame but do not know where to submit it. I also drafted my own 32 page response to the hall of shame letter. One is in the hands of my US CongressWoman today and the other 2 for the US Senators will be hand delivered to them tomorrow here in my home state. They will have plenty of reading and time to ponder their actions as they fly back to DC on Friday for the tally of the EC votes next week. I corrected every misinterpretation of my orginal letter and then some and was sure to spell out their duties as stated in the Constitution so they couln’t be confused as to what action we expect them to take. The essay letter can be read at:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/9628582/Dear-Senator-Johnson-Dec-30-2008-Scribd-Doc

  16. ““I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    Obama is not eligible because he’s a British Born Citizen. DO YOUR DUTY!

    We should start blast faxing this to every Representative and Senator office line until they get the picture.

  17. CW…. Here’s the response i got from Senator Jim Inhofe in Oklahoma on Dec, 17.2008
    ————————————————————

    Thank you for your correspondence. As your voice in Washington, I appreciate knowing your concerns.

    There is a considerable amount of information circulating over the Internet making various claims about Senator Obama, including that he was not born in Hawaii and has not provided a valid birth certificate as proof he is a natural born citizen. Likewise, there was information on the Internet claiming Senator John McCain was not eligible to run for President due to an alleged lack of U.S. jurisdiction over the military installation in Panama Canal in which Senator McCain was born. These issues have resulted in a number of unsuccessful legal filings challenging the natural born citizen qualification of both Senators Obama and McCain. The most recent of these cases was dismissed in the U.S. Supreme Court on December 8, 2008.

    Specifically, with regard to Senator Obama’s birth certificate, in June 2008, Senator Obama produced a certificate of live birth from the State of Hawaii Department of Health, which has been available for inspection by various news media over the past number of months. In addition, Hawaii’s Health director, in October, has verified that the Health Department has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on file.

    I can certainly appreciate the need for the appropriate review to ensure all candidates for the Presidency meet the basic requirements in the Constitution. Again, thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. Please do not hesitate to contact me again.

  18. Perhaps this will inspire or assist some of you to do as I did and/or send something like this to your own state Congresspeople. I sent this to minority leaders and whips of both houses – and ALL their staff. Feel free to use my template or customize it for your own purposes. You can get email addresses and other information from

    http://saveourrights.wikia.com/wiki/Congressional_email_addresses

    I am able to use email, but we need to make sure they get snail mail and FAXes as well. I used a subject of: “Please Review our URGENT Request”. The email I sent is contained in the next post.

  19. URGENT — TIME SENSITIVE INFORMATION

    Barack Obama is not yet known to be eligible for office.

    Dear and Staff:

    Given the severity of the situation I trust that you are not yet aware of what I am about to report. I am hoping that this information will stimulate you to look into the matter and take appropriate action.

    We have written thousands of letters and received hundreds of responses from members of congress. Almost without exception the responses we have received are laced with bald-faced misrepresentations and barely disguised platitudes. This is no way to respond to citizens and patriots. We are not ignorant. We have spent thousands of hours of intensive research, hired private investigators, and have engaged a number of law firms in our quest for credible raw information. There is a lot we do not yet know. But there is also a lot we do know. When the responses to our queries touch on the areas on which we are fully informed and yet get it wrong – it throws the whole response into question.

    Either your congressional members are ignorant or they are purposefully sending out false information. If the latter, I am sure you agree that this would have serious political and legal implications.

    Here is what we DO NOT know: Is Barack Obama a citizen of the United States and if so, is he a natural born citizen? There is considerable incomplete and inconclusive evidence of problems with citizenship. And unless his official birth certificate shows something different than he currently claims, he is not natural born.

    Here is what we DO know: Barack Obama refuses to release his original full birth certificate, his passport information, and his school records. The Internet post(s) of a scanned birth certificate summary is not adequate, according to Hawaii law. No government official or major media organization has reported on seeing or analyzing any of the above information. Specifically, contrary to Associated Press reporting, officials in Hawaii have not verified or confirmed the birth certificate. We are in possession of the original statements by those officials and they do not say anything more than that Hawaii does indeed have some records on file. They have made no comment on the content of those records. Please note carefully that Hawaii also keeps such records on foreign-born births, so simply possessing a record means nothing.

    As citizens and patriots we have a right to know if our president is constitutionally eligible. You are our representatives and we demand that you determine this for us. It has not been determined yet. At a minimum, the above list of withheld documents must be accessed and analyzed.

    There are dozens of lawsuits across the country attempting to determine this big question – some are currently at the US Supreme Court. Many more are being prepared to be filed. The next scheduled event at the Supreme Court is a full conference review of one of these cases on January 9. You will have met the day before to consider and certify the Electoral votes. I can only imagine the repercussions if the Supreme Court determines that Obama is in fact ineligible and congress had not asked the obvious and proper questions.

    In summary, we are not suggesting that you summarily refuse to certify the votes for Obama. We are simply asking that you accept your responsibility and ask the questions that need to be asked. And please inform your colleagues to cease and desist the disinformation campaign.

    Respectfully,

  20. It sounds like Senator Inhofe isn’t showing his hand on this one.

    There may be promise in one Senator doing his duty, if he has the ethical bones to do what’s right.

  21. Here’s an interesting Inhofe article regarding his questioning of Obama’s Patriotism back in August:

    http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=11&articleid=20080906_11_A1_STPAUL227187&allcom=1&sortcom=r

    The real question is, will he do what’s right on January 9?

  22. zachjonesishome

    Mr. Wells:

    I love this stream of letters written by those who are “protecting” our rights and the Constitution. Please keep them coming.

    Spread them far and wide.

    Zach

  23. Thanks Zach.
    Just like spreading manure.

  24. stand up and fight

    There should be a class action lawsuit filed against every senator and congressman for failing to uphold the oath of office they all took.Either these people are pretending to be misinformed or their idiots.

  25. Carlyle – Brilliant letter! I just sent it to Michael Steele who is campaigning for RNC Chair. I have supported Mr. Steele (wow – guess I’m not a racist after all!) in the past, but essentially told him that if someone doesn’t have the guts and integrity to STAND UP and OBJECT until documentation of eligibilty is provided, we won’t need an RNC. We won’t have a USA.

  26. Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:–

    1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.

    2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.

    3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.

    4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.

    5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.

    6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.

    7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

  27. You’re wrong.

    Under the 14th Amendment, any person born in the United States is a natural born U.S. Citizen.

  28. Anony Mouse.
    Do some more reading.
    This time, try a reliable source.

  29. Anytime Biden’s name is mentioned, I immediately have a mental picture of him wearing a dunce cap; but I guess the upside of Biden is that he’s not a con-artist.

  30. Re Your comment to Anony Mouse:

    This site has excellent information as to who are natural born citizens under citizenship law. It is a theory, merely a theory, that the Constitution means something more when it refers to a natural born citizen in Article II than what is the definition of citizens at birth in citizenship law.

    http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html

    Here is a list of categories of persons considered citizens at birth according to Title 8 of the U.S. Code:

    * Anyone born inside the United States *
    * Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
    * Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
    * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
    * Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
    * Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
    * Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
    * A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.

    * There is an exception in the law – the person must be “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States. This would exempt the child of a diplomat, for example, from this provision.

    I am particularly stuck by the provision that a child under the age of five whose parentage cannot be determined is a citizen at birth so long as she or he cannot be PROVEN not to be a citizen by the age of 21.

    As an intellectual exercise consider whether if such a child grew up and ran for office and ultimately ran for president whether she or he would be eligible? To be sure, the foundling (that’s the word for someone who has been found) cannot prove that she or he was born in the USA, but the law says that unless it is proven that she or he was NOT a citizen by 21, then citizenship is awarded.

    Two questions arise: Would we vote for the foundling if we thought that she or he was qualified? My answer is yes, why not? (But others may disagree).

    The second question is whether the election of the foundling would be legal under Article II of the Constitution. Those who argue that “natural born” means something higher than a citizen at birth under Title 8 would claim that the foundling would not be eligible since their tight definition of “natural born” has to be proven.

    But this, as I say, is merely a theory. Would five Supreme Court justices vote for the strict “natural born” theory or for the foundling? I think that not merely five but six or seven would vote for the foundling.

    Why? Because strict constructionists would say “where does the Constitution say that the candidate has to prove birth in the USA to two persons who were already citizens?” And at least two of the conservative justices had fathers who were born outside of the USA.

  31. Even strict constructionists have to look at then current Common Laws, since the Constitution was clearly based on many existing British adapted Common Laws. Especially given how many Founding Fathers have correspondence showing what they had as reference to build the Constitution upon.

    Thus they must give a nod to Vattel’s definition of Natural BC and Native BC.

  32. Frank.
    Much of our law was derived from English common law.
    However, in the case of natural born citizen, there was a clear departure
    from the English view on allegiance.
    Vattel’s definition was clearly in line with the thoughts of the
    founding fathers.

  33. Pingback: Senator Sherrod Brown finds certified copies of Obama birth certificate…oops, Same lies reported at Citizen Wells December 30, 2008, Democrat mantra end justifies the means | Citizen WElls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s